Ritual, Communitas, Performance

Abstract

From the previous chapters the conclusion can be drawn that youth in a variety of societies constitutes a life phase with a particular importance, even if both the notions of moratorium and transition, which are often attached to the idea of youth, can be criticized. Schlegel and Barry show in their comparative analysis that in most societies the peer group gains importance in this life phase, even if it is disputed if this significance is a product of parental disregard or of the attractiveness of the peer group. Whatever the case, Schlegel and Barry state that, particularly in more complex societies, peer groups can be recognized as legitimate groups, which can overtake important functions of the community in the realm of socialization and development of conformity to norms and standards (Schlegel, Barry 1991: 79-80). This is even the case when the internal structure of the peer group is very distinct and shows no correlation to the normative framework of the community or society it is part of. Commonly the relations in the peer group are regarded as friendships, even if hierarchical structures might develop in the group. These relationships – as shown above – are shaped differently and interpreted according to the cultural setting, but it can be assumed that within a peer group – an informal group of fewer members on a local basis – a consensus on the concept of friendship exists.