Inclusion and Exclusion in the Cosmospolis

  • Anil Jain
Part of the zu | schriften der Zeppelin Universität. zwischen Wirtschaft, Kultur und Politik book series (zszuzwkp)


Cosmopolitanism is often associated with a general open-mindedness, a sense of universal equality and unity and the global awareness of the world as a whole. In fact, it cannot be denied that we live in a global world. There are (still) nation-states and borders, there is the division between periphery and centre, there are local bonds, but there is the vision and the reality of the globe: the shape of our world. Today, networks of finance and power, communication and transportation penetrate the whole planet. And even those who (for good reasons) deny the benefits of globalisation cannot ignore the dimension of truly global threats: global warming, global diseases, global war… Important questions need to be answered: Which forms of difference can be »tolerated« in the Cosmopolis and how to deal with fundamental, oppositional differences? Further: How is it justified to make differences, i.e. how to distribute goods and rights? And, like any society, but with a much increased level of sensitivity, cosmopolitan world society would have to address the related question of inclusion and exclusion, because an exclusion from the Cosmopolis would, in fact, mean an exclusion from humanity. I will start with an exploration of the literal and latent meaning(s) of cosmopolitanism: delving into the term and mapping its metaphorical »cosmos«. This (re)search s important since imaginative inclusions and exclusions are crucial for possible practical translations, and a serious investigation of the metaphorical content and a history of the »terminological objects« may provide in addition new directions for both practical and theoretical orientation.


Political Community Gated Community Global City Global Class Greek City State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aguilar, Adrian G./Escamilla, Irma (eds.) (1999): Problems of Megacities – Social Inequalities, Environmental Risk and Urban Government. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónomia de México.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, Amanda (2001): The Powers of Distance – Cosmopolitanism and the Cultivation of Detachment. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Appiah, Kwame A. (2006): Cosmopolitanism – Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York/London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  4. Aristotle (1985 [before 322 BCE]): Nicomachean Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  5. Aristotle (1885 [ca. 345–325 BCE]): Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Aristotle (1924 [ca. 348–322 BCE]: Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, Ulrich (2006 [2004]): Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Benhabib, Seyla (2004): The Rights of Others – Aliens, Residents, and Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, Walter E. (ed.) (1930): The Aryabhatiya of Aryabhata – An Ancient Work on Methematics and Astronomy. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  10. Coles, Peter (2006): From Cosmos to Chaos. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cosgrove, Dennis (2001): Appolo’s Eye – A Cartographic Genealogy of the Earth in the Western Imagination. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dabag, Mihran (2000): Genozid und weltbürgerliche Absicht. In: Bolz, Norbert/Kittler, Friedrich/Zons, Raimar (eds.) (2000): Weltbürgertum und Globalisierung. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Held, David (1995): Democracy and the Global Order – From the Modern Nation State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Habermas, Jürgen (1998 [1996]): The Inclusion of the Other – Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hardt, Michael/Negri, Antonio (2000): Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Morgan, Catherine/Coulton, Lames J. (1997): The Polis as a Physical Entity. In: Hansen, Mogens Herman (ed.) (1997): The Polis as an Urban Centre and as a Political Community. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, pp. 87–144.Google Scholar
  17. Jain, Anil K. (2002 [1999]): The Global Class – The Power of Disposition Over (Global) Space as a New Dimension of Class Structuration. In: Globalics [e-journal]. Vol. 2 (2002).Google Scholar
  18. Jain, Anil K. (2002): Medien der Anschauung – Theorie und Praxis der Metapher. München: edition fatal.Google Scholar
  19. Jain, Anil K. (2004): The Economy of Difference. In: Angermüller, Johannes et al. (eds.): Reflexive Representations – Politics, Hegemony, and Discourse in Global Capitalism. Münster: Lit Verlag, pp. 11–20.Google Scholar
  20. Jain, Anil K. (2007): Anchors of Resistance – The Reagent of Discomfort. In: Stopinska, Agata/Bartels, Anke/Kollmorgen, Raj (eds.) (2007): Revolutions – Reframed, Revisited, Revised. Frankfurt/New York: Peter Lang, pp. 105–114.Google Scholar
  21. Kagan, Donald (1991): Pericles of Athens and the Birth of Democracy. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kant, Immanuel (1917 [1795]): Perpetual Peace – A Philosophical Essay. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  23. Leslie, John (ed.) (1998): Modern Cosmology and Philosophy. Amherst/New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  24. Muris, Oswald/Saarmann, Gert (1961): Der Globus im Wandel der Zeiten – Eine Geschichte der Globen. Berlin/Beutelsbach: Columbus Verlag Paul Oestergaard.Google Scholar
  25. Plato (1901 [360 BCE]: The Republic [Politeia]. New York: P. F. Collier & Son.Google Scholar
  26. Raulet, Gérard (2005): Critical Cosmology – On Nations and Globalization: A Philosophical Essay. Lanham a. o.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  27. Rosivach, Vincent (1999): Enslaving Barbaroi and the Athenian Ideology of Slavery. In: Historia. Vol. 48 (1999), pp. 129–157.Google Scholar
  28. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1911 [1762]) Émile. London: Dent.Google Scholar
  29. Sassen, Saskia (1991): The Global City – New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Schmitt, Carl (1996 [1928]): The Concept of the Political. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Toulmin, Stephen E. (1990): Cosmopolis – The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  32. Verma, Rajendra (1996): Vedic Cosmology – Creation Ideas in the Ancient Vedic Religion: A Hermeneutic Study. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Wright, Rosemary (1995): Cosmology in Antiquity. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FriedrichshafenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations