Advertisement

The Power of Symbolic Packaging Cues

  • Iris van Ooijen
Chapter
Part of the European Advertising Academy book series (EAA)

Abstract

Packaging can be considered as an element of communication in the marketplace. By communicating through packaging, marketers are able to appeal to consumers at the most crucial moment in the consumer decision journey: the point of sale. At the point of sale, consumers are able to consider the purchase of a product by evaluating the visual and tactile attributes of its packaging. Marketers increasingly become aware of the powerful role of packaging as a communication tool, which is reflected in the recognition of the capacity of packaging to create product differentiation and identity within product categories that are relatively homogenous, such as FMCG goods (Bertrand, 2002; Underwood, 2003).

Keywords

Product Category Dark Version Symbolic Meaning Evaluative Conditioning Product Packaging 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ampuero, O., & Vila, N. (2006). Consumer perceptions of product packaging. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(2), 100–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertrand, K. (2002). Wake up your product category with 'shapely' packaging. BrandPackaging,(January/February).Google Scholar
  3. De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001). Association learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127(6), 853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deighton, J. (1992). The consumption of performance. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 362–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ford, G. T., Smith, D. B., & Swasy, J. L. (1990). Consumer skepticism of advertising claims: Testing hypotheses from economics of information. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(4), 433–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gorn, G. J., Chattopadhyay, A., Yi, T., & Dahl, D. W. (1997). Effects of color as an executional cue in advertising: They're in the shade. Management Science, 43(10), 1387–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jacobs, L., Keown, C., Worthley, R., & Ghymn, K. (1991). Cross-cultural colour comparisons: Global marketers beware! International Marketing Review, 8(3)Google Scholar
  8. Karjalainen, T. (2007). It looks like a toyota: Educational approaches to designing for visual brand recognition. International Journal of Design, 1(1), 67–81.Google Scholar
  9. Katz, M. L., Gordon-Larsen, P., Bentley, M. E., Kelsey, K., Shields, K., & Ammerman, A. (2004). " Does skinny mean healthy?" perceived ideal, current, and healthy body sizes among african-american girls and their female caregivers. Ethnicity and Disease, 14, 533–541.Google Scholar
  10. Labrecque, L. I., & Milne, G. R. (2012). Exciting red and competent blue: The importance of color in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(5), 711–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morris, C. (1946). Oxford, England: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Peirce, C. S., Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P., & Burks, A. W. (1994). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. InteLex.Google Scholar
  13. Price, G. M., Uauy, R., Breeze, E., Bulpitt, C. J., & Fletcher, A. E. (2006). Weight, shape, and mortality risk in older persons: Elevated waist-hip ratio, not high body mass index, is associated with a greater risk of death. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 84(2), 449–460.Google Scholar
  14. Raghunathan, R., Naylor, R. W., & Hoyer, W. D. (2006). The unhealthy = tasty intuition and its effects on taste inferences, enjoyment, and choice of food products. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 170–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Underwood, R. L. (2003). The communicative power of product packaging: Creating brand identity via lived and mediated experience. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 11(1), 62–76.Google Scholar
  16. van Grinsven, B., & Das, E. (2014). Logo design in marketing communications: Brand logo complexity moderates exposure effects on brand recognition and brand attitude. Journal of Marketing Communications, (ahead-of-print), 1–15.Google Scholar
  17. Walther, E. (2002). Guilty by mere association: Evaluative conditioning and the spreading attitude effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations