Neil Fligstein: The Architecture of Markets

Chapter
Part of the Wirtschaft + Gesellschaft book series (WUG)

Zusammenfassung

In der Monografie The Architecture of Markets entwickelt Neil Fligstein einen eigenständigen Ansatz der wirtschaftssoziologischen Forschung, den er selbst als „political-cultural approach“ bezeichnet. Eine Besonderheit des Ansatzes ist die handlungstheoretische Fundierung, die das Motiv der Existenzsicherung ins Zentrum der Überlegungen rückt. Der Ansatz setzt sich damit bewusst ab von ökonomischen Theorien, in denen die Profitmaximierung als handlungsleitend angenommen wird.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Aguilera, R. V. 2002. Review of The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies by Neil Fligstein. In: Academy of Management Review 27, S. 304–306.Google Scholar
  2. Berle, A. A., Means, G. C. 1967. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, 2nd Edition. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. 1972. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chandler, A. 1962. Strategy and Structure. Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chandler, A. 1990. Scale and Scope. The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. DiMaggio, P. 1985. Structural Analysis of Organizational Fields: A Blockmodel Approach. In: Research in Organizational Behavior 8, S. 335–370.Google Scholar
  7. DiMaggio, P., Powell, W. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. In: American Sociological Review 48, S. 147–160.Google Scholar
  8. Dobbin, F. 2002. Markets are Social Animals. In: Contexts, Summer, S. 64–65.Google Scholar
  9. Donaldson, L. 1995. American Anti-Management Theories of Organization. A Critique of Paradigm Proliferation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fligstein, N. 1990. The Transformation of Corporate Control. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fligstein, N. 2008. Euroclash: The EU, European Identity, and the Future of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fligstein, N., Mc Adam, D. 2012. A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Goldstone, J. A., Useem, B. 2012. Putting Values and Institutions Back into the Theory of Strategic Action Fields. In: Sociological Theory 30, S. 37–47.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, P. A., Soskice, D. (Hrsg.). 2001. Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hess, D. J. 2012. A Theory of Fields: A Review, Mobilizing Ideas, https://mobilizingideas.word-press.com/2012/06/13/a-theory-of-fields-a-review/ (Abfrage: 18.11.2015)
  16. Hollingsworth, J. R., Schmitter, P. C., Streeck, W. (Hrsg.). 1994. Governing Capitalist Economies: Performance and Control of Economic Sectors. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jasper, J. M. 2014. Review of „A Theory of Fields“. In: Cultural Sociology 8, S. 212–219.Google Scholar
  18. Lutter, M. 2012. Besprechung von Neil Fligstein „Die Architektur der Märkte“. In: Soziologische Revue 35, S. 78–80.Google Scholar
  19. Meyer, J., Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. In: American Journal of Sociology 83, S. 340–363.Google Scholar
  20. Mintz, B. A., Schwartz, M. 1985. The Power Structure of American Business. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G. R. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  22. Sparsam, J. 2015. Wirtschaft in der New Economic Sociology – Eine Systematisierung und Kritik. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut f. SoziologieUniversität HamburgHamburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations