Skip to main content

The Impact of the Inspectorate System on Initial Teacher Education in England

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Governance in der Lehrerausbildung: Analysen aus England und Deutschland

Part of the book series: Educational Governance ((EDUGOV,volume 27))

  • 918 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter fouses on how the regulatory framework for Initial Teacher Education (ITE) has reflected the wider development of a neo-liberal performative landscape of recent decades, and particularly on the complex relationship between the notionally independent inspectorate and government delivery agencies. The chapter explores the extent to which the performative ITE inspection model is deployed, sometimes overtly, but often covertly, to ensure providers align the structure, content and delivery of their programmes according to the political positioning of government rather than their own professional and academic judgement. This growth of ‘coercive compliance’ is situated in the wider debate about the extent to which ITE is positioned either as a ‘craft apprenticeship’, or as a preparation for exercising ‘theorised profession/situated judgement’.

Zusammenfassung

Die folgenden Ausführungen setzen sich mit dem Einfluss der neoliberalen, performance-orientierten Ära der letzten Jahrzehnte auf die rechtlichen Rahmenbedingungen der Lehrerausbildung auseinander. Ein besonderer Fokus liegt hierbei auf dem vielschichtigen Verhältnis zwischen der theoretisch unabhängigen Aufsichtsbehörde Ofsted, welche für die Qualitätsprüfung zuständig ist, und der Teaching Agency, die als staatliche Behörde die Sicherstellung eines gut qualifizierten Lehrpersonals zu verantworten hat. Der Beitrag untersucht das Ausmaß, zu welchem das performance-orientierte Inspektionsmodell dazu dient – manchmal offenkundig, häufig jedoch in versteckter Form – zu gewährleisten, dass die Anbieter sich hinsichtlich der Struktur, der Inhalte und der Gestaltung ihrer Kursprogramme in der Lehrerausbildung im Wesentlichen an den politischen Intentionen der Regierung und weniger an ihrem eigenen professionellen und akademischen Urteilsvermögen ausrichten. Diese Entwicklung zu einer „zwangsweisen Fügsamkeit“ ist verbunden mit der umfassenden Frage nach dem Verständnis der Lehrerausbildung entweder als eine Art Ausbildung für ein Handwerk oder aber als eine Vorbereitung auf eine akademische Profession, welche ein komplexes und situationsangemessenes Urteils- und Handlungsvermögen erfordert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For consistency, the term initial teacher education (ITE) is retained throughout this chapter.

  2. 2.

    This Agency has been re-branded a number of times:

    1998–2005 Teacher Training Agency (TTA)

    2005–2010 Training and Development Agency for Schools (TDA)

    2010-present Teaching Agency (TA) (with a further reorganisation underway at the time of writing (February 2013)).

References

  • Apple, M. W. (2005). Education, markets, and an audit culture. Critical Quarterly, 47(1–2), 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (1996). New Britain: my vision of a young country. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubb, S., Earley, P., Ahtaridou, E., Jones, J., & Taylor, C. (2007). The self-evaluation form: Is the SEF aiding school improvement? Management in Education, 21(3), 32–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education (DfE). (2010). The importance of teaching: The schools white paper 2010. London: TSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Gay, P. (1996). Consumption and identity at work. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. (2011). The “shape” of teacher professionalism in England: Professional standards, performance management, professional development and the changes proposed in the 2010 White Paper. British Educational Research Journal, 37(5), 851–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, M. (2001). OFSTED, inspection and the betrayal of democracy. Journal of Philosophy in Education, 35(4), 695–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, J. (2005). New labour and teacher education: the end of an era. Oxford Review of Education, 31(1), 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, J. (2013). Globalisation, neoliberalism, and the reform or teacher education in England. The Educational Forum, 77(1), 28–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghouri, N., & Barnard, N. (1998). Training courses go after poor inspections. Times Educational Supplement, 30 October 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilroy, D. (1992). The political rape of initial teacher education in England and Wales: A UCET rebuttal. Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy, 18(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilroy, P. (1998). New labour and teacher education in England and Wales: The first 500 days. Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy, 24(3), 221–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace, G. (1996). School leadership: Beyond educational management – an essay in policy scholarship. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillgate Group. (1986). Whose schools? A radical manifesto. London: Hillgate Place.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, A., & Spero, R. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching. A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglis, F. (2000). A malediction upon management. Journal of Education Policy, 15(4), 417–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaton, G. (2006). Teachers under Siege. Stoke-upon-Trent: Trentham Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition. A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBeath, J. (2006). School inspection and self-evaluation. Working with the new relationship. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, P., & Hextall, I. (1997). Problems of accountability in reinvented government: A case study of the Teacher Training Agency. Journal of Education Policy, 12(4), 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, P., & Hextall, I. (2000). Reconstructing teaching: Standards, performance and accountability. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, W. (2007). Education by numbers: The tyranny of testing. London: Politicos Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, K., Osborne, P., & Ferlie, E. (2002). New public management: Current trends and future prospects. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • OfSTED. (2004). A new relationship with schools: Improving performance through school self-evaluation. London: DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  • OfSTED. (2009). The inspection of initial teacher education 2008–11: A guide for inspectors on the management and organisation of initial teacher education inspections. London: Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • OfSTED (2012). The ITE inspection handbook. http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/inspection-forms-and-guides/i/Initial%20teacher%20education%20inspection%20handbook%202012.pdf.

  • Palmer, F. (1986). Anti-racism: An assault on education and values. Wiltshire: Sherwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perryman, J. (2006). Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: Disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Training and Development Agency for Schools (TDA). (2011). TDA self-evaluation document (SED) for initial teacher training (ITT) providers. London: TDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troman, G. (1997). Self-management and School Inspection: complementary forms of surveillance and control in the primary school. Oxford Review of Education, 23(3), 345–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Universities Council for the Education of Teachers (UCET). (2011). A study of self-evaluation in Initial Teacher Education (ITE) in England: A tool of governmentality? London: UCET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, C. (2011). Professionalism and the post‐performative teacher: new teachers reflect on autonomy and accountability in the English school system. Professional Development in Education, 37(3), 389–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, C., & Wood, P. (2009). Initial teacher education in the panopticon. Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy, 35(3), 283–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, C. (1999). Platform: Why inspections set you free. Times Educational Supplement, 14 May 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youens, B., & Bailey, M. (2004). The impact of quality assurance on mentor training in initial teacher education partnerships: A UK perspective. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 32(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Wilkins .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A: Grade Descriptors for Assessing Quality of Provision as “Outstanding” (Grade 1): Ofsted ITE Inspection Handbook (Ofsted 2012)

Appendix A: Grade Descriptors for Assessing Quality of Provision as “Outstanding” (Grade 1): Ofsted ITE Inspection Handbook (Ofsted 2012)

  1. a.

    Outcomes for trainees

    • All primary and secondary trainees awarded QTS exceed the minimum level of practice expected of teachers as defined in the Teachers’ Standards by the end of their training. Trainees demonstrate excellent practice in some of the standards for teaching and their personal and professional conduct. Much of their teaching is outstanding and never less than consistently good.

    • Completion and employment rates are consistently high.

    • There are no significant variations in the outcomes achieved by different groups of trainees.

  2. b.

    Quality of training across the partnership

    • Much of the training, as judged through the impact on outcomes for trainees, is outstanding and never less than consistently good.

    • High-quality training prepares trainees and former trainees to teach exceptionally well, demonstrating:

      • strong subject and curriculum knowledge

      • phase expertise

      • the ability to use a range of teaching and learning strategies to great effect.

    • Trainees are well prepared to accurately assess achievement and demonstrate through their planning and teaching that their pupils, including those who are disabled and those who have special educational needs, make good progress.

    • Outstanding training in behaviour management equips trainees with the knowledge, understanding and skills to manage behaviour and discipline effectively and create an excellent climate for learning.

    • Expert mentors and trainers have consistently high expectations and work collaboratively to ensure training is coherent and highly relevant to the needs of trainees.

    • High-quality, complementary placements meet trainees’ needs very well and ensure trainees gain substantial practical experience to develop their evaluative and practical teaching skills effectively in different settings.

    • High-quality training enables trainees to teach reading, writing, communication and mathematics effectively to enhance the progress of pupils they teach.

    • Primary training in early reading, systematic synthetic phonics, communication and language development and primary mathematics is of outstanding quality and ensures trainees have gained sufficient practical experience to teach these aspects with confidence and competence by the end of their training.

    • Assessment of trainees is rigorous and precise. Consistently high-quality oral and written feedback and challenging developmental targets support trainees’ critical reflections, enabling them to analyse, evaluate and improve their practice.

  3. c.

    Leadership and Management of the partnership

    • The pursuit of excellence in all of the ITE partnership’s activities is demonstrated by an uncompromising and highly successful drive to strongly improve, or sustain, the highest levels of provision and outcomes over a sustained period of time.

    • Leaders and managers base their actions on a deep and accurate understanding of the ITE partnership’s performance and strengths.

    • Rigorous and well-embedded quality assurance systems are used extremely effectively to sustain high-quality outcomes and to continuously improve the quality of provision across the ITE partnership.

    • Improvement planning is based on the rigorous, accurate and systematic analysis of internal and externally validated data, thorough self-evaluation and is extremely responsive to satisfaction surveys from employers, trainees, former trainees and the Newly Qualified Teacher (NQT) survey (where appropriate) who attest to the high quality of the training.

    • All leaders and managers focus relentlessly on continually improving the quality of provision and outcomes for trainees.

    • Mentors and trainers are of the highest quality and benefit from high-quality and well-focused professional development. As a result, the quality of training across the partnership is likely to be outstanding or at least consistently good and improving.

    • Schools, colleges and/or other settings are influential in shaping the provision and are heavily involved in recruitment and selection and the strategic leadership and management of the ITE partnership.

    • Rigorous selection procedures ensure the best possible trainees are recruited to meet specific local and/or regional needs. Trainees selected demonstrate excellent subject and curriculum knowledge and a strong aptitude for teaching.

    • The performance of trainees and groups of trainees is monitored extremely rigorously from the point of selection to final assessment to ensure that all who are awarded qualified teacher status (QTS) become good or better teachers by the end of their training

  4. d.

    Overall effectiveness

    • The ITE partnership’s practice consistently reflects the highest aspirations for trainees and expectations of mentors and trainers are exacting.

    • The ITE partnership ensures that best practice is spread effectively in a drive for continuous improvement.

    • The quality of training across the partnership is outstanding in all aspects, including in literacy – and systematic synthetic phonics for primary trainees – and highly relevant to trainees’ needs.

    • Outstanding training contributes to outstanding outcomes for all trainees or, in exceptional circumstances, outcomes that are good and rapidly improving.

    • The leadership and management of the partnership are outstanding.

    • The ITE partnership has an outstanding reputation with its trainees, former trainees, schools, colleges and/or settings, other partners and employers and its trainees are very well prepared to join the profession as good or better teachers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilkins, C. (2015). The Impact of the Inspectorate System on Initial Teacher Education in England. In: Kuhlee, D., van Buer, J., Winch, C. (eds) Governance in der Lehrerausbildung: Analysen aus England und Deutschland. Educational Governance, vol 27. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05894-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05894-4_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-05893-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-05894-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics