Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diversifikation war gestern, aber vielleicht auch morgen. Überlegungen zur Portfoliogestaltung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategie und Leadership

  • 9282 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Wie diversifiziert soll ein Unternehmen sein? Die Antwort auf diese Frage variierte im Laufe der letzen 50 Jahre sehr stark. Bis in die 1980er Jahre vertrauten insbesondere die grossen Unternehmen auf ein breites Portfolio, um Branchenrisiken nicht voll ausgeliefert zu sein. Die 1970 von Bruce Henderson eingeführte BCG Matrix lieferte ein Instrument das Unternehmen die Logik einer breiten Aufstellung vor Augen führte. Doch im Zuge der Globalisierung und den damit verbundenen Chancen und Herausforderungen schienen Konglomerate nicht länger konkurrenzfähig. Die Konzentration auf das Kerngeschäft war jetzt angesagt (Hamel and Prahalad, 1996). Dementsprechend setzt sich in den letzten 15 Jahren auch im deutschsprachigen Raum ein Trend hin zur Konzentration durch (Mayer and Whittington, 1999; Hautz, Mayer, Stadler, 2013), der in den USA bereits in den 1980er Jahren begann (Markides, 1995).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Aggarwal RK und Samwick AA (2003). Why Do Managers Diversify Their Firms? Agency Reconsidered. Journal of Finance. 58. 71–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arregle JL. Hitt MA. Sirmon DG und Very P (2007). The Development of Organizational Social Capital: Attributes of Family Firms. The Journal of Management Studies. 44. 73–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management. 17 (1). 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casson M (1999). The economic of the family firm. Scandinavian Economic History Review. 47. 10–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David P, O’Brien JP, Yoshikawa T und Delios A (2010). Do Shareholders or Stakeholders Appropriate the Rents from Corporate Diversification? The Influence of Ownership Structure. Academy of Management Journal. 53. 636–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis L und North D (1970). Institutional Change and American Economic Growth. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis DJ, Denis DK und Sarin A (1997). Agency problems. equity ownership. and corporate diversification. Journal of Finance. 52. 135–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Encarnation D (1989). Dislodging Multinationals: India’s Comparative Perspective. Cornell University Press: Ithaca NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faccio M und Lang LHP (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics. 65. 365–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccio M und Stolin D (2006). Expropriation vs. Proportional Sharing in Corporate Acquisitions. Journal of Business. 79. 1413–1444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF und Jensen MC (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics. 26. 301–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatemi AM (1984). Shareholder Benefits from Corporate International Diversification. Journal of Finance. 39. 1325–1345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss PC und Zajac E (2004). The Diffusion of Ideas over Contested Terrain: The (Non)adoption of a Shareholder Value Orientation among German Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly. 49. 501–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisman R (2000). Estimating the value of political connections. American Economic Review 91 (4). 1095–2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox MA und Hamilton R (1994). Ownership and diversification: Agency theory or stewardship theory. Journal of Management Studies. 31. 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mejia LR, Nunez-Nickel M, Jacobson K und Moyano-fuentes J (2007). Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family Controlled Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly. 52. 103–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant T (1999). International Directory of Company Histories. St. James Press: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel G und Prahalad CK (1996). Competing for the Future. Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hautz J, Mayer M und Stadler C (2013) Ownership Identity and Concentration: A Study of their Joint Impact on Corporate Diversification. British Journal of Management. 24. 102–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinterhuber HH (2004). Strategische Unternehmungsführung. I. Strategisches Denken. Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE und Kim H (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal 40(4). 767–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi T, Kashyap A und Scharfstein D (1991). Corporate structure. liquidity. and investment: evidence from Japanese industrial groups. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 106. 33–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson RE und Turk T (1990). Corporate Restructuring: Governance and Control Limits of the Internal Capital Market. Academy of Management Review. 15. 459- 477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC und Meckling WH (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior. agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. 3. 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna T und Palepu K (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review 75(4): 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna T und Rivkin JW (2001). Estimating the performance effect of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal 22: 45–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee K, Peng MW und Lee K (2008). From diversification premium to diversification discount during institutional transitions. Journal of World Business 43(1). 47–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln JR, Gerlach ML und Ahmadjian CL (1996). Keiretsu networks and corporate performance in Japan. American Sociological Review. 61. 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markides CC (1995). Diversification. restructuring and economic performance. Strategic Management Journal. 16. 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markides CC und Williamson O (1994). Related diversification. core competencies and corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal. 15 (summer special issue). 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer M und R. Whittington R (2003). Diversification in context: A cross-national and cross-temporal extension. Strategic Management Journal. 24. 773–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D und Breton-Miller IL (2005). Management Insights from Great and Struggling Family Businesses. Long Range Planning. 38. 517–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery CA und Singh H (1984). Diversification Strategy and Systematic Risk. Strategic Management Journal. 5. 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North D (1990). Institutions. institutional change. and economic performance. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palich LE, Cardinal LB und Miller CC. (2000). Curvilinearity in the diversificationperformance linkage: An examination of over three decades. Strategic Management Journal. 21. 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng MW und Delios A (2006). What determines the scope of the firm over time and around the world? An Asia Pacific perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 23(4). 385–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng MW, Seung-Hyun L und Wang DYL (2005). What determines the scope of the firm over time? A focus on institutional relatedness. Academy of Management Review 30(3). 622–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose E (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Basil Blackwell: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy K, Mingfang L und Veliyath R (2002). Variations in Ownership Behavior and Propensity to Diversify: A Study of the Indian Corporate Context. Strategic Management Journal. 23. 345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roechling Group (2008). The History of the Röchling Family Firm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz A (1994). A Nation in Waiting: Indonesia in the 1990s. Allen & Unwin: St Leonards, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadler C und Wältermann P (2012). Die Jahrhundert-Champions: Fünf Prinzipien für dauerhaften Unternehmenserfolg oder Was wir aus der Geschichte europäischer Top- Unternehmen lernen können. Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strachan H (1976). Family and Other Business Groups in Economic Development: The Case of Nicaragua. Praeger: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanriverdi H und Venkatraman N (2005). Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms. Strategic Management Journal. 26. 97–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ (1980). Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 1. 223–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ (1982). Toward an Economic Theory of the Multiproduct Firm. Journal of Economic and Organization. 3(1). 39–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen S und P. Pedersen (2000). Ownership Structure and Economic Performance in the Largest European Companies. Strategic Management Journal. 21. 689–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tihanyi L, Johnson RA, Hoskisson RE und Hitt MA (2003). Institutional Ownership differences and international diversification: The effect of boards of directors and technological opportunity. Academy of Management Journal. 46. 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan WP (2005). Country Resource Environments. Firm Capabilities. and Corporate Diversification Strategies. Journal of Management Studies. 42(1). 161–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt B (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal. 5. 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White LJ (1974). Industrial Concentration and Economic Power in Pakistan. Princeton University Press: Princeton. NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Warwick, Warwick, Großbritannien

    Prof. Dr. Christian Stadler

  2. PWI GmbH, München, Deutschland

    Dr. Philip Wältermann

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Christian Stadler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. Philip Wältermann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Stadler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für strategische Management, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

    Kurt Matzler

  2. Katholische Uni. Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany

    Harald Pechlaner

  3. Professur f. Strategie u. Organisation, Privatuniversität Schloss Seeburg, Seekirchen am Wallersee/Salzburg, Austria

    Birgit Renzl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stadler, C., Wältermann, P. (2014). Diversifikation war gestern, aber vielleicht auch morgen. Überlegungen zur Portfoliogestaltung. In: Matzler, K., Pechlaner, H., Renzl, B. (eds) Strategie und Leadership. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04057-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04057-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-04056-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-04057-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation