Perfecting the Human: Posthuman Imaginaries and Technologies of Reason

Part of the Technikzukünfte, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft / Futures of Technology, Science and Society book series (TEWG)


Religious or secular, humanity’s dreams of the future have always been posthuman. As long as people have tried to fathom the reasons for sorrow and evil, they have also looked for ways of transcending the bitterness of being human. Take, for instance, the myth of Icarus that I encountered in early childhood. I grew up speaking Bengali as my mother tongue and learned English only as a second language. I must not have been quite six when I read that story in an English lesson with my father, and it fascinated me.


York Time Actor Network Theory National Security Agency Methyl Isocyanate Political Stake 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London, England: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture & Society, 7 (2), 295–310.Google Scholar
  3. Austen, I. (2013, July 8). Deadly derailment in Quebec underlines oil debate. New York Times, p. A4.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and ambivalence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. (R. Nice, Trans.). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bush, V. (1945). Science: The endless frontier. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  8. Carlson, N. (2014, December 21). What happened when Marissa Mayer tried to be Steve Jobs. New York Times, p. MM22.Google Scholar
  9. Dao, J. (2013, July 8). Taking on rules to ease Sikhs’ path to the army. New York Times, p. A9.Google Scholar
  10. Ellul, J. (1964 [1954]). The technological society. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  11. Ezrahi, Y. (1990). The descent of Icarus. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  13. Gies, E. (2013, July 8). In Europe, greener transit on existing infrastructure. New York Times, p. B4.Google Scholar
  14. Gilbreth, F. B., Jr., & Carey, E. G. (1948). Cheaper by the dozen. Boston, MA: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
  15. Goel, V. (2013, July 8). A new tool aims to help Facebook users dig deep. New York Times, p. B1.Google Scholar
  16. Habermas, J. (1970). Toward a rational society: Student protest, science, and politics. (Jeremy J. Shapiro, Trans.) Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
  17. Hecht, G. (2012). Being nuclear: Africans and the global uranium trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Heidegger, M. (2008 [1954]). The question concerning technology. In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Basic Writings by Martin Heidegger (pp. 307–341). New York: Harper Perennial Modern Thought.Google Scholar
  19. Hilgartner, S. (2015). Capturing the imaginary: Vanguards, visions, and the synthetic biology revolution. In S. Hilgartner, C. Miller, & R. Hagendijk (Eds.), Science and democracy: Knowledge as wealth and power in the biosciences and beyond. Abingdon, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva, 41 (3), 223–244.Google Scholar
  21. Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Jasanoff, S. (2014). Vulnerability and development: Bhopal’s lasting legacy. In A. Hommels, J. Mesman, & W. E. Bijker (Eds.), Vulnerability in technological cultures: New directions in research and governance (pp. 89–108). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2009). Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear regulation in the U.S. and South Korea. Minerva, 47 (2), 119–146.Google Scholar
  24. Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2013). Sociotechnical imaginaries and national energy policies. Science as Culture, 22 (2),189–196.Google Scholar
  25. Jasanoff, S., & Kim, S.-H. (Eds.) (2015). Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Jones, C. F. (2014). Routes of power: Energy and modern America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kennedy, D. (2009). The rights of spring: A memoir of innocence abroad. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. (A. Sheridan & J. Law, Trans.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Latour, Bruno. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Latour, Bruno. (2012, Winter). Love your monsters: Why we must care for our technologies as we do our children. The Breakthrough. Available at Scholar
  31. Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man. London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  32. Nelkin, D., & Pollak, M. (1981). The atom besieged. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Rampell, C. (2013, July 8). Coveting not a corner office, but time at home. New York Times, p. A1.Google Scholar
  34. Reider, R. (2009). Dreaming the biosphere: The theater of all possibilities. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  35. Risen, J. (2013, July 8). Privacy group to ask Supreme Court to stop N.S.A.’s phone spying program. New York Times, p. A9.Google Scholar
  36. Rohan, T. (2013, July 8). Beyond the finish line. New York Times, p. D1.Google Scholar
  37. Sandberg, S., with N. Scovell. (2013). Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
  38. Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  39. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sen, S. (1974). A richer harvest: New horizons for developing countries. New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  41. Strauss, L. L. (1954, September 17). Speech to the National Association of Science Writers, New York City, September 16. New York Times, p. 5.Google Scholar
  42. Weber, M. (2004 [1918]). The vocation of science. In S. Whimster (Ed.), The Essential Weber: A Reader (pp. 270–287). London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Winner, L. (1986). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations