Advertisement

Diversity Kompetenz, soziale Verantwortung und Führungspersönlichkeit

Chapter
Part of the Springer Reference Psychologie book series (SRP)

Zusammenfassung

Der vorliegende Beitrag thematisiert Diversity Kompetenz und deren Zusammenhänge zu sozialer Verantwortung und Führungspersönlichkeit. Hierfür wird der Begriff der Diversität zunächst vorgestellt und es werden aktuelle Trends in der Gesellschaft und Wirtschaft näher beleuchtet, wie mit dem Thema der (kulturellen) Diversität in diesen Bereichen aktuell umgegangen wird. Als weitere wichtige Grundlagen für das Thema des vorliegenden Beitrages wird das Konstrukt der sozialen Diskriminierung eingehend beleuchtet und auf die Gründe ihrer Entstehung, Wirkung und Aufrechterhaltung eingegangen. Dabei werden weiterhin Ansätze zur Reduktion der sozialen Diskriminierung aufgezeigt, die sich in den Bereichen der Persönlichkeit und Führung, aber auch auf der Gruppen- und organisationalen Ebene finden lassen.

Schlüsselwörter

Führung Diskriminierung Stress und Kultur Interkulturalität 

Literatur

  1. Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2004). Sozialpsychologie, (4. Aufl.). München: Pearson Studium.Google Scholar
  2. Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2008). Sozialpsychologie. München: Pearson Studium.Google Scholar
  3. Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism-popularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 132–145.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker, R. A. (1994). The rethinking of leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 1, 46–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baughman, H., Dearing, S., Giammarco, E., & Vernon, P. (2012). Relationship between bullying behaviours and the dark triad: A study with adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 571–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, J. H. A., & O’Hair, H. D. (2007). Machiavellians’ motives in organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35, 246–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benet-Martínez, V., & Haritatos, J. (2005). Bicultural identity integration (BII): Components and psychological antecedents. Journal of Personality, 73, 1015–1050.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett, M. J. (1993). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In M. R. Paige (Hrsg.), Education for the intercultural experience (S. 21–71). Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bernstein, R. S., & Salipante, P. F. (2011). The Practices of a non-diversity-focused organization and their impact on its members’ intercultural behavioral comfort. SSRN Journal. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1839840. Zugegriffen am 23.07.2015.
  10. Bierhoff, H. W., & Frey, D. (Hrsg.). (2006). Handbuch der Sozialpsychologie und Kommunikationspsychologie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  11. Blair, C. A., Hoffman, B. J., & Helland, K. R. (2008). Narcissism in organizations: A multisource appraisal reflects different perspectives. Human Performance, 21, 254–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brunell, A. B., Gentry, W. A., Campbell, W. K., Hoffman, B. J., Kuhnert, K. W., & DeMarree, K. G. (2008). Leader emergence: The case of the narcissistic leader. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1663–1676.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (BPB). (2014). Migration und Integration. http://www.bpb.de/izpb/198020/migration-und-integration?p=all. Zugegriffen am 22.07.2015
  14. Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 219–229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Campbell, W. K., & Foster, C. A. (2002). Narcissism and commitment in romantic relationships: An investment model analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 484–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell, W. K., Foster, C. A., & Finkel, E. J. (2002). Does self-love lead to love for others? A story of narcissistic game playing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 340–354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Kupersmidt, J. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Hrsg.), Peer rejection in childhood (S. 17–59). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Crysel, L. C., Crosier, B. S., & Webster, G. D. (2013). The Dark Triad and risk behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Deluga, R. J. (1997). Relationship among American presidential charismatic leadership, narcissism, and rated performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 8, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deluga, R. J. (2001). American presidential Machiavellianism: Implications for charismatic leadership and rated performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 12, 339–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dorfman, P., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., Dastmalchian, A., & House, R. (2012). GLOBE: A twenty year journey into the intriguing world of culture and leadership. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 504–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (1996). Affirmative action, unintentional racial biases, and intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 52(4), 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Drory, A., & Gluskinos, U. M. (1980). Machiavellianism and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fehr, B., Samsom, D., & Paulhus, D. L. (1992). The construct of Machiavellianism: Twenty years later. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Hrsg.), Advances in personality assessment (Bd. 9, S. 77–116). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Gardenswartz, L., & Rowe, A. (1995). Managing diversity. Sydney: Irwin.Google Scholar
  27. Gutting, D. (2012). Diversity Management als Führungsaufgabe. In S. Grote (Hrsg.), Die Zukunft der Führung (S. 119–129). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Güttler, P. O. (1996). Sozialpsychologie. München: Oldenburg Verlag.Google Scholar
  29. Hamilton, D. L., & Gifford, R. K. (1976). Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 392–407.Google Scholar
  30. Hare, R. D. (1985). The psychopathy checklist. Unpublished manuscript. University of British Columbia, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  31. Hare, R. D. (1996). Psychopathy: A clinical construct whose time has come. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23(1), 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hare, R. D. (2003). The hare psychopathy checklist-revised (PCL-R), (2. Aufl.). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  33. Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 279–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Herwartz-Emden, L., & Strasser, J. (2013). Interkulturalität und Sozialisation. In P. Genkova, T. Ringeisen, & F. T. L. Leong (Hrsg.), Handbuch Stress und Kultur. Interkulturelle und kulturvergleichende Perspektiven (S. 361–380). Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holm, K., Nokelainen, P., & Tirri, K. (2009). Relationship of gender and academic achievement to Finnish students’ intercultural sensitivity. High Ability Studies, 20(2), 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ickes, W., Reidhead, S., & Patterson, M. (1986). Machiavellianism and self-monitoring: As different as „me“ and „you“. Social Cognition, 4, 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jonason, P. K., & Tost, J. (2010). I just cannot control myself: The Dark Triad and self-control. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 611–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2012). A protean approach to social influence. Dark Triad personalities and social influence tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 512–526.Google Scholar
  39. Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Hrsg.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (S. 102–120). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  40. Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Kosalka, T. (2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 855–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jungbauer-Gans, M. (2012). Call for Papers zum Thema „Theoretische und methodische Konzepte von Diversität“. http://www.soziologie.de/de/nc/aktuell/call-for-papers/cfp-archiv-detailansicht/archive/2012/02/21/article/cfp-theoretische-und-methodische-konzepte-von-diversitaet.html. Zugegriffen am 28.10. 2013.
  42. Kraske, M. (2012). Vielfalt in der Belegschaft zahlt sich aus. http://www.zeit.de/karriere/beruf/2012-04/diversity-unternehmen. Zugegriffen am 07.01.2013.
  43. Krell, G. (2008). Chancengleichheit durch Personalpolitik. Gleichstellung von Frauen und Männern in Unternehmen und Verwaltungen. Rechtliche Regelungen – Problemanalysen – Lösungen. Cham: SpringerLink.Google Scholar
  44. Kupka, B., Everett, A. M., Atkins, S. G., Mertesacker, M., Walters, L., Walters, T., et al. (2009). The intercultural communication motivation scale: An instrument to assess motivational training needs of candidates for international assignments. Human Resource Management Review, 48(5), 717–744.Google Scholar
  45. Kutzner, E. (2013). Diversity-Management – Schlagwort oder ernstzunehmendes Führungsinstrument? http://www.online-diversity.de/rubriken/Diversity_Management/. Zugegriffen am 28.10.2013.
  46. Luijters, K., van der Zee, K. I., & Otten, S. (2008). Cultural diversity in organizations: Enhancing identification by valuing differences. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(2), 154–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Matkin, G. S., & Barbuto, J. E. (2012). Demographic similarity/difference, intercultural sensitivity, and leader-member exchange: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 19(3), 294–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In J. D. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Hrsg.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism (S. 91–125). Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  49. McHoskey, J. W. (1999). Machiavellianism, intrinsic versus extrinsic goals, and social interest: A self-determination theory analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 23, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller, M. J., Kim, J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2011). Validating the riverside acculturation stress inventory with Asian Americans. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 300–310.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of Narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99–128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. O’ Boyle, E. H., Jr., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & Mc Daniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the Dark Triad and work behaviour: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. OECD. (2013). Deutsche Ämter brauchen mehr Migranten. http://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2013-05/oecd-studie-migranten-oeffentlicher-dienst. Zugegriffen am 28.10.2013.
  55. Pepper, M. B., Tredennick, L., & Reyes, R. F. (2010). Transparency and trust as antecedents to perceptions of commitment to stated diversity goals. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 3(3), 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Plummer, D. L. (2003). Handbook of diversity management. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  57. Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Rauthmann, J. F. (2011). Acquisitive or protective self-presentation of dark personalities? Associations among the Dark Triad and selfmonitoring. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 502–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rauthmann, J. F., & Will, T. (2011). Proposing a multidimensional Machiavellianism conceptualization. Social Behavior and Personality, 39, 391–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rhodewalt, F., & Eddings, S. (2002). Narcissus reflects: Memory distortion in response to ego relevant feedback in high and low narcissistic men. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rockstuhl, T., Dulebohn, J. H., Ang, S., & Shore, L. M. (2012). Leader–member exchange (LMX) and culture: A meta-analysis of correlates of LMX across 23 countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1097–1130.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth century England. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  63. Sagener, N. (2013). Der Staat verschläft die Integration. Zeit online. http://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2013-05/integrationsgipfel-arbeitsmarkt-oeffentlicher-dienst. Zugegriffen am 29.10.2013.
  64. Salekin, R. T., Leistico, A.-M. R., & Mullins-Nelson, J. L. (2006). Psychopathy, empathy, and perspective-taking ability in a community sample: Implications for the successful psychopathy concept. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 5, 133–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sanchez-Burks, J., Bartel, C. A., & Blount, S. (2009). Performance in intercultural interactions at work: Cross-cultural differences in response to behavioral mirroring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 216–223.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment (Bd. 10). Norman: University Book Exchange.Google Scholar
  67. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stuber, M. (2009). Diversity: Das Potenzial-Prinzip. Ressourcen aktivieren – Zusammenarbeit gestalten. Köln: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  69. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.). The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  70. Uslucan, H.-H. (2013). Belastungen und Unterstützungspotenziale von Migranten. In P. Genkova, T. Ringeisen, & F. T. L. Leong (Hrsg.), Handbuch Stress und Kultur. Interkulturelle und kulturvergleichende Perspektiven (S. 381–395). Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Veselka, L., Schermer, J. A., & Vertnon, P. A. (2012). The Dark Triad and an expanded framework of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Williams, K. M., Nathanson, C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2003). Structure and validity of the self-report psychopathy scale-III in normal populations. In Presentation at the 11th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
  73. Wilson, D. S., Near, D. C., & Miller, R. R. (1998). Individual differences in Machiavellianism as a mix of cooperative and exploitative strategies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yakunina, E. S., Weigold, I. K., Weigold, A., Hercegovac, S., & Elsayed, N. (2012). The multicultural personality: Does it predict international students’ openness to diversity and adjustment? International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(4), 533–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Young, S. M., & Pinsky, D. (2006). Narcissism and celebrity. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zick, A. (2010): Psychologie der Akkulturation: Neufassung eines Forschungsbereiches. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Redfield, Linton & Herskovits, 1936.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WirtschaftspsychologieUniversity of Applied Sciences OsnabrückOsnabrückDeutschland

Personalised recommendations