Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gibt es eine Beziehung zwischen Organisationskultur und Risikovorkehrungen? Eine Studie in türkischen Unternehmen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Risikomanagement in Unternehmen

Zusammenfassung

Während das Thema „Risikomanagement“ in früheren Jahren eher als eine Art „Nebensache“ angesehen wurde, ist es heute zu einem Thema geworden, mit dem sich die Führungsebene einer Organisation persönlich beschäftigt. Studien zu diesem Themenbereich konzentrierten sich zunächst primär auf die finanzielle Perspektive und es handelte sich um ein Gebiet, mit dem sich Rechnungswesen- und Finanzexperten beschäftigten. In den letzten Jahren sind Studien zum Risikomanagement zunehmend auf den menschlichen Einfluss eingegangen und Verhalten in Organisationen wurde als einer der Schlüsselfaktoren angesehen. Damit Risikomanagement erfolgreich sein kann, müssen alle Mitarbeiter bezüglich Risikovermeidung proaktiv handeln und die Organisationskultur muss ein solches Verhalten unterstützen. In der vorliegenden Studie werden verschiedene Arten des Risikos, u.a. Terror-, Korruptions-, Technik- und Spionagerisiken eingehend betrachtet und es wird eine Verbindung zu unterschiedlichen Organisationskulturen hergestellt. Die Studie zeigt, dass die höchste Risikovorbereitung bei der Wettbewerbskultur und die niedrigste bei der Entrepreneurskultur besteht. Des Weiteren sind die Organisationen am besten auf Korruptionsrisiken und am wenigsten auf Terrorismusrisiken vorbereitet. Die Ergebnisse weisen darauf hin, dass bezüglich Organisationskultur und Risikoart die Beziehung zwischen der Wettbewerbskultur und Produktions- und Spionagerisiken am höchsten ist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Arena M, Arnaboldi M, Azzone G (2010) The organizational dynamics of enterprise risk management. Account Organ Soc 35:659–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argüden Y (2007) Risk yönetimi. http://www.donusumkonagi.net. Zugegriffen: 20. Oktober 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Argun T (2007) Risk yönetimi. http://www.bilgiyonetimi.org. Zugegriffen: 10. September 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator- mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:1137–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamish TD (2002) Silent spill: the organization of industrial crisis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Berberoğlu GN, Besler S, Tosun Z (1998) Örgüt Kültürü. AÜ İİBF Dergisi 14(1-2):29–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackhurst J, Craighead CW, Elkins D, Handfield RB (2005) An empirically derived agenda of critical research issues for managing supply-chain disruptions. Int J Prod Res 43(19):4067–4081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron KS, Freeman SJ (1991) Culture congruence, strength, and type: Relationships to effectiveness. Res Organ Chang Dev 5:23–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Can H, Aşan Ö, Aydın EM (2006) Örgütsel Davranış. Arıkan Yayınları, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon MD, Edmondson AC (2005) Failing to learn and learning to fail (intelligently): how great organizations put failure to work to improve and innovate. Long Range Plann 38:299–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassimon D, Engelen PJ, Thomassen L, Van Wouwe M (2004) The valuation of a NDA using a 6-fold compound option. Res Policy 33:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman C, Ward S (2003) Constructively simple estimating: A project management example. J Oper Res Soc 54(10):1050–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee S, Lubatkin MH, Schweiger DM, Weber Y (1992) Cultural differences and shareholder value: explaining the variability in the performance of related mergers. Strateg Manag J 13(5):319–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra S, Sodhi M (2004) Managing risk to avoid supply chain breakdown. Mit Sloan Manag Rev 46(1):53–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher M, Peck H (2004) Building the resilient supply chain. Int J Logist Manag 15(2):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher M, Towill DR (2002) Developing market specific supply chain strategies. Int J Logist Manag 13(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke S (1999) Perceptions of organizational safety: Implications for the development of safety culture. J Organ Behav 20:185–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman L (2006) Frequency of man-made disasters in the 20th century. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 14(1):3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craighead CW, Blackhurst J, Rungtusanatham MJ, Handfield R (2007) The severity of supply chain disruptions: design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decis Sci 38(1):131–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Joy DM, Bryan SS, Wilson MG, Vandenberg RJ, Butts MM (2004) Creating safer workplaces: Assessing determinants and role of safety climate. J Safety Res 35:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deal TE, Kennedy AA (1982) Corporate Cultures. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Demir S (2011) Bürokratik Kültür. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 16(2):153–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande R, Farley J (1999) Corporate culture and market orientation: Comparing Indian and Japanese firms. J Int Mark 7:111–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Didla S, Mearns K, Flin R (2009) Safety citizenship behaviour: a proactive approach to risk management. J Risk Res 12(3–4):475–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dünya Bankası. http://www.worldbank.org/tr/country/turkey, www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/anticorrupt/. Zugegriffen: 02. September 2014

  • Eken M (2005) Kötü yönetimi tedavi etmek. Siyasette ve Yönetimde Etik Sempozyumu Bildiri Kitabı. Sakarya, S 113–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser I, Henry W (2007) Embedding risk management: Structures and approaches. Manag Auditing J 22(4):392–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gephart RP, van Maanen J, Oberlechner T (2009) Organizations and risk in late modernity. Organ Stud 30(2&3):141–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (2003) Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Green SG, Aiman-Smith L (2004) Research on the human connection in technological innovation: An introductory essay. J Eng Technol Manag 21:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker R (2010) Billion Dollar Company. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland C, Brenchley R, Walker H (2003) Risk in supply networks. J Purch Supply Manag 9(1):51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison R (1972) Understanding your organization’s character. Harv Bus Rev 50:119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann DA, Morgeson FP, Gerras SJ (2003) Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar. J Appl Psychol 88:170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood C, Rothstein H, Baldwin R (2001) The Government of Risk. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hua Z, Sun Y, Xu X (2011) Operational causes of bankruptcy propagation in supply chain. Decis Support Syst 51(3):671–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult GT, Ketchen MD, Slater SF (2004) Information processing, knowledge development, and strategic supply chain performance. Acad Manag J 47(2):241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutter B, Power M (2005) Organizational Encounters with Risk. Cambridge University Press, the Edinburgh Building, Cambridge UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Istanbul Ticaret Odası (2014) Istanbul Ticaret Odası. http://www.ito.org.tr/wps/portal/bilgi-bankasi/uye-firma-bilgileri?prmPageId=BM12&initView=true. Zugegriffen: 2. Oktober 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones G (1983) Transaction costs, property rights, and organisational culture: an exchange perspective. Adm Sci Q 28:454–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jüttner U (2005) Supply chain risk management. Int J Logist Manag 16(1):120–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jüttner U, Peck H, Christopher M (2003) Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research. Int J Logist Res Appl 6(4):197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamal B (1988) Organisational culture: organisational adaptability and change – a study of Petronas. Dissertation University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendirligil S (2006) Çalışanların örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı sergileme eğilimleri üzerinde örgüt kültürünün etkisi. İstanbul Üniversitesi, Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Masterthesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiser J, Cantrell G (2006) Six steps to managing risk. Supply Chain Manag Rev 10(3):12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleindorfer PR, Saad GH (2005) Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Prod Oper Manag Soc 14(1):53–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konuk M (2006) İşletmelerde örgüt kültürünün iş tatmini üzerine etkisi, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Masterthesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Krimsky S, Golding D (Hrsg) (1992) Social Theories of Risk. Praeger, Westport CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurt E (2013) Üniversitelerde çalışanların örgüt kültürü algıları: bir vakıf üniversitesi meslek yüksekokulu örneği. http://www.izu.edu.tr/Assets/Content/file/20130201-ek.pdf. Zugegriffen: 2. Juli 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis MA (2003) Cause, consequence and control: towards a theoretical and practical model of operational risk. J Oper Manag 21(2):205–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin M, Schweiger D, Weber Y (1999) Top management turnover in related M&As: an additional test of the theory of relative standing. J Manage 25(1):55–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Marucheck A, Greis N (2011) Insights on the special issue on product safety and security in the global supply chain. J Oper Manag 29:704–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor D (1960) The human side of the enterprise. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller KD (1998) Economic exposure and integrated risk management. Strateg Manag J 19(5):497–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell VW (1995) Organizational risk perception and reduction: a literature review. Br J Manag 6(2):115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff II, Alpaslan MC (2003) Preparing for evil. Harv Bus Rev 81(4):109–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Özbilgin IG (2012) Risk ve risk çeşitleri. Bilişim Dergisi 7:86–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Özkalp E, Kırel Ç (2001) Örgütsel Davranış. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları, Eskişehir

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly CA, Chatman J, Caldwell DF (1991) People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person–organization fit. Acad Manag J 34:487–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pheysey D (1993) Organisational culture: types and transformation. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Postası KOBI (2011) Türkiye’de şirketlerin ortalama ömrü ve risk değerlendirme. http://www.kobipostasi.net. Zugegriffen: 3. Juni 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Power M (2007) Organized uncertainty designing a world of risk management. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn RE (1988) Beyond rational management. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn RE, Rohrbaugh J (1983) A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Manage Sci 29:363–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman M, Kumaraswamy M (2002) Joint risk management through transactionally efficient relational contracting. Constr Manag Econ 20(1):45–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid ZA, Sambasivan M, Johari J (2003) The influence of corporate culture and organisational commitment on performance. J Manag Dev 22(8):708–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robock SH, Simmonds K (1973) International business and multinational enterprise. R. Irwin, Homewood

    Google Scholar 

  • Scapens B, Bromwich M (2009) Risk management, corporate governance and management accounting. Manag Account Res 20(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein E (1992) Organisational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz C (1987) Corporate culture and strategy: the problem of strategic fit. Long Range Plann 20(4):78–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran U (1992) Research methods for business. John Wiley and Sons, Chicester

    Google Scholar 

  • Seshadri S, Subrahmanyam M (2005) Risk management in operations. Prod Oper Manag 14(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short J (1992) Defining, explaining and managing risk. In: Short J, Clarke L (Hrsg) Organizations, uncertainties and risk. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, S 3–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Şimşek ÖF (2007) Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş. Temel İlkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara, Ekinoks Eğitim Ve Danışmanlık Hizmetleri ve Basım Yayın ve Dağıtım

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi MS, Son B-G, Tang CS (2012) Researchers’ perspectives on supply chain risk management. Prod Oper Manag 21(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Specht M, Chevreau R, Denis-Remis C (2006) Dedicating management to cultural processes: Toward a human risk management system. J Risk Res 9:525–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spira LF, Page M (2003) Risk management: The reinvention of internal control and the changing role of internal audit. Account Auditing Account J 16(4):640–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarhan RB, Gençkaya ÖF, Ergül E, Özsemerci K, Özbaran H (2006) Bir olgu olarak yolsuzluk: nedenler, etkiler ve çözüm önerileri. http://www.tedmer.org.tr/pdf/yolsuzluk.pdf. Zugegriffen: 24. August 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Tozkoparan G, Susmuş T (2001) Üretim ve hizmet sektörü işletmelerinde örgüt kültürüne karşılaştırmalı bir uygulama. Ege Üniversitesi, İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi. Ege Akademik Bakış 1(1):202–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Türk Dil Kurumu (2014) Türk Dil Kurumu. http://www.tdk.gov.tr. Zugegriffen: 28. September 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner BA, Pidgeon NF (1997) Man-made disasters, 2. Aufl. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Uluslararası Saydamlık Örgütü (2000) Background information to the corruption perceptions index. www.transparency.org.de/documents/cpi/2000/qanda.html. Zugegriffen: 25. August 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Post WZ, Coning TJ de, Smit EV (1998) The relationship between organisational culture and financial performance: some South African evidence. South African J Bus Manag 29(1):30–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan D (2005) Organizational rituals of risk and error. In: Hutter B, Power M (Hrsg) Organizational encounters with risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, S 33–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan E, Vaughan T (2008) Fundamentals of Risk and Insurance, 10. Aufl. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vo TQ, Nguyen DK (2011) Corporate ownership structure and organizational culture in a transition economy: the case of Vietnam. Int J Econ Finance 3(4):36–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner SM, Bode C (2008) An empirical examination of supply chain performance along several dimension of risk. J Bus Logist 29(1):307–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber Y, Pliskin N (1996) The effects of information systems integration and organizational culture on a firm’s effectiveness. Inf Manag 30:81–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber Y, Tarba SY (2012) Mergers and acquisitions process: the use of corporate culture analysis. Cross Cult Manag Int J 19(3):288–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods M (2009) A contingency theory perspective on the risk management control system within Birmingham City Council. Manag Account Res 20(1):69–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates JF, Stone ER (1992) The risk construct. In: Yates J (Hrsg) Risk Taking Behavior. Wiley, New York, S 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsidisin GA, Ragatz GL, Melnyk SA (2005) An institutional theory perspective of business continuity planning for purchasing and supply management. Int J Prod Res 43(16):3401–3420

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät für Wirtschaft, deutschsprachige Abteilung für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Marmara Universität, Bahçelievler, Istanbul, Türkei

    Prof. Dr. habil. Dilek Zamantılı Nayır

  2. Lehrstuhl Arbeitsökonomie und Industrielle Beziehungen, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Çünür Mahallesi, 32260, Çünür/Isparta, Türkei

    Dr. habil. Ömer Turunç

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. habil. Dilek Zamantılı Nayır
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. habil. Ömer Turunç
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilek Zamantılı Nayır .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für Allgemeine BWL/Finance and Banking I, Wissenschaftliche Hochschule Lahr, Lahr/Schwarzwald, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Stephan Schöning

  2. Almanca İşletme Bölümü, Marmara Üniversitesi İ.F., Istanbul, Turkey

    E. Handan Sümer Göğüş

  3. Johannes Kepler Universität, Linz, Austria

    Helmut Pernsteiner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nayır, D.Z., Turunç, Ö. (2017). Gibt es eine Beziehung zwischen Organisationskultur und Risikovorkehrungen? Eine Studie in türkischen Unternehmen. In: Schöning, S., Sümer Göğüş, E., Pernsteiner, H. (eds) Risikomanagement in Unternehmen. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07073-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07073-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-07072-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-07073-1

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation