Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diversity Kompetenz, soziale Verantwortung und Führungspersönlichkeit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Diversity Kompetenz

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Psychologie ((SRP))

  • 788k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der vorliegende Beitrag thematisiert Diversity Kompetenz und deren Zusammenhänge zu sozialer Verantwortung und Führungspersönlichkeit. Hierfür wird der Begriff der Diversität zunächst vorgestellt und es werden aktuelle Trends in der Gesellschaft und Wirtschaft näher beleuchtet, wie mit dem Thema der (kulturellen) Diversität in diesen Bereichen aktuell umgegangen wird. Als weitere wichtige Grundlagen für das Thema des vorliegenden Beitrages wird das Konstrukt der sozialen Diskriminierung eingehend beleuchtet und auf die Gründe ihrer Entstehung, Wirkung und Aufrechterhaltung eingegangen. Dabei werden weiterhin Ansätze zur Reduktion der sozialen Diskriminierung aufgezeigt, die sich in den Bereichen der Persönlichkeit und Führung, aber auch auf der Gruppen- und organisationalen Ebene finden lassen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2004). Sozialpsychologie, (4. Aufl.). München: Pearson Studium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2008). Sozialpsychologie. München: Pearson Studium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism-popularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 132–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R. A. (1994). The rethinking of leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 1, 46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baughman, H., Dearing, S., Giammarco, E., & Vernon, P. (2012). Relationship between bullying behaviours and the dark triad: A study with adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 571–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. H. A., & O’Hair, H. D. (2007). Machiavellians’ motives in organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35, 246–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benet-Martínez, V., & Haritatos, J. (2005). Bicultural identity integration (BII): Components and psychological antecedents. Journal of Personality, 73, 1015–1050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. J. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In M. R. Paige (Hrsg.), Education for the intercultural experience (S. 21–71). Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. S., & Salipante, P. F. (2011). The Practices of a non-diversity-focused organization and their impact on its members’ intercultural behavioral comfort. SSRN Journal. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1839840. Zugegriffen am 23.07.2015.

  • Bierhoff, H. W., & Frey, D. (Hrsg.). (2006). Handbuch der Sozialpsychologie und Kommunikationspsychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, C. A., Hoffman, B. J., & Helland, K. R. (2008). Narcissism in organizations: A multisource appraisal reflects different perspectives. Human Performance, 21, 254–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunell, A. B., Gentry, W. A., Campbell, W. K., Hoffman, B. J., Kuhnert, K. W., & DeMarree, K. G. (2008). Leader emergence: The case of the narcissistic leader. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1663–1676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (BPB). (2014). Migration und Integration. http://www.bpb.de/izpb/198020/migration-und-integration?p=all. Zugegriffen am 22.07.2015

  • Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 219–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W. K., & Foster, C. A. (2002). Narcissism and commitment in romantic relationships: An investment model analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 484–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W. K., Foster, C. A., & Finkel, E. J. (2002). Does self-love lead to love for others? A story of narcissistic game playing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 340–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Kupersmidt, J. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Hrsg.), Peer rejection in childhood (S. 17–59). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crysel, L. C., Crosier, B. S., & Webster, G. D. (2013). The Dark Triad and risk behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deluga, R. J. (1997). Relationship among American presidential charismatic leadership, narcissism, and rated performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 8, 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deluga, R. J. (2001). American presidential Machiavellianism: Implications for charismatic leadership and rated performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 339–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, P., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., Dastmalchian, A., & House, R. (2012). GLOBE: A twenty year journey into the intriguing world of culture and leadership. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 504–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (1996). Affirmative action, unintentional racial biases, and intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 52(4), 51–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drory, A., & Gluskinos, U. M. (1980). Machiavellianism and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 81–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, B., Samsom, D., & Paulhus, D. L. (1992). The construct of Machiavellianism: Twenty years later. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Hrsg.), Advances in personality assessment (Bd. 9, S. 77–116). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardenswartz, L., & Rowe, A. (1995). Managing diversity. Sydney: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutting, D. (2012). Diversity Management als Führungsaufgabe. In S. Grote (Hrsg.), Die Zukunft der Führung (S. 119–129). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Güttler, P. O. (1996). Sozialpsychologie. München: Oldenburg Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. L., & Gifford, R. K. (1976). Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 392–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (1985). The psychopathy checklist. Unpublished manuscript. University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (1996). Psychopathy: A clinical construct whose time has come. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23(1), 25–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. D. (2003). The hare psychopathy checklist-revised (PCL-R), (2. Aufl.). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 279–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herwartz-Emden, L., & Strasser, J. (2013). Interkulturalität und Sozialisation. In P. Genkova, T. Ringeisen, & F. T. L. Leong (Hrsg.), Handbuch Stress und Kultur. Interkulturelle und kulturvergleichende Perspektiven (S. 361–380). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, K., Nokelainen, P., & Tirri, K. (2009). Relationship of gender and academic achievement to Finnish students’ intercultural sensitivity. High Ability Studies, 20(2), 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ickes, W., Reidhead, S., & Patterson, M. (1986). Machiavellianism and self-monitoring: As different as „me“ and „you“. Social Cognition, 4, 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., & Tost, J. (2010). I just cannot control myself: The Dark Triad and self-control. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 611–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2012). A protean approach to social influence. Dark Triad personalities and social influence tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 512–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Hrsg.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (S. 102–120). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Kosalka, T. (2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 855–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungbauer-Gans, M. (2012). Call for Papers zum Thema „Theoretische und methodische Konzepte von Diversität“. http://www.soziologie.de/de/nc/aktuell/call-for-papers/cfp-archiv-detailansicht/archive/2012/02/21/article/cfp-theoretische-und-methodische-konzepte-von-diversitaet.html. Zugegriffen am 28.10. 2013.

  • Kraske, M. (2012). Vielfalt in der Belegschaft zahlt sich aus. http://www.zeit.de/karriere/beruf/2012-04/diversity-unternehmen. Zugegriffen am 07.01.2013.

  • Krell, G. (2008). Chancengleichheit durch Personalpolitik. Gleichstellung von Frauen und Männern in Unternehmen und Verwaltungen. Rechtliche Regelungen – Problemanalysen – Lösungen. Cham: SpringerLink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupka, B., Everett, A. M., Atkins, S. G., Mertesacker, M., Walters, L., Walters, T., et al. (2009). The intercultural communication motivation scale: An instrument to assess motivational training needs of candidates for international assignments. Human Resource Management Review, 48(5), 717–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutzner, E. (2013). Diversity-Management – Schlagwort oder ernstzunehmendes Führungsinstrument? http://www.online-diversity.de/rubriken/Diversity_Management/. Zugegriffen am 28.10.2013.

  • Luijters, K., van der Zee, K. I., & Otten, S. (2008). Cultural diversity in organizations: Enhancing identification by valuing differences. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(2), 154–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matkin, G. S., & Barbuto, J. E. (2012). Demographic similarity/difference, intercultural sensitivity, and leader-member exchange: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 19(3), 294–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In J. D. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Hrsg.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism (S. 91–125). Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHoskey, J. W. (1999). Machiavellianism, intrinsic versus extrinsic goals, and social interest: A self-determination theory analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 23, 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. J., Kim, J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2011). Validating the riverside acculturation stress inventory with Asian Americans. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 300–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of Narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’ Boyle, E. H., Jr., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & Mc Daniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behaviour: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). Deutsche Ämter brauchen mehr Migranten. http://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2013-05/oecd-studie-migranten-oeffentlicher-dienst. Zugegriffen am 28.10.2013.

  • OECD. (2015). Indicators of immigrant integration 2015. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/8115051e.pdf?expires=1437562491&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=149ED4094B62597820D7489D5ACC9551. Zugegriffen am 22.07.2015.

  • Pepper, M. B., Tredennick, L., & Reyes, R. F. (2010). Transparency and trust as antecedents to perceptions of commitment to stated diversity goals. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 3(3), 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, D. L. (2003). Handbook of diversity management. Lanham: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rauthmann, J. F. (2011). Acquisitive or protective self-presentation of dark personalities? Associations among the Dark Triad and selfmonitoring. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 502–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauthmann, J. F., & Will, T. (2011). Proposing a multidimensional Machiavellianism conceptualization. Social Behavior and Personality, 39, 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodewalt, F., & Eddings, S. (2002). Narcissus reflects: Memory distortion in response to ego relevant feedback in high and low narcissistic men. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockstuhl, T., Dulebohn, J. H., Ang, S., & Shore, L. M. (2012). Leader–member exchange (LMX) and culture: A meta-analysis of correlates of LMX across 23 countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1097–1130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth century England. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagener, N. (2013). Der Staat verschläft die Integration. Zeit online. http://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2013-05/integrationsgipfel-arbeitsmarkt-oeffentlicher-dienst. Zugegriffen am 29.10.2013.

  • Salekin, R. T., Leistico, A.-M. R., & Mullins-Nelson, J. L. (2006). Psychopathy, empathy, and perspective-taking ability in a community sample: Implications for the successful psychopathy concept. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 5, 133–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Burks, J., Bartel, C. A., & Blount, S. (2009). Performance in intercultural interactions at work: Cross-cultural differences in response to behavioral mirroring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 216–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment (Bd. 10). Norman: University Book Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stuber, M. (2009). Diversity: Das Potenzial-Prinzip. Ressourcen aktivieren – Zusammenarbeit gestalten. Köln: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.). The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslucan, H.-H. (2013). Belastungen und Unterstützungspotenziale von Migranten. In P. Genkova, T. Ringeisen, & F. T. L. Leong (Hrsg.), Handbuch Stress und Kultur. Interkulturelle und kulturvergleichende Perspektiven (S. 381–395). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Veselka, L., Schermer, J. A., & Vertnon, P. A. (2012). The Dark Triad and an expanded framework of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 417–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. M., Nathanson, C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2003). Structure and validity of the self-report psychopathy scale-III in normal populations. In Presentation at the 11th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S., Near, D. C., & Miller, R. R. (1998). Individual differences in Machiavellianism as a mix of cooperative and exploitative strategies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakunina, E. S., Weigold, I. K., Weigold, A., Hercegovac, S., & Elsayed, N. (2012). The multicultural personality: Does it predict international students’ openness to diversity and adjustment? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(4), 533–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. M., & Pinsky, D. (2006). Narcissism and celebrity. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 463–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zick, A. (2010): Psychologie der Akkulturation: Neufassung eines Forschungsbereiches. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Redfield, Linton & Herskovits, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wirtschaftspsychologie, University of Applied Sciences Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Deutschland

    Petia Genkova

Authors
  1. Petia Genkova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petia Genkova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hochschule Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany

    Petia Genkova

  2. Hochschule Merseburg, Merseburg, Germany

    Tobias Ringeisen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Genkova, P. (2016). Diversity Kompetenz, soziale Verantwortung und Führungspersönlichkeit. In: Genkova, P., Ringeisen, T. (eds) Handbuch Diversity Kompetenz. Springer Reference Psychologie . Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08594-0_51

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08594-0_51

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-08593-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-08594-0

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation