Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Forschungs-/Entwicklungs-/Innovations-Management ((FEIM))

  • 799 Accesses

Abstract

The research scope of this thesis is volunteers’ joining decisions in open collaborative innovation communities. These joining decisions of individuals characterize individual behavior and interaction mechanisms with the community. In order to reflect on joining decisions, I propose several perspectives from different theories. I view behavior from an individual point of view and a network-exchange point of view. In addition, I view behavior from a discipline point of view, reviewing models describing the innovation activity. I finally integrate the perspectives, compare the central tenets of the different theories, and prepare the ground for a coherent view of joining decisions based on a general paradigm and a specific theory level for open initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Ehls .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ehls, D. (2014). Theoretical Foundation. In: Joining Decisions in Open Collaborative Innovation Communities. Forschungs-/Entwicklungs-/Innovations-Management. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04064-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics