Advertisement

Energieungleichheit international: Welche Rolle spielen nationale Kontextfaktoren?

  • André Schaffrin
  • Alexander Schmidt-Catran
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Lebenswertes Wohnen gehört zu den menschlichen Grundbedürfnissen und beeinflusst nicht nur unser körperliches, soziales und materielles Wohlbefinden; wir wenden auch einen Großteil unserer verfügbaren Resourcen zur Gestaltung und Verbesserung unserer Wohnsituation auf (Grösche 2010; Healy 2003; Sardianou 2007). Die Bedeutung von Haushaltsenergie zeigt sich auch anhand des konstant hohen Bedarfs nach Strom und Gas bei gleichzeitiger Effizienzsteigerung von Gebäuden und Geräten, einer sich verändernden Haushaltszusammensetzung und zunehmendem Energiekonsum für Luxusgüter (z. B. Dresner und Ekins 2006; Umweltbundesamt 2015). Dieser Entwicklung stehen fluktuierende Energiepreise und Bestrebungen der Europäischen Länder zur Reduzierung von Klimagasen durch Haushaltsenergie gegenüber.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Anderson, W., V. White, und A. Finney. 2012. „Coping with low incomes and cold homes“. Energy Policy 49 (Oktober): 40–52. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.002.
  2. Bartiaux, F., V. Gosselain, D. Vassileva, G. Stamova, L. Ozolina, und E. Gara. 2011. „Knowledge on Climate Change and Energy Saving Renovations by Apartment Owners in Bulgaria and Latvia. A Qualitative Study“. International Review of Social Research 1 (3): 133–54.Google Scholar
  3. Bladh, M., und H. Krantz. 2008. „Towards a Bright Future? Household Use of Electric Light: A Microlevel Study“. Energy Policy 36 (9): 3521–30. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.001.
  4. Boardman, B. 1991. Fuel poverty: From cold homes to affordable warmth. New York: Belhaven.Google Scholar
  5. Boardman, B. 2010. Fixing fuel poverty : challenges and solutions. London; Sterling, VA: Earthscan. http://hollis.harvard.edu/?itemid=%7Clibrary/m/aleph%7C012181512.
  6. Bohringer, C., U. Moslener, U. Oberndorfer, und A. Ziegler. 2012. „Clean and Productive? Empirical Evidence from the German Manufacturing Industry“. Research Policy 41 (2): 442–51. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.004.
  7. Bonnefoy, X., M. Braubach, M. Davidson, und N. Roebbel. 2007. „A Pan-European Housing and Health Survey: Description and Evaluation of Methods and Approaches“. International Journal of Environment and Pollution 30 (3-4): 363–83.Google Scholar
  8. Bouzarovski, S. (2014). Energy poverty in the European Union: landscapes of vulnerability. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 3, 276–289.Google Scholar
  9. Brunner, K.-M., M. Spitzer, und A. Christanell. 2012. „Experiencing fuel poverty. Coping strategies of low-income households in Vienne/Austria“. Energy Policy 49: 53–59.Google Scholar
  10. Büchs, M., N. Bardsley, und S. Duwe. 2011. „Who bears the brunt? Distributional effects of climate change mitigation policies“. Critical Social Policy. Google Scholar
  11. Buzar, S.. 2007. „When homes become prisons: the relational spaces of postsocialist energy poverty“. Environment and Planning A 39 (8): 1908–25. doi: 10.1068/a38298.
  12. Campbell, R. 1993. „Fuel Poverty and Government Response“. Social Policy & Administration 27 (1): 58–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.1993.tb00391.x.
  13. Chester, L., und A. Morris. 2011. „A new form of energy poverty is the hallmark of liberalised electricity sectors“. Australian Journal of Social Issues 46 (4): 435–59.Google Scholar
  14. Dresner, S., und P. Ekins. 2006. „Economic Instruments to Improve UK Home Energy Efficiency without Negative Social Impacts“. Fiscal Studies 27 (1): 47–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2006.00027.x.
  15. Druckman, A., und T. Jackson. 2008. „Household Energy Consumption in the UK: A Highly Geographically and Socio-Economically Disaggregated Model“. Energy Policy 36 (8): 3177–92. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.021.
  16. European Commission. 2010. „An Energy Policy for Consumers“. European Commission Staff Working Paper 1407.Google Scholar
  17. Gerbery, D., und R. Filcak. 2014. „Exploring Multi-Dimensional Nature of Poverty in Slovakia: Access to Energy and Concept of Energy Poverty“. Ekonomicky Casopis 62 (6): 579–97.Google Scholar
  18. Grösche, P. 2010. „Housing, Energy Cost, and the Poor: Counteracting Effects in Germany’s Housing Allowance Program“. Energy Policy 38 (1): 93–98. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.056.
  19. Hamada, Y., M. Nakamura, K. Ochifuji, S. Yokoyama, und K. Nagano. 2003. „Development of a database of low energy homes around the world and analyses of their trends“. Renewable Energy 28 (2): 321–28. doi: 10.1016/s0960-1481(02)00031-9.
  20. Hamza, N., und R. Gilroy. 2011. „The Challenge to UK Energy Policy: An Ageing Population Perspective on Energy Saving Measures and Consumption“. Energy Policy 39 (2): 782–89. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.052.
  21. Harrison, C., und J. Popke. 2011. „‚Because You Got to Have Heat‘: The Networked Assemblage of Energy Poverty in Eastern North Carolina“. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (4): 949–61. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2011.569659.
  22. Häußermann, H., und Walter S.. 1995. „Internationaler Vergleich: Der schwedische, dr amerikanische und der westdeutsche Weg“. In Dienstleistungsgesellschaften, herausgegeben von Hartmut Häußermann und Walter Siebel, 51–67. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  23. Healy, JD. 2003a. „Housing conditions, energy efficiency, affordability and satisfaction with housing: A Pan-European analysis“. Housing Studies 18 (3): 409–24. doi: 10.1080/0267303032000101985.
  24. Healy, J. D., und J. P. Clinch. 2004. „Quantifying the severity of fuel poverty, its relationship with poor housing and reasons for non-investment in energy-saving measures in Ireland“. ENERGY POLICY 32 (2): 207–20. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00265-3.
  25. Heindl, P.. 2014. „Measuring Fuel Poverty: General Considerations and Application to German Household Data“. SOEPpapers 632: 37.Google Scholar
  26. Hertwig, E. G. 2005. „Consumption and the Rebound Effect: An Industrial Ecology Perspective“. Journal of Industrial Ecology 9: 85–98.Google Scholar
  27. Hills, J.. 2012. „Getting the measure of fuel poverty – Final Report of the Fuel Poverty Review“. London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion.Google Scholar
  28. Hinnells, M. 2008. „Technologies to Achieve Demand Reduction and Microgeneration in Buildings“. Energy Policy 36 (12): 4427–33. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.029.
  29. Hölsch, K., und M. Kraus. 2006. „European Schemes of Social Assistance: An Empirical Analysis of Set-Ups and Distributive Impacts“. International Journal of Social Welfare 15 (1): 50–62.Google Scholar
  30. Jensen, C. 2008. „Worlds of Welfare Services and Transfers“. Journal of European Social Policy 18 (2): 151–62.Google Scholar
  31. Kerkhof, A. C., R. M. J. Benders, und H. C. Moll. 2009. „Determinants of Variation in Household CO2 Emissions between and within Countries“. Energy Policy 37 (4): 1509–17. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.013.
  32. Kopatz, M., M. Spitzer, und A. Christanell. 2010. „Energiearmut. Stand der Forschung, national Programme und regionale Modellprojekte in Deutschland, Österreich und Großbritannien“. Wuppertal Papers – Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt und Energie 184.Google Scholar
  33. Lapillonne, B., C. Sebi, K. Pollier, und N. Mairet. 2012. „Energy Efficiency Trends in Buildings in the EU. Lessons from the ODYSSEE/MURE project“. ADEME.Google Scholar
  34. Laurent, E. 2011. „Issues in Environmental Justice within the European Union“. Ecological Economics 70 (11): 1846–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.025.
  35. Liddell, C.. 2012. „Fuel poverty comes of age: Commemorating 21 years of research and policy“. Energy Policy 49 (Oktober): 2–5. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.036.
  36. Liddell, C., C. Morris, S. J. P. McKenzie, und G. Rae. 2012. „Measuring and monitoring fuel poverty in the UK: National and regional perspectives“. Energy Policy 49 (Oktober): 27–32. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.029.
  37. Meyer, R., und U. Liebe. 2010. „Are the Affluent Prepared to Pay for the Planet? Explaining Willingness to Pay for Public and Quasi-Private Environmental Goods in Switzerland“. Population and Environment 32 (1): 42–65. doi: 10.1007/s11111-010-0116-y.
  38. Moore, R.. 2012. „Definitions of fuel poverty: Implications for policy“. ENERGY POLICY 49 (Oktober): 19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.057.
  39. Petrova, S., M. Gentile, I. H. Makinen, und S. Bouzarovski. 2013. „Perceptions of Thermal Comfort and Housing Quality: Exploring the Microgeographies of Energy Poverty in Stakhanov, Ukraine“. Environment and Planning A 45 (5): 1240–57. doi: 10.1068/a45132.
  40. Price, C. W., K. Brazier, und W. Wang. 2012. „Objective and subjective measures of fuel poverty“. Energy Policy 49 (Oktober): 33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.095.
  41. Pye, S., Ian S., Nils M.-O., A. Leipprand, K. Lucas, und R. Salmons. 2008. „Addressing the social dimension of environmental policy. A study on the linkages between environmental and social sustainability in Europe“. European Commission. Directorate-general „Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities“ Unit E1 – Social and Demographic Analysis.Google Scholar
  42. Roberts, S.. 2008. „Energy, equity and the future of the fuel poor“. Energy Policy 36 (12): 4471–74. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.025.
  43. Santamouris, M., K. Kapsis, D. Korres, I. Livada, C. Pavlou, und M. N. Assimakopoulos. 2007. „On the relation between the energy and social characteristics of the residential sector“. Energy and Buildings 39 (8): 893–905. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.11.001.
  44. Sardianou, E. 2007. „Estimating Energy Conservation Patterns of Greek Households“. Energy Policy 35 (7): 3778–91. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.01.020.
  45. Schaffrin, A.. 2013. „Who pays for climate mitigation? An empirical investigation on the distributional effects of climate policy in the housing sector“. Energy and Buildings 59: 265–72. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.12.033.
  46. Schaffrin, A., und N. Reibling. 2015. „Household energy and climate mitigation policies: Investigating energy practices in the housing sector“. Energy Policy 77: 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.002.
  47. Soderholm, P., und F. Pettersson. 2008. „Climate Policy and the Social Cost of Power Generation: Impacts of the Swedish National Emissions Target“. Energy Policy 36 (11): 4154–58. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.008.
  48. Steg, L. 2008. „Promoting Household Energy Conservation“. Energy Policy 36 (12): 4449–53. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.027.
  49. Tews, K.. 2014. „Fuel Poverty in Germany: From a Buzzword to a Definition Energiearmut – vom politischen Schlagwort zur handlungsleitenden Definition“. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 23 (5): 14–18.Google Scholar
  50. Thomson, H., und C. Snell. 2013. „Quantifying the prevalence of fuel poverty across the European Union“. Energy Policy 52: 563–72. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.009.
  51. Umweltbundesamt. 2015. „Energieverbrauch der privaten Haushalte“. Online-Beitrag. Dessau. http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/daten/private-haushalte-konsum/energieverbrauch-der-privaten-haushalte.
  52. Wall, R., und T. Crosbie. 2009. „Potential for Reducing Electricity Demand for Lighting in Households: An Exploratory Socio-Technical Study“. Energy Policy 37 (3): 1021–31. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.045.
  53. World Health Organization. 2007. „Housing, Energy, and Thermal Comfort. A review of 10 countries within the WHO European region“. WWHO Regional Office for Europe. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  54. Wright, F. 2004. „Old and Cold: Older People and Policies Failing to Address Fuel Poverty“. Social Policy & Administration 38 (5): 488–503. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2004.00403.x.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EA European Academy of Technology and Innovation Assessment GmbHBad Neuenahr-AhrweilerDeutschland
  2. 2.Institut für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (ISS)Universität Köln / Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche FakultätKölnDeutschland

Personalised recommendations