Swiss watches, genetic machines, and ethics

An introduction to synthetic biology’s conceptual and ethical challenges
Part of the Technikzukünfte, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft / Futures of Technology, Science and Society book series (TEWG)


Emerging technologies have a history. They do not emerge out of nothing but develop gradually and continuously. Synthetic biology is no exception. It is rooted in genetic engineering, and many observers maintain that synthetic biology is no more than a new label for just that: genetic engineering.


Synthetic Biology Genome Editing Conceptual Frame Natural Organism Risk Assessment Procedure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bensaude Vincent, B. (2009). Self-Assembly, Self-Organization: Nanotechnology and Vitalism. Nanoethics, 3(1), 31–42. doi: 10.1007/s11569-009-0056-0.Google Scholar
  2. Boldt, J. (2013). Life as a Technological Product: Philosophical and Ethical Aspects of Synthetic Biology. Biological Theory, 8(4), 391–401. doi: 10.1007/s13752-013-0138-7.Google Scholar
  3. Church, G.M., & Regis, E. (2012). Regenesis. How synthetic biology will reinvent nature and ourselves. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  4. Deplazes-Zemp, A. (2012). The Moral Impact of Synthesising Living Organisms: Biocentric Views on Synthetic Biology. Environmental Values, 21(1), 63-82. doi: 10.3197/09632711 2X13225063228023.Google Scholar
  5. ETC (2007). ETC Group. Extreme Genetic Engineering. An Introduction to Synthetic Biology. pdf. Accessed: 26 March 2015.Google Scholar
  6. Giese, B., & Gleich, A. v. (2014). Hazards, risks, and low hazard development paths of synthetic biology. In: B. Giese, C. Pade, H. Wigger, A. von Gleich (eds.), Synthetic biology. Character and impact (pp. 173-196). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Keller, E.F. (2002). Making sense of life explaining biological development with models, metaphors, and machines. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Keller, E.F. (2009). What Does Synthetic Biology Have to Do with Biology? BioSocieties, 4(2-3), 291–302.Google Scholar
  9. Knight, T.F. (2005). Engineering novel life. Molecular Systems Biology, 1(1). doi: 10.1038Google Scholar
  10. msb4100028.Google Scholar
  11. Kuzma, J., & Tanji, T. (2010). Unpackaging synthetic biology: Identification of oversight policy problems and options. Regulation & Governance, 4(1), 92-112. doi: 10.1111/j.1748- 5991.2010.01071.x.Google Scholar
  12. Lorenzo, V. de, & Danchin, A. (2008). Synthetic biology: Discovering new worlds and new words. The new and not so new aspects of this emerging research field. EMBO Reports, 9(9), 822–827. doi: 10.1038/embor.2008.159.Google Scholar
  13. NSTC (1999). National Science and Technology Council of the USA. Nanotechnology. Shaping the world atom by atom. Accessed: 12 May 2015.
  14. Pauwels, K., Willemarck, N., Breyer, D., & Herman, P. (2012). Synthetic Biology: Latest developments, biosafety considerations and regulatory challenges. Biosafety and Biotechnology Unit (Belgium). Accessed: 12 May 2015.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Ethik Geschichte der MedAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations