Advertisement

Organisation und Institution

Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Man muss nicht gleich auf sogenannte totale Institutionen – besser: Organisationen – wie Gefängnisse, Armeen, Psychiatrien und Klöster oder auf Organhandel und Transplantationsskandale zu sprechen kommen, wenn man namhaft machen möchte, dass Körper und Organisation in enger Beziehung stehen. Aber es hilft, um klar zu machen, dass das Themenfeld mehr beinhaltet als betriebliches Gesundheitsmanagement, Neuroenhancement oder Schönheitschirurgie. Es geht nicht nur um die Umgestaltung und Disziplinierung, also die Reorganisation des Körpers.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Becker, William J., Cropanzano, Russell, & Sanfey, Alan G. (2011). Organizational neuroscience: Taking organizational theory inside the neural black box. Journal of Management, 37(4), 933 – 961.Google Scholar
  2. Böhle, Fritz (2004). Die Bewältigung des Unplanbaren als neue Herausforderung in der Arbeitswelt. In: Fritz Böhle, Sabine Pfeiffer, Nese Sevsay-Tegethoff (Hrsg.), Die Bewältigung des Unplanbaren (S. 12 – 54). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  3. Cornelissen, Joep P., & Kafouros, Mario. (2008). The emergent organization: primary and complex metaphors in theorizing about organizations. Organization Studies, 29(7), 957 – 978.Google Scholar
  4. Dale, Karen (2001). Anatomising embodiment and organisation theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar
  5. Dale, Karen (2005). Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization, 12(5), 649 – 678.Google Scholar
  6. Dreyfus, Hubert L. & Dreyfus, Stuart E. (2005). Expertise in real world contexts. Organization Studies, 26 (5), 779 – 792. Google Scholar
  7. Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1988). Agency- and institutional-theory explanations: The case of retail sales compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 488 – 511Google Scholar
  8. Gärtner, Christian (2007). Innovationsmanagement als soziale Praxis. Grundlagentheoretische Vorarbeiten zu einer Organisationstheorie des Neuen. München & Mering: Hampp.Google Scholar
  9. Gärtner, Christian (2013). Cognition, knowing and learning in the flesh: Six views on embodied knowing in organization studies. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29(4), 338 – 352. Google Scholar
  10. Gärtner, Christian, & Ortmann, Günther (2016). Recursiveness: Relations between bodies, metaphors, organizations and institutions. In: Walgenbach, Peter, & Weik, Elke (Hrsg.): Institutions Inc. (S. 94 – 123). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Gugutzer, Robert (2004). Soziologie des Körpers. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Hassard, John, Holiday, Ruth, & Willmott, Hugh (Hrsg.). (2000). Body and organization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Heaphy, Emily D., & Dutton, Jane E. (2008). Positive social interactions and the human body at work. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 137 – 162.Google Scholar
  14. Hochschild, Arlie R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
  15. Kamoche, Ken & Maguir, Kevin (2010). Pit sense: Appropriation of practice-based knowledge in a UK coalmine. Human Relations, 64(5), 725 – 744.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, Mark L., & Lakoff, George (2002). Why cognitive linguistics requires embodied realism. Cognitive Linguistics, 13(3), 245 – 263.Google Scholar
  17. Luthans, Fred (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 57 – 72.Google Scholar
  18. Jacobs, Claus D., & Heracleous, Loizos Th. (2006). Constructing shared understanding: The role of embodied metaphors in organization development. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(2), 207 – 226.Google Scholar
  19. Judge, Timothy A., & Cable, Daniel M. (2004). The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: preliminary test of a theoretical model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 428.Google Scholar
  20. Leroi-Gourhan, André (1980). Hand und Wort: Die Evolution von Sprache, Technik und Kunst. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  21. March, James G./Simon, Herbert A. (1993 [1958]). Organizations. 2. Aufl., New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  22. Michel, Alexandra (2011). Transcending socialization A nine-year ethnography of the body’s role in organizational control and knowledge workers’ transformation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(3), 325 – 368.Google Scholar
  23. Polanyi, Michael (1985). Implizites Wissen. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  24. Strati, Antonio (2007). Sensible knowledge and practice-based learning. Management Learning, 38 (1), 61 – 77. Google Scholar
  25. Townley, Barbara (1993). Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance to human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 518 – 545.Google Scholar
  26. White, Roderick E., Thornhill, Stuart, & Hampson, Elizabeth (2006). Entrepreneurs and evolutionary biology: The relationship between testosterone and new venture creation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(1), 21 – 34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HamburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations