Advertisement

Aktuelle Fragen der Stadtgeographie

  • Ulrich JürgensEmail author
Chapter
  • 3.9k Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Es werden verschiedene Fragesets identifiziert, die teils über mehrere Jahrzehnte den stadtgeographischen Mainstream dominiert haben. Aufgezeigt wird, wie sich das Fach in Inhalten, Methoden, Theorien und vor allem in seinem konstituierenden Raumverständnis diversifiziert, spezialisiert, regionalisiert und „enträumlicht“ hat und welche Potenziale sich hieraus für die aktuelle Stadtgeographie zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts ergeben.

Schlüsselwörter

Stadtstrukturen Stadtdefinitionen Critical urban theory Emancipatory city Smart city 

Literatur

  1. Aldrich, R. (2004). Homosexuality and the city: An historical overview. Urban Studies, 41(9) 1719–1737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altshuler, A., & Luberoff, D. (2003). Megaprojects. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  3. Annes, A., & Redlin, M. (2012). Coming out and coming back: Rural gay migration and the city. Journal of Rural Studies, 28, 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong, E. A. (2002). Forging gay identities: Organizing sexuality in San Francisco 1950–1994. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Attoh, K. (2011). What kind of right is the right to the city? Progress in Human Geography, 35(5), 669–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Augé, M. (2012). Nicht-Orte (3. Aufl.). München: Beck.Google Scholar
  7. Aurousseau, M. (1924). Recent contributions to urban geography. Geographical Review, 14(3), 444–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Badgett, M. (2001). Money, myths, and change: The economic lives of lesbians and gay men. Chigaco: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bähr, J., & Jürgens, U. (2005). Regionale Stadtgeographie. Braunschweig: Westermann.Google Scholar
  10. Bähr, J., Jentsch, C., & Kuls, W. (1992). Bevölkerungsgeographie. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  11. Balooni, K., Gangopadhyay, K., & Kumar, B. (2014). Governance for private green spaces in a growing Indian city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 123, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blakely, E., & Snyder, M. (1997). Fortress America: Gated communities in the United States. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  13. Blomley, N. (2006). Uncritical critical geography? Progress in Human Geography, 30(1), 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blomley, N. (2007). Critical geography: Anger and hope. Progress in Human Geography, 31(1), 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blomley, N. (2008). The spaces of critical geography. Progress in Human Geography, 32(2), 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Booth, C. (1889 ff.). Life and Labour of the people in London. London (Vol. 17) – veröff. Charles Booth’s London (1968). A portrait of the poor at the turn of the century, drawn from his “life and labour of the people in London”. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  17. Bourdieu, P. (1985). Sozialer Raum und „Klassen“. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  18. Brenner, N. (2009). What is critical urban theory? City, 13(2/3), 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brenner, N., Madden, D., & Wachsmuth, D. (2011). Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory. City, 15(2), 225–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brown, G. (2008). Urban (homo)sexualities: Ordinary cities and ordinary sexualities. Geography Compass, 2(4), 1215–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brown, M. (2013). Gender and sexuality II: There goes the gayborhood? Progress in Human Geography, 1–9. doi:10.1177/0309132513484215Google Scholar
  22. Brunn, S., Williams, J., & Zeigler, D. (Hrsg.). (2003). Cities of the world. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  23. Brunsdon, C. (2012). The attractions of the cinematic city. Screen, 53(3), 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bubenhofer, N. (2009). Sprachgebrauchsmuster. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  25. Carter, H. (1995). The study of urban geography (4. Aufl.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  26. Castells, M. (1983). The city and the grassroots. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Certeau, M. de. (1988). Kunst des Handelns. Berlin: Merve.Google Scholar
  28. Chegut, A., Eichholtz, P., & Kok, N. (2014). Supply, demand and the value of green buildings. Urban Studies, 51(1), 22–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chevron, M., Reinprecht, C., & Traoré, G. (Hrsg.). (2002). Umwelt und Urbanität in Westafrika. Frankfurt a. M.: Brandes & Apsel.Google Scholar
  30. Christafore, D., & Leguizamon, S. (2012). The influence of gay and lesbian coupled households on house prices in conservative and liberal households. Journal of Urban Economics, 71, 258–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Christaller, W. (1933). Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland – eine ökonomisch-geographische Untersuchung über die Gesetzmäßigkeit der Verbreitung und Entwicklung der Siedlungen mit städtischen Funktionen. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
  32. Clarke, D. (Hrsg.). (1997). The cinematic city. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Clarke, D., Curson, P., Kayastha, S., & Nag, P. (Hrsg.). (1989). Population and disaster. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Clarke, L., Jenerette, G., & Davila, A. (2013). The luxury of vegetation and the legacy of tree biodiversity in Los Angeles, CA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 116, 48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Crawford, C., & Bell, S. (2012). Analysing the relationship between urban livelihoods and water infrastructure in three settlements in Cusco, Peru. Urban Studies, 49(5), 1045–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Davis, M. (1990). City of quartz. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  37. Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality – power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. DeLyser, D., & Sui, D. (2012). Crossing the qualitative-quantitative divide II. Progress in Human Geography, 37(2), 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dérive. (2008). Schwerpunkt Cinematic Cities – Stadt im Film. Dérive – Zeitschrift für Stadtforschung 30.Google Scholar
  40. Dickson, E., et al. (2012). Urban risk assessments. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  41. Donald, J. (1995). The city, the cinema: modern spaces. In: Jenks, C. (Hrsg.). Visual culture (S. 77–95). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Eckardt, F. (2001). Tony Blair „im Dickicht der Städte“. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 16–17, 32–38.Google Scholar
  43. Edensor, T., & Jayne, M. (2012). Urban theory beyond the west – a world of cities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Ehlers, E. (Hrsg.). (1992). Modelling the city – cross-cultural perspectives. Bonn: Dümmler (= Colloquium Geographicum 22).Google Scholar
  45. Eisenschitz, A. (2010). Neoliberalism and the future of place marketing. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 6(2), 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Elwood, S. (2006). Critical issues in participatory GIS: Deconstructions, reconstructions, and new research directions. Transactions in GIS, 10(5), 693–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Elwood, S., Goodchild, M., & Sui, D. (2012). Researching volunteered geographic information: Spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(3), 571–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Engels, F. (1845). Die Lage der arbeitenden Klasse in England. Leipzig: Verlag Otto Wigand.Google Scholar
  49. Escher, A. (2006). The geography of cinema – a cinematic world. Erdkunde, 60(4), 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Feliciano, M., & Prosperi, D. (2011). Planning for low carbon cities: Reflection on the case of Broward County, Florida, USA. Cities, 28, 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ferguson, B. C., Frantzeskaki, N., & Brown, R. R. (2013). A strategic program for transitioning to a water sensitive city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 117, 32–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Feyisa, G., Dons, K., & Meilby, H. (2014). Efficiency of parks in mitigating urban heat island effect: An example from Addis Ababa. Landscape and Urban Planning, 123, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  54. Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power – democracy in practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Flyvbjerg, B., et al (2003). Megaprojects and risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Flyvbjerg, B. (2005). Machiavellian megaprojects. Antipode, 37(1), 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Flyvbjerg, B., & Richardson, T. (2002). Planning and Foucault – in search of the dark side of planning theory. http://flyvbjerg.plan.aau.dk/DarkSide2.pdf. Zugegriffen: 13. Mai. 2013.
  58. Foucault, M. (1991) [urspr. 1979]: Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Hrsg.), The Foucault effect – studies in governmentality (S. 87–104). London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  59. Foucault, M. (2012). Die Ordnung des Diskurses (12. Aufl.). Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer.Google Scholar
  60. Fox, K. (2006). Cinematic visions of Los Angeles: Representations of identity and mobility in the cinematic city.PHD thesis, Queen Mary University of London, London.Google Scholar
  61. Fyfe, N., & Kenny, J. (Hrsg.). (2005). The urban geography reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Garreau, J. (1991). Edge city: Life on the new frontier. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  63. Gehl, R. (2009). YouTube as archive: Who will curate this digital wunderkammer? International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(1), 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Gibbs, D., Krueger, R., & MacLeod, G. (2013). Grappling with smart city politics in an era of market triumphalism. Urban Studies, 50(11), 2151–2157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Glasze, G. (2007). Vorschläge zur Operationalisierung der Diskurstheorie von Laclau und Mouffe in einer Triangulation von lexikometrischen und interpretativen Methoden. FQS8 (2), Art. 14.Google Scholar
  66. Glasze, G., Webster, C., & Frantz, K. (Hrsg.). (2006). Private cities – global and local perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Glasze, G., Pütz, R., Germes, M., Schirmel, H., & Brailich, A. (2012). „The same but not the same“: The discursive constitution of large housing estates in Germany, France, and Poland. Urban Geography, 33(8), 1192–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Glock, B. (2006). Stadtpolitik in schrumpfenden Städten. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  69. Hall, T., & Hubbard, P. (1996). The entrepreneurial city – new urban politics, new urban geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 20(2), 153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hamedinger, A. (2006). Governance: „Neue“ Technik des Regierens und die Herstellung von Sicherheit in Städten. dérive – Zeitschrift für Stadtforschung, 24, 11–19.Google Scholar
  71. Harris, C., & Ullman, E. (1945). The nature of cities. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 242, 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Harrison, C., & Donnelly, I. (2011). A theory of smart cities. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS – 2011, Hull, UK. http://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings55th/article/view/1703. Zugegriffen: 18. Mai. 2014.
  73. Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  74. Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism. Geografiska Annaler, 71B(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53(1), 23–40.Google Scholar
  76. Hasse, J. (Hrsg.) (2002). Subjektivität in der Stadtforschung. Frankfurt a. M.: Selbstverlag Universität Frankfurt a. M. Didaktik Geographie.Google Scholar
  77. Hassert, K. (1907). Die Städte geographisch betrachtet. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
  78. Hassinger, H. (1910). Über Aufgaben der Städtekunde. Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen, 56(2), 289–294.Google Scholar
  79. Häussermann, H., & Siebel, W. (Hrsg.). (1993). Festivalisierung der Stadtpolitik – Stadtentwicklung durch große Projekte. Opladen (= Leviathan Sonderheft 13).Google Scholar
  80. Häussermann, H., & Simons, K. (2000). Die Politik der großen Projekte – eine Politik der großen Risiken? Archiv für Kommunalwissenschaften, 39(1), 56–72.Google Scholar
  81. Healey, P. (1998). Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and Planning A, 30(9), 1531–1546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Hebbert, M., & Jankovic, V. (2013). Cities and climate change: The precedents and why they matter. Urban Studies, 50(7), 1332–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Heineberg, H. (2006). Stadtgeographie (3./4. Aufl.). Paderborn: Schöningh. (2014).Google Scholar
  84. Heinritz, G. (Hrsg.). (2003). Integrative Ansätze in der Geographie – Vorbild oder Trugbild? Münchener Geographische Hefte 85.Google Scholar
  85. Helms, H. (Hrsg.). (1992). Die Stadt als Gabentisch. Leipzig: Reclam.Google Scholar
  86. Herbert, D., & Thomas, C. (1997). Cities in space – city as place (3. Aufl.). London: David Fulton Publ.Google Scholar
  87. Ho, L. (2010). Gay and lesbian subculture in urban China. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  88. Hofmeister, B. (1980). Stadtgeographie (4. Aufl.). Braunschweig: Westermann .Google Scholar
  89. Hofmeister, B. (1991). Die Stadtstruktur – ihre Ausprägung in den verschiedenen Kulturräumen der Erde (2. Aufl.). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  90. Hollands, R. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Holmer, B., & Eliasson, I. (1999). Urbanrural vapour pressure differences and their role in the development of urban heat islands. International Journal of Climatology, 19, 989–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Howard, E. (1902). Garden cities of tomorrow. London: S. Sonnenschein & Co.Google Scholar
  93. Hoyt, H. (1939). The structure and growth of residential neighborhoods in American cities. Washington DC: Federal Housing Administration.Google Scholar
  94. Huchzermeyer, M. (2011). Cities with ‘slums’ – from informal settlement eradication to a right to the city in Africa. Johannesburg: Juta & Co.Google Scholar
  95. Inayatullah, S. (2011). City futures in transformation: Emerging issues and case studies. Futures, 43, 654–661.Google Scholar
  96. Iveson, K. (2013). Cities within the city: Do-it-yourself urbanism and the right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 941–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Jabareen, Y. (2013). Planning the resilient city: Concepts and strategies for coping with climate change and environmental risk. Cities, 31, 220–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  99. Jahoda, M., Lazarsfeld, P., & Zeisel, H. (1975) [urspr. 1933]. Die Arbeitslosen von Marienthal. Ein soziographischer Versuch. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  100. Jha, A., Miner, T., & Stanton-Geddes, Z. (Hrsg.). (2013). Building urban resilience. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  101. Jones, S. (2012). A tale of two cities: Climate change policies in Vancouver and Melbourne- barometers of cooperative federalism? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(6), 1242–1267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Jürgens, U. (2012). Governance and new discounter outlets in Germany. Erdkunde, 66(2), 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Kabisch, N., & Haase, D. (2013). Green spaces of European cities revisited for 1990–2006. Landscape and Urban Planning, 110, 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Kabisch, N., & Haase, D. (2014). Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Kamleithner, C. (2008). Planung und Liberalismus. dérive – Zeitschrift für Stadtforschung 31. http://www.derive.at/index.php?p_case=2&id_cont=701&issue_No=31. Zugegriffen: 8. Juli 2011.
  106. Kantsa A., Tscheulin T., Junker R., Petanidou T., & Kokkini S. (2013). Urban biodiversity hotspots wait to get discovered: The example of the city of Ioannina, NW Greece. Landscape and Urban Planning, 120, 129–137.Google Scholar
  107. Keller, R. (2011). Diskursforschung. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.Google Scholar
  108. Keller, R., et al. (Hrsg.). (2010). Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse (Bd. 2). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.Google Scholar
  109. Keller, R., et al (Hrsg.). (2012). Diskurs-Macht-Subjekt. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.Google Scholar
  110. Klöpper, R. (1956). Der geographische Stadtbegriff. Geographisches Taschenbuch 6, 1956, 453–461.Google Scholar
  111. Knox, P. (1995). Urban social geography. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  112. Koonings, K. (Hrsg.). (2009). Megacities: The politics of urban exclusion and violence in the global south. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  113. Kraas, F., et al. (Hrsg.). (2014). Megacities: our global urban future. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  114. Kuymulu, M. (2013). The vortex of rights: ‘Right to the city’ at a crossroads. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 923–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Kwan, M., & Ding, G. (2008). Geo-narrative: Extending geographic information systems for narrative analysis in qualitative and mixed-method research. Professional Geographer, 60(4), 443–465.Google Scholar
  116. Landwehr, A. (2009). Historische Diskursanalyse. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  117. Latham, A., & McCormack, D. (2004). Moving cities: Rethinking the materialities of urban geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 28(6), 701–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Lees, L. (2004). The emancipatory city? Paradoxes and possibilities. London: Sage Publ.Google Scholar
  119. Lees, L. (2004a). Urban geography: Discourse analysis and urban research. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Lefebvre, H. (1996). The right to the city. In E. Kofman & E. Lebas (Hrsg.), Writing on cities (S. 63–184). London: Blackwell [urspr. 1968].Google Scholar
  121. Lefebvre, H. (2003) [urspr. 1970]. Die Revolution der Städte. Dresden: Druckhaus Dresden.Google Scholar
  122. Lefebvre, H. (2005) [urspr. 1974]. The production of space. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  123. LeGates, R., & Stout, F. (Hrsg.). (1996). The city reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  124. Lever, J. (2005). Governmentalisation and local strategic partnerships: Whose priorities? Environment and Planning C, 23(6), 907–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Liu, J., Kang, J., Behm, H., & Luo, T. (2014). Effects of landscape on soundscape perception: Soundwalks in city parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 123, 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Longley, P. (2002). Geographical information systems: Will developments in urban remote sensing and GIS lead to ‘better’ urban geography? Progress in Human Geography, 26(2), 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Lottrup, L., Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. (2013). Workplace greenery and perceived level of stress: Benefits of access to a green outdoor environment at the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning, 110, 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. MacKillop, F. (2012). Climatic city: two centuries of urban planning and climate science in Manchester (UK) and its region. Cities, 29, 244–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. MacLeod, G., & Goodwin, M. (1999). Space, scale and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance. Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), 503–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. MacLeod, G., & Ward, K. (2002). Spaces of utopia and dystopia: Landscaping the contemporary city. Geografiska Annaler, 84B(3/4), 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Mahizhnan, A. (1999). Smart cities – the Singapore case. Cities, 16(1), 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Marcuse, P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13(2/3), 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Marquardt, N., Füller, H., Glasze, G., & Pütz, R. (2013). Shaping the urban renaissance: New-build luxury developments in Berlin. Urban Studies, 50(8), 1540–1556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and critical urbanism. City, 15(2), 204–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Mennis, J., Mason, M., & Cao, Y. (2013). Qualitative GIS and the visualization of narrative activity space data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27(2), 267–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  137. Mitscherlich, A. (1965). Die Unwirtlichkeit unserer Städte. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  138. Mohammad, A., Shrestha, P., & Kumar, S. (2013). Urban residential energy use in Kandahar, Afghanistan. Cities, 32, 135–142.Google Scholar
  139. Mollet, E., et al (2010). Choosing the best tools for comparative analyses of texts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 429–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Moore, S. (2012). Garbage matters: Concepts in new geographies of waste. Progress in Human Geography, 36(6), 780–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Moskell, C., & Allred, S. (2013). Residents’ belief about responsibility for the stewardship of park trees and street trees in New York City. Landscape and Urban Planning, 120, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Mubi Brighenti, A. (Hrsg.). (2013). Urban interstices – the aesthetics and the politics of the in-between. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  143. Mukhija, V., & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (Hrsg.). (2014). The informal American city – beyond taco trucks and day labor. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  144. Neirotti, P., et al. (2014). Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylized facts. Cities 38, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Netusil, N., Levin, Z., Shandas, V., & Hart, T. (2014). Valuing green infrastructure in Portland, Oregon. Landscape and Urban Planning 124, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. O’Sullivan, D. (2006). Geographical information science: Critical GIS. Progress in Human Geography, 30(6), 783–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Oswin, N. (2008). Critical geographies and the uses of sexuality: Deconstructing queer space. Progress in Human Geography, 32(1), 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Pace, S. (2008). YouTube – an opportunity for consumer narrative analysis? Qualitative Market Research, 11(2), 213–226.Google Scholar
  149. Pacione, M. (2001). Urban geography – a global perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  150. Pandit, R., Polyakov, M., Tapsuwan, S., & Moran, T. (2013). The effect of street trees on property value in Perth, Western Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 110, 134–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Park, R. (1915). The City. Suggestions for the investigation of behavior in the city environment. American Journal of Sociology, 20, 579–83.Google Scholar
  152. Park, R., Burgess, E., & McKenzie, R. (1925). The City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  153. Pavlovskaya, M. (2006). Theorizing with GIS: A tool for critical geographies? Environment and Planning A, 38, 2003–2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Peck, J. (2012). Austerity urbanism. City, 16(6), 626–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Poon, J. (2005). Quantitative methods: Not positively positivist. Progress in Human Geography, 29(6), 766–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Prentice, S., Rayson, P., & Taylor, P. (2012). The language of Islamic extremism. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(2), 259–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Priemus, H. (2007). Development and design of large infrastructure projects. Environment and Planning B, 34(4), 626–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Priemus, H., et al. (Hrsg.). (2008). Decision-making on megaprojects. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  160. Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Raco, M., & Imrie, R. (2000). Governmentality and rights and responsibilities in urban policy. Environment and Planning A 32 (12) 2187–2204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Reichertz, J., & Englert, C. (2011). Einführung in die qualitative Videoanalyse. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.Google Scholar
  163. Reid, G., & Dirsuweit, T. (2002). Understanding systemic violence: Homophobic attacks in Johannesburg and its surrounds. Urban Forum, 13(3), 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Ren, C., Lau, K., Yiu, K., & Ng, E. (2013). The application of urban climatic mapping to the urban planning of high-density cities: The case of Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Cities, 31, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Rose, G. (2012). Visual methodologies. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  166. Roseland, M. (1997). Dimensions of the ecocity. Cities, 14(4), 197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Rose-Redwood, R. (2006). Governmentality, geography, and the geo-coded world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(4), 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Sadler, W., & Haskins, E. (2005). Metonymy and the metropolis: Television show settings and the image of New York City. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 29(3), 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Samara, T., Shenjing, H., & Guo, C. (Hrsg.). (2013). Locating right to the city in the global South. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  170. Sanderson, J. (2012). Risk, uncertainty and governance in megaprojects: A critical discussion of alternative explanations. International Journal of Product Management, 30, 432–443.Google Scholar
  171. Sarzynski, A. (2012). Bigger is not always better: A comparative analysis of cities and their air pollution Impact. Urban Studies, 49(14) 3121–3138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Sassen, S. (2012). Cities in a world economy(4. Aufl.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  173. Schlünzen K. H., Hoffmann P., Rosenhagen G., & Riecke W. (2010). Long-term changes and regional differences in temperature and precipitation in the metropolitan area of Hamburg. International Journal of Climatology, 30, 1121–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Schlüter, O. (1899). Bemerkungen zur Siedlungsgeographie. Geographische Zeitschrift, 5 (2), 65–84.Google Scholar
  175. Schöller, P. (1953). Aufgaben und Probleme der Stadtgeographie. Erdkunde, 7(3), 161–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Schöller, P. (Hrsg.). (1969). Allgemeine Stadtgeographie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (= Wege der Forschung Bd. 181).Google Scholar
  177. Schöller, P. (Hrsg.). (1972). Zentralitätsforschung. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (= Wege der Forschung Bd. 301).Google Scholar
  178. Schwarz, G. (1989). Allgemeine Siedlungsgeographie – Teil 2 Die Städte (4. Aufl.). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  179. Seamans, G. (2013). Mainstreaming the environmental benefits of street trees. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12, 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Shiel, M. (2001). Cinema and the city in history and theory. In M. Shiel & T. Fitzmaurice (Hrsg.), The city – film and urban societies in a global context (S. 1–18). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  181. Sibalis, M. (2004). Urban space and homosexuality: The example of the Marais, Paris ‘Gay Ghetto’. Urban Studies, 41(9), 1739–1758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Sieber, R. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Simmel, G. (2006) [urspr. 1903]. Die Großstädte und das Geistesleben. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  184. Smith, N. (1996). New urban frontier: gentrification and the revanchist city. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  185. Soja, E. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  186. Sorkin, M., & Zukin, S. (Hrsg.). (2002). After the World Trade Center: Rethinking New York city. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  187. Stella, F. (2009). Lesbian identities and everyday space in contemporary urban Russia. Glasgow: University of Glasgow (PhD).Google Scholar
  188. Tan, Q. (2013). Smell in the city: Smoking and olfactory politics. Urban Studies, 50(1), 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Tan, P., Wang, J., & Sia, A. (2013). Perspectives on five decades of the urban greening of Singapore. Cities, 32, 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Tian, L., Chen, J., & Yu, S. (2013). How has Shenzhen been heated up during the rapid urban build-up process? Landscape and Urban Planning, 115, 18–29.Google Scholar
  191. Tickell, A., & J. Peck (1992): Accumulation, regulation and the geographies of post-Fordism. Progress in Human Geography, 16(2), 190–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Tonkiss, F. (2013). Austerity urbanism and the makeshift city. City, 17(3), 312–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Torreggiani, D., Dall’Ara, E., & Tassinari, P. (2012). The urban nature of agriculture: bidirectional trends between city and countryside. Cities, 29, 412–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. UCREL (o. J.). UCREL Semantic Analysis System (USAS). http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/usas/. Zugegriffen: 8. März 2013.
  195. Visser, G. (2008). Exploratory notes on the geography of Black gay leisure spaces in Bloemfontein, South Africa. Urban Forum, 19, 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. Wehrhahn, R., et al. (2008). Urban restructuring and social and water-related vulnerability in megacities – the example of the urban village of Xincùn, Guangzhou (China). Die Erde, 139(3), 227–249.Google Scholar
  197. Wirth, L. (1928). The ghetto. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  198. Zukin, S. (1989). Loft living: Culture and capital in urban change. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  199. Zukin, S. (2005). Point of purchase: How shopping changed American culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geographisches InstitutUniversität KielKielDeutschland

Personalised recommendations