Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reflexive Innovation

Zur Innovation in der radikalisierten Moderne

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovationsgesellschaft heute

Zusammenfassung

Innovation als ‚kreative Zerstörung, die Positives hervorbringt‘ (Schumpeter 2003) wird heute zu einem gesellschaftlichen Imperativ, der weit über die Wirtschaft hinaus Innovationsgesellschaften zunehmend charakterisiert (Hutter et al. in diesem Band). Forciert wird diese Entwicklung durch reflexive Innovationen, die Akteure unter Rückgriff auf moderne Institutionen, Regulationen und das Können von Akteuren in Interaktionen konstituieren. Sowohl welche Innovationen hergestellt, fortgeschrieben und transformiert werden, als auch wie das geschieht, ist so durch spezielle, symbolische wie materielle Bedingungen mit geformt, die ihrerseits durch Innovationen immer wieder erneut mit produziert und reproduziert werden. Ich stelle in diesem Aufsatz Grundzüge einer praxistheoretischen Perspektive auf reflexive Innovation als Charakteristikum radikal-moderner Gesellschaften vor (vgl. Giddens 1990a), die durch die Strukturationstheorie (Giddens 1984) informiert ist und dessen Konzepte ich an anderer Stelle systematisch ausgearbeitet habe (Windeler 2001, 2014). Ich umreiße in diesem Aufsatz eine gegenüber der etablierten Innovationsforschung alternative Sicht auf Innovation, die an Joseph Schumpeter ansetzt, dann aber Innovationen in ihrem über soziale Praktiken vermittelten Verhältnis zur Gesellschaft thematisiert.

Ich danke Dzifa Ametowobla, Robert Jungmann, Uli Meyer und Cornelius Schubert für Anregungen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Abbott, A. (1988). The systems of professions. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, A. (2014). The Problem of Excess. Sociological Theory 32 (1), 1-26. doi:10.1177/0735275114523419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adner, R., & Snow, D. (2010). Old technology responses to new technology threats: demand heterogeneity and technology retreats. Industrial and Corporate Change 19 (5), 1655-1675. doi:10.1093/icc/dtq046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, S. (Shaz), Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2015). The disruptor’s dilemma: TIVO and the U.S. television ecosystem. Strategic Management o. A. doi:10.1002/smj.2442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antal, A. B., Hutter, M., & Stark, D. (Hrsg.). (2015). Moments of Valuation. Exploring Sites of Dissonance. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustard, P., Siegele, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy 43, 1097-1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa, N., Faria, A. P., & Eirizy, V. (2013). Industry- and firm-specific factors of innovation novelty. Industrial and Corporate Change 23 (3), 865-902. doi:10.1093/icc/dtt029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S. R. (2010). Building an institutional field to corral a government: A case to set an agenda for organization studies. Organization Studies 31 (6), 777-805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing – Insights from the study of social enterprises. The Academy of Management Annals 8 (1), 397-441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. C., Knudsen, T., & March, J. G. (2006). Schumpeter, Winter, and the sources of novelty. Industrial and Corporate Change 15 (2), 353-371. doi:10.1093/icc/dtl003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, J. (2013). Imagined futures: fictional expectations in the economy. Sociological Theory 42, 219-240. doi: 10.1007/s11186-013-9191-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belt, H. van den, & Rip, A. (1987). The Nelson-Winter-Dosi model and synthetic dye chemistry. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (Hrsg.), The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology (S. 135-158). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhme, H. (2004). Einführung. Netzwerke. Zur Theorie und Geschichte einer Konstruktion. In J. Barkhoff, H. Böhme, & J. Riou (Hrsg.), Netzwerke. Eine Kulturtechnik der Moderne (S. 17-36). Köln, Weimar, Wien: Böhlau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhme, H., & Böhme, G. (1985). Das Andere der Vernunft. Zur Entwicklung von Rationalitätsstrukturen am Beispiel Kants. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boli, J., & Thomas, G. M. (1997). World culture in the world polity: A century of international non-governmental organizations. American Sociological Review 62 (2), 171-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1979 [1972]). Entwurf einer Theorie der Praxis. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R., & Freyssenet, M. (2003 [2000]). Produktionsmodelle. Eine Typologie am Beispiel der Automobilindustrie. Berlin: Edition Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Thürmann, H. (2005). Innovation. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, P., & Meyer, J. W. (2014). ‘They are all organizations’: The cultural roots of blurring between the nonprofit, business, and government sectors. Administration & Society (online first), 1-28. doi:10.1177/0095399714548268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B., Jacobsson, S., Holmén, M., & Rickne, A. (2002). Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy 31, 233-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, T., Pohjola, M., Sapprasert, K., & Verspagen, B. (2011). Innovation strategies as a source of persistent innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change 21 (3), 553-585. doi:10.1093/icc/dtr051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colapinto, J. (2014). Material Question. Graphene may be the most remarkable substance ever discovered. But what’s it for? The New Yorker (December 22), 1-21. http://www.newyorker. com/magazine/2014/12/22/material-question. Zugegriffen: 4. Januar 2016.

  • Colatat, P. (2015). An organizational perspective to funding science: Collaborator novelty at DARPA. Research Policy 44, 874-887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedrick, J., Kraemer, K. L., & Linden, G. (2009). Who profits from innovation in global value chains? A study of the iPod and notebook PCs. Industrial and Corporate Change 19 (1), 81-116. doi:10.1093/icc/dtp032.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2), 147-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, M. (2011). Exploring new combinations in innovation and entrepreneurship: social networks, Schumpeter, and the case of Josiah Wedgwood (1730-1795). Industrial and Corporate Change 20 (4), 1119-1151. doi:10.1093/icc/dtr021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolata, U. (2015). Volatile Monopole, Konzentration und Innovationsstrategien. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 24, 505-529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, L. (2004). Whole world on fire: organizations, knowledge, and nuclear weapons devastation. Ithaca, N.Y., London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology 103 (2 ), 281-317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erumban, A. A., & Timmer, M. P. (2012). The dark side of creative destruction: innovation and retirement of capital. Industrial and Corporate Change 21 (5), 1149-1174. doi:10.1093/icc/dts005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J. (2005). Innovation. A guide to the literature. In J. Fagerberg, D. G. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (S. 1-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrary, M., & Granovetter, M. (2009). The role of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley’s complex innovation network. Economy and Society 38 (2), 326-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. W. (1981 [1963]). Self-Renewal: The individual and the innovative society. New York, London: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., & Karnoe, P. (Hrsg.). (2001). Path dependence and creation. Mahwah, London: Lawrence Erlevbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi , G., & Fernandez-Stark, K. (2011). Global value chain analysis. A primer. Durham, NC: Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness (CGGC), Duke University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990a). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1990b). Structuration theory and sociological analysis. In J. Clark, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Hrsg.), Anthony Giddens. Consensus and controversy (S. 297-315). London, New York, Philadelphia: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1993 [1976]). New rules of sociological method (2. Aufl.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert-Walsh, J. (2010). Revisiting the concept of time: Archaic perplexity in Bergson and Heidegger. Human Studies 2-3 (33), 173-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, B. (2012). “Innovation Studies”: The Invention of a Specialty. Minerva 50 (4), 397-421. doi:10.1007/s11024-012-9212-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, B. (2015). Innovation contested. The idea of innovation over the centuries. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation – A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8 (1), 4-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 (6), 1360-1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1974). Getting a job. A study of contacts and careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, K. (2015). The Performativity of Networks. European Journal of Sociology 56 (2), 175-205. doi: 10.1017/S0003975615000107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilpinen, R. (2011). Artifact. In E. N. Zalta (Hrsg.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/artifact/, Zugegriffen: 4. Januar 2016.

  • Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal 42 (4), 351-371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, M., Knoblauch, H., Rammert, W., & Windeler, A. (in diesem Band). Innovationsgesellschaft heute. Die reflexive Herstellung des Neuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jandhyala, S., & Phene, A. (2015). The Role of Intergovernmental Organizations in Crossborder Knowledge Transfer and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 60 (4), 712-743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P. (2016). How to cultivate the art of serendipity New York Times, 2. Januar 2016. http://nyti.ms/1RgW60z, Zugegriffen: 3. Januar 2016.

  • Kenney, M. (2011). How venture capital became a component of the US National System of Innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change 20 (6), 1677-1723. doi:10.1093/icc/dtr061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoblauch, H. (in diesem Band). Kommunikatives Handeln, das Neue und die Innovationsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (1988). Das naturwissenschftliche Labor als “Verdichtung” von Gesellschaft. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 17 (2), 85-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (2000). Zeitschichten. Studien zur Historik. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology 38 (21), 201-221. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120022

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, K., Müller-Seitz, G., Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (2013). Financing innovations in uncertain networks – Filling in roadmap gaps in the semiconductor industry. Research Policy 42 (39), 647-661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, S., Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (2012). Securing access to lower-cost talent globally: The dynamics of active embedding and fi eld structuration. Regional Studies 46 (9), 1201-1218. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.571243.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2 (1), 71-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1993 [1958]). Organizations. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K., & Barber, E. (2004). The travels and adventures of serendipity. A study in sociological semantics and the sociology of science. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W. (2005). Weltkultur. Wie die westlichen Prinzipien die Welt durchdringen. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W. (2008). Reflections on institutional theories of organization. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Hrsg.), Organizational Institutionalism (S. 790-811). Los Angeles, London, New Dehli, Singapore: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., & Thomas, G. M. (2005). Ontologie und Rationalisierung im Zurechnungssystem der westlichen Kultur. In J. W. Meyer (Hrsg.), Weltkultur. Wie die westlichen Prinzipien die Welt durchdringen (S. 17-46). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Meyer, J. W., & Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The ‘actors’ of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory 18 (1), 100-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 (2), 340-363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, U. (2016). Innovationspfade. Evolution und Institutionalisierung komplexer Technologie in organisationalen Feldern. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muniesa, F. (2014). The Provoked Economy. Economic Reality and the Performative Turn. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, A. J., Earle, A., Howard-Grenville, J., Haack, J., & Young, D. (2014). Do innovation measures actually measure innovation? Obliteration, symbolic adoption, and other finicky challenges in tracking innovation diffusion. Research Policy 43, 927-940.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social order. A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2013). Political emotions: why love matters for justice. Cambridge, MA; London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals 2 (1), 433-474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, G. (in diesem Band). Innovation: In Ketten tanzen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, G., Windeler, A., Becker, A., & Schulz, H.-J. (1990). Computer und Macht in Organisationen. Mikropolitische Analysen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudheusden, M. van, Charlier, N., Rosskamp, B., & Delvennea, P. (2015). Broadening, deepening, and governing innovation: Flemishtechnology assessment in historical and socio-political perspective. Research Policy 44, 1877-1886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahnke, E. C., Katila, R., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2015). Who Takes You to the Dance? How Partners’ Institutional Logics Influence Innovation in Young Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 60 (4), 596-633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahnke, E. C., Mcdonald, R., Wang, D., & Hallen, B. (2015). Exposed: Venture capital, competitor ties, and entrepreneurial innovation. Academy of Management Journal 58 (5), 1334-1360. doi:org/10.5465/amj.2012.0777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1956). Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of Organizations I. Administrative Science Quarterly 1 (1), 63-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1957). Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of Organizations II. Administrative Science Quarterly 1 (2), 225-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popitz, H. (2000 [1997]). Wege der Kreativität. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rammert, W. (2014). Vielfalt der Innovation und gesellschaftlicher Zusammenhalt. Von der ökonomischen zur gesellschaftstheoretischen Perspektive. In M. Löw (Hrsg.), Vielfalt und Zusammenhalt. Verhandlungen des 36. Kongresses der Deutschen für Soziologie in Bochum und Dortmund 2012, Teil 2 (S. 619-639). Frankfurt a. M.: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (2003 [1962]). Diffusion of innovations (5. Aufl.). New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Singapore: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, C., Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (2013). The means of managing momentum: Bridging technological paths and organisational fields. Research Policy 42, 1389-1405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1912). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Berlin: Duncker & Humboldt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (2000 [1911]). Entrepreneurship as Innovation. In R. Swedberg (Hrsg.), Entrepreneurship. The Social Science View (S. 51-75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (2002 [1932]). Entwicklung. In U. Hedtke (Hrsg.), Joseph Alois Schumpeter. Werke, Briefe, Bibliografien. Ein Schumpeter-Archiv. http://www.schumpeter.info/Edition-Entwicklung.htm, Zugegriffen: 4. Januar 2016.

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (2003 [1942]). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, D. (2011). The moodiness of action. Sociological Theory 29 (3), 199-222. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01394.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (2003). Knowledge, trust and control. Managing tensions and contradictions in a regional network of service firms. International Studies of Management & Organization 33 (2), 69-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J., Windeler, A., Schubert, C., & Möllering, G. (2012). Organizing R&D Consortia for Path Creation and Extension: The Case of Semiconductor Manufacturing Technologies. Organization Studies 33 (7), 907-936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J., Windeler, A., Wirth, C., & Staber, U. (2010). Foreign market entry as network entry: A relational-structuration perspective on internationalization in television content production. Scandinavian Journal of Management 26 (1), 13-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavassoli, S., & Karlsson, C. (2015). Persistence of various types of innovation analyzed and explained. Research Policy 44, 1887-1901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (2004 [1967]). Organizations in action. Social science bases of administrative theory. New Brunswick, London: Transaction Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villani, M., Bonacini, S., Ferrari, D., Serra, R., & Lane, D. (2007). An agent-based model of exaptive processes. European Management Review 4, 141-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1976 [1921]). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windeler, A. (2001). Unternehmungsnetzwerke. Konstitution und Strukturation. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windeler, A. (2003). Kreation technologischer Pfade: ein strukturationstheoretischer Analyseansatz. In G. Schreyögg & J. Sydow (Hrsg.), Managementforschung 13 (S. 295-328). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windeler, A. (2012). Kooperation und Konkurrenz in Netzwerken. Theoretische Überlegungen zum Strukturwandel der Arbeitsorganisation. In C. Schilcher, M. Will-Zocholl, & M. Ziegler (Hrsg.), Vertrauen und Kooperation in der Arbeitswelt (S. 23-50). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windeler, A. (2014). Können und Kompetenzen von Individuen, Organisationen und Netzwerken. Eine praxistheoretische Perspektive. In A. Windeler & J. Sydow (Hrsg.), Kompetenz. Sozialtheoretische Perspektiven (S. 225-301). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windeler, A. (2015). Organisationen in der radikalisierten Moderne – Herausforderungen. In M. Apelt & U. Wilkesmann (Hrsg.), Zur Zukunft der Organisationssoziologie (S. 173-188). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windeler, A., & Sydow, J. (2001). Project networks and changing industry practices – Collaborative content production in the German television industry. Organization Studies 22 (6), 1035-1061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windeler, A., & Wirth, C. (2005). Strukturation von Arbeitsregulation: eine relationale Mehrebenenperspektive. In M. Faust, M. Funder, & M. Moldaschl (Hrsg.), Organisation von Arbeit (S. 163-191). München, Mehring: Hampp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoffie, D. B., & Cusumano, M. A. (2015). Strategy rules: Five timeless lessons from Bill Gates, Andy Grove, and Steve Jobs. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Wright, M., & Abdelgawad, S. G. (2014). Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal 32 (5), 479-500.

    Google Scholar 

Internetquellen

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    Arnold Windeler

Authors
  1. Arnold Windeler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnold Windeler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Werner Rammert

  2. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Arnold Windeler

  3. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Hubert Knoblauch

  4. für Sozialforschung gGmbH, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Michael Hutter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Windeler, A. (2016). Reflexive Innovation. In: Rammert, W., Windeler, A., Knoblauch, H., Hutter, M. (eds) Innovationsgesellschaft heute. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10874-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10874-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-10873-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-10874-8

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation