Abstract
If by social equality is meant: a relatively equal distribution of goods, material and immaterial, in a society; then the ends of social equality must be rethought. Since the world revolution of 1968 and its consummation in the collapse of the post World War II geopolitical, Cold War accords in 1989-1991, all prior liberal theories of the modern national society as one in which social equality could a viable ideal if not a practical reality have fallen on hard times. When, thereafter, globalization began to tear at the political flesh of the national state, social equality was thrown into the chaos of global inequalities. More than a quarter century later, well into the 2010s, global income, wealth, and health measures of inequality have proven resistant to the considerable, if often misguided, efforts of International NGOs to reduce the terrible plight of the many global poor relative to the obscene wealth of the 1% most wealthy. Unless global capitalism changes how does its business the norm of social equality will slouch further toward a Bethlehem of permanent inequality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Collins, Randall (2015), “Emotional Micro-details that Drive Social Interactions,” Unpublished workshop presentation (April 27, 2015), Urban Ethnography Workshop, Yale University.
Economic and Social Research Council (2013), The World’s Top Incomes Database, Paris School of Economics/Center for Equitable Growth. http://topincomes.gmond.parisschoolofeconomics.eu/
Harvey, David (2007), A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Lemert, Charles (2015), Globalization: An Introduction to the End of the Known World. Boulder, Colorado: Routledge/Paradigm.
Mbembe, Achille (2003), “Necropolitics,” Public Culture 15: 11–40.
Ohmae, Kenichi (1995), The End of the Nation-State and the Rise of Regional Economies. New York: Free Press.
Piketty, Thomas (2014), Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Ong, Aihwa (2006), Neoliberalism As Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
Saez, Emmanuel (2013), “Striking it Richer: The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States,” Berkeley: University of California, Department of Economics. http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2012.pdf
Wallerstein, Immanuel, Charles Lemert, and Carlos Aguirre Rojas (2014), Uncertain Worlds: World Systems Theory in Changing Times Boulder, Colorado: Routledge/Paradigm.
Wallerstein, Immanuel (2004), The Modern World-System: An Introduction, Durham, North Carlina: Duke University Press.
World Economic Forum (2013) “Outlook on the Global Agenda 2014”, Geneva: World Economic Forum. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GAC_GlobalAgend-aOutlook_2014.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lemert, C. (2016). Slouching Toward Inequality. In: Machin, A., Stehr, N. (eds) Understanding Inequality: Social Costs and Benefits. zu | schriften der Zeppelin Universität. zwischen Wirtschaft, Kultur und Politik. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11663-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11663-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-11662-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-11663-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)