Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Wie kann Intuition in der Statistikausbildung helfen?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Daten, Zufall und der Rest der Welt

  • 5031 Accesses

Kurzfassung

Kann man Statistik intuitiv lehren? Die Antwort, die in diesem Kapitel gegeben wird ist ein klares „Ja“. Es wird postuliert, dass die meisten Schüler über zumindest rudimentäre Versionen von zwei statistischen Intuitionen verfügen – die „Verhältnis-Intuition“ und die „Größe- Konfidenz-Intuition“, die zur Lösung einer Vielzahl von Wahrscheinlichkeitsaufgaben benutzt werden können. Ob diese Intuitionen angewandt werden oder nicht hängt allerdings davon ab, in welchem Darstellungsformat die entsprechenden Informationen dargeboten werden. Es wird zunächst anhand von Beispielen aus sehr unterschiedlichen inhaltlichen Bereichen gezeigt, dass die Beziehung zwischen Darstellungsformat und intuitiver Problemlösung sehr generell ist. Danach werden die beiden statistischen Intuitionen vorgestellt und ihr Einsatz im Unterricht kurz diskutiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Betsch, T., Biel, G. M., Eddelbüttel, C., & Mock, A. (1998). Natural sampling and base-rate neglect. European Journal of Social Psychology 28, 269–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borneleit, P., Danckwerts, R., Henn, H.-W., & Weigand, H.-G. (2001). Expertise zum Mathematikunterricht in der gymnasialen Oberstufe. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 22, 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casscells, W., Schoenberger, A., & Grayboys, T. (1978). Interpretation by physicians of clinical laboratory results. New England Journal of Medicine, 299, 999–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58, 1–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M. (1988). Rational choice in an uncertain world. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, D. M. (1982). Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 249–267). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, J. & Sedlmeier, P. (2004). Zum Verständnis von Zufall und Variabilität in empirischen Daten bei Schülern. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 32, 169–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E. (1975). The intuitive sources of probabilistic thinking in children. Reidel: Dordrecht- Holland.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E. (1994). The interaction between the formal, the algorithmic, and the intuitive components in a mathematical activity. In R. Biehler, R. W. Scholz, R. Sträßer, & B. Winkelmann (Eds.), Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp. 231–245). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., Hoffrage, U., & Sedlmeier, P. (2008). Cognitive illusions reconsidered. In C. R. Plott, & V. L. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics results. Volume 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland. (pp. 1018–1034).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102, 684–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2007).The power of thinking without thinking. New York: Back Bay Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1992). Bully for brontosaurus: Further reflections in natural history. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. R. (1983). A Survey of probability concepts in 3000 students aged 11–16 years. In D. R. Grey et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Teaching Statistics (pp. 766–783). University of Sheffield: Teaching Statistics Trust, University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. R. (1991). A longitudinal study of pupil’s probability concepts. Loughborough: Loughborough University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffrage, U., & Gigerenzer, G. (1998). Using natural frequencies to improve diagnostic inferences. Academic Medicine, 73, 538–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, R. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, O. (1993). The development of the probability concept: Some reflections. Archives de Psychologie, 61, 187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hußmann, S., & Prediger, S. (2010). Vorstellungsorientierte Analysis – auch in Klassenarbeiten und zentralen Prüfungen. Praxis der Mathematik in der Schule, 52, 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1964). The early growth of logic in the child. (E. A. Lunzer & D. Papert, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64, 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychological Review, 103, 582–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmak, S. D., & Gelman, R. (1986). Young children’s understanding of random phenomena. Child Development, 57, 559–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, R., Schliemann, A. D., & Carraher, D. W. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1994). Inevitable illusions: How mistakes of reason rule our minds. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyna, V. R., & Brainerd, C. J. (1994). The origins of probability judgment: A review of data and theories. In G. Wright & P. Ayton (Eds.), Subjective probability (pp. 239–272). Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmeier, P. (1998). The distribution matters: Two types of sample-size tasks. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmeier, P. (1999). Improving statistical reasoning: Theoretical models and practical implications. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmeier, P. (2000). How to improve statistical thinking: Choose the task representation wisely and learn by doing. Instructional Science, 28, 227–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmeier, P. (2001). Statistik ohne Formeln. In M. Borovcnik, J. Engel & D. Wickmann (Hrsg). Anregungen zum Stochastikunterricht (S. 83–95). Hildesheim: Franzbecker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmeier, P. (2002). Associative learning and frequency judgments: The PASS model. In P. Sedlmeier & T. Betsch (Eds.). Etc. Frequency processing and cognition (pp. 137–152). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmeier, P. (2005). From associations to intuitive judgment and decision making: Implicitly learning from experience. In T. Betsch & S. Haberstroh (Eds). Experience based decision making (pp. 83–99). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmeier, P. (2007). Statistical reasoning: valid intuitions put to use. In M. Lovett & P. Shah (Eds.). Thinking with data (pp. 389–419). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmeier, P., & Gigerenzer, G. (1997). Intuitions about sample size: The empirical law of large numbers. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmeier, P. & Gigerenzer, G. (2001) Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 380–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmeier, P., & Hilton, D. (2012). Improving judgment and decision making through communication and representation. In M. K. Dhami, A. Schlottmann, & M. Waldmann (Eds.). Judgment and decision making as a skill: Learning, development and evolution (pp. 229–258). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmeier, P., & Köhlers, D. (2001). Wahrscheinlichkeiten im Alltag: Statistik ohne Formeln (Mit Tutorprogramm auf CD). Braunschweig: Westermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P. C., Shapiro, Diana (1971). Natural and contrived experience in a reasoning problem. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychologie, TU Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Peter Sedlmeier

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Peter Sedlmeier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Sedlmeier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Mathematik und Informatik, Pädagogische Hochschule Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany

    Ute Sproesser

  2. Institut für Mathematik und Informatik, Pädagogische Hochschule Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany

    Silvia Wessolowski

  3. Institut für Mathematik und Informatik, Pädagogische Hochschule Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany

    Claudia Wörn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sedlmeier, P. (2014). Wie kann Intuition in der Statistikausbildung helfen?. In: Sproesser, U., Wessolowski, S., Wörn, C. (eds) Daten, Zufall und der Rest der Welt. Springer Spektrum, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04669-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04669-9_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Spektrum, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-04668-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-04669-9

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation