Advertisement

Support or Restriction: Swedish Primary School Teachers’ Views on Mathematics Curriculum Reform

  • Benita Berg
  • Kirsti Hemmi
  • Martin Karlberg
Chapter
Part of the Freiburger Empirische Forschung in der Mathematikdidaktik book series (FEFMD)

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a quantitative study on primary teachers’ (n=253) views on the introduction of steering documents and national examinations for Grade 3. While the majority of the teachers experience the reform as empowering, some teachers feel the new curriculum and the national examination restrict their teacher professionalism. We found differences in how teachers viewed the reform depending on whether they had graduated before or after the reform in 1994. The differing views can be connected to teachers’ beliefs about teacher professionalism and the relation between teaching, learning and maturing. We discuss our findings also in the light of curriculum development during the last four decades.

Key words:

teacher beliefs, curriculum reform, teacher professionalism, primary school, mathematics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of the pedagogic discourse: Class, codes and control. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bulmer, M. G. (1979). Principles of statistics. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Cuban, L (1993). The lure of curricular reform and its pitiful history. Phi Delta Kappan, 75 (2), 182–185.Google Scholar
  4. Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2001). The problematic relationship between beliefs and attitudes. In Proceedings of the MAVI-X European Workshop, pp. 17-24. Kristianstad, Sweden.Google Scholar
  5. Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2011). Attitude towards mathematics: a bridge between beliefs and emotions. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(4), 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fowler, F. C., & Poetter, T. S. (2004). Framing French success in elementary mathematics: Policy, curriculum, and pedagogy. Curriculum Inquiry, 34(3), 283–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fullan, M. (1991). The New Meaning of Educational Change. London: Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar
  8. Furinghetti, F. & Pehkonen, E. (2003). Rethinking Characterizations of Beliefs. In G.C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education. (pp. 39-57). Secaucus, NJ: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Gjone, G. (2001). Läroplaner och läroplansutveckling i matematik. In B. Grevholm (Ed.), Matematikdidaktik – ett nordisk perspektiv. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  10. Handal, B. & Herrington, A (2003). Mathematics teachers´ beliefs and curriculum reform. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15(1), 59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hannula, M. S., & Lepik, M., Pipere, A., & Tuohilampi, L. (in press). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs in Estonia, Latvia and Finland. Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Antalya, Turkey. Feb 6th-10th, 2013.Google Scholar
  12. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing Teachers, Changing Times: Teachers Work and Culture in the Postmodern Age. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  13. Hemmi, K., & Berg, B. (2012). Empowerment and control in primary mathematics reform – the Swedish case. In C. Bergsten, E. Jablonka & M. Raman (red.) Evaluation and Comparison of Mathematical Achievement: Dimensions and Perspectives: Proceedings of MADIF 8.Google Scholar
  14. Hemmi, K., Lepik, M., & Viholainen, A. (2013). Analysing proof-related competences in Estonian, Finnish and Swedish mathematics curricula—towards a framework of developmental proof. Journal of Curriculum Studies, http://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/nzt5QqJAU2tqaVgya8eI/full.
  15. Kleve, B. (2007). Mathematics Teachers’ Interpretation of the Curriculum Reform, L97, in Norway. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Agder University College, Kristiansand.Google Scholar
  16. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw- Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Oppenheim, A. N. (1998). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  18. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers' Use of Mathematics Curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Skolverket. (2012). Ett år med en ny läroplan: Om Reformarbete, kunskapsbedömning och Skolverkets stöd. [One year with a new curriculum: About the reform work, assessment and the support of the National Agency.] Stockholm: Elanders Sverige AB.Google Scholar
  20. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mälardalen UniversityVästeråsSweden

Personalised recommendations