Skip to main content

Lebensphasen von Communities of Practice – Eine Fallstudie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Moderne Konzepte des organisationalen Marketing

Abstract

Interdependencies between organizations are constantly increasing. Hence, more companies and employees are engaged in inter-organizational Communities of Practice (CoP). This paper focuses on the life cycle of such communities, using the case example of a German innovation network. For this reason, a literature review was undertaken to derive a conceptual life cycle model. Based on our research we found that the CoP life cycle model can be applied and extended with an additional phase identified in the case. Moreover, our results show that externally founded, interorganizational CoP can be successful as well, which is a fact that is mostly neglected in the literature on CoP. Further (especially quantitative) research is recommended to strengthen the theoretical background of CoP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Quellenverzeichnis

  • Adams, G. L.;Lamont, B. T. (2003): Knowlege management systems and developing sustainable competitive advantage. In: Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(2), S. 142–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blois, K. J. (1980): Quasi-Integration as a Mechanism for Controlling External Dependencies. In: Management Decision, 18(1), S. 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S.;Duguid, P. (1991): Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovating. In: Organization Science, 2(1), S. 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S.;Duguid, P. (1998): Organizing Knowledge. In: California Management Review, 40(3), S. 90–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M.;Levinthal, D. A. (1990): Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), S. 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gongla, P.;Rizzuto, C. R. (2001): Evolving communities of practice: IBM global services experience. In: IBM Syst. J., 40(4), S. 842–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimble, C.;Hildreth, P. M. (2004): Communities of Practice: Going One Step Too Far? In: SSRN Journal, Onlineausgabe, Working Paper Series, am 18.09.2013 abgerufen unter dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.634642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J.;Wenger, E. (1991): Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, S.;Birkinshaw, J. (2008): Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators. In: Journal of Management, 34(3), S. 375–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. (2006): Limits to Communities of Practice. In: Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), S. 623–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simyard, C.;West, J. (2008): Knowledge Networks and Geographic Locus of Control. In: Chesbrough, H.;Vanhaverbeke, W.;West, J. (Hrsg.): Open Innovation. Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford, S. 220–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, J. A.;Scarbrough, H.;Robertson, M. (2002): The Construction of ’Communities of Practice’ in the Management of Innovation. In: Management Learning, 33(4), S. 477–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J. (2005): Strategische Netzwerke. Evolution und Organisation, 6. Aufl., Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Baalen, P.;Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.;van Heck, E. (2005): Knowledge Sharing in an Emerging Network of Practice: The Role of a Knowledge Portal. In: European Management Journal, 23(3), S. 300–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998): Communities of Practice: Learning as a Social System. In: Systems Thinker, 9(5), S. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1999): Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. 1. Aufl. Cambridge, U.K, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C.-L.;Wei, S.-T. (2010): Modelling the performance of CoP in knowledge management. In: Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21(10), S. 1033–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994): Case study research. Design and methods, 2. Aufl., Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zboralski, K. (2007): Wissensmanagement durch Communities of Practice. Eine empirische Untersuchung von Wissensnetzwerken, Wiesbaden, zugleich Dissertation an der Technischen Universität Berlin 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Brem .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brem, A., Maier, M. (2014). Lebensphasen von Communities of Practice – Eine Fallstudie. In: Kliewe, T., Kesting, T. (eds) Moderne Konzepte des organisationalen Marketing. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04680-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04680-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-04679-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-04680-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics