Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Experimente in der Politikwissenschaft pp 155–164Cite as

Forschungsfelder der experimentellen Politikwissenschaft

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 2845 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Experimentelle Designs werden in der Politikwissenschaft in nahezu allen Forschungsfeldern angewandt. Die Vielzahl und thematische Vielfalt experimenteller Untersuchungen ist mittlerweile so groß, dass es im Rahmen eines Literaturberichts nicht möglich ist, diese auch nur annähernd vollständig darzustellen. Insgesamt zeigt sich, dass dabei auf alle Typen und Varianten des experimentellen Designs zurückgegriffen wird. Inzwischen gibt es einige Überblicksdarstellungen, die verschiedene Teilbereiche der experimentellen Politikwissenschaft illustrieren. Im Folgenden werden einige Forschungsbereiche beispielhaft herausgegriffen und überblicksartig vorgestellt, um das Potenzial und die Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten experimenteller Forschung noch einmal zu verdeutlichen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Addonizio, E. M., Green, D. P., & Glaser, J. M. (2007). Putting the party back into politics. An experiment testing whether election day festivals increase voter turnout. Political Science and Politics, 40, 721–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1997). Going negative. How political advertisements shrink and polarize the electorate. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D., & Duggan, J. (Hrsg.). (2005). Social choice and strategic decisions. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. P., & Ferejohn, J. A. (1989). Bargaining in legislatures. The American Political Science Review, 83(4), 1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, M. H., Curhan, J. R., Moore, D. A., & Valley, K. L. (2000). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 279–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellemare, C., & Kröger, S. (2007). On representative social capital. European Economic Review, 51(1), 183–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berinsky, A. J. (2002). Political context and the survey response. The dynamics of racial policy opinion. Journal of Politics, 64, 567–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottom, W. P., Eavey, C. L., & Miller, G. J. (1996). Getting to the core: Coalitional integrity as a constraint on the power of agenda setters. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40(2), 298–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozoyan, C. (2015). Vertrauen und Vertrauenswürdigkeit. In M. Keuschnigg & T. Wolbring (Hrsg.), Experimente in den Sozialwissenschaften. Sonderband der Sozialen Welt (S. 195–216). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brader, T., Valentino, N. A., & Suhay, E. (2008). What triggers public opposition to immigration? Anxiety, group cues, and immigration threat. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 959–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardenas, J.-C. (2000). How do groups solve local commons dilemmas? Lessons from experimental economics in the field. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2(3), 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, R. E., & Love, G. J. (2013). The politics of interpersonal trust and reciprocity: An experimental approach. Political Behavior, 35(1), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, E. (2015). Ethnic voting and accountability in Africa: A choice experiment in Uganda. World Politics, 67(2), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, A. (2011). Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: A selective survey of the literature. Experimental Economics, 14(1), 47–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2013). Counterframing effects. The Journal of Politics, 75(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, E. A., & Steed, B. C. (2009). Monitoring and sanctioning in the commons: An application to forestry. Ecological Economics, 68(7), 2106–2113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 448–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, A., & Strauss, A. (2009). Don’t forget to vote. Text message reminders as a mobilization tool. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 787–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, J. N. (Hrsg.). (2011). Cambridge handbook of experimental political science. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, J. N., Green, D. P., Kurklinski, J. H., & Lupai, A. (2006). The growth and development of experimental research in political science. American Political Science Review, 100(4), 627–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckel, C. C., & Wilson, R. K. (2003). Conditional trust: Sex, race and facial expressions in a trust game. Trust and Institutions, 24, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermisch, J., Gambetta, D., Laurie, H., Siedler, T., & Uhrig, S. C. N (2009). Measuring people’s trust. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 172(4), 749–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faas, T., & Huber, S. (2010). Experimente in der Politikwissenschaft. Vom Mauerblümchen zum Mainstream. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 51(4), 721–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faas, T., & Maier, J. (2004). Mobilisierung, Verstärkung, Konversion? Ergebnisse eines Experiments zur Wahrnehmung der Fernsehduelle im Vorfeld der Bundestagswahl 2002. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 45, 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fershtman, C., & Gneezy, U. (2001). Discrimination in a segmented society. An experimental approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 351–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M. P., & Plott, C. R. (1978). Committee decisions under majority rule: An experimental study. American Political Science Review, 72(2), 575–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fröhlich, N., & Oppenheimer, J. (1998). Some consequences of e-mail vs. face-to-face communication in experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 35(3), 389–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, S. S. (2008). The multiple effects of casualties on public support for war: An experimental approach. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H. (2005). Moral sentiments and material interests. The foundations of cooperation in economic life. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, J. M. (2003). Social context and inter-group political attitudes: Experiments in group conflict theory. British Journal of Political Science, 33(4), 607–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habyarimana, J., Humphrey, J., Posner, D., & Weinstein, J. (2007). Why does ethnic diversity undermine public goods provision? American Political Science Review, 101(4), 709–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamenstädt, U. (2015). Experimentelle Politikwissenschaft. Über die Untersuchung von Entscheidungen in der experimentellen Forschung. In A. Glatzmeier & H. Hilgert (Hrsg.), Entscheidungen: Geistes- und sozialwissenschaftliche Beiträge zu Theorie und Praxis (S. 43–54). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. A., & Arceneaux, K. (2007). Identifying the persuasive effects of presidential advertising. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 957–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, V. L., & Valentino, N. A. (2004). The centrality of race in American politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 7(1), 383–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. A., Hunter, J. E., & Hodge, C. N. (1995). Physical attractiveness and intellectual competence: A meta-analytic review. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(2), 108–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. D., & Mislin, A. A. (2011). Trust games. A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 865–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittel, B., & Luhan, W. (2013). Decision making in networks. An experiment on structure effects in a group dictator game. Social Choice and Welfare, 40(1), 141–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2000). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. Journal of Politics, 62, 729–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How voters decide. Information processing during election campaigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, M., McGraw, K., & Stroh, P. (1989). An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 83, 399–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma. Can citizens learn what they need to know? New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, K. M., Lodge, M., & Jones, J. M. (2002). The pandering politicians of suspicious minds. Journal of Politics, 64(2), 362–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meffert, M. F., & Gschwend, T. (2011). Polls, coalition signals and strategic voting. An experimental investigation of perceptions and effects. European Journal of Political Research, 50(5), 636–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen, T., & Suetens, S. (2008). Communication and guilt in a prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(6), 945–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations. Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. E., & Kinder, D. R. (1996). Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion. Journal of Politics, 58(4), 1055–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, S. P. (2012). Polarizing cues. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2014). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 6(4), 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagopoulos, C. (2009). Street fight. The impact of a street sign campaign on voter turnout. Electoral Studies, 28, 309–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sally, D. (1995). Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society, 7(1), 58–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman, P., & Theriault, S. M. (2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In W. E. Saris & P. M. Sniderman (Hrsg.), Studies in public opinion (S. 133–165). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H.-J., & Milinski, M. (2008). Multiple gossip statements and their effect on reputation and trustworthiness. Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society, 275(1650), 2529–2536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, M., & Kocher, M. G. (2007). Trust and trustworthiness across different age groups. Games and Economic Behavior, 59(2), 364–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos, W., Westenberg, M., van Dijk, E., & Crone, E. A. (2010). Development of trust and reciprocity in adolescence. Cognitive Development, 25(1), 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Swol, L. M. (2003). The effects of regulation on trust. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, M. (2013). Vertrauen in der ökonomischen Theorie. Eine mikrofundierte und verhaltensbezogene Analyse. Berlin: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkerson, J. D. (1999). „Killer“ amendments in Congress. American Political Science Review, 93(3), 535–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. K., & Eckel, C. C. (2006). Judging a book by its cover. Beauty and expectations in the trust game. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. I., Ratner, K. G., & Fazio, R. H. (2014). Political attitudes bias the mental representation of a presidential candidate’s face. Psychological Science, 25(2), 503–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Niedersachsen, Deutschland

    Ina Kubbe

Authors
  1. Ina Kubbe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ina Kubbe .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kubbe, I. (2016). Forschungsfelder der experimentellen Politikwissenschaft. In: Experimente in der Politikwissenschaft. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09424-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09424-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-09423-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-09424-9

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation