Bewertung der Informationsqualität im Enterprise 2.0

  • Sven Ahlheid
  • Gernot Gräfe
  • Alexander Krebs
  • Dirk Schuster
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Die Entwicklungen zum Web 2.0 haben das World Wide Web (WWW) grundlegend verändert. Nachdem die meisten Nutzer im WWW zunächst „nur“ nach Informationen suchten stellen Nutzer inzwischen sehr ausgiebig Informationen über sich selbst oder ihnen vertraute Themen in Blogs und Communities bereit. Facebook und Wikipedia sind zwei prominente Webseiten. Ihre Attraktivität entstammt allein den Informationen, welche die Nutzer selber zur Verfügung stellen.

Literatur

  1. Agichtein, E./Brille, E./Dumais, S.: Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, August 6–11, 2006, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
  2. Antiqueira, L./Graças, M./Nunesm, V./Oliveira, O. N./Da F. Costa, L.: Strong correlations between text quality and complex networks features. In: Physica, A, 373, 2007, S. 811–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumenstock, J. E.: Automatically Assessing the Quality of Wikipedia Articles. School of Information, Paper 2008-021, 2008.Google Scholar
  4. Cao, Q./Duan, W./Gan, Q.: Exploring determinants of voting for the „helpfulness” of online user reviews: A text mining approach. In: Decision Support Systems, 50 (2), 2011, S. 511–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Claypool, M./Le, P./Wased, M./Brown, D.: Implicit interest indicators. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States, January 14–17, 2001, IUI ’01, ACM, New York, NY, 2001, S. 33–40.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, M. D.: Predicting the relevance of a library catalog search. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (10), 2001, S. 813–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DuBay, W. H.: The Principles of Readability. Impact Information, Costa Mesa, Calif., 2004.Google Scholar
  8. Dufty, D./McNamara, D./Louwerse, M./Cai, Z./Graesser, A.: Automatic Evaluation of Aspects of Document Quality. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Design of Communication: The engineering of quality documentation, 2004.Google Scholar
  9. Garnefeld, I./Iseke, A./Krebs, A.: Explicit Incentives in Online Communities: Boon or Bane? In: International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17 (1), 2012, S. 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghose, A./Ipeirotis, P.: Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. In: IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23 (10), 2010, S. 1498–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giles, J.: Internet encyclopedias go head to head. In: Nature, 43, 2005, S. 900–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Golder, S./Huberman, B.: The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems. In: Journal of Information Science 32 (2), 2006, S. 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Graefe, G./Maaß, C./Heß, A.: Alternative Searching Services: Seven Theses on the Importance of “Social Bookmarking”. In: The Social Semantic Web 2007: Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Social Semantic Web (CSSW), GI Edition, Lecture Notes in Informatics, 2007, S. 11–21.Google Scholar
  14. Graesser, A. C./McNamara, D. S./Louwerse, M. M./Cai, Z.: Coh-metrix: analysis of text on cohesion and language. In: Behavior Research Methods 36 (2), 2004, S. 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammwöhner, R./Fuchs, K.-P./Kattenbeck, M./Sax, C.: Qualität der Wikipedia – Eine vergleichende Studie. Internationales Symposium Informationswissenschaft, ISI 2007, Köln, 2007.Google Scholar
  16. Hu, N./Bose, I./Koh, N. S./Liu, L.: Manipulation of online reviews: An analysis of ratings, readability, and sentiments. In: Decision Support Systems, 52 (3), 2012, S. 674–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Joachims, T./Granka, L./Pan, B./Hembrooke, H./Radlinkski, F./Gay, G.: Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in Web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 25 (2), 2007.Google Scholar
  18. Kelly, J. D.: Understanding Implicit Feedback and Document Preference: a Naturalistic User Study. Doctoral Thesis, UMI Order Number: AAI3117613, Rutgers University, 2004.Google Scholar
  19. Kim, J./Oard, D. W./Romanik, K.: Using implicit feedback for user modeling in internet and intranet searching. University of Maryland, CLIS, Technical Report 00–01, 2000.Google Scholar
  20. Koch, M./Richter, A.: Enterprise 2.0– Planung, Einführung und erfolgreicher Einsatz von Social Software in Unternehmen. Oldenburg Wissenschaftsverlag, München, Germany, 2008.Google Scholar
  21. Konstan, J./Miller, B./Maltz, D./Herlocker, J./Gordon, L./Riedl, J.: GroupLens: applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news. Communications of the ACM 40 (3), 1997, S. 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Korfiatis, N./Garcia-Bariocanal, E./Sánchez-Alonso, S.: Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews: The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content. In: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11 (3), 2012, S. 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawrence, S./Bollacker, K./Giles, C. L.: Indexing and retrieval of scientific literature. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (Kansas City, Missouri, United States, November 02–06, 1999), S. Gauch, Ed. CIKM ’99, ACM, New York, NY, 1999, S. 139–146.Google Scholar
  24. Li, M./Huang, L./Tan, C.-H./Wie, K.-K.: Helpfulness of online product reviews as seen by consumers: Source and content features. In: International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17 (4), 2013, S. 101–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lih, A: Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource. 5th International Symposium on Online Journalism, April 16–17, 2004.Google Scholar
  26. Ludwig, S./de Ruyter, K./Friedman, M./Brüggen, E. C./Wetzels, M./Pfann, G.: More than words: The influence of affective content and linguistic style matches in online reviews on conversion rates, In: Journal of Marketing, 77 (1), 2013, S. 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ng, K. B./Kantor, P./Strzalkowski, T./Wacholder, N./Tang, R./Bai, B./Rittman, R./Song, P./Sun, Y.: Automated judgment of document qualities: Research Articles. In: American Society for Information Science & Technology, 57 (9), 2006, S. 1155–1164.Google Scholar
  28. Nichols, D.: Implicit ratings and filtering. In: Proceedings of the 5th DELOS Workshop on Filtering and Collaborative Filtering, Budapest, Hungary 10–12, ERCIM, 1997.Google Scholar
  29. Rheinberg, F.: Intrinsische Motivation und Flow-Erleben. In: Heckhausen, J./Heckhausen, H. (Hrsg.): Motivation und Handeln, 3. Aufl., Heidelberg, 2006, S. 331–354.Google Scholar
  30. Rucker, J./Polanco, M. J.: Siteseer: personalized navigation for the Web. In: Communications of the ACM, 40 (3), 1997, S. 73–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seo, Y./Zhang, B.: Learning user’s preferences by analyzing Web-browsing behaviors. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Barcelona, Spain, June 03–07, 2000), AGENTS ’00, ACM, New York, NY, 2000; S. 381–387.Google Scholar
  32. Stvilia B./Twidale, M. B./Smith, L.C./Gasser, L.: Assessing information quality of a community-based encyclopedia. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality – ICIQ 2005, S. 442–454.Google Scholar
  33. Tang, R./Ng, K. B./Strzalkowski, T./Kantor, P. B.: Automatically Predicting Information Quality in News Documents. In: Proceedings of Human Language Technology – North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2003.Google Scholar
  34. White, R. W.: Implicit Feedback for Interactive Information Retrieval. Doctoral Thesis, Glasgow University, 2004.Google Scholar
  35. Wikimedia Foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_criteria (letzte Änderung vom 29. August 2014, 12:51h) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_criteria (letzte Änderung vom 25. January 2014, 16:41h).
  36. Wikimedia Foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Splitting (letzte Änderung vom 26. August 2014, 16:35h).
  37. Wikimedia Foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_for_nominating_good_articles (letzte Änderung vom 3. August 2014, 00:34h).
  38. Wikimedia Foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism (letzte Änderung vom 5. September 2014, 19:55h).
  39. Willemsen, L. M./Neijens, P. C./Bronner, F./de Ridder, J. A.: “Highly recommended!” The content characteristics and perceived usefulness of online consumer reviews. In: Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17 (1), 2011, S. 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yanbe, Y./Jatowt, A./Nakamura, S./Tanaka, K.: Can social bookmarking enhance search in the web? In: Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Digital Libraries, June 18–23, 2007, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2007, S. 107–116.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sven Ahlheid
    • 1
  • Gernot Gräfe
    • 2
  • Alexander Krebs
    • 1
  • Dirk Schuster
    • 1
  1. 1.Atos IT Solutions and Services GmbHC-LABPaderbornDeutschland
  2. 2.Siemens AGEnergy ManagementNürnbergDeutschland

Personalised recommendations