Skip to main content

How Rituals Elicit Shared Sacred Values

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interdisziplinäre Anthropologie

Part of the book series: Interdisziplinäre Anthropologie ((ANTHRO))

  • 1605 Accesses

Abstract

Foreword | In “The Ritual Origins of Humanity”, Matt Rossano offers an important contribution to our understanding of ritual’s role in the development of humanity. Among the many merits of his target article, Rossano’s insights into the differences between chimpanzee and human capacities for group commitment are particularly pertinent and valuable. While we are in general agreement with Rossano’s approach and while we share his sentiment that ritual played a critical – and often overlooked – role in human social evolution, we think Rossano’s argument is in need of further elucidation. Specifically, although it is clear that apes are limited in their ability to elicit shared values amongst group members, it is not obvious how human rituals achieve what ape and other nonhuman rituals are unable to do, that is, provide a foundation for collective values. Our comments are aimed at filling this lacuna in Rossano’s argument.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Alcorta, Canadace S. / Sosis, Richard: Ritual, Emotion, and Sacred Symbols. The Evolution of Religion as an Adaptive Complex, in: Human Nature 16 (2005), No. 4, p. 323–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, Justin L. / Keil Frank C.: Conceptualizing a Nonnatural Entity. Anthropomorphism in God Concepts, in: Cognitive Psychology 31 (1996), Issue 3, p. 219–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, Justin L.: Theological Correctness. Cognitive Constraint and the Study of Religion, in: Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 11 (1998), p. 325–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Andrade, Roy: A Study of Personal and Cultural Values. American, Japanese, and Vietnamese, New York 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, Graham: Food, Sex & Strangers. Understanding Religion as Everyday Life, Durham 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Julian: A Discussion on Ritualization of Behaviour in Animals and Man, in: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Science 251 (1966), No. 4, p. 475–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiper, Jordan / Sosis, Richard: Moral Intuitions and the Religious System. An Adaptationist Account, in: Philosophy, Theology, and Science 1 (2014), p. 172-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purzycki, Benjamin G. / Sosis, Richard: The Religious System as Adaptive. Cognitive Flexibility, Public Displays, and Acceptance, in: The Biological Evolution of Religious Mind and Behavior, edited by Eckart Voland and Wulf Schiefenhövel, New York 2009, p. 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purzycki, Benjamin G. / Sosis, Richard: Religious Concepts as Necessary Components of the Adaptive Religious System, in: The Nature of God. Evolution and Religion, edited by Ulrich Frey, Marburg 2010, p. 37–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purzycki, Benjamin G. / Sosis, Richard: The Extended Religious Phenotype and the Adaptive Coupling of Ritual and Belief, in: Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution 59 (2013), p. 99-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John R.: The Construction of Social Reality, New York 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, Roy A.: The Obvious Aspects of Ritual, in: Ecology, Meaning & Religion, edited by Roy A. Rappaport, Berkeley 1979, p. 173–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, Roy A.: Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity, Cambridge 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, Peter J. / Boyd, Robert: Not by Genes Alone. How Culture Transformed Human Evolution, Chicago 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, John: The Evolution of Stratification in Fijian Ritual Participation, in: Religion, Brain & Behavior 5 (2015), Issue 2, p. 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slone, Jason D.: Theological Incorrectness. Why Religious People Believe What They Shouldn’t, Oxford 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, Richard: Ifaluk Atoll. An Ethnographic Account, in: eHRAF World Cultures, edited by Carol Ember, New Haven/Connecticut 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, Richard: Religions as Complex Adaptive Systems, Paper Presented at the Center of Theological Inquiry, Princeton/New Jersey 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, Richard / Feldstein, Sharon / Hill, Kim: Bargaining Theory and Cooperative Fishing Participation on Ifaluk Atoll, in: Human Nature 9 (1998), p. 163–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, Nikolaas: On Aims and Methods of Ethology, in: Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 20 (1963), No. 4, p. 410–433.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Sosis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sosis, R., Shaver, J. (2016). How Rituals Elicit Shared Sacred Values. In: Hartung, G., Herrgen, M. (eds) Interdisziplinäre Anthropologie. Interdisziplinäre Anthropologie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10978-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10978-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-10977-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-10978-3

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics