Skip to main content

Erbschaften der Vergangenheit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbuch Transformationsforschung

Zusammenfassung

Im Gefolge der jüngst ausgerufenen „historischen Wende in den Demokratisierungsstudien“ (Cappocia/Ziblatt 2010) sowie der neuen Popularität des Konzepts der Pfadabhängigkeit in der Variante des Historischen Institutionalismus hat die Transformationsforschung die Erbschaften (legacies) vorangegangener Regime als einen wichtigen Faktor in der Analyse von Prozessen der Demokratisierung und der Konsolidierung junger Demokratien wiederentdeckt. Das Konzept hat insbesondere in der auf Osteuropa bezogenen Literatur großen Anklang gefunden (La Porte/Lussier 2011).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Capoccia, Giovanni;Ziblatt, Daniel (2010): The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies: A New Research Agenda for Europe and Beyond. Comparative Political Studies 43(8/9): 931-968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesarini, Paola, und Hite, Katherine (2004): Introducing the Concept of Authoritarian Legacies . In Hite, Katherine, und Cesarini, Paola (Hrsg.): Authoritarian Legacies and Democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, S. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, Ruth Berins, und Collier, David (1991): Shaping the Political Arena. Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croissant, Aurel (2003): Staat, Staatlichkeit und demokratische Transformation in Ostasien. In Bendel, Petra; Croissant, Aurel und Rüb, Friedbert W.(Hrsg.): Demokratie und Staatlichkeit. Systemwechsel zwischen Staatsreform und Staatskollaps. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, S. 203–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croissant, Aurel;Kuehn, David;Chambers, Paul W. und Lorenz (2013): Democratization and Civilian Control in Asia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon;Offe, Claus und Preuss, Ulrich K. (1998): Institutional design in post-communist societies: rebuilding the ship at sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hite, Katharian, und Morlino, Leonardo (2004): Problematizing the links between authoritarian legacies and „good“ democracy. In Hite, Katharina, und Cesarini, Paola (Hrsg.): Authoritarian Legacies and Democracy in Latin America and Southern Europe. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, S. 25–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtmann, Everhard (2009): Signaturen des Übergangs. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 28: 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, Marc Morjé (2003): The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, Herbert;Mansfeldova, Zdenka;Markowski, Radosław;und Toka, Gabór (1999): Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuzer, Marcus (2009): How Party Systems Form: Path Dependency and the Institutionalization of the Post-War German Party System. British Journal of Political Science 39(4): 669-697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porte, Jody und Lussier, Danielle N. (2011): What is the Leninist Legacy? Assessing Twenty Years of Scholarship. Slavic Review 70(3): 637-654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, Wolfgang (2007): Gegen alle Theorie? Die Konsolidierung der Demokratie in Ostmitteleuropa. Politisches Vierteljahresschrift (PVS) 48(3): 413-433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morlino, Leonardo (2010): Authoritarian Legacies, Politics of the Past and the Quality of Democracy in Southern Europe: Open Conclusions. South European Society and Politics 15(3): 507-529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pridham, Geoffrey (2000): Confining conditions and breaking with the past: historical legacies and political learning in transitions to democracy. Democratization 7(2): 36-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberg, Jason (2012): What is a Historical Legacy? Paper presented at the 19th International Council of Europeanists, Boston, MA, March 22-24, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aurel Croissant .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Croissant, A. (2015). Erbschaften der Vergangenheit. In: Kollmorgen, R., Merkel, W., Wagener, HJ. (eds) Handbuch Transformationsforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05348-2_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05348-2_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-05347-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-05348-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics