Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mittel nonverbaler Kommunikation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychologie der Kommunikation

Part of the book series: Basiswissen Psychologie ((BASPSY))

  • 41k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel sollen ausgewählte Fertigkeiten nonverbaler Kommunikation vorgestellt und erläutert werden. Im Einzelnen gehen wir auf haptische Signale, Körpersprache, Proxemik (d. h. räumliches Verhalten) und physische Charakteristika ein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Altman, I., & Vinsel, A. M. (1977). Personal space: An analysis von E. T. Hall’s proxemics framework. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Hrsg.), Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research (Bd. 2, S. 181–259). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (1988). Bodily communication (2. Aufl.). New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M. (1994). The psychology of interpersonal behaviour (5. Aufl.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossi, J. (1995). Augen-Blicke. Zur Psychologie des Flirts. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyson, A. R., Pryor, B., & Butler, J. (1999). Height as power in women. North American Journal of Psychology, 1, 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briegel, W. (2006). Neuropsychiatric findings of Möbius sequence-a review. Clinical Genetics, 70, 91–97. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00649.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J., Walther, J., & Baesler, E. (1992). Interpretations, evaluations, and consequences of interpersonal touch. Human Communication Research, 19, 237–263. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00301.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–112. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrea, D. M., & Sîrbu, A. (2008). A complex non-contact bio-instrumental system. In N. Wickramasinghe & E. Geisler (Hrsg.), Encyclopedia of Healthcare Information Systems (S. 251–269). Hershey: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-889-5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ebster, C., & Reisinger, H. (2007). Erfolg durch Schönheit – wie sich körperliche Attraktivität im Verkauf auswirkt. Wirtschaftspsychologie Aktuell, 14, 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expression of emotion. In J. Cole (Hrsg.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Bd. 19). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1971). Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 124–129. doi:10.1037/h0030377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1978). Facial action coding system. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Davidson, R. J., & Friesen, W. V. (1990). The Duchenne smile: Emotional expression and brain physiology: II. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 342–353. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Hager, J. C. (2002). Facial action coding system. Salt Lake City: Research Nexus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 304–341. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, W. (1972). Cultural differences in facial expression. An experimental test of the concept of display rules. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Deception Research Team. (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 60–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1996). Touch, status, and gender at professional meetings. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 23–44. doi: 10.1007/BF02248713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargie, O., & Dickson, D. (2004). Skilled interpersonal communication. Research, theory and practice (4. Aufl.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, M. C. P., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (2006). Social messages of crying faces. Their influence on anticipated person perception, emotions and behavioural responses. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 878–886. doi:10.1080/02699930500450218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, H., Kreifelts, B., Brück, C., Nizielski, S., Schütz, A., & Wildgruber, D. (2013). Nonverbal signals speak up: Association between perceptual nonverbal dominance and emotional intelligence. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 783–799. doi:10.1080/02699931.2012.739999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joule, R.-V., & Guéguen, N. (2007). Touch, compliance, and awareness of tactile contact. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104, 581–588. doi:10.2466/pms.104.2.581-588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jungbauer-Gans, M., Berger, R., & Kriwy, P. (2005). Machen Kleider Leute? Ergebnisse eines Feldexperiments zum Verkäuferverhalten. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 34, 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (1979). Die Rolle sichtbaren Verhaltens in der Organisation sozialer Interaktion. In K. R. Scherer & H. R. Wallbott (Hrsg.), Nonverbale Kommunikation. Forschungsberichte zum Interaktionsverhalten (S. 202–237). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klosinski, C., & Hermanutz, M. (2010). Lügenentdeckung durch Beobachtung von nonverbalem Verhalten – Mythos oder Möglichkeit? Polizei & Wissenschaft, 2, 234–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhnken, G. (1990). Glaubwürdigkeit – Untersuchungen zu einem psychologischen Konstrukt. München: Psychologie-Verlag-Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Litzcke, S. M., Hermanutz, M., & Klossek, A. (2006). Nonverbale Warnsignale – Glaubhaftigkeitsdiagnostik und Glaubwürdigkeitsattribution. In: S. Schwan & S. M. Litzcke (Hrsg.), Nachrichtendienstpsychologie 4 (S. 5–19). Brühl: Fachhochschule des Bundes für öffentliche Verwaltung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, M., Le, J.-M., & Sherwyn, D. S. (1998). Reach out and touch your customers. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 60–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahan, E. M. (1976). Nonverbal communication as a function of attribution in impression formation. Communication Monographs, 43, 287–294. doi:10.1080/03637757609375939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A., & Ferris, S. R. (1967). Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 31, 248–252. doi:10.1037/h0024648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A., & Wiener, M. (1967). Decoding of inconsistent communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 109–114. doi:10.1037/h0024532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melamed, J., & Bozionelos, N. (1992). Managerial promotion and height. Psychological Reports, 71, 587–593. doi:10.2466/pr0.1992.71.2.587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, N. H., Truschzinski, M., Fink, V., Schuster, J., Dinkelbach, H. Ü., Heft, W., Kronfeld, T., Rau, C., & Spitzhirn, M. (2014). The Smart Virtual Worker – Digitale Menschmodelle für die Simulation industrieller Arbeitsvorgänge. Technische Sicherheit, (7–8), 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster, H. (2006). Baby FACS: Facial action coding system for infants and young children. Unpublished monograph and coding manual, New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otta, E., Lira, B. B. P., Delevati, N. M., Cesar, O. P., & Pires, C. S. G. (1994). The effect of smiling and of head tilting on person perception. Journal of Psychology, 128, 323–331. doi:10.1080/00223980.1994.9712736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, L. A., Waller, B. M., Burrows, A. M., Gothard, K. M., & Vick, S.-J. (2010). MaqFACS: A muscle-based facial moving coding system for the macaque monkey. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 143, 625–630. doi:10.1002/ajpa.21401

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, T. (2013a). Documentation of gestures with motion captures. In H. E. Wiegand (Hrsg.), Body-language-communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Bd. 1, S. 857–868). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, T. (2013b). Documentation of gestures with data gloves. In H. E. Wiegand (Hrsg.), Body-language-communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Bd. 1, S. 868–879). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remland, M. (2000). Nonverbal communication in everyday life. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, V., & Mc Croskey, J. (2000). Nonverbal behavior in interpersonal relations (4. Aufl.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Six, B., Martin, P., & Pecher, M. (1983). A cultural comparison of perceived crowding and discomfort: The United States and West Germany. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656–666. doi:10.1080/00223980.1983.9915397

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. L., Dustin, S. L., Barrick, M. R., & Darnold, T. C. (2008). Exploring the handshake in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1139–1146. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 768–777.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sturman, D. J. (1999). A brief history of motion capture for computer character animation. http://www.siggraph.org/education/materials/HyperGraph/animation/character_animation/motion_capture/history1.htm.

  • Vaidis, D. C. F., & Halimi-Falkowicz, S. G. M. (2008). Increasing compliance with request: Two touches are more effective than one. Psychological Reports, 103, 88–92. doi:10.2466/pr0.103.1.88-92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vick, S.-J., Waller, B. M., Parr, L. A., Smith Pasqualini, M. C., & Bard, K. A. (2007). A cross-species comparison of facial morphology and movement in humans and chimpanzees using the Facial Action Coding System (FACS). Journal of Nonverbal Behaviour, 31, 1–20. doi:10.1007/s10919-006-0017-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller, B. M., & Pasqualini, M. S. (2013). Analysing facial expression using the facial action coding system (FACS). In H. E. Wiegand (Hrsg.), Body-language-communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Bd. 1, S. 917–932). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, O. M. (1970). Proxemic behavior. A cross-cultural study. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, O. M., & Graves, T. D. (1966). Quantitative research in proxemic behavior. American Anthropologist, 68, 971–985. doi:10.1525/aa.1966.68.4.02a00070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieser, M., Pauli, P., Alpers, G., & Mühlberger, A. (2009). Is eye to eye contact really threatening and avoided in social anxiety? An eye-tracking and psychophysiology study. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23, 93–103. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, T., & French, L. (1996). Height and perceived competence of U.S. presidents. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 1002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Spiegel, N. H., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1982). Nonverbal strategies for decoding deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6, 171–187. doi:10.1007/BF00987066

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. TU Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Deutschland

    Jessica Röhner

  2. Kompetenzzentrum für Angewandte Personalpsychologie, Universität Bamberg, Bamberg, Deutschland

    Astrid Schütz

Authors
  1. Jessica Röhner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Astrid Schütz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Röhner .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Röhner, J., Schütz, A. (2016). Mittel nonverbaler Kommunikation. In: Psychologie der Kommunikation. Basiswissen Psychologie. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10024-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10024-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-10023-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-10024-7

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation