Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Virtuelle Psychophysik Psychologische – Untersuchungen zur räumlichen Wahrnehmung in virtuellen Umgebungen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Exploring Virtuality

  • 3831 Accesses

Abstract

Die klassische Psychophysik beschreibt Zusammenhänge zwischen physikalischen Reizen und menschlicher Wahrnehmung. Die zunehmende Verbreitung und Nutzungsvielfalt von virtuellen Umgebungen macht eine virtuelle Psychophysik notwendig. Diese untersucht die menschliche Wahrnehmung in virtuellen Umgebungen und liefert Parameter für eine möglichst realitätsnahe Visualisierung. Hier wird am Beispiel räumlicher Wahrnehmung dargestellt, dass es in virtuellen Umgebungen zu Fehlwahrnehmungen kommen kann, welche Faktoren diese beeinflussen und welche Untersuchungsmethoden hierfür zur Verfügung stehen. Ergebnisse einer aktuellen psychophysischen Studie werden berichtet. Diese bestätigen den Einfluss der Komplexität der virtuellen Umgebung auf die räumliche Wahrnehmung, speziell den Nutzen einer regelmäßigen Bodentextur und des Tiefenreizes Höhe im visuellen Feld. Für eine Manipulation der Stereobasis konnte kein Einfluss gezeigt werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Balcetis, E.;Dunning, D. (2010): Wishful Seeing: More Desired Objects Are Seen as Closer. In: Psychological Science. Bd. 21, Nr. 1, S. 147–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beall, A. C.;Loomis, J. M.;Philbeck, J. W.;Fikes, T. G. (1995): Absolute motion parallax weakly determines visual scale in real and virtual environments. In: Rogowitz, B. E.;Allebach, J. P. (Hrsg.): Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display. Bd. VI,. Bellingham, WA: SPIE, S. 288–297.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, G. P.;Bradley, A.;Bailey, M.;Vinner, R. (2001): Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: A comparison of actual versus virtual environments. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. Bd. 27, Nr. 6, S. 1314–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruder, G.;Pusch, A.;Steinicke, F. (2012): Analyzing effects of geometric rendering parameters on size and distance estimation in on-axis stereographics. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception. New York, NY, USA: ACM, S. 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambon, M. (2009): Embodied perception with others’ bodies in mind: Stereotype priming influence on the perception of spatial environment. In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Bd. 45, Nr. 1, S. 283–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creem-Regehr, S. H.;Kunz, B. R. (2010): Perception and action. In: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. Bd. 1, Nr. 6, S. 800–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Neira, C.;Sandin, D. J.;DeFanti, T. A.;Kenyon, R. V.;Hart, J. C. (1992): The CAVE: audio visual experience automatic virtual environment. In: Communications of the ACM. Bd. 35, Nr. 6, S. 64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, J. E.;Vishton, P. M. (1995): Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In: Epstein, W.;Rogers, S. J. (Hrsg.): Handbook of perception and cognition. Bd. 5: Perception of space and motion. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, S. 69–117.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Drascic, D.;Milgram, P. (1996): Perceptual Issues in Augmented Reality. In: Bolas, M. T.;Fisher, S. S.;Merritt, J. O. (Hrsg.): Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems. Bd. III, Bellingham, Wash.: SPIE, S. 123–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durgin, F. H.;Baird, J. A.;Greenburg, M.;Russell, R.;Shaughnessy, K.;Waymouth, S. (2009): Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack. In: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Bd. 16, Nr. 5, S. 964–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, E. (1998): Fiktion und Virtualität. In: Krämer, S. (Hrsg.): Medien, Computer, Realität: Wirklichkeitsvorstellungen und Neue Medien. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, S. 269–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fechner, G. T. (1860): Elemente der Psychophysik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, G. (2012): The same old New Look: Publication bias in a study of wishful seeing. In: i-Perception. Bd. 3, Nr. 3, S. 176–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1950): The perception of the visual world. Oxford, England: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, E. B.;Irtel, H. H. (2008): Wahrnehmungspsychologie. 7. Aufl., Berlin, Heidelberg: Spektrum, Akad. Verl.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Z.;Wu, B.;Ooi, T.-L.;Yarbrough, G.;Wu, J. (2004): Judging egocentric distance on the ground: Occlusion and surface integration. In: Perception. Bd. 33, Nr. 7, S. 789–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrachovec, H. (2002): Virtualität. Aktuelle Orientierungspunkte. In: Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie. Bd. 27, Nr. 3, S. 241–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, J. J.;Loomis, J. M. (2006): Does energy expenditure affect the perception of egocentric distance? A failure to replicate Experiment 1 of Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton, and Epstein (2003). In: Spanish Journal of Psychology. Bd. 9, Nr. 2, S. 332–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interrante, V., Ries, B., & Anderson, L. (2006): Distance Perception in Immersive Virtual Environments, Revisited. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Virtual Reality. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, S. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, F.;Bolte, B.;Bruder, G.;Rautenberg, U.;Steinicke, F.;Lappe, M.;Koch, R. (2012): Geometric Calibration of Head-Mounted Displays and its Effects on Distance Estimation. In: IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. Bd. 18, Nr. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon, R. V.;Phenany, M.;Sandin, D.;DeFanti, T. (2007): Accommodation and Size-Constancy of Virtual Objects. In: Annals of Biomedical Engineering. Bd. 36, Nr. 2, S. 342–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon, R. V.;Sandin, D.;Smith, R. C.;Pawlicki, R.;DeFanti, T. (2007): Size- Constancy in the CAVE®. In: Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. Bd. 16, Nr. 2, S. 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, S. A.;Thompson, W. B.;Creem-Regehr, S. H. (2009): HMD calibration and its effects on distance judgments. In: ACM Transactions on Applied Perception. Bd. 6, Nr. 3, S. 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lappin, J. S.;Shelton, A. L.;Rieser, J. J. (2006): Environmental context influences visually perceived distance. In: Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. Bd. 68, Nr. 4, S. 571–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leyrer, M.;Linkenauger, S. A.;Bülthoff, H. H.;Kloos, U.: Mohler, B. (2011): The influence of eye height and avatars on egocentric distance estimates in immersive virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. New York, NY, USA: ACM, S. 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J. M.;Philbeck, J. W. (2008): Measuring spatial perception with spatial updating and action. In: Klatzky, R. L.;Behrmann, M.;MacWhinney, B. (Hrsg.): Embodiment, ego-space, and action. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, S. 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X.;Kenyon, R. V.;Kamper, D. G.;Sandin, D. J.;DeFanti, T. A. (2009): On the Determinants of Size-Constancy in a Virtual Environment. In: The International Journal of Virtual Reality. Bd. 8, Nr. 1, S. 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, P.;Takemura, H.;Utsumi, A.;Kishino, F. (1995): Augmented Reality: A Class of Displays on the Reality-Virtuality Continuum In: SPIE Proceedings 2351: Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies. S. 282–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohler, B. J.;Bülthoff, H. H.;Thompson, W. B.;Creem-Regehr, S. H. (2008): A fullbody avatar improves egocentric distance judgments in an immersive virtual environment In: Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization. New York, NY, USA: ACM, S. 194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohler, B. J.;Creem-Regehr, S. H.;Thompson, W. B.;Bülthoff, H. H. (2010): The Effect of Viewing a Self-Avatar on Distance Judgments in an HMD-Based Virtual Environment. In: Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. Bd. 19, Nr. 3, S. 230–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münker, S. (2005): Medienphilosophie der Virtual Reality. In: Sandbothe, M.; Nagl, L.(Hrsg.): Systematische Medienphilosophie. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, S. 381–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murgia, A.;Sharkey, P. M. (2009): Estimation of distances in virtual environments using size constancy. In: International Journal of Virtual Reality. Bd. 8, Nr. 1, S. 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L.;Ries, B.;Kaeding, M.;Interrante, V. (2010): Avatar self-embodiment enhances distance perception accuracy in non-photorealistic immersive virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference. S. 115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proffitt, D. R. (2006): Distance Perception. In: Current Directions in Psychological Science, Bd. 15, Nr. 3, S. 131–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proffitt, D. R. (2008): An action-specific approach to spatial perception. In: Klatzky, R. L.;Behrmann, M.;MacWhinney, B. (Hrsg.): Embodiment, ego-space, and action. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, S. 179–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proffitt, D. R.;Caudek, C. (2002): Depth perception and the perception of events. In: Healy, A. F.;Proctor, R. W. (Hrsg.): Handbook of psychology. Bd. 4: Experimental psychology. New York: Wiley, S. 213–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proffitt, D. R.;Stefanucci, J.;Banton, T.;Epstein, W. (2003): The role of effort in perceiving distance. In: Psychological Science. Bd. 14, Nr. 2, S. 106–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2012): R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renner, R. S.;Velichkovsky, B. B.;Helmert, J. R. (2013): The perception of egocentric distances in Virtual Environments – a Review. Manuscript accepted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieser, J. J.;Ashmead, D. H.;Talor, C. R.;Youngquist, G. A. (1990): Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. In: Perception. Bd. 19, Nr. 5, S. 675–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinai, M. J.;Krebs, W. K.;Darken, R. P.;Rowland, J. H.;McCarley, J. S. (1999): Egocentric distance perception in a virtual environment using a perceptual matching task. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. S. 1256–1260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinai, M. J.;Ooi, T. L.;He, Z. J. (1998): Terrain influences the accurate judgement of distance. In: Nature. Bd. 395, S. 497–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanucci, J. K.;Gagnon, K. T.;Lessard, D. A. (2011): Follow Your Heart: Emotion Adaptively Influences Perception. In: Social & Personality Psychology Compass. Bd. 5, Nr. 6, S. 296–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinicke, F.;Bruder, G.;Hinrichs, K.;Steed, A. (2010): Gradual transitions and their effects on presence and distance estimation. In: Computers & Graphics. Bd. 34, Nr. 1, S. 26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. (1962): The surprising simplicity of sensory metrics. In: American Psychologist. Bd. 17, Nr. 1, S. 29–39.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M. (2006): The Geometries of Visual Space. Mahwah, New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Professur Ingenieurpsychologie und angewandte Kognitionsforschung | Institut für Psychologie III, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland

    Rebekka S. Renner Dipl.-Psych., Prof. (em.) Dr. Dr. psych. habil. Boris M. Velichkovsky & Dr. rer. nat. Jens R. Helmert

  2. Professur Konstruktionstechnik/CAD, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Ralph H. Stelzer

Authors
  1. Rebekka S. Renner Dipl.-Psych.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. (em.) Dr. Dr. psych. habil. Boris M. Velichkovsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Ralph H. Stelzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dr. rer. nat. Jens R. Helmert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebekka S. Renner Dipl.-Psych. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Sabina Jeschke

  2. RWTH Aachen Institut für Informatik, Aachen, Germany

    Leif Kobbelt

  3. IMA/ZLW, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany

    Alicia Dröge

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Renner, R., Velichkovsky, B., Stelzer, R., Helmert, J. (2014). Virtuelle Psychophysik Psychologische – Untersuchungen zur räumlichen Wahrnehmung in virtuellen Umgebungen. In: Jeschke, S., Kobbelt, L., Dröge, A. (eds) Exploring Virtuality. Springer Spektrum, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03885-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation