Erzieherin-Kind-Beziehungen und kindliche Entwicklung: Der Einfluss von Geschlecht und Migrationshintergrund

  • Daniela Mayer
  • Kathrin Beckh
  • Julia Berkic
  • Fabienne Becker-Stoll
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Die NUBBEK-Studie zeigt, dass unter Kontrolle von familiären Hintergrundvariablen die Qualität der Erzieherin-Kind-Beziehung einen signifikanten Einfluss auf die Entwicklung von Kindern hat: Kinder mit einer hohen Erzieherin-Kind-Beziehungsqualität zeigten die höchsten Werte im rezeptiven Wortschatz in Deutsch, in Kommunikationsfertigkeiten und sozial-emotionalen Kompetenzen sowie die niedrigsten Werte im Problemverhalten. Im Bereich der sprachlichen Entwicklung profitierten besonders Kinder mit Migrationshintergrund, insbesondere Jungen, von einer hohen Qualität der Erzieherin-Kind-Beziehung.

Literatur

  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the child behavior checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  2. Ahnert, L., Pinquart, M., & Lamb, M. E. (2006). Security of children’s relationships with nonparental care providers: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 77(3), 664–679.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahnert, L., Harwardt-Heinecke, E., Kappler, G., Eckstein-Madry, T., & Milatz, A. (2012). Student-teacher relationships and classroom climate in first grade: How do they relate to student’s stress regulation? Attachment and Human Development, 14(3), 249–263.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahnert, L., Milatz, A., Kappler, G., Schneiderwind, J., & Fischer, R. (2013). The impact of teacher-child relationships on child cognitive performance as explored by a priming paradigm. Developmental Psychology, 49(3), 554–567.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Arbeitsgruppe Deutsche Child Behavior Checklist. (2002). Elternfragebogen für Klein- und Vorschulkinder (CBCL/1½–5). Köln: Arbeitsgruppe Kinder-, Jugend- und Familiendiagnostik (KJFD).Google Scholar
  6. Burchinal, M., Peisner-Feinberg, E., Bryant, D. M., & Clifford, R. (2000). Children’s social and cognitive development and child-care quality: Testing for differential associations related to poverty, gender, or ethnicity. Applied Developmental Science, 4(3), 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burchinal, M., Howes, C., Pianta, R. C., Bryant, D. M., Early, D., Clifford, R., & Barbarin, O. A. (2008). Predicting child outcomes at the end of kindergarten from the quality of pre-kindergarten teacher-child interactions and instruction. Applied Developmental Science, 12(3), 140–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunn, D. M., & Dunn, L. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test, fourth edition, manual. Minneapolis: Pearson.Google Scholar
  9. Eckhardt, A., Egert, F., Beckh, K., Berkic, J., Kalicki, B., & Quehenberger, J. (2012). NUBBEK – Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente (unveröffentlichter Forschungsbericht der NUBBEK-Studienpartner).Google Scholar
  10. Ewing, A. R., & Taylor, A. R. (2009). The role of child gender and ethnicity in teacher-child relationship quality and children’s behavioral adjustment in preschool. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24(1), 92–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. M. (2008). Social skills improvement system (SSIS). Rating scale manual. San Antonio: Pearson.Google Scholar
  12. Hagekull, B., & Bohlin, G. (1995). Day care quality, family and child characteristics and socioemotional development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10(4), 505–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625–638.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mashburn, A. J., Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., Barbarin, O. A., Bryant, D., Burchinal, M., Early, D. M., & Howes, C. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79(3), 732–749.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. NICHD ECCRN = Early Child Care Research Network. (2002). Child-care structure → Process → Outcome: Direct and indirect effects of child-care quality on young children’s development. Psychological Science, 13(3), 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Connor, E. E., Collins, B. A., & Supplee, L. (2012). Behavior problems in late childhood: The roles of early maternal attachment and teacher-child relationship trajectories. Attachment and Human Development, 14(3), 265–288.Google Scholar
  17. Pianta, R. C. (1992a). Child parent relationship scale. Charlottesville: University of Virginia.Google Scholar
  18. Pianta, R. C. (1992b). Student teacher relationship scale. Charlottesville: University of Virginia.Google Scholar
  19. Pianta, R. C., Steinberg, M. S., & Rollins, K. B. (1995). The first two years of school: Teacher-child relationships and deflections in children’s classroom adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 7(2), 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pianta, R. C., Nimetz, S. L., & Bennett, E. (1997). Mother-child relationship, teacher-child relationship, and school outcomes in preschool and kindergarten. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12(3), 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Saft, E. W., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Teachers’ perceptions of their relationships with students: Effects of child age, gender, and ethnicity of teachers and children. School Psychology Quarterly, 16(2), 125–141.Google Scholar
  22. Schneider, S. L. (2008). Applying the ISCED-97 to the German educational qualifications. In Dies. (Hrsg.), The international standard classification of education (ISCED-97). An evaluation of content and criterion validity for 15 European countries (S. 76–102). Mannheim: Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung (MZES).Google Scholar
  23. Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Balla, D. A. (Hrsg.). (2005). Vineland-II Adaptive Behavior Scales: Survey forms manual. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Spilt, J. L., Hughes, J. N., Wu, J.-Y., & Kwok, O.-M. (2012). Dynamics of teacher-student relationships: Stability and change across elementary school and the influence on children’s academic success. Child Development, 83(4), 1180–1195.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Tietze, W., Becker-Stoll, F., Bensel, J., Eckhardt, A. G., Haug-Schnabel, G., Kalicki, B., Keller, H., & Leyendecker, B. (Hrsg.). (2013). NUBBEK – Nationale Untersuchung zur Bildung, Betreuung und Erziehung in der frühen Kindheit. Forschungsbericht. Berlin: das Netz.Google Scholar
  26. Watamura, S. E., Phillips, D. A., Morrissey, T. W., McCartney, K., & Bub, K. (2011). Double Jeopardy: Poorer social-emotional outcomes for children in the NICHD SECCYD experiencing home and child-care environments that confer risk. Child Development, 82(1), 48–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniela Mayer
    • 1
  • Kathrin Beckh
    • 1
  • Julia Berkic
    • 1
  • Fabienne Becker-Stoll
    • 1
  1. 1.Staatsinsitut für Frühpädagogik (IFP)MünchenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations