Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Je mehr, desto besser?

Der Effekt unterschiedlicher Immigrantenanteile auf die Toleranz gegenüber Immigranten in der Schweiz

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Europäische Minderheiten

  • 1736 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

„Europe’s Call to Intolerance“ lautete der Titel der Washington Post im Jahr 2009 kurz nach der Abstimmung über das Verbot von Minaretten in der Schweiz. Durch den steigenden Individualismus, die erhöhte Immigration sowie durch den fortwährenden Wandel in der Gesellschaft treffen vermehrt divergierende Werte, Lebensweisen und Kulturen aufeinander, wodurch der Ruf nach Toleranz in modernen Zivilgesellschaften immer lauter wird (Dunn 2012; Inglehart 1977; Inglehart und Baker 2000).

Das folgende Kapitel basiert mit leichten Überarbeitungen auf Rapp (2014).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Allport GW. (1954) The nature of prejudice. Addison Wesley, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonsich M, Jones PI (2010) Mapping the Swiss referendum on the minaret ban. Political Geography 29: 57–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blalock HM (1967) Toward a theory of minority-group relations. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau PM, Schwartz JE (1984) Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations. Transaction Publication, Orlando.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer H (1958) Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position. Pac Sociol Rev 1: 1, 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobo L, Hutchings VL (1996) Perceptions of Racial Group Competition: Extending Blumer’s Theory of Group Position to a Multiracial Social Context. Am Sociol Rev 61: 951–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornschier S (2010) Integrating the Defense of Traditional Communities into the Libertarian- Authoritarian Divide: The Role of the Swiss People’s Party in the Redefinition of Cultural Conflicts. In: Hug S, Kriesi H (Hrsg.), Value Change in Switzerland. Boulder: Lexington Books, Boulder, S 75–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattacin S, Gerber B, Sardi M, Wegener R (2006) Monitoring Rightwing Extremist Attitudes, Xenophobia and Misanthropy in Switzerland. Geneva: Sociograph Sociological Research. Study No. 1 of the Department of Sociology of the University of Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenders M, Scheepers P (2003) The Effect of Education on Nationalism and Ethnic Exclusionism: An International Comparison. Polit Psychol, 24:313–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danaci D (2009) When Two Worlds Collide: Does Cultural Liberalism of Swiss Citizen Guarantee Tolerance for Islamic Minorities? Working Paper, Institute for Political Science, University of Zürich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch K (1976) Die Schweiz als paradigmatischer Fall politischer Integration. Paul Haupt Verlag, Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn K, Orellana S, Singh S (2009) Legislative Diversity and Social Tolerance: How Multiparty Systems Lead to Tolerant Citizens. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, 19:283–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn K, Singh S (2012) Pluralistic Conditioning: Social Tolerance and Effective Democracy. Democratization: 1–28. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2012.697056

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldmann E, Henschel TR, Ulrich S (2002) Tolerance. Basis for Democratic Interaction. Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrar JW (1976) The Dimensions of Tolerance. Pac Sociol Rev, 19:63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forst R (2000) Toleranz. Philosophische Grundlagen und gesellschaftliche Praxis einer umstrittenen Tugend. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst R (2003) Toleranz im Konflikt: Geschichte, Gehalt und Gegenwart eines umstrittenen Begriffs. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitag M, Rapp C (2013) Intolerance Toward Immigrants in Switzerland. Diminished Threat Through Social Contacts? Swiss Polit Scie Rev, 19: 1–30. DOI: 10.1111/spsr.12049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JL (1992) Alternative Measures of Political Tolerance – Must Tolerance be ‘least-liked’? Am J of Polit Sci, 36:560–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JL (2006) Enigmas of Intolerance: Fifty Years after Stouffer’s Communism, Conformity, and Civil Liberties. Perspectives on Politics, 4:21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson JL (2013) Measuring Political Tolerance and General Support for Pro-Civil Liberties Policies: Notes, Evidence, and Cautions. Public Opin Quart, 77:45–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giugni M, Morariu M (2010) Intolerance Begets Intolerance. Explaining Negative Attitudes toward Foreigners and Muslims in Switzerland, 1996-2007. In: Kriesi H (Hrsg.), Value Change in Switzerland. Lexington Books; Plymoutz, S 81–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Green EGT, Fasel N, Sarrasin O (2010) The more the merrier? The effects of type of cultural diversity on exclusionary immigration attitudes in Switzerland. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4:177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundelach B (2013) In Diversity We Trust: The Positive Effect of Ethnic Diversity on Outgroup Trust. Polit Behav (online first publication). DOI: 10.1007/s11109-013-9220-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagendoorn L (1995) Intergroup Biases in Multiple Group Systems: The Perception of Ethnic Hierarchies. Eur Rev of Soc Psychol, 6: 199–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammar T (1985) European Immigration Policy: A Comparative Study. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hastedt H (2012) Toleranz. Philipp Reclam jun, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman JJ (1979) Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica, 47:153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitmeyer W (1997) Was treibt die Gesellschaft auseinander? Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbling M (2008) Practising Citizenship and Heterogeneous Nationhood. Naturalisation in Swiss Municipalities. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helbling M (2011) Why Swiss-Germans dislike Germans. Eur Soc, 13: 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjerm M (2007) Do Numbers Really Count? Group Threat Theory Revisited. J Ethn Migr Stud, 33: 1253–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjerm M (2009) Anti-Immigrant Attitudes and Cross-Municipal Variation in the Proportion of Immigrants. Acta Sociol, 52: 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjerm M, Nagayoshi K (2011) The composition of the minority population as a threat: Can real economic and cultural threats explain xenophobia? Int Sociol, 26: 815–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann-Nowotny H-J (2001) Das Fremde in der Schweiz: Ergebnisse soziologischer Forschung. Seismo, Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt RR (1986) Politics in Context: Assimilation and Conflict in Urban Neighborhoods. Agathon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart R (1977) The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart R, Baker WE (2000) Modernization, Cultural Change and the Persistence of Traditional Values. Am Sociol Rev, 65:19–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King PT (1998) Toleration. Frank Cass, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner A, Freitag M, Rapp C (2011) Crafting tolerance: the role of political institutions in a comparative perspective. Europ Polit Sci Rev, 3:201–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi H, Lachat R, Selb P, Bornschier S, Helbling M (2005) Der Aufstieg der SVP: acht Kantone im Vergleich. Verlag Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunovich RM (2004) Social structural position and prejudice: an exploration of cross-national differences in regression slopes. Soc Sci Res, 33: 20–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart A (1999) Patterns of democracy. Yale University Press, New Haven, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder W (2010) Swiss Democracy. Possible Solutions to conflict in multicultural societies. Palgrave/McMillan, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke J (1996) A Letter Concerning Toleration. J. Tully, Indianapolis, Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manatschal A (2011) Path-dependent or dynamic? Cantonal integration policies between regional citizenship and traditions and right populist. Ethnic Racial Stud, 35:281–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manatschal A, Stadelmann-Steffen I (2013) Cantonal Variations of Integration Policy and Their Impact on Immigrant Educational Inequality. Comparative European Politics, 11: 671–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow AH (2002) Motivation und Persönlichkeit. Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClosky H, Brill A (1983) Dimensions of Tolerance. What Americans Believe about Civil Liberties. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mclaren L (2003) Anti-Immigrant Prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat Perception, and Preferences for the Exclusion of Migrants. Soc Forces, 81: 909–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill JS (1988) On Liberty. Reclam, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondak JJ, Sanders MS (2003) Tolerance and Intolerance, 1976-1998. Am J Polit Sci 46: 838–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolet S, Sciarini P (2006) When Do Issue Opinions Matter, and to Whom? The Determinants of Long-term Stability and Change in Party Choice in the 2003 Swiss Elections. Swiss Polit Sci Rev, 12: 159–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niederberger JM (2004) Ausgrenzen, assimilieren, integrieren: die Entwicklung einer schweizerischen Integrationspolitik. Seismo Verlag, Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver JE, Mendelberg T (2000) Reconsidering the Environmental Determinants of White Racial Attitudes. Am J Polit Sci, 44: 574–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver JE, Wong J (2003) Intergroup Prejudice in Multiethnic Settings. Am J Polit Sci, 47: 567–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quillian L (1995) Prejudice as a Response to Perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-Immigrant and Racial Prejudice. Am Sociol Rev, 60: 209–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp C (2014) Toleranz gegenüber Immigranten in der Schweiz und in Europa. Empirische Analysen zum Bestand und den Entstehungsbedingungen im Vergleich. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes G, Halberstaedt J, Brajkerovich G (2001) Generalizations of mere exposure effects to averaged composite faces. Soc Cognition 19: 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sader M (2002) Toleranz und Fremdsein. 16 Stichworte zum Umgang mit Intoleranz und Fremdenfeindlichkeit. Beltz Taschenbuch, Hemsbach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon TM. (2003) The Difficulty of Tolerance. In: Scanlon TM (Hrsg.), The Difficulty of Tolerance. Essays in Political Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 187–208.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scheepers P, Gijsberts M, Coenders M (2002) Ethnic Exclusionism in European Countries. Public Opposition to Civil Rights for Legal Migrants as a Response to Perceived Ethnic Threat. European Sociological Review, 18: 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider S L (2008) Anti-Immigrants Attitudes in Europe: Outgroup Size and Perceived Ethnic Threat. Eur Sociol Rev, 24: 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizerische Gemeinnützige Gesellschaft (2011) Volunteering in Swiss Municipalities 2010 Survey, Zürich/Lausanne: FORS (http://forsdata.unil.ch/fw_query_fors/jd-result-3-list.fwx?lang=d, FORS-Id: 10905).

  • Semyonov M, Raijman R, Tov AY, Schmidt P (2004) Population size, perceived threat, and exclusion: a multiple-indicators analysis of attitudes toward foreigners in Germany. Soc Sci Res, 33:681–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skenderovic D (2009) The radical right in Switzerland: continuity and change, 1945-2000. Berghahn Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sniderman PM, Tetlock PE, Glaser JM, Green DP, Hout M (1989) Principled tolerance and the American mass public. Bri J Polit Sci, 19:25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolle D Soroka S Johnston R (2008) When Does Diversity Erode Trust? Neighborhood Diversity, Interpersonal Trust, and the Mediating Effect of Social Interactions. Polit Stud-London, 55: 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolz J (2001) Einstellungen zu Ausländern und Ausländerinnen 1969 und 1995: eine Replikationsstudie. In: Hoffmann-Nowotny H-J (Hrsg.) Das Fremde in der Schweiz. Seismo Verlag, Zürich, S. 33–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer SL (1955) Communism, conformity, and civil liberties: A cross-section of the nation speaks its mind. Transaction Publishers, Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan JL, Piereson J, Marcus GE (1993) Political Tolerance and American Democracy. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel H (1982) Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Annu Rev Psychol, 33: 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theiler T (2004) The origins of Euroscepticism in German-speaking Switzerland. Eur J Polit Res, 43: 635–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1995) Declaration of Principles on Tolerance. Proclaimed and signed by the Member States of UNESCO on 16 November 1995. URL http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001518/151830eo.pdf.

  • Vatter A (2008) Vom Extremtyp zum Normalfall? Die Schweizerische Konsensusdemokratie im Wandel. Eine Re-Analyse von Lijpharts Studie für die Schweiz von 1997bis 2007. Swiss Polit Sci Rev, 14:1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vatter A (2011) Vom Schächt- zum Minarettverbot: religiöse Minderheiten in der direkten Demokratie. Verlag Neue Zürcher Zeitung, Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatter A (2014) Das Politische System der Schweiz. Nomos, Baden-Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner U, Christ O, Pettigrew T, Stellmacher J, Wolf C (2006) Prejudice and Minority Proportion: Contact Instead of Threat Effects. Soc Psychol Quart, 69: 380–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer A (2002) The Politics of Exclusion in Nationalist States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winship C, Mare RD (1992) Models for Sample Selection Bias. Annu Rev Sociol, 18: 327–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geschwister-Scholl-Institut f. Politikwissenschaft, München, Deutschland

    Karin B. Schnebel

Authors
  1. Karin B. Schnebel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karin B. Schnebel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Didaktik der Sozialkunde, Geschwister-Scholl-Institut für Politische Wissenschaft, München, Germany

    Karin B. Schnebel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schnebel, K. (2014). Je mehr, desto besser?. In: Schnebel, K. (eds) Europäische Minderheiten. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04714-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04714-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-04713-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-04714-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation