Skip to main content

Margaret S. Archer und die Kultursoziologie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Kultursoziologie

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften ((SRS))

  • 5509 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In der Tradition des Kritischen Realismus vertritt Margaret S. Archer eine soziologische Kulturtheorie, die Kultur als eine gegenüber sozialen Strukturen und Beziehungen autonome Sphäre auffasst. Der Beitrag stellt die argumentativen Begründungen für diese Position dar und verortet diese im Kontext zeitgenössischer kultursoziologischer Forschung. Von besonderer Relevanz ist diesbezüglich die Kritik von Archer an solchen Theorien, die der Kultur die Funktion sozialer Integration zusprechen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Archer, Margaret S. 1979. Social origins of educational systems. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 1985. The myth of cultural integration. British Journal of Sociology 36:333–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 1988. Culture and agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 1995. Realist social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 1996a. Social integration and system integration. Sociology 30:679–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 1996b. Morphogenesis versus structuration on combining structure and action. In Anthony giddens. Critical assessments, Hrsg. Christopher G. A. Bryant und David Jary, Bd. 2, 25–52. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 2000. For structure: Its reality, properties and powers. A reply to Anthony King. The Sociological Review 48:464–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 2005. Structure, culture and agency. In The Blackwell companion to the sociology of culture, Hrsg. Mark D. Jacobs und Nancy Weiss Hanrahan, 17–34. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 2007a. Making our way through the world. Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 2007b. The ontological status of subjectivity: The missing link between structure and agency. In Contributions to social ontology, Hrsg. Clive Lawson et al., 17–31. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 2007c. The trajectory of the morphogenetic approach. An account in the first person. Sociologia, Problemas E Prácticas 54:35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 2011. Morphogenesis: Realism’s explanatory framework. In Sociological realism, Hrsg. Andrea M. Maccarini et al., 59–95. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S. 2012. The reflexive imperative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S., Hrsg. 2015a. Generative mechanisms transforming the social order. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S., Hrsg. 2015b. Social morphogenesis. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S., Hrsg. 2017. Morphogenesis and human flourishing. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Margaret S., und Dave Elder-Vass. 2012. Cultural system or norm cycles. European Journal of Social Theory 15(1): 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, Roy. 1975. A realist theory of science. Hassocks: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, Roy. 1979. The possibility of naturalism. Brighton: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, Walter. 1967. Sociology and modern systems theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati, Pierpaolo, und Margaret S. Archer. 2015. The relational subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elder-Vass, Dave. 2007a. For emergence: refining Archer’s account of social structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37:25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder-Vass, Dave. 2007b. Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu in an emergentist theory of action. Sociological Theory 25:325–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elder-Vass, Dave. 2010. The casual power of social structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elder-Vass, Dave. 2014. Social entitites and the basic of their powers. In Rethinking the individualism-holism-debate, Hrsg. Julie Zahle und Fion Colin, 39–53. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob. 1986. Der Gedanke. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Anthony. 1999. Against structure. A critique of morphogenetic social theory. The Sociological Review 47(2): 199–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Anthony. 2010. The odd couple. Margaret Archer, Anthony Giddens and British social theory. The British Journal of Sociology 61:253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Tony, und Andrew Collier, Hrsg. 1998. Critical realism. Essential readings. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, David. 1964. Social integration and system integration. In Explorations in social change, Hrsg. George K. Zollschan und Walter Hirsch, 244–257. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. 1973. Objektive Erkenntnis. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeuner, Lilli. 1999. Margaret Archer on structural and cultural morphogenesis. Acta Sociologica 42(1): 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeuner, Lilli. 2001. Theory of culture. Margaret Archer versus classical sociology. Cultural Dynamics 13(1): 92–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Schützeichel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schützeichel, R. (2019). Margaret S. Archer und die Kultursoziologie. In: Moebius, S., Nungesser, F., Scherke, K. (eds) Handbuch Kultursoziologie. Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07616-0_69

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07616-0_69

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-07615-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-07616-0

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics