Skip to main content

Creative vs. Traditional Media Choice: Effects on Word-of-Mouth and Purchase Intention

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: European Advertising Academy ((EAA))

Abstract

Nowadays, consumers are daily confronted with dozens of advertising messages due to an explosive media and advertising growth during the past decades. Compared to the 1970’s, where consumers where daily exposed to about 500 ads, today they are faced with approximately 5,000 ads a day (Johnson, 2006). Taking into account this enormous mass of advertising messages, which is also known as advertising clutter, it is only logical that consumers protect themselves by selectively paying attention to the advertising jungle they are living in.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (2002), “Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations,” retrieved from http://chuang.epage.au.edu.tw/ezfiles/168/1168/attach/20/pta_41176_7688352_57138.pdf.

  • Alexandrov, A., Lilly, B. and E. Babakus (2013), “The Effects of Social-and Self-Motives on the Intentions to Share Positive and Negative Word of Mouth,” in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 41, 531–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. and G. H. Bower (1973), “Human Associative Memory,” Halstead, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, J. C., Akhter, S. H., Durvasula, S. and D. D. Muehling (1992), “The Effects of Advertising Distinctiveness and Message Content Involvement on Cognitive and Affective Responses to Advertising,” in: Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, Vol. 14 (1), 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, J. (1967), “Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product,” in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 9, 291–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babin, B. J., Lee, Y. K., Kim, E. J. and M. Griffin (2005), “Modeling Consumer Satisfaction and Word-of-Mouth: Restaurant Patronage in Korea,” in: Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 19 (3), 133–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beerli, A. and J. D. M. Santana (1999), “Design and Validation of an Instrument for Measuring Advertising Effectiveness in the Printed Media,” in: Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, Vol. 21 (2), 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand Science Institute (2005). First International Word of Mouth Marketing Conference, Brand Science Institute, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. J. and P. H. Reingen (1987), “Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behaviour,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 14, 350–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, A. J., Smith, R. and C. Martin (1999), “The Influence of Consumer Socialization Variables on Attitude Toward Advertising: A comparison of African-Americans and Caucasians,” in: Journal of Advertising, Vol. 28(3), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. C. and K. L. Keller (2003), “Brand Familiarity and Advertising Repetition Effects,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 30(2), 292–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlén, M. and F. Lange (2004), “To Challenge or Not to Challenge: Ad-brand Incongruency and Brand Familiarity,” in: Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 12(3), 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlén, M. (2005), “The Medium as a Contextual Cue: Effects of Creative Media Choice,” in: Journal of Advertising, Vol. 34(3), 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlén, M., Friberg, L. and E. Nilsson (2009a), “Long Live Creative Media Choice. The Medium as a Persistent Brand Cue,” in: Journal of Advertising, Vol. 38(2), 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlén, M., Granlund, A. and M. Grenros (2009b), “The Consumer-Perceived Calue of Non-Traditional Media: Effects of Brand Reputation, Appropriateness and Expense,” in: Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 26(3), 155–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S. (1971), “Attitude Change, Media and Word of Mouth,” in: Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 11(6), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Ballester, E., Navarro, A. and M. Sicilia (2012), “Revitalising Brands Through Communication Messages: The Role of Brand Familiarity,” in: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 46(1/2), 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Matos, C. A. and C. A. V. Rossi (2008), “Word-of-Mouth Communications in Marketing: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Antecedents and Moderators,” in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 36(4), 578–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducoffe, R. H. (1995), “How Consumers Assess the Value of Advertising,” in: Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, Vol. 17(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D. and P. W. Miniard (1990), “Consumer Behaviour,” Dryden Press, Orlando.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen (1975) “Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research”, Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2012), “PROCESS: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling [white paper],” retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.

  • Johnson, C. (2006), “Cutting Through Advertising Clutter,” retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-3445_162-2015684.html.

  • Kent, R. J. and C. T. Allen (1994), “Competitive Iinterference Effects in Consumer Memory for Advertising: The Role of Brand Familiarity,” in: The Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58(3), 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilby, N. (2007), “Market Shift Opens Door to Word of Mouth,” in: Marketing Week, Vol. 30(38), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, F. and M. Dahlén (2003), “Let’s Be Strange: Brand Familiarity and Ad-Brand Incongruency,” in: Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 12(7), 449–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F. and E. Katz (1955), “Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications, “ Glencoe, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, J.C. (1984), “Guerrilla Marketing: Secrets for Making Big Profits from Your Small Business,” Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, J.C. and M. W. McLaughlin (2005), “Guerrilla Marketing for Consultants,” John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. (2006), “Word of Mouth for Movies: Its Dynamics and Impact on Box Office Revenue,” in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 70, 74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. E., MacKenzie, S. B., Yang, X., Buchholz, L. M. and W. K. Darley (2007), “Modeling the Determinants and Effects of Creativity in Advertising,” in: Marketing Science, Vol. 26(6), 819–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speck, P. S. and M. T. Elliott (1997), “Predictors of Advertising Avoidance in Print and Broadcast Media,” Journal of Advertising, Vol. 26(3), 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, S. R. and S. W. Kelley (2001), “Service Recovery Attributions and Word-of-Mouth Intentions,” in: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 35(1/2), 194–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N. and T. Mazzarol (2008), “Factors Influencing Word of Mouth Effectiveness: Receiver Perspectives,” in: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 42(3/4), 344–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. S., Cheng, Y. F. and Y. L. Chu (2012), “Effect of Celebrity Endorsements on Consumer Purchase Intentions: Advertising Effect and Advertising Appeal as Mediators,” in: Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, Vol. 23(5), 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S., Hu, M. M., Winer, R. S., Assael, H. and X. Chen (2012), “An Empirical Study of Word-of-Mouth Generation and Consumption. Marketing Science, Vol. 31(6), 952–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Verena M. Wottrich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wottrich, V., Voorveld, H. (2016). Creative vs. Traditional Media Choice: Effects on Word-of-Mouth and Purchase Intention. In: Verlegh, P., Voorveld, H., Eisend, M. (eds) Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. VI). European Advertising Academy. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10558-7_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics