Multiple Challenges

Nuclear Waste Governance in the United Kingdom
Chapter
Part of the Energiepolitik und Klimaschutz. Energy Policy and Climate Protection book series (EPKS)

Abstract

The United Kingdom has a long history of both military and civilian activity in nuclear technology. In the early days of nuclear development, especially the 1950s, there was neglect of waste management, and this neglect has serious consequences in the present. It leads directly to the first major challenge for UK nuclear waste governance: extracting, characterising and safely packaging large quantities of legacy wastes, especially those held at Sellafield. Much more publicity attaches to the second challenge, which is the search for an acceptable long-term management route for wastes, especially the search for a suitable and acceptable site for deep geological disposal of higher activity wastes.

Keywords

Transportation Uranium Immobilization Drilling Expense 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Broomby, R. (2013, November 6). Hinkley Firm Denies Fuel Claim. BBC News, Science & Environment. http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-24834932.
  2. Committee on Radioactive Waste Management (CoRWM) (2006): Managing our radioactive waste safely. CoRWM’s recommendations to Government Doc 700, July.Google Scholar
  3. CoRWM (2007). The CoRWM process – lessons learned. Doc 1896 September. Defra (2008). Managing radioactive waste safely: a framework for implementing geological disposal Cm 7386, June.Google Scholar
  4. Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) (2011). The Energy Act 2008. Government response to the consultation on the amendment to the radioactive waste and decommissioning (Finance and Fees) regulations 2011, February.Google Scholar
  5. DECC (2013a). Management of the UK’s plutonium stocks: consultation responses, 24 February.Google Scholar
  6. DECC (2013b). Managing radioactive waste safely: implementing geological disposal. Annual report April 2012–March 2013.Google Scholar
  7. DECC (2013c). Review of the Siting Process for a Geological Disposal Facility, URN13D/250, September.Google Scholar
  8. House of Commons Public Accounts Committee (2013). Nuclear Decommissioning Authority: Managing Risk at Sellafield HC 746 4 February.Google Scholar
  9. KPMG (2013). The PBO Model at Sellafield: Performance to 31st May 2013. Final Report, September.Google Scholar
  10. MacKerron, G. (2012). Evaluation of nuclear decommissioning and waste management. A report commissioned by the Department of Energy and Climate Change, March.Google Scholar
  11. MacKerron, G., and Berkhout, F. (2009). Learning to listen: institutional change and legitimation in UK radioactive waste policy, Journal of Risk Research, 12 (7–8): 989–1008.Google Scholar
  12. National Nuclear Laboratory (2013). ‘Plutonium Disposition – Immobilisation of Pu residues’ presented to IPFM, London, March.Google Scholar
  13. Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) (2013a). Annual Report and Accounts 2012/2013 HC236 June.Google Scholar
  14. NDA (2013b). Geological disposal: RWMD approach to issues management Report NDA/RWMD/081 Version 3.Google Scholar
  15. NDA/ DECC (2010). Radioactive Waste in the UK: A Summary of the 2010 Inventory. http://www.nda.gov.uk/ukinventory/documents/Reports/upload/2010-UKRadioactive-Waste-Inventory-Summary-of-the-2010-Inventory.pdf, last accessed 9 June 2014.
  16. Nuclear Liabilities Fund (NLF) (2012). Nuclear Liabilities Fund Limited Annual Report for the Year ended 31 March 2012.Google Scholar
  17. NLF (2013). http://www.nlf.uk.net/news.html, last access 9 June 2014.
  18. Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) (2013). Annual figures for holdings of civil unirradiated plutonium 2013.Google Scholar
  19. World Nuclear News (2013). UK swaps plutonium to balance MOX policies, 23 April 2013.Google Scholar
  20. Wald, M. (2013, June 25). US moves to abandon costly reactor fuel plant. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/26/us/us-moves-to-abandon-costly-reactorfuel-plant.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0, last access 9 June 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SPRUUniversity of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations