Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Regieren die Medien?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Demokratie und Krise

  • 12k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Verursachen oder verschärfen die Massenmedien eine Krise der Demokratie? Die umfangreiche und mannigfaltige sogenannte Mediamalaise-Literatur geht davon aus, dass Medien in den westlichen Demokratien einen starken Einfluss auf Politik und Regierung ausüben und sie dadurch die Demokratie schwächen oder gar zerstören können. Medien – Presse, TV, Radio und Internet – sind in der modernen Gesellschaft mittlerweile allgegenwärtig und ihre negativen Folgen scheinen in jeden Bereich des politischen Systems vorzudringen. Manche argumentieren, dass die Medien nur einer von vielen Gründen für das Versagen und die Krise der Demokratie sind, doch andere gehen so weit zu behaupten, dass die Medien in Wirklichkeit bereits die Macht von Parlamenten und Regierungen an sich gerissen haben. Die Behauptung, Medien spielten eine bedeutende – und meist negative – Rolle in modernen Gesellschaft en, ist so verbreitet, dass sie mittlerweile zu einem unhinterfragten Gemeinplatz geworden ist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Adatto, Kiku. 1990. Sound bite democracy: Network evening news Presidential campaign coverage, 1968-and 1988, Research Paper R-2, Joan Shorenstein Barone Center, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andolina, Molly W. und Clyde Wilcox. 2000. Public opinion: The paradoxes of Clinton’s popularity. In The Clinton Scandal and the Future of American Politics, hrsg. Mark J. Rozell und Clyde Wilcox, 171-194. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansolabehere, Stephen, Roy Behr und Shanto Iyengar. 1991. Mass Media and Elections: An Overview. American Politics Quarterly 19 (1): 109–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Applegate, Evan. 2013. Two years on. Fukushima casts no shadow over nuclear. Business- Week, 11. März 2013. http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-03-11/two-years-onfukushima-casts-no-shadow-over-nuclear. Zugegriffen: 24. Juni 2014.

  • Baker, C. Edwin. 2007. Media Concentration and Democracy: Why Ownership Matters. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1988. The Evil Demon of Images. Sydney: Power Institute of Fine Arts, University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck Paul Allen Russell J. Dalton, Steven Greene und Robert Huckfeldt. 2002. The social calculus of voting: Interpersonal, media, and organizational; influences on presidential choice. American Political Science Review 96 (1): 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Steve. 2000. Kill the messenger! The public condemns the news media. USA Today Magazine 128 (2656), Januar 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Stephen Earl. 2002. Another Lesson about Public Opinion during the Clinton-Lewinsky Scandal. Presidential Studies Quarterly 32 (2): 276–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. Lance. 2007. News: The Politics of Illusion. New York: Pearson, 7. Aufl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. Lance und Shanto Iyengar. 2008. A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication. Journal of Communication 58 (4): 707–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bimber, Bruce A. 2003. Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumler, Jay George und Michael Gurevitch. 1995. The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braestrup, Peter. 1977. Big Story. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, Heinz. 2006. Pathologies of the Virtual Public Sphere. In The Internet and Politics: Citizens, Voters, and Activists, hrsg. Sarah Oates, Diana Owen und Rachel K. Gibson, 207-222. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brants, Kees und Karen Siune. 1998. Politization in Decline? In Media Policy. Convergence, Concentration and Commerce, hrsg. Denis McQuail und Karen Suine, 128-143. Thowbridge, Wiltshire: Cromwell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchsbaum, Thomas M. 2005. E-voting: Lessons Learnt from Recent Pilots, Switzerland. Vortrag auf der Conference on E-voting and Electronic Democracy: Present and the Future. Seoul, März 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappella, Joseph N. und Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, Susan L. 2000. The Media at War. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coll, Steve. 2011. The Internet: For Better or for Worse. The New York Review of Books, April 7: 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, Allen und John F. Burns. 2012. At British Inquiry, Cameron Denies ‘Deals’ With Murdoch. New York Times, 14. Juni. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/15/world/europe/cameron-to-testify-over-murdoch-links-at-british-press-inquiry.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0. Zugegriffen: 24. Juni 2014.

  • Crozier, Michel J., Samuel P. Huntington und Joji Watanuki. 1975. The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, James. Hrsg. 1986. Bending Reality: The State of the Media. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, James und Jean Seaton. 2009. Power without Responsibility: The Press and Broadcasting in Britain. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtice, John. 1998. Do newspapers change voters’ minds? Or do voters change their papers? Vortrag auf der Jahrestagung der American Political Science Association, Boston, September 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtice, John. 1999. Was it the Sun wot won it again: The influence of newspapers in the 1997 election campaign, Working Papers N75. Oxford: Centre for Research into Elections and Social Trends, National Centre for Social Research, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtice, John und Holli Semetko. 1994. Does it Matter What the Paper’s Say? In Labour’s Last Chance? The 1992 Election and Beyond, hrsg. Anthony Francis Heath, Roger Jowell und John Curtice, 43-64. Sudbury, MA: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. 1958. A Critique of the Ruling Elite Model. The American Political Science Review 52 (2): 463–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, Peter. 1995. Television and the Public Sphere. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dautrich, Kenneth und Thomas H. Hartley. 1999. How the News Media Fail American Voters: Causes, Consequences and Remedies. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, W. Phillips. 1983. The Third-Person Effect in Communication. Public Opinion Quarterly 47 (1): 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debord, Guy. 1990. Comments on ‘The Society of the Spectacle’. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, Ben. 2012. Rupert Murdoch: ‘Sun wot won it’ headline was tasteless and wrong. The Guardian, 25. April 2012. http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/apr/25/rupertmurdoch-sun-wot-won-it-tasteless. Zugegriffen: 24. Juni 2014.

  • Durante, Ruben und Brian Knight. 2009. Partisan Control, Media Bias, and Viewer Responses: Evidence from Berlusconi’s Italy. NBER Working Paper Series, 14762. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w14762. Zugegriffen: 24. Juni 2014.

  • Elegant, Robert S. 1981. How to Lose a War. Reflections of a War Correspondent. Encounter LVII (2): 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entman, Robert M. 1995. Television, democratic theory and the visual construction of poverty. In Research in Political Sociology Volume 7: Mass Media and Politics, hrsg. P. C. Washburn, 139-160. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entman, Robert M. und Andrew Rojecki. 1993. Freezing out the public: Elite and media framing of the U.S. anti‐nuclear movement. Political Communication 10 (2): 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Audiovisual Observatory. 2007. The Public Service Broadcasting Culture. Volume V. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallows, James. 1997. Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine American Democracy. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Bob. 1994. Packaging Politics: Political Communications in Britain’s Media Democracy. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabler, Neal. 1998. Life the Movie: How Entertainment Conquered Reality. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galle, Matthias. 2012. Framing in der Berichterstattung deutscher Zeitungen zu regenerativer- und Atomenergie vor und nach Fukushima und dem deutschen Atomausstieg, Master-Arbeit Technische Universität Dresden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup Poll. 1998. Embroiled in highly publicized intern controversy, Clinton receives highest job approval ratings of his administration, 31. Januar 1998. http://www.gallup.com/poll/4264/ clintons-popularity-paradox.aspx. Zugegriffen: 24. Juni 2014.

  • Genest, Marc A. 1995. Negotiating in the Public Eye: The Impact of the Press on the Intermediate Range Nuclear Force Negotiations. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenslade, Roy. 2009. The Sun’s political switch is no surprise. The Guardian, 29. September. http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2009/sep/29/sun-conservatives. Zugegriffen: 24. Juni 2014.

  • Gunther Richard und Anthony Mughan. 2000. Democracy and the Media: A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hachten, William A. 1998. The Troubles of Journalism: A Critical Look at Whats Right and Wrong with the Press. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, Daniel. 1984. The Media, the War in Vietnam, and Political Support: A Critique of the Thesis of an Oppositional Media. The Journal of Politics 46 (1): 2–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, Daniel. 1989. The ‘Uncensored War’: The Media and Vietnam. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, Daniel. 1991. Sound bite news: Television coverage of elections, 1968-88. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Centre for International Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, Daniel und Paolo Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: The Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, William M. 1988. Military and the Media, 1962-1968. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Army Center of Military History.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanas, Jim. 1998. Dog the Wag. The Memphis Flyer: Media Watch, 2. Februar 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Roderick. 1994. Seducing America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Anthony Francis, Roger Jowell und John Curtice. Hrsg. 1994. Labour’s Last Chance? The 1992 Election and Beyond. London: Dartmouth Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, Edward S. und Noam Chomsky. 1994. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbert, R., Lance, R. Kelly Garrett und Laurel S. Gleason. 2010. A New Era of Minimal Effects? A Response to Bennett and Iyengar. Journal of Communication 60 (1): 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, Mark. 1986. The Press and Political Dissent. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, Peter. 1996. Mass Media and Media Policy in Western Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hundal, Sunny. 2010. What happens to politics after the Sun dies? New Statesman, 3. Juni 2010. http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/06/sun-media-labour-politics. Zugegriffen 24. Juni 2014.

  • Iyengar, Shanto, Mark D. Peters und Donald R. Kinder. 1982. Experimental Demonstrations of the “Not-So-Minimal” Consequences of Television News Programs. The American Political Science Review 76 (4): 848–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, Shanto. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible: How Television Frames PoliticaI Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, Detlef und Sebastian Korolczuk. 2012. German exceptionalism: the end of nuclear energy in Germany! Environmental Politics 21 (1): 159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalb, Marvin. 1998. The Rise of the “New News”. A Case Study of Two Root Causes of the Modern Scandal Coverage. Discussion Paper D-34. Cambridge, MA: Joan Shorenstein Centre on the Press, Politics, and Public Policy, John F. Kennedy School of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnow, Stanley. 1991. Vietnam: A History. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, Peter. 2011. Media Power: a myth. Prospect Magazine, 20. Juli 2011. http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/power-of-the-sun-newspaper-murdoch-overrated. Zugegriffen: 24. Juni 2014.

  • Kepplinger, Hans Mathias und Richard Lemke. 2012a. Augen zu und durch. Die Welt 13. August 2012, S. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kepplinger, Hans Mathias und Richard Lemke. 2012b. Die Reaktorkatastrophe bei Fukushima in Presse und Fernsehen in Deutschland, Schweiz, Frankreich und England. http://www.Kepplinger.de/files/Kepplinge&Lemke%282012%29_Fukushima_in_Presse_und_Fernsehen.pdf. Zugegriffen: 24. Juni 2014.

  • Key, Valdimer Orlando. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. The Journal of Politics 29 (1): 216–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, Jeffrey. P. 1988. The Stab-in-the-Back Legend and the Vietnam War. Armed Forces & Society 14 (3): 433–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Margali. S. und Robin Wagner-Pacifici. 2001. The dubious place of virtue: Reflections on the impeachment of William Jefferson Clinton and the death of the political event in America. Theory and Society 30: 735–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Regina. G. und W. Lance Bennett. 2001. Rethinking Media Politics and Public Opinion: Reactions to the Clinton‐Lewinsky Scandal. Political Science Quarterly 116 (3): 425–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsky, Martin. 1986. Impact. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maarek, Philippe J. 1995. Political Marketing and Communication. London: John Libby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manheim, Jarol. 1991. All of the people, all the time: Strategic communication and American politics. Armonk, NY, ME Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancini, Paolo. 2011. Between Commodification and Lifestyle Politics: Does Silvio Berlusconi Provide a New Model of Politics for the Twenty-First Century? Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcinkowski, Frank und Martin R. Herbers. 2013. Mehr Konkurrenz – bessere Publizistik? Wettbewerbsbedingungen und Informationsqualität im deutschen Zeitungsmarkt. In Media Structures and Media Performance – Medienstrukturen und Medienperformanz,

    Google Scholar 

  • hrsg. Manuel Puppis, Matthias Künzler und Otfried Jarren, 377-400. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Rowena 2012. David Cameron‘s five secret meetings with Rupert Murdoch. Daily Telegraph, 25. April 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, Robert W. 2000. Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, Robert W. 2013. Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism is Turning the Internet Against Democracy. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyrowitz, Joshua. 1995. How television changes the political drama. In Reseach in Political Sociology Volume 7: Mass Media and Politics, hrsg. P. C. Wasburn, 117-138. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur H. 1999. Sex, Politics, and Public Opinion: What Political Scientists Really Learned from the Clinton-Lewinsky Scandal. PS: Political Science & Politics 32 (4): 721–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyers, Bill. 2009. Moyers on Democracy. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, John E. 1973. War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrine, Ralph und Stylianos Papathanassopoulos. 1996. The “Americanization” of political communication: A critique. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 1 (2): 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Brian. 2002. Bill Clinton’s Approval Ratings: The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same. Political Research Quarterly 55 (4): 781–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Kenneth und Malcolm Brynin. 2001. The national press and party voting in the UK. Political Studies 49 (2): 265–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, John und Robert W. McChesney. 2013. Dollarocracy: How the Money-and-Media- Election Complex is Destroying America. New York: Nation Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa. 2001. Apathetic Landslide: The 2001 British General Election. Parliamentary Affairs 54: 564–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa. 2004. E-campaigning and e-democracy.Experiments in e-voting v. all-postal voting facilities in UK local elections. Paper for the conference on Political Communications in the 21st Century, St Margarett’s College, University of Otago, New Zealand, Januar 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa, John Curtice, David Sanders., Margaret Scammell und Holli A Semetko. 1999. On Message: Communicating the Campaign. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, Sarah, Diana Owen und Rachel K. Gibson. 2006. The Internet and Politics: Citizens, Voters, and Activists. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parenti, Michael. 1992. Make-Believe Media: The Politics of Entertainment. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pariser, Eli. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding From You. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, Thomas E. 1994. Out of Order. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Centre. 1998. Americans unmoved by prospects of Clinton, Lewinsky Testimony, 4. August 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfetsch, Barbara. 1996. Convergence through privatization? Changing media environments and televised politics in Germany. European Journal of Communication 11 (4): 427–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poguntke, Thomas und Paul Webb. Hrsg. 2007. The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman, Neil. 1985. Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. New York: Viking-Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Lance. 2010. Where Power Lies: Prime Ministers v the Media. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, Markus. 2013. Media and Political Polarization. Annual Review of Political Science 16: 129–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protess David L. Fay Lomax Cook Jack C. Doppelt, James S. Ettema, Margaret T. Gordon, Donna R. Leff und Peter Miller. 1992. The Journalism of Outrage: Investigative Reporting and Agenda Building in America. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 1995. Bowling Alone: America‘s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy 6 (1): 65–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranney, Austin. 1983. Channels of Power: The Impact of Television on American Politics. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rattinger, Hans, Sigrid Roßteutscher, Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, Bernhard Weßels, Thomas Gschwend, Hermann Schmitt, Andreas Wüst und Thomas Zittel. 2012. Kandidatenstudie, Befragung (GLES 2009). GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln. ZA5319 Datenfile Version 2.0.0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rentoul, John. 2013. It wasn’t the Sun wot won it: official. Independent, 18. April 2013. http://www. independent.co.uk/news/it-wasnt-the-sun-wot-won-it-official-1364910.html. Zugegriffen: 24. Juni 2014.

  • Ricolfi, Luca. 1997. Politics and the Mass Media in Italy. West European Politics 20 (1): 135–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Martin. 2012. How David Cameron went to “great lengths” to woo Murdoch empire before 2010 general election. Mail Online, 29. November. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2240521/How-David-Cameron-went-great-lengths-woo-Murdochempire-2010-general-election.html. Zugegriffen: 24. Juni 2014.

  • Sabato, Larry. 2000. Feeding Frenzy: How Attack Journalism has Transformed American Politics. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabbagh, Dan. 2011. How Tony Blair was taken into the Murdoch family fold. The Guardian, 5. September. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/sep/05/tony-blair-murdoch-family-fold. Zugegriffen: 24. Juni 2014.

  • Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger und David Farrell. 2002. Do political campaigns matter? In Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums, hrsg. David Farrell und Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck, 183-193. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger und Ansgar Wolsing. 2010. European TV environments and citizens’ social trust: Evidence from multilevel analyses. Communications 35 (4): 461–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, Michael. 1995. The Power of the News. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snoddy, Raymond. 1992. The Good, the Bad and the Unacceptable. The Hard News. London: Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonne, Paul. 2012. Blair Denies Aiding Rupert Murdoch. The Wall St. Journal, 28. Mai 2012. http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303674004577431921039857912. Zugegriffen: 24. Juni 2014.

  • Sonner, Molly W. und Clyde Wilcox. 1999. Forgiving and Forgetting: Public Support for Bill Clinton during the Lewinsky Scandal. PS: Political Science & Politics 32 (3): 554–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statista. 2013. Umfrage: Waren Sie schon vor dem Super-Gau von Fukushima gegen die Erzeugung von atomarem Strom oder sind Sie danach zum Atomkraftgegner geworden? http://de.statista. com/statistik/daten/studie/191887/umfrage/atomkraftgegner-vor-oder-nach-fukushima/. Zugegriffen: 2. Mai 2013.

  • Stevens, David und Kieron O’Hara. 2006. Inequality.Com: Power, Poverty and the Digital Divide. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, Jesper und Peter Van Aelst. 2013. Why Political Parties Adapt to the Media Exploring the Fourth Dimension of Mediatization. International Communication Gazette 75 (4): 341–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, Cass. 2001. Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, Eric M. 1998. Social Capital, Television, and the “Mean World”: Trust, Optimism, and Civic Participation. Political Psychology 19 (3): 441–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visschers, Vivianne H. M. und Michael Siegrist. 2013. How a Nuclear Power Plant Accident Influences Acceptance of Nuclear Power: Results of a Longitudinal Study Before and After the Fukushima Disaster. Risk Analysis 33 (2): 333–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, David, Oliver Carsten Fueg und Alessandro D’Armo. 2004. A Mapping Study of Media Concentration and Ownership in Ten European Countries. http://77.87.161.246/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/A-Mapping-Study-of-Media-Concentration-and-Ownership-in-Ten-European-Countries.pdf. Zugegriffen: 24. Juni 2014.

  • Weiss, Stephen, Clark Dougan und Boston Publishing Company. 1983. Nineteen Sixty-Eight (The Vietnam Experience). Boston: Boston Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatcroft, Geoffrey. 2012. What Rupert hath wrought! The New York Review of Books, 21. Juni 2012: 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Michael. 2012. Tony Blair and the Murdochs: a family affair. The Guardian, 29. Mai 2012. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/may/29/tony-blair-murdochs-family-affair. Zugegriffen: 24. Juni 2014.

  • Wyatt, Clarence. 1993. Paper Soldiers. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, John R. 1998. Monica Lewinsky’s Contribution to Political Science. PS: Political Science & Politics 31 (2): 182–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, John R. 2001. Monica Lewinsky and the Mainsprings of American Politics. In Mediated Politics, hrsg. W. Lance Bennett und Robert M. Entman, 252-278. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Abt. Demokratie und Demokratisierung, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin, Deutschland

    Professor Kenneth Newton & Nicolas Merz

Authors
  1. Professor Kenneth Newton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicolas Merz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth Newton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB) für Sozialforschung, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Wolfgang Merkel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Newton, K., Merz, N. (2015). Regieren die Medien?. In: Merkel, W. (eds) Demokratie und Krise. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05945-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05945-3_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-05944-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-05945-3

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation