Skip to main content

Historische Diskriminierungsforschung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften ((SRS))

Abstract

Although discrimination has not often been the explicit subject of historical research, the fact that discrimination has been ubiquitous in most societies throughout history has made it an implicit feature of much historical research. This chapter discusses several ways historians have approached discrimination as a historical subject, including analysis of the origins of discriminatory social structures and their development through time, implicit paradoxes of egalitarian discourses and discriminatory practices within the field of history itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Definitions of the concept of discrimination are both various and divergent. This definition borrows heavily from the discussions of Aitor Ibarrola-Armendariz and John F. Dovidio et.al. in: Ibarrolla-Armendariz (2008) and Dovidio et al. (2010).

References

  • Anderson, W. (2006). The cultivation of whiteness. Science, health, and racial destiny in Australia. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, M, & Geyer, M. H. (2002). Introduction. In: M. Berg & M. H. Geyer (Eds.), Two cultures of rights: The quest for inclusion and participation in modern America and Germany (pp. 1–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsay, A. (2005). Disability and social policy in Britain since 1750. A history of exclusion. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsay, A. (2006). Disciplining disabled bodies. The development of orthopaedic medicine in Britain, c. 1800–1939. In: D. M. Turner & K. Stagg (Eds.), Social histories of disability and deformity (pp. 97–115). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broberg, G., & Roll-Hansen, N. (Eds.). (1996). Eugenics and the welfare state. Sterilization policy in Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Finland. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, D. (2007a). Provincializing Europe. Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, D. (2007b). History and the politics of recognition. In: K. Jenkins, S. Morgan & A. Munslow (Eds.), Manifestos for history (pp. 77–87). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi, V. (2000). Introduction. In: V. Chaturvedi (Ed.), Mapping subaltern studies and the postcolonial (pp. vii–xix). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coontz, S., & Henderson, P. (1986). Introduction. ‘Explanations’ of male dominance. In: S. Coontz & P. Henderson (Eds.), Women’s work, men’s property: The origins of gender & class (pp. 1–42). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  •  Dovidio, J. F., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., & Esses, V. M. (2010). Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination. Theoretical and empirical overview. In: J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The Sage handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 3–28). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, S. G. (2003). Racial discrimination in late medieval Ireland. In: G. Hálfdanarson (Ed.), Racial discrimination and ethnicity in European history (pp. 21–32). Pisa: Edizioni Plus/Università di Pisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epple, A, & Schaser, A. (2009). Multiple histories? Changing perspectives on modern historiography. In: A. Epple & A. Schaser (Eds.), Gendering historiography. Beyond national canons (pp. 7–23). Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Armesto, F. (2004). So you think you’re human? A brief history of humankind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, G. M. (2002). Racism. A short history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladfelder, H. (2006). Plague spots. In: D. M. Turner & K. Stagg (Eds.), Social histories of disability and deformity (pp. 56–78). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glotzer, P. (2015). Exclusion in Arcadia. How suburban developers circulated ideas about discrimination, 1890–1950. Journal of Urban History, 41(3), 479–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guha, R. (1988). On some aspects of the historiography of colonial India. In: R. Guha & G. C. Spivak (Eds.), Selected Subaltern studies (pp. 37–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guichard, S. (2010). The construction of history and nationalism in India. Textbooks, controversies and politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarrola-Armendariz, A. (2008). Reading historiographic metafiction as an anti-discriminatory practice in contemporary America. In: G. Hálfdanarson (Ed.), Discrimination and tolerance in historical perspective (pp. 19–40). Pisa: Edizioni Plus/Pisa University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, T. (2007 [1776]). The declaration of independence. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalská, E. (2008). Religious intolerance after the Patent of Toleration (1781): The case of the Hungarian Lutherans. In G. Hálfdanarson (Ed.), Discrimination and tolerance in historical perspective (pp. 147–155). Pisa: Edizioni Plus/Pisa University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, V. (2001). Subaltern Studies and its critics. Debates over Indian history. History and Theory, 40(1), 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martykánová, D., Peyrou, F., Mazzucchi, R., Reboton, J., Pederson, F., Isaacs, A. K., Lottes, G., German, K., Lokk, R., & Rohmets, H. (2008). Discrimination, tolerance and institutions in European history. In: G. Hálfdanarson (Ed.), Discrimination and tolerance in historical perspective (pp. 41–76). Pisa: Edizioni Plus/Pisa University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayaram, S. (2003). Against history, against state. Counterperspectives from the margins. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. I. (1987). The formation of a persecuting society: Power and deviance in Western Europe 950–1250. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, J. (2004). The Spanish Inquisition: A history. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. W. (1999). Gender and the politics of history (Rev. ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, J. (2001). History from below. In: P. Burke (Ed.), New perspectives on historical writing (2nd ed., pp. 25–42). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singham, S. M. (1994). Betwixt cattle and men: Jews, blacks, and women, and the Declaration of the Rights of Man. In: D. van Kley (Ed.), The French idea of freedom. The old regime and the Declaration of Rights of 1789 (pp. 114–153). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, K. (1999). Defiled trades and social outcasts: Honor and ritual pollution in early modern Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (1948). United Nations. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/

  • Thompson, E. P. (1968). The making of the English working class (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, D. M. (2006). Introduction. Approaching anomalous bodies. In: D. M. Turner & K. Stagg (Eds.), Social histories of disability and deformity (pp. 1–16). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eickels, K. (2008). Why minorities were neither tolerated nor discriminated against in the Middle Ages. In: G. Hálfdanarson (Ed.), Discrimination and tolerance in historical perspective (pp. 285–293). Pisa: Edizioni Plus/Pisa University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Kley, D. (Ed.). (1994). The French idea of freedom. The old regime and the Declaration of Rights of 1789. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J. (2007). Discourse, desire and sexual deviance. Some problems in a history of homosexuality. In: R. Parker & P. Aggleton (Eds.), Culture, society and sexuality: A reader (2nd ed., pp. 125–150). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, P. (2008a). How to be French. Nationality in the making since 1789. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, P. (2008b). Liberté, égalité, discriminations: l’identité nationale au regard de l’histoire. Paris: Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner-Hanks, M. (2001). Patriarchy. In: P. N. Stearns (Ed.), Encyclopedia of European social history from 1350–2000 (Vol. 4, pp. 15–25). Detroit: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. J. C. (2001). Postcolonialism. An historical introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guðmundur Hálfdanarson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hálfdanarson, G., Vilhelmsson, V. (2017). Historische Diskriminierungsforschung. In: Scherr, A., El-Mafaalani, A., Yüksel, G. (eds) Handbuch Diskriminierung. Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10976-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10976-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-10975-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-10976-9

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics