Advertisement

Theoretische und methodische Konzepte zu Netzwerkstrukturen in und zwischen Unternehmen

Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Das zweite Kapitel beinhaltet eine Darstellung theoretischer und methodischer Grundlagen zu intra- und interorganisationalen Unternehmensnetzwerken. Neben einer Diskussion der konzeptionellen Grundlagen von Unternehmensnetzwerken (2.1) wird in Abschn. 2.2 der Frage nachgegangen, welche Nutzenformen mit Beziehungen in und zwischen Unternehmen einhergehen können und welche Arten von Kosten im Rahmen des Aufbaus und Unterhalts solcher Beziehungen entstehen. Dies führt im Weiteren zu einer Beurteilung von Netzwerkstrukturen unter simultaner Berücksichtigung von Nutzen und Kosten (Kap. 2.3). Ferner werden in Abschn. 2.4 Möglichkeiten und Ansätze zur Gestaltung von Netzwerkstrukturen diskutiert und anschließend methodische Ansätze zur Untersuchung von Unternehmensnetzwerken vorgestellt (Kap. 2.5). Im letzten Abschn. 2.6 dieses Kapitels erfolgt eine grundlegende Darstellung der in den Fallstudien angewendeten Methoden der Netzwerkanalyse, wobei sowohl grafische als auch analytisch-statistische Verfahren vorgestellt werden.

Literatur

  1. Adler, P. S. (1995). Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design/manufacturing interface. Organization Science, 6(2), 147–167.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, P. S. (1999). Building better bureaucracies. Academy of Management Executive, 13(4), 36–47.Google Scholar
  3. Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.Google Scholar
  4. Agneessens, F., & Wittek, R. (2012). Where do intra-organizational advice relations come from? The role of informal status and social capital in social exchange. Social Networks, 34(3), 333–345.Google Scholar
  5. Ahuja, M. K., Galletta, D. F., & Carley, K. M. (2003). Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: An empirical study. Management Science, 49(1), 21–38.Google Scholar
  6. Akerlof, G. A. (1982). Labor contracts as partial gift exchange. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97(4), 543–569.Google Scholar
  7. Akerlof, G. A. (1984). Gift exchange and efficiency-wage theory: Four views. The American Economic Review, 74(2), 79–83.Google Scholar
  8. Allen, J., James, A. D., & Gamlen, P. (2007). Formal versus informal knowledge networks in R&D: A case study using social network analysis. R&D Management, 37(3), 179–196.Google Scholar
  9. Anderson, M. H. (2008). Social networks and the cognitive motivation to realize network opportunities: A study of managers’ information gathering behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(1), 51–78.Google Scholar
  10. Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. (2002). The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 979.Google Scholar
  11. Aristoff, D., & Radin, C. (2013). Emergent structures in large networks. Journal of Applied Probability, 50(3), 883–888.Google Scholar
  12. Athanassiou, N. A., & Roth, K. (2006). International experience heterogeneity effects on top management team advice networks: A hierarchical analysis. Management International Review (MIR), 46, 749–769.Google Scholar
  13. Baldwin, T. T., Bedell, M. D., & Johnson, J. L. (1997). The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1369.Google Scholar
  14. Bearman, P. (1997). Generalized exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 102(5), 1383.Google Scholar
  15. Beersma, B., Hollenbeck, J. R., Humphrey, S. E., Moon, H., Conlon, D. E., & Ilgen, D. R. (2003). Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Toward a contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 572–590.Google Scholar
  16. Belliveau, M. A., O’Reilly, C. A., & Wade, J. B. (1996). Social capital at the top: Effects of social similarity and status on CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1568–1593.Google Scholar
  17. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Boissevain, J. (1974). Friends of friends: Networks, manipulators, and coalitions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), 166.Google Scholar
  20. Borgatti, S. P., & Cross, R. (2003). A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49(4), 432–445.Google Scholar
  21. Braha, D., & Bar-Yam, Y. (2004). Information flow structure in large-scale product development organizational networks. Journal of Information Technology (Palgrave Macmillan), 19(4), 244–253.Google Scholar
  22. Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795–817.Google Scholar
  23. Brouthers, K. D., Nakos, G., & Dimitratos, P. (2014). SME entrepreneurial orientation, international performance, and the moderating role of strategic alliances. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, in press.Google Scholar
  24. Burris, V. (2005). Interlocking directorates and political cohesion among corporate elites. American Journal of Sociology, 111(1), 249–283.Google Scholar
  25. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structural of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339–365.Google Scholar
  27. Burt, R. S., & Ronchi, D. (1994). Measuring large networks quickly. Social Networks, 16(2), 91–135.Google Scholar
  28. Carley, K. M., & Krackhardt, D. (1996). Cognitive inconsistencies and non-symmetric friendship. Social Networks, 18(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
  29. Casciaro, T. (1998). Seeing things clearly: Social structure, personality, and accuracy in social network perception. Social Networks, 20(4), 331–351.Google Scholar
  30. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Conell, C., & Voss, K. (1990). Formal organization and the fate of social movements: Craft association and class alliance in the knights of labor. American Sociological Review, 55(2), 255–269.Google Scholar
  32. Contractor, N. S., Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2006). Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 681–703.Google Scholar
  33. Cross, R., & Cummings, J. N. (2004). Tie and networks correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 928–937.Google Scholar
  34. Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2000). A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 26(1), 31–62.Google Scholar
  35. Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2001). Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22(2), 251–283.Google Scholar
  36. Davern, M., & Hachen, D. S. (2006). The role of information and influence in social networks. American Journal of Economics & Sociology, 65(2), 269–293.Google Scholar
  37. de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2012). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek (2. Aufl.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Ebers, M., & Gotsch, W. (2014). Institutionenökonomische Theorien der Organisation. In A. Kieser & M. Ebers (Hrsg.), Organisationstheorien (7. Aufl., S. 195–255). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
  39. Emerson, R. M. (1972a). Exchange theory, part I: A psychological basis for social exchange. In J. Berger, M. J. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Hrsg.), Sociological theories in progress (Bd. 2, S. 38–57). New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  40. Emerson, R. M. (1972b). Exchange theory, part II: Exchange relations and network structures. In J. Berger, M. J. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Hrsg.), Sociological theories in progress (Bd. 2, S. 58–87). New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  41. Fehr, E., Kirchsteiger, G., & Riedl, A. (1998). Gift exchange and reciprocity in competitive experimental markets. European Economic Review, 42(1), 1–34.Google Scholar
  42. Frank, O., & Strauss, D. (1986). Markov graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(395), 832–842.Google Scholar
  43. Frank, K. A., Muller, C., & Mueller, A. S. (2013). The embeddedness of adolescent friendship nominations: The formation of social capital in emergent network structures. American Journal of Sociology, 119(1), 216–253.Google Scholar
  44. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.Google Scholar
  45. Friedkin, N. E. (1981). Information flow through strong and weak ties in intraorganizational social networks. Social Networks, 3, 273–285.Google Scholar
  46. Gargiulo, M., Ertug, G., & Galunic, C. (2009). The two faces of control: Network closure and individual performance among knowledge workers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54, 299–333.Google Scholar
  47. Geletkanycz, M. A., Boyd, B. K., & Finkelstein, S. (2001). The strategic value of CEO external directorate networks: Implications for CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(9), 889.Google Scholar
  48. Gibbons, D. E. (2004). Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 238–262.Google Scholar
  49. Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., & van den Oord, A. (2008). Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Research Policy, 37(10), 1717–1731.Google Scholar
  50. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178.Google Scholar
  51. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.Google Scholar
  52. Gulati, R., & Nickerson, J. A. (2008). Interorganizational trust, governance choice, and exchange performance. Organization Science, 19(5), 688–708.Google Scholar
  53. Hage, J., & Aiken, M. (1967). Relationship of centralization to other structural properties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 72–92.Google Scholar
  54. Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111.Google Scholar
  55. Hardy, C., Phillips, E., & Lawrence, T. B. (2003). Resources, knowledge and influence: The organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration. Journal of Management Studies, 40(2), 321–347.Google Scholar
  56. Hite, J. M., & Hesterly, W. S. (2001). The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 275–286.Google Scholar
  57. Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606.Google Scholar
  58. Husted, B. W. (1994). Transaction costs, norms, and social networks. Business & Society, 33(1), 30.Google Scholar
  59. Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 673–703.Google Scholar
  60. Ingram, P., & Roberts, P. W. (2000). Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. American Journal of Sociology, 106(2), 387–432.Google Scholar
  61. Jablin, F. M. (1987). Formal organizational structure. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Hrsg.), Handbook of organizational communication (S. 389–419). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Jackson, M. O., & Wolinsky, A. (1996). A strategic model of social and economic networks. Journal of Economic Theory, 71(1), 44–74.Google Scholar
  63. Jansen, D. (2004). Networks, social capital and knowledge production. FÖV Discussion Papers (S. 1–40). Speyer.Google Scholar
  64. Jansen, D. (2006). Einführung in die Netzwerkanalyse: Grundlagen, Methoden, Forschungsbeispiele (3. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  65. Kilduff, M., Crossland, C., Tsai, W., & Krackhardt, D. (2008). Organizational network perceptions versus reality: A small world after all? Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 107, 15–28.Google Scholar
  66. Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. (2002). Strategic alliances as social capital: A multidimensional view. Strategic Management Journal, 23(9), 795.Google Scholar
  67. Koka, B. R., Madhavan, R., & Prescott, J. E. (2006). The evolution of interfirm networks: Environmental effects on patterns of network change. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 721–737.Google Scholar
  68. Koskinen, J., & Daraganova, G. (2013). Exponential random graph model fundamentals. In D. Lusher, J. Koskinen, & G. Robins (Hrsg.), Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications (S. 49–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Krackhardt, D. (1987). Cognitive social structures. Social Networks, 9(2), 109–134.Google Scholar
  70. Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 342–369.Google Scholar
  71. Kratzer, J., Gemünden, H. G., & Lettl, C. (2008). Balancing creativity and time efficiency in multi-team R&D projects: The alignment of formal and informal networks. R&D Management, 38, 538–549.Google Scholar
  72. Labianca, G., & Brass, D. J. (2006). Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 596–614.Google Scholar
  73. Labianca, G., Brass, D. J., & Gray, B. (1998). Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 55–67.Google Scholar
  74. Laumann, E. O., & Pappi, F. U. (1976). Networks of collective action: A perspective on community influence systems. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  75. Laumann, E. O., Marsden, P. V., & Prensky, D. (1983). The boundary specification problem in network analysis. In R. S. Burt & M. J. Minor (Hrsg.), Applied network analysis: A methodological introduction (S. 18–34). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  76. Lazega, E. (2003). Rationalité, discipline sociale et structure. Revue Française de Sociologie, 44, 305–330.Google Scholar
  77. Lazega, E. (2009). Cooperation among competitors: Its social mechanisms through network analyses. Sociologica, 1/2009.Google Scholar
  78. Lazega, E., & Pattison, P. E. (1999). Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: A case study. Social Networks, 21, 67–90.Google Scholar
  79. Lazega, E., Jourda, M.-T., Mounier, L., & Stofer, R. (2008). Catching up with big fish in the big pond? Multi-level network analysis through linked design. Social Networks, 30(2), 159–176.Google Scholar
  80. Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477–1490.Google Scholar
  81. Lin, N. (2001a). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Lin, N., Cook, K., & Burt, R. S. (2006). Social Capital. Theory and Research. New Brunswick: Transactions Publishers.Google Scholar
  83. Lomi, A., & Pattison, P. (2006). Manufacturing relations: An empirical study of the organization of production across multiple networks. Organization Science, 17(3), 313–332.Google Scholar
  84. Lusher, D., Koskinen, J., & Robins, G. (2013). Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Ma, X., Yao, X., & Xi, Y. (2009). How do interorganizational and interpersonal networks affect a firm’s strategic adaptive capability in a transition economy? Journal of Business Research, 62(11), 1087–1095.Google Scholar
  86. Marcum, C. S., Bevc, C. A., & Butts, C. T. (2012). Mechanisms of control in emergent interorganizational networks. Policy Studies Journal, 40(3), 516–546.Google Scholar
  87. McDonald, M. L., & Westphal, J. D. (2003). Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs’ advice networks and firms’ strategic responses to poor performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 1–32.Google Scholar
  88. McFadyen, M. A., Semadeni, M., & Cannella, J. A. A. (2009). Value of strong ties to disconnected others: Examining knowledge creation in biomedicine. Organization Science, 20(3), 552–564.Google Scholar
  89. Mehra, A., Dixon, A. L., Brass, D. J., & Robertson, B. (2006). The social network ties of group leaders: Implications for group performance and leader reputation. Organization Science, 17(1), 64–79.Google Scholar
  90. Moran, P. (2005). Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1129–1151.Google Scholar
  91. Moreno, J. L., & Jennings, H. H. (1938). Statistics of social configurations. Sociometry, 1(3/4), 342–374.Google Scholar
  92. Oh, H., Chung, M.-H., & Labianca, G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 860–875.Google Scholar
  93. Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1), 129–141.Google Scholar
  94. Ounnar, F., Pujo, P., Mekaouche, L., & Giambiasi, N. (2007). Customer-supplier relationship management in an intelligent supply chain network. Production Planning & Control, 18, 377–387.Google Scholar
  95. Pallotti, F., Lomi, A., & Mascia, D. (2013). From network ties to network structures: Exponential Random Graph Models of interorganizational relations. Quality & Quantity, 47(3), 1665–1685.Google Scholar
  96. Paruchuri, S. (2010). Intraorganizational networks, interorganizational networks, and the impact of central inventors: A longitudinal study of pharmaceutical firms. Organization Science, 21(1), 63–80.Google Scholar
  97. Pattison, P. E., & Wasserman, S. (1999). Logit models and logistic regression for social networks: II. Multivariate relations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52(2), 169–193.Google Scholar
  98. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Standford: Standford University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Pina-Stranger, A., & Lazega, E. (2011). Bringing personlized ties back in: Their added value for biotech entrepreneurs and venture capitalists interorganizational networks. Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 268–292.Google Scholar
  100. Podolny, J. M., & Baron, J. N. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 673–693.Google Scholar
  101. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.Google Scholar
  102. Provan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33(3), 479–516.Google Scholar
  103. Putzke, J., Fischbach, K., Schoder, D., & Gloor, P. A. (2010). The evolution of interaction networks in massively multiplayer online games. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(2), 69–94.Google Scholar
  104. Raider, H., & Krackhardt, D. (2001). Intraorganizational networks. In J. A. C. Baum (Hrsg.), Companion to organizations (S. 58–74). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  105. Rank, O. N. (2003). Formale und informelle Organisationsstrukturen: Eine Netzwerkanalyse des strategischen Planungs- und Entscheidungsprozesses multinationaler Unternehmen (mir-Edition Aufl.). Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  106. Rank, O. N. (2005). Interdependenzen in den Governance-Strukturen deutscher Großunternehmen. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 75(1), 15–41.Google Scholar
  107. Rank, O. N. (2006). Dynamics of the German governance-network. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft(Special Issue 5/2006), 75–98.Google Scholar
  108. Rank, O. N. (2008). Formal structures and informal networks: Structural analysis in organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(2), 145–161.Google Scholar
  109. Rank, O. N., & Tuschke, A. (2010). Perceived influence and friendship as antecedents of cooperation in top management teams: A network approach. Business Research, 3(2), 151–171.Google Scholar
  110. Rank, O. N., Robins, G. L., & Pattison, P. E. (2010). Structural logic of intraorganizational networks. Organization Science, 21(3), 745–764.Google Scholar
  111. Raz, O., & Gloor, P. A. (2007). Size really matters – New insights for start-ups’ survival. Management Science, 53(2), 169–177.Google Scholar
  112. Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12(4), 502–517.Google Scholar
  113. Riordan, C. M., & Griffeth, R. W. (1995). The opportunity for friendship in the workplace: An underexplored construct. Journal of Business & Psychology, 10(2), 141–154.Google Scholar
  114. Ritala, P., & Ellonen, H.-K. (2010). Competitive advantage in interfirm cooperation: Old and new explanations. Competitiveness Review, 20(5), 367–383.Google Scholar
  115. Robins, G., & Malcolm, A. (2004). Small worlds among interlocking directors: Network structure and distance in bipartite graphs. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 10, 69–94.Google Scholar
  116. Robins, G., Pattison, P. E., & Wasserman, S. (1999). Logit models and logistic regression for social networks: III: Valued relations. Psychometrika, 64(3), 371–394.Google Scholar
  117. Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y., & Lusher, D. (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29(2), 173–191.Google Scholar
  118. Rodan, S., & Galunic, C. (2004). More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 25(6), 541–562.Google Scholar
  119. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students (6. Aufl.). Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  120. Scharpf, F. W. (1993). Coordination in hierarchies and networks. In F. W. Scharpf (Hrsg.), Games in hierarchies and networks: Analytical and empirical approaches to the study of governance institutions (S. 125–165). Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  121. Schmid, S., & Schurig, A. (2003). The development of critical capabilities in foreign subsidiaries: Disentangling the role of the subsidiary’s business network. International Business Review, 12(6), 755–782.Google Scholar
  122. Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Cropanzano, R. S. (2000). The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 294–304.Google Scholar
  123. Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook (2. Aufl.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  124. Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 219–227.Google Scholar
  125. Sheperis, C. J., Young, S. J., & Daniels, H. M. (2010). Counseling research. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  126. Snijders, T. A. B., Pattison, P. E., Robins, G. L., & Handcock, M. S. (2006). New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology, 36(1), 99–153.Google Scholar
  127. Sparrowe, R. T., & Liden, R. C. (2005). Two routes to influence: Integrating leader-member exchange and social network perspectives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(4), 505–535.Google Scholar
  128. Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316–325.Google Scholar
  129. Srivastava, S. B., & Banaji, M. R. (2011). Culture, cognition, and collaborative networks in organizations. American Sociological Review, 76(2), 207–233.Google Scholar
  130. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2014). Pressemitteilung vom 04. März 2014.Google Scholar
  131. Stuart, T. E. (1998). Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3), 668–698.Google Scholar
  132. Tang, J. A., & Beamish, P. W. (2006). Which ties matter when? The strategic impact of network linkages on foreign subsidiary survival. In Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2006/08//2006 (S. V1–V6). Academy of Management.Google Scholar
  133. Tidd, J. (1995). Development of novel products through intraorganizational and interorganizational networks. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(4), 307–322.Google Scholar
  134. Trappmann, M., Hummel, H. J., & Sodeur, W. (2011). Strukturanalyse sozialer Netzwerke: Konzepte, Modelle, Methoden (2. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  135. Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996.Google Scholar
  136. Tsai, W. (2002). Social structure of ‚coopetition‘ within a multiunit organization: Coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2), 179–190.Google Scholar
  137. Umphress, E. E., Labianca, G., Brass, D. J., Kass, E., & Scholten, L. (2003). The role of instrumental and expressive social ties in employees’ perceptions of organizational justice. Organization Science, 14(6), 738–753.Google Scholar
  138. Valjavec, F. (2001). Seßhafte Jäger, akkulturierte Sammler. Zur Cambridge-Enzyklopädie zeitgenössischer Wildbeuter. Anthropos, 96(1), 207–217.Google Scholar
  139. Wald, A. (2005). Zur Effektivität von Organisationsstrukturen: Ein Vergleich formaler Soll- und realisierter Ist-Struktur. Die Unternehmung, 59(2), 161–180.Google Scholar
  140. Wang, P., Sharpe, K., Robins, G. L., & Pattison, P. E. (2009). Exponential random graph (p*) models for affiliation networks. Social Networks, 31(1), 12–25.Google Scholar
  141. Wang, P., Pattison, P., & Robins, G. (2013a). Exponential random graph model specifications for bipartite networks: A dependence hierarchy. Social Networks, 35(2), 211–222.Google Scholar
  142. Wang, P., Robins, G., Pattison, P., & Lazega, E. (2013b). Exponential random graph models for multilevel networks. Social Networks, 35(1), 96–115.Google Scholar
  143. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  144. Wasserman, S., & Pattison, P. E. (1996). Logit models and logistic regression for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p*. Psychometrika, 61(3), 401–425.Google Scholar
  145. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organizations. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
  146. Weyer, J. (Hrsg.). (2011). Soziale Netzwerke: Konzepte und Methoden der sozialwissenschaftlichen Netzwerkforschung (2. Aufl.). München: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
  147. Willer, D., & Skvoretz, J. (1997). Network connection and exchange ratios: Theory, preditions, and experimental tests. Advances in Group Processes, 14, 199–234.Google Scholar
  148. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  149. Yamagishi, T., & Cook, K. S. (1993). Generalized exchange and social dilemmas. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56(4), 235–248.Google Scholar
  150. Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 809–825.Google Scholar
  151. Zhao, Y., & Rank, O. N. (2013). Interdependencies between working relations: Multivariate ERGMs for advice and satisfaction. In D. Lusher, J. Koskinen, & G. Robins (Hrsg.), Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications (S. 213–225). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Betriebswirtschaftliches Seminar III Lehrstuhl f. Organisation u. PersonalAlbert-Ludwigs-Universität FreiburgFreiburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations