Conclusion: What Makes a School a “School of the Future”?

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is a summary of recommendations on building and renovating “schools for the future” that are stated throughout this book. These recommendations have been systematically compiled by means of the facet approach and the system for judging the quality of buildings (see chapter 7). This is a specific method of architectural psychology and social sciences. The sources of the data were: Historical experiences with school buildings (see chapter 2), results of architectural psychology research (see chapter 3), interviews of architects of innovative school buildings (see chapter 7), observations by architectural experts who are building schools and teaching in the United States and Japan (the authors of chapters 4–6) as well as descriptions of innovative school projects (see Appendix).

Keywords

Transportation Acoustics Reformer Rhein 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blundell Jones, P. (2007). Peter Hübner: Architecture as social process. Stuttgart: Edition Axel Menges.Google Scholar
  2. Buddensiek, W. (2001). Zukunftsfähiges Lernen in Häusern des Lernens [Future-oriented learning in houses of learning[. Göttingen: Werkstatt.Google Scholar
  3. Dudek, M. (2000). Architecture of schools. The new learning environments. Oxford: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dudek, M. (2007). Schools and kindergartens: A design manual. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  5. Engel, O., & Dahlmann, J. (2001). Pädagogische Architektur [Educational Architecture]. Unpublished thesis submitted to the State Examination Office for First State Examinations at Schools in Cologne as part of the first state examination for special needs education. University of Cologne, Germany.Google Scholar
  6. Gifford, R. (2002). Educational environmental psychology. In: Environmental psychology. principles and practice (3rd ed.). (pp. 296–336). Colville, WA: Optimal Environments.Google Scholar
  7. Goldstein, A.P. (1996). The psychology of vandalism. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  8. Hübner, P., & Beierlorzer, H. (2005). Kinder bauen ihre Schule. Evangelische Gesamtschule Gelsenkirchen. [Children build their school: The Protestant Comprehensive School in Gelsenkirchen.] Stuttgart: Karl Krämer.Google Scholar
  9. Hübner, P. (2005). Kinder bauen ihre Schule. Children make their school. Evangelische Gesamtschule Gelsenkirchen. Stuttgart/London: Edition Axel Menges. (English and German).Google Scholar
  10. Kroner, W. (1994). Architektur für Kinder = Architecture for children. Stuttgart: Krämer (English and German).Google Scholar
  11. Kükelhaus, H. (1971). Organismus und Technik. Gegen die Zerstörung der menschlichen Wahrnehmung [Organism and technology. Against the destruction of human perception]. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
  12. Kükelhaus, H. (1988). Unmenschliche Architektur: Von der Tierfabrik zur Lernanstalt [Inhuman architecture: From animal factory to learning institution] (6th ed.). Cologne: Gaia.Google Scholar
  13. Rittelmeyer, C. (2007). Schule als gestalteter Raum: Schularchitektur [School as designed space: school architecture]. In S. Hellekamps, W. Wittenbruch & W. Plöger (Ed.): Handbuch Schule [Handbook for Schools]. Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar
  14. Rittelmeyer, C. (2013). Einführung in die Gestaltung von Schulbauten. [Introduction into the design of school buildings]. Frammersbach: Verlag Farbe und Gesundheit.Google Scholar
  15. Sanoff, H. (2001a). School building assessment methods. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.Google Scholar
  16. Sanoff, H. (2001b). A visioning process for designing responsive schools. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.Google Scholar
  17. Sanoff, H. (2002). Schools designed with community participation. Washington, DC: NationalClearinghouse for Educational Facilities.Google Scholar
  18. Schavan, A. (2001). Schulen in Baden-Württemberg. Moderne und historische Bauten zwischen Rhein, Neckar und Bodensee [Schools in Baden-Württemberg. Modern and historical buildings between the Rhine, Neckar, and Lake Constance]. Stuttgart: Hohenheim-Verl.Google Scholar
  19. Seydel, O. (2004). Die gute Schule der Zukunft [The good school for the future]. In Wüstenrot-Stiftung (Ed.), Schulen in Deutschland: Neubau und Revitalisierung [Schools in Germany: New construction and renovation] (pp. 122–141). Stuttgart: Krämer.Google Scholar
  20. Stoner, G., Shinn, M.R., & Walker, H.M. (1991). Interventions for achievement and behavior problems. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.Google Scholar
  21. Walden, R. (2008). Architekturpsychologie: Schule, Hochschule und Bürogebäude der Zukunft [Architectural psychology: School, university and office building of the future]. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Watschinger, J., & Kühebacher, J. (Eds.). (2007). Schularchitektur und neue Lernkultur. Neues Lernen – Neue Räume [School architecture and new learning culture. New learning – new spaces). Bern: h.e.p./Ott.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for PsychologyUniversity in KoblenzKoblenzGermany

Personalised recommendations