Income Inequality and Public Debt in OECD-Countries from a CSR Perspective

  • Łukasz JabłońskiEmail author
  • Piotr Zmuda
  • Linda O’Riordan
Part of the FOM-Edition book series (FOMEDITION)


Against the backdrop of the financial crisis which triggered the occupy movement, income inequality, and unsustainable levels of public and private debt elicit concerns regarding the health of the economic system. These issues, which are increasingly gaining public awareness, trigger over-arching questions which reach to the fundamental roots of the model of capitalism. Although capitalism can be considered to have served society well in helping to reduce global poverty and expand access to healthcare and education, the distribution of the wealth which is created by capitalism undoubtedly concurrently generates, as a spin-off, costs for society. In particular, some authors suggest that the growing gap in income inequality and public debt, which have both widened and currently reached an historic high in some countries, negatively affects the economy and thereby society. Consistent with the contemporary interest in addressing social problems and welfare in a new more inclusive approach to capitalism based on stakeholder theory, key to advancing our knowledge in this area would be the identification of the conditions under which public debt and income inequality are growing. A salient question in this debate is the (negative) role that a widening income gap plays in influencing and increasing public debt. This research gap is the missing link upon which the chapter focuses. To address these themes, the aim of the chapter is to present the theoretical and empirical arguments for causality between growing income inequality and increasing public debt within capitalist economies. However, in establishing this causal link and identifying income inequality as a contributing factor to public debt growth, the chapter does not focus on evaluating the role of public debt in society per se. Instead this theme is consigned to the scope of separate research in this field.


Income Inequality Public Debt Government Bond Income Disparity Debt Security 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aguiar, M., & Amador, M. (2011). Growth in the shadow of expropriation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(2), 651–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiyagari, S. R., & McGrattan, E. R. (1998). The optimum quantity of debt. Journal of Monetary Economics, 42(3), 447–469. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albanesi, S., & Sleet, C. (2006). Dynamic optimal taxation with private information. Review of Economic Studies, 73, 1–30. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alesina, A., & Rodrik, D. (1994). Distributive politics and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), 465–490. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. (1990). A positive theory of fiscal deficits and government debt. Review of Economic Studies, 57(3), 403–414. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2011). Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(1), 3–71. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Azzimonti, M., de Francisco, E., & Quadrini, V. (2012). Financial globalization, inequality, and the rising of public debt. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.
  8. Battaglini, M., & Coate, S. (2008). A dynamic theory of public spending, taxation, and debt. American Economic Review, 98(1), 201–236. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhalla, S.S. (2002). Imagine there’s no country: Poverty, inequality and growth in the era of globalization. Institute for International Economics, September 26, 2002.
  10. Blommestein, H. J., & Turner, P. (2012). Interactions between sovereign debt management and monetary policy under fiscal dominance and financial instability. OECD Working Papers on Sovereign Borrowing and Public Debt Management, 3. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.
  11. Bordo, M. D., & Meissner, C. M. (23–24 Sept 2011). Do financial crises always raise inequality? Some evidence from history. Paper presented at the JIMF 4th Annual Conference at UC Santa Cruz, USA. Accessed 10 Dec 2012.
  12. Bourguignon, F., & Morrisson, C. (2002). Inequality among world citizens: 1820–1992. The American Economic Review, 92(4), 727–744. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caballero, R., & Yared, P. (2008). Future renting-seeking and current public savings. NBER Working Paper, 14417.Google Scholar
  14. Chilosi, A. (2010). Poverty, population, inequality, and development: The historical perspective. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 7(2), 469–501.Google Scholar
  15. Chotikapanich, D., Valenzuela, R., & Rao, D. S. P. (1997). Global and regional inequality in the distribution of income: Estimation with limited and incomplete data. Empirical Economics, 22, 533–546. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Corbae, D., D’Erasmo, P., & Kuruscu, B. (2009). Politico-economic consequences of rising wage inequality. Journal of Monetary Economics, 56(1). Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.
  17. Davies, J. B. (Ed.). (2008). The world distribution of household wealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.
  18. Deininger, K., & Squire, L. (1996). A new data set measuring income inequality. World Bank Economic Review, 10, 565–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dowrick, S., & Akmal, M. (2005). Contradictory trends in global income inequality: A tale of two biases. Review of Income and Wealth, 51(2), 201–230. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. European Commission. (2010). Why socio-economic inequality increases? Facts and policy responses in Europe. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.
  21. Fisher, S. (2003). Globalization and its challenges. American Economic Review, 93(2), 1–30. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flejtarski, S. (2010). Globalny kryzys bankowo-finansowy. Geneza, aktorzy, konsekwencje [The global banking and financial crisis. Genesis, actors, consequences]. In G. W. Kołodko (Ed.), Globalizacja, kryzys i co dalej? [Globalization, crisis and what next?] (pp. 134–154). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Poltext.Google Scholar
  23. George, J. M. (2013). Compassion and capitalism: Implications for organizational studies. Journal of Management, 40(1), 5–15. January 2014. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Golosov, M., Kocherlakota, N., & Tsyvinski, A. (2003). Optimal indirect and capital taxation. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 569–587. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gradstein, M., & Milanovic, B. (2004). Does Liberté=Egalité? A survey of the empirical links between democracy and inequality with some evidence on the transition economies. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14, 515–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. HPDD. (2012). Historical public debt database. Fiscal Affairs Department, IMF. Accessed 27 Dec 2012.
  27. Ilzetzki, E (2011). Rent-seeking distortions and fiscal procyclicality, Journal of Development Economics, 96(1), 30–46.Google Scholar
  28. Jenkins, S. (2011). The economic debate on inequality: Past, present and future. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(18), 46–56.Google Scholar
  29. Jolly, R. (2006). Inequality on historical perspective. UNU-WIDER Research Paper, no. 2006/32, March. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.
  30. Krusell, P., & Rios-Rull, J. V. (1999). On the size of U.S. government: Political economy in the neoclassical growth model. American Economic Review, 89(5), 1156–1181. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McKinsey Quarterly. (2014). Business, society, and the future of capitalism. Accessed 19 May 2014.
  32. Milanovic, B. (2006). Global income inequality: What it is and why it matters? DESA Working Paper, No. 26. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.
  33. Milanovic, B. (2011). The haves and the have-nots: A brief and idiosyncratic history of inequality around the globe. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  34. OECD. (2008). Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD-countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. OECD. (2012). OECD statistics portal. Accessed 27 Dec 2012.
  36. Ortiz, I., & Cummins, M. (2011). Global inequality: Beyond the bottom billion. A rapid review of income distribution in 141 countries. UNICEF Social and Economic Policy Working Paper, April 2011. Accessed 15 Nov. 2012.
  37. Persson, T., & Svensson, L. (1989). Why a stubborn conservative would run a deficit: Policy with time-inconsistent preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(2), 325–345. Accessed 19 June 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1991). Is inequality harmful for the growth? Theory and evidence. NBER Working Papers Series, No. 3599. Accessed 19 June 2014.
  39. Podder, N. (1998). The implications of economic inequality for social welfare and social conflict. International Journal of Social Economics, 25(6/7/8), 1244–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reich, R. (2014). Robert Reich: 10 ways to close the inequality gap. Accessed 16 May 2014.
  41. Reynolds, L. L. (1983). The spread of economic growth to the third word. Journal of Economic Literature, 21, 941–975.Google Scholar
  42. Röhrs, S., & Winter, C. (2011). Wealth inequality and the optimal level of government debt. Working Papers Series, no. 51. Accessed 19 June 2014.
  43. Sala-i-Martin, X. (2002). The disturbing ‘rise’ of world income inequality. NBER Working Paper, No. 8904. Accessed 19 June 2014.
  44. Sutcliffe, B. (2003). World inequality and globalization. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20(1), 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. TEDB. (2012). Total economy database. Accessed 27 Dec 2012.
  46. The Guardian Newspaper. (16 May 2014a). Occupy movement. The Guardian Newspaper. Accessed 19 June 2014.
  47. The Guardian Newspaper. (1 June 2014b). Inclusive capitalism initiative is trojan horse to quell coming global revolt. The Guardian Newspaper. Accessed 19 June 2014.
  48. Timmons, J. F. (2010). Does democracy reduce economic inequality? British Journal of Political Science, 40(4), 741–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tomkiewicz, J. (2012). Zmieniająca się struktura dochodów jako jedna z przyczyn kryzysu finansowego [The changing structure of income as one of the causes of the financial crisis]. Nierówności społeczne a wzrost gospodarczy, 24, 103–111.Google Scholar
  50. Voitchovsky, S. (2005). Does the profile of income inequality matter for economic growth? Distinguishing between the effects of inequality in different parts of the income distribution. Journal of Economic Growth, 10(3), 273–296. %2Fs10887-005-3535-3. Accessed 19 June 2014.
  51. Wilkinson, R., & Picket, K. (2010). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  52. Woźniak, M. G., & Jabłoński, Ł. (2012). Social inequality, human capital and economic growth in OECD-countries. Synthesis. Nierówności społeczne a wzrost gospodarczy, 28, 24–40.Google Scholar
  53. WTID. (2012). The world top incomes database. Accessed 3 Oct 2012.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Łukasz Jabłoński
    • 1
    Email author
  • Piotr Zmuda
    • 2
  • Linda O’Riordan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Applied EconomicsCracow University of EconomicsKrakowPoland
  2. 2.FOM University of Applied SciencesEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations