Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

New Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility pp 341–370Cite as

How Does it Pay to be Green and Good? The Impact of Environmental and Social Supply Chain Practices on Operational and Competitive Outcomes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: FOM-Edition ((FOMEDITION))

Abstract

Although much has been written about whether it pays to be green, few researchers ask does it pay to be good and fewer still offer insights into which practices pay and which do not. This chapter addresses a key missing link in supply chain management by identifying which environmentally and socially sustainable supply chain management practices impact the operational and competitive outcomes of firms. The research literature has presented a diverse catalogue of measures of supply chain sustainability practices. In this chapter we have consolidated and synthesised existing measures in an effort to test the relationship between established sustainability practices and outcomes which allow firms to create a business case for both environmental and social sustainability practices. In doing so, we arrived at four environmental and four social supply chain sustainability practices with similar themes: monitoring; management systems; new product and process development; and strategy re-definition. A key outcome of this examination is that social sustainability practices pay more than environmental sustainability practices. This finding suggests that it might be advantageous for companies to invest their resources in social new product and process development as well as social supply chain re-definition focusing on social issues and in environmental monitoring and developing new environmental products and processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, W. F., & Monsen, J. R. (1979). On the measurement of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 501–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, G. J., & Buchholz, R. A. (1978). Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 479–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2007). When and why does it pay to be green? (Discussion Paper No. IEA –07–04). Montreal: HEC. http://www.hec.ca/iea/cahiers/2007/iea0704_planoie.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2013.

  • Ambec. S, & Lanoie, P. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awaysheh, A., & Klassen, R. D. (2010). The impact of supply chain structure on the use of supplier socially responsible practices. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(12), 1246–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamon, B. M. (1999). Designing the green supply chain. Logistics Information Management, 12(4), 332–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S., Wicks, A., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besser, T. L., Miller, N., & Perkins, R. K. (2006). For the greater good: Business networks and business social responsibility to communities. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 18(4), 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandlogic and CRD Analytics. (2012). Sustainability leadership report: Measuring perception vs. reality for 100 prominent global brands. http://www.sustainabilityleadershipreport.com. Accessed 22 Feb 2013.

  • Brown, K. A. (1996). Workplace safety: A call for research. Journal of Operations Management, 14(2), 157–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2011). Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(3), 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. (2000). Ethical issues in international buyer-supplier relationships: A dyadic examination. Journal of Operations Management, 18, 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R. (2005). Purchasing social responsibility and firm performance: The key mediating roles of organizational learning and supplier performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 35(3), 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C., & Easton, P. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(1), 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., & Stevens, C. K. (2007). Electronic reverse auction configuration and its impact on buyer price and supplier perceptions of opportunism: A laboratory experiment. Journal of Operations Management, 25(5), 1035–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S., & Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, S., Kingsley, T., & Whitehead, B. W. (1995). The real green issue. McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 132–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cycyota, C. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2006). What (not) to expect when surveying executives: A meta-analysis of top manager response rates and techniques over time. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 133–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, A., Pagell, M., Behm, M., & Veltri, A. (2008). Toward a theory of the linkages between safety and quality. Journal of Operations Management, 26(4), 521–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrgott, M., Reimann, F., Kaufmann, L., & Carter, C. R. (2011). Social sustainability in selecting emerging economy suppliers. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate social responsibility programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogler, H. R., & Nutt. F. (1975). A note on social responsibility and stock valuation. Academy of Management Journal, 18(1), 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (13 Sept 1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30(4), 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, A. (2000). Implementing sustainability in service operations in Scandic hotels. Interfaces, 30(3), 202–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gore, A. (1993). Earth in the balance: Ecology and the human spirit. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamschmidt, J., & Dyllick, T. (2006). ISO 14001: Profitable? Yes! But is it eco-effective? In Schaltegger, S. & Wagner, M. (Eds.), Managing the business case for sustainability (pp. 554–568). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handfield, R. B., & Baumer, D. L. (2006). Managing conflict of interest issues in purchasing. Journal of Supply Chain Management: A Global Review of Purchasing & Supply, 42(3), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, J. D., Melnyk, S. A., & Calantone, R. J. (2004). Core values and environmental management. Greener Management International, 46, 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinz, D. C. (1976). Financial correlates of a social measure. Akron Business and Economic Review, 7(1), 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensley, R. L. (1999). A review of operations management studies using scale development techniques. Journal of Operations Management, 17(3), 343–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D., & Ghobadian, A. (2009). An empirical study of green supply chain management practices amongst UK manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(7), 933–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A., Buttle, M., & Wrigley, N. (2007). Organisational geographies of corporate responsibility: A UK-US comparison of retailers’ ethical trading initiatives. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(4), 491–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. D., & Vereecke, A. (2012). Social issues in supply chains: Capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koplin, J., Seuring, S., & Mesterharm, M. (2007). Incorporating sustainability into supply management in the automotive industry: The case of the Volkswagen AG. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11/12), 1053–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotcharin, S., Eldridge S., & Freeman, J. (2012). The relationship between internal and supplier integration: Effects on product quality, cost efficiency and market performance. Proceedings of the 21st IPSERA conference, 1–4 April 2012, Naples, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, K. H., & Wong, C. W. (2012). Green logistics management and performance: Some empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing exporters. Omega, 40(3), 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lankoski, L. (2000). Determinants of environmental profit: An analysis of the firm-level relationship between environmental performance and economic performance. Espoo: Helsinki University of Technology, Institute of Strategy and International Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankoski, L. (2006). Environmental and economic performance: The basic links. In S. Schaltegger & M. Wagner (Eds.), Managing the business case for sustainability (pp. 32–46). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B., Tyler, B. B., & Cousins, P. D. (2008). Antecedents and consequences of social capital on buyer performance improvement. Journal of Operations Management, 26(3), 446–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. Y., & Klassen, R. D. (2008). Drivers and enablers that foster environmental management capabilities in small-and medium-sized suppliers in supply chains. Production and Operations Management, 17(6), 573–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D. L. (1995). The environmental practices and performance of transnational corporations. Transnational Corporations, 4(1), 44–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Ke, W., Wei, K. K., Gu, J., & Chen, H. (2010). The role of institutional pressures and organizational culture in the firm’s intention to adopt internet-enabled supply chain management systems. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 372–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miemczyk, J., Johnsen, T. E., & Macquet, M. (2012). Sustainable purchasing and supply management: A structured literature review of definitions and measures at the dyad, chain and network levels. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 478–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G., & Roth, A. V. (1994). A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies. Management Science, 40(3), 285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollenkopf, D., Closs, D., Twede, D., Lee, S., & Burgess, G. (2005). Assessing the viability of reusable packaging: A relative cost approach. Journal of Business Logistics, 26(1), 169–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollenkopf, D., Stolze, H., Tate, W. L., & Ueltschy, M. (2010). Green, lean, and global supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(1/2), 14–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montabon, F., Melnyk, S. A., Sroufe, R., & Calantone, R. J. (2000). ISO 14000: Assessing its perceived impact on corporate performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 36(2), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review, 1, 71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahm, A. Y., Vonderembse, M. A., & Koufteros, X. A. (2004). The impact of organizational culture on time-based manufacturing and performance. Decision Sciences, 35(4), 579–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied linear statistical models (4th ed.). Chicago: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 56–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, M., & Gobeli, D. (2009). Plant managers’ experiences and attitudes. Toward sustainability production and operations management. Production and Operations Management Society, 18(3), 278–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, M., & Wu, Z. (2009). Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of ten exemplars. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(2), 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parket, R., & Eilbirt, H. (1975). Social responsibility: The underlying factors. Business Horizons, 18(4), 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmigiani, A., Klassen, R. D., & Russo, M. V. (2011). Efficiency meets accountability: Performance implications of supply chain configuration, control and capabilities. Journal of Operations Management, 29(3), 212–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (2010). Building sustainable organizations: The human factor. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(1), 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1991). America’s green strategy. Scientific American, 264(4), 168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspective, 9(4), 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preuss, L. (2001). In dirty chains? Purchasing and greener manufacturing. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 345–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preuss, L. (2009). Addressing sustainable development through public procurement: The case of local government. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(3), 213–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullman, M., Maloni, M., & Carter, C. (2009). Food for thought: Motivations to adopt sustainability practices and perceived outcomes. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45(4), 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, F. L. (2000). Down to earth: Applying business principles to environmental management. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, D. A., & Vastag, G. (1996). International environmental standards and corporate policies: An integrative framework. California Management Review, 39(1), 106–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, E. D., & Roth, A. V. (2007). B2B seller competence: Construct development and measurement using a supply chain strategy lens. Journal of Operations Management, 25(6), 1311–1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring, S., & Muller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., & Henriques, I. (2005). Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheu, C. (2013). Global manufacturing research group update on research collection. http://www.gmrg.org/Questionnaire.html. Accessed 6 Feb 2012.

  • Singh, P. J., Power, D., & Chuong, S. C. (2011). A resource dependence theory perspective of ISO 9000 in managing organizational environment. Journal of Operations Management, 29(1), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S., & Barrientos, S. (2005). Fair trade and ethical trade: Are there moves towards convergence? Sustainable Development, 13, 190–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply-chain management: A state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tate, W. L., Ellram, L. M., & Kirchoff, J. F. (2010). Corporate social responsibility reports: A thematic analysis related to supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(1), 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touboulic, A., & Walker, H. (2013). A sense-making approach to sustainability in supply chains: An analysis of stakeholders’ perceptions and meanings. IPSERA Conference Proceedings, Nantes, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2006). Extending green practices across the supply chain: The impact of upstream and downstream integration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(7), 795–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance, S. C. (1975). Are socially responsible corporations good investment risks? Management Review, 64(8), 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. (1994). It’s not easy being green. Harvard Business Review, 72(3), 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, S. V., Handfield, R. B., & Melnyk, S. A. (1998). The green supply chain: Integrating suppliers into environmental management processes. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 34(2), 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiengarten, F., Pagell, M., & Fynes, B. (2013). ISO 14000 certification and investments in environmental supply chain management practices: Identifying differences in motivation and adoption levels between Western European and North American companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, C., & Seuring, S. (2010). Environmental impacts as buying criteria for third party logistical services. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(1/2), 84–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, I., Ram, M., Boyal, H., & Shah, M. (2008). Researching the drivers of socially responsible purchasing: A cross-national study of supplier diversity initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(3), 319–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z., & Pagell, M. (2011). Balancing priorities: Decision-making in sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Operations Management, 29(6), 577–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2004). Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 22(3), 265–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2007). The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18–19), 4333–4355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Geng, Y. (2005). Green supply chain management in China: Pressures, practices and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(5), 449–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai. K. (2008). Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices and implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Dou, Y., & Sarkis, J. (2010). A portfolio-based analysis for green supplier management using the analytical network process. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(4), 306–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai. K. (2013). Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. Journal of Purchasing Supply Management, 19(2), 106–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Irish Research Council for the Humanities and Social Sciences for funding this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UCD Business School, Belfield Campus, Dublin 4, Ireland

    Dr. Lucy McCarthy & Dr. Donna Marshall

Authors
  1. Dr. Lucy McCarthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. Donna Marshall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucy McCarthy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, Essen, Germany

    Linda O'Riordan

  2. FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, Essen, Germany

    Piotr Zmuda

  3. FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, Essen, Germany

    Stefan Heinemann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCarthy, L., Marshall, D. (2015). How Does it Pay to be Green and Good? The Impact of Environmental and Social Supply Chain Practices on Operational and Competitive Outcomes. In: O'Riordan, L., Zmuda, P., Heinemann, S. (eds) New Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility. FOM-Edition. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06794-6_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation