Advertisement

Weltmacht EU? Die Folgen der Eurokrise für die globale Stellung der EU

  • Hubert Zimmerman
Part of the Sonderheft der Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik book series (ZFAS, volume 5)

Zusammenfassung

Die Staatsschuldenkrise in der Eurozone hat weltweit zu Prognosen über die zunehmende Bedeutungslosigkeit der EU im globalen Mächtespiel geführt. Der Beitrag analysiert die Folgen der Krise für ausgewählte Indikatoren des globalen Einflusses der EU sowohl im Hinblick auf kurzfristige Auswirkungen als auch mögliche längerfristige Trends. Auf der Basis einer Analyse unterschiedlicher Dimensionen der Macht der EU als globaler Akteur wird argumentiert, dass von einem umfassenden Bedeutungsverlust der EU nicht gesprochen werden kann. Die Auswirkungen der Krise sind ausgesprochen politikfeldspezifisch.

Schlüsselwörter

Europäische Union Eurokrise GSVP Handelspolitik Normative Macht 

World Power EU? The Euro Crisis and Europe’s Global Standing

Abstract

The sovereign debt crisis in the Eurozone has led to a global perception of European decline. The article deals with the short- and long-term impact of the crisis on selected indicators of EU global influence. Based on an analysis of different dimensions of the EU’s power as global actor, the article argues that a comprehensive loss of EU influence has not yet occurred. The consequences of the crisis vary greatly according to the subject area.

Keywords

European Union Euro-crisis ESDP Trade policy Normative power 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Andrews, D. M. (Hrsg.). (2006). International monetary power. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, D. A. (2002). Power and international relations. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. Simmons (Hrsg.), Handbook of international relations (S. 177–191). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Barroso, J. M. (2007). Interview with John Peterson, July 17, EU-Consent. http://www.eu-consent.net/library/BARROSO-transcript.pdf. Zugegriffen: 10. Juni 2013.
  4. Bergsten, C. F. (11. Dez. 2007). How to solve the problem of the dollar. Financial Times, p. 9.Google Scholar
  5. Bieler, A., & Morton, A. (2001). Introduction: Neo-gramscian perspectives in international political economy and the relevance to European integration. In A. Bieler & A. Morton (Hrsg.), Social forces in the making of New Europe. The restructuring of European social relations in the global political economy (S. 3–24). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Chaffin, J. (17. Apr. 2013). Eurozone woes shift climate change focus. Financial Times, p. 2.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, B. J. (2006). The macrofoundations of monetary power. In D. Andrews (Hrsg.), International monetary power (S. 31–50). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. de Hoop Scheffer, A., & Michelot, M. (2013). Mali intervention exposes Europe’s security shortcomings. http://blog.gmfus.org/2013/01/17/mali-intervention-exposes-europes-security-shortcomings/. Zugegriffen: 09. Juni 2013.
  9. De Ville, F., & Orbie, J. (2011). The European Union’s trade policy response to the crisis. paradigm lost or reinforced? European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 15. http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2011-002a.htm. Zugegriffen: 08. Juni 2013.
  10. Duke, S. (2012). The euro-crisis, the other crisis, and the need for global thinking. Maastricht: EIPA. http://www.eipa.eu/files/repository/eipascope/20121213144919_SDU_Eipascope2012_2.pdf. Zugegriffen: 16. Mai 2013.
  11. Dür, A., & Zimmermann, H. (2007). The EU in international trade negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(4), 771–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Europäische Kommission. (2006).Global Europe: Competing in the world. COM (2006) 567 final. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/october/tradoc_130376.pdf. Zugegriffen: 15. Mai 2013.
  13. Europäische Zentralbank. (2012). International role of the euro. Frankfurt: ECB.Google Scholar
  14. Europäische Kommission. (2013). Overview of FTA and other trade negotiations. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/december/tradoc_118238.pdf. Zugegriffen: 13. Mai 2013.
  15. European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR). (2013). European Policy Scorecard 2013. London: ECFR.Google Scholar
  16. Fägersten, B. (2012). European foreign policy and the eurozone crisis. A Swedish perspective. Stockholm: The Swedish Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  17. Financial Times. (5. Juni 2013). Paris threatens to block EU-US talks as China trade war looms. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/747fe80e-cdcc-11e2-8313-00144feab7de.html#axzz2XVdvWgdI. Zugegriffen: 26. Juni 2013.
  18. Giegerich, B. (2013). Military transition in the CSDP. In S. Gareis, G. Hauser, & F. Kernic (Hrsg.), The European Union—A global actor? (S. 75–87). Opladen: Budrich.Google Scholar
  19. Gowan, P. (1999). The global gamble: Washington’s Faustian bid for World dominance. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  20. Harding, R. (01. Apr. 2013). Emerging nations dump euro reserves. Financial Times, S. 1.Google Scholar
  21. Hauser, G. (2013). The common security and defence policy (CSDP)—Challenges after “Lisbon”. In S. Gareis, G. Hauser, & F. Kernic (Hrsg.), The European Union—A global actor? (S. 32–51). Opladen u. a.: Budrich.Google Scholar
  22. Hill, C. (1993). The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualizing Europe’s international role. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(3), 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Horn, H. (06. Dez. 2011). As euro crisis worsens, global climate efforts lose biggest leader. The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/12/as-euro-crisis-worsens-global-climate-efforts-lose-biggest-leader/249481/. Zugegriffen: 20. Oktober 2013.
  24. Kihara, L., & Da Costa, A. N. (2. Juni 2010). Top central banks not planning shift out of euro: Sources. http://uk.reuters.com/article/2010/06/02/us-cenbanks-euro-reserves-idUSTRE6511GE20100602. Zugegriffen: 20. Oktober 2013.
  25. Kilian, B., & Elgström, O. (2010). Still a green leader? The European Union’s role in international climate negotiations. Cooperation and Conflict, 45(3), 255–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kölling, M., & Fernandez-Sola, N. (2012). Bridging the gap between ambitions, expectations and capability. Madrid: Elcano Royal Institute.Google Scholar
  27. Laïdi, Z. (2008a). Norms over force: The enigma of European power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laïdi, Z. (Hrsg.). (2008b). EU foreign policy in a globalized world. Normative power and social preferences. London u. a.: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Link, W. (2013). Europa in der Welt: Ansätze, Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer gemeinsamen Außenpolitik. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 6–7, 23–30.Google Scholar
  30. Lucarelli, S., & Manners, I. (Hrsg.). (2006). Values and principles in European Union foreign policy. London u. a.: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Manners, I. (2002). Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms? Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manners, I. (2012). The European Union’s normative power in global politics. In H. Zimmermann & A. Dür (Hrsg.), Key controversies in European integration (S. 192–198). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Marrone, A. (2012). Defence spending in Europe in light of the economic crisis. Rome: Istituto Affari Internazionali.Google Scholar
  34. Mattli, W., & Büthe, T. (2003). Setting international standards. Technological rationality or primacy of power? World Politics, 56(1), 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Menon, A. (2011). European defence policy from Lisbon to Libya. Survival, 53(3), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meunier, S., & Nicolaïdis, K. (2006). The European Union as a conflicted trade power. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(6), 906–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mölling, C., & Brune, S. (2011). The impact of the financial crisis on European defence. Brüssel: Europäisches Parlament. www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/studiesdownload.html?languageDocument=EN&file=40671. Zugegriffen: 08. Juni 2013.
  38. Morgenthau, H. (1948). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  39. Nicoletti, B. (2013). ‘Crisis upon decline’. Foreign policy perspectives on the EU beyond the eurozone crisis. Mailand: Istituto per gli Studi di Politica Internazionale.Google Scholar
  40. Nye, J. (2002). The paradox of American power: Why the world’s only superpower can’t go it alone. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Oberthür, S., & Roche Kelly, C. (2008). EU Leadership in international climate policy. Achievements and challenges. The International Spectator, 43(3), 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ojanen, H. (2012). Defence integration in the EU: A successful vision! In H. Zimmermann & A. Dür (Hrsg.), Key controversies in European integration (S. 219–225). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Pollack, M. (2012). Living in a material world. A critique of ‘Normative Power Europe’. In H. Zimmermann & A. Dür (Hrsg.). Key controversies in european integration (S. 199–204). Basingstoke u. a.: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  44. Reuters. (26. Nov. 2012). Euro debt crisis saps EU’s ability to lead climate debate. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/26/us-climate-talks-eu-idUSBRE8AP08H20121126. Zugegriffen: 30. Mai 2013.
  45. Sender, H. (11. Februar 2009). ‘China to Stick with US bonds’. Financial Times. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ba857be6-f88f-11dd-aae8-000077b07658.html#axzz2Vqn37NAf.
  46. Shellock, D. (28. Mai 2010). Investors reassured by China’s eurozone support. Financial Times, p. 10.Google Scholar
  47. Spengler, O. (1917). Der Untergang des Abendlands. München: Braumüller.Google Scholar
  48. Strange, S. (1988). States and markets. An introduction to international political economy. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  49. Tocci, N. (Hrsg.). (2008). Who is a normative foreign policy actor? The European Union and its global partners. Brüssel: Centre for European Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  50. Torney, D. (2012). Assessing EU leadership on climate change. The limits of diffusion in EU relations with China and India. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
  51. Valasek, T. (2011). Surviving austerity. The case for a new approach to EU military collaboration. London: Centre for European Reform. http://www.cer.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/attachments/pdf/2011/rp_981-141.pdf. Zugegriffen: 08. Juni 2013.
  52. Van Schaik, L. (2013). The European Union and the climate change regime. In K. E. Jørgensen & K. V. Lattikainen (Hrsg.), Routledge handbook on the European Union and international institutions (S. 357–370). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Van Schaik, L., & Schunz, S. (2012). Explaining EU activism and impact in global climate politics. Is the union a norm- or interest-driven actor? Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(1), 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vermeiren, M. (2010). The global imbalances and the contradictions of US monetary hegemony. Journal of International Relations and Development, 13(2), 105–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vermeiren, M. (2013). Power and imbalances in the global monetary system. A comparative capitalism perspective. PhD, Universität Gent, Gent.Google Scholar
  56. Wall, D. (22. Aug. 2012). EU official says crisis is eroding influence. Wall Street Journal.http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444358404577605394174850980.html. Zugegriffen: 30. Apr. 2013.
  57. Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  58. Whitman, R. (Hrsg.). (2011). Normative power Europe. Empirical and theoretical perspectives. Basingstoke u. a.: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  59. Whitman, R., & Nicolaïdis, K. (Hrsg.). (2013). Special issue on European Union and normative power: Assessing the decade. Cooperation and Conflict, 48(2).Google Scholar
  60. Woolcock, S. (2012). European Union economic diplomacy: The role of the EU in external economic relations. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  61. Wurzel, R., & Connelly, J. (Hrsg.). (2010). The European Union as a leader in international climate change politics. London u. a.: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Zimmermann, H. (2009). Unravelling the ties that really bind. The dissolution of the transatlantic monetary order and European monetary cooperation, 1965–73. In M. Schulz (Hrsg.), The strained alliance: U.S.-European relations from Nixon to Carter (S. 125–144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Zimmermann, H. (2013). 2013: Can the euro rival the US dollar? In A. Cafruny & H. Schwartz (Hrsg.), Exploring the global financial crisis (S. 147–164). Lynne Rienner: Boulder.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hubert Zimmerman
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für PolitikwissenschaftPhilipps-Universität MarburgMarburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations