Advertisement

Pensionsfonds-Kapitalismus und privatisierter Keynesianismus.

Zur Finanzialisierung privater Haushalte
  • Daniel MertensEmail author
  • Richard Meyer-Eppler
Chapter
Part of the Globale Politische Ökonomie book series (GPÖ)

Zusammenfassu

Dieses Kapitel untersucht, wie sich Finanzialisierungsprozesse auf Privathaushalte ausgewirkt haben und inwieweit auch beim Verhalten und Handlungskontext der Haushalte von einer Dominanz des Finanzsektors, der Finanzmärkte und der Finanzmotive gesprochen werden kann (Epstein 2005, S. 3). Konkret verstehen wir unter der Finanzialisierung von privaten Haushalten, dass diese unmittelbarer als zuvor in Finanzmärkte eingebunden und dadurch zahlreichen Risiken ausgesetzt sind, die zuvor von kollektiven Akteuren oder von professionellen Intermediären, wie Banken, übernommen wurden (vgl. Martin 2002, S. 12).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Aalbers, M. B. 2008. The Financialization of Home and the Mortgage Market Crisis. Competition and Change 12 (1): 148–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aalbers, M. B. 2009. The Globalization and Europeanization of Mortgage Markets. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33 (2): 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashcroft, J., und F. Stewart. 2010. Managing and Supervising Risks in Defined Contribution Pension Systems. International Organisation of Pension Supervisors, Working Paper 12.Google Scholar
  4. Bernanke, B. S. 2005. The Global Saving Glut and the U.S. Current Account Deficit. Remarks at the Sandridge Lecture, Virginia Association of Economists, Richmond.Google Scholar
  5. Brenner, R. 2003. The Boom and the Bubble. The US in the World Economy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Burtless, G. 2012. Can Improved Options for Private Saving Offer a Plausible Substitute for Public Pensions? Politics & Society 40 (1): 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burton, D. 2008. Credit and Consumer Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, G. L. 2003. European Pensions & Global Finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crouch, C. 2009. Privatised Keynesianism. An Unacknowledged Policy Regime. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 11 (3): 382–399.Google Scholar
  10. Crouch, C. 2010. Postdemokratie und die Krise des „privatisierten Keynesianismus“ In Kurswechsel für Deutschland. Die Lehren aus der Krise, hrsg. B. Huber, 114–129. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  11. Cynamon, B. Z., und S. M. Fazzari. 2008. Household Debt in the Consumer Age. Source of Growth – Risk of Collapse. Capitalism and Society 3 (3): 4.Google Scholar
  12. Dahrendorf, R. 2009. Nach der Krise. Zurück zur protestantischen Ethik? Merkur 720: 373–381.Google Scholar
  13. Deutsche Bundesbank. 2011. Ergebnisse der Gesamtwirtschaftlichen Finanzierungsrechnung für Deutschland 2005 bis 2010. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  14. Deutschmann, C. 2008. Die Finanzmärkte und die Mittelschichten. Der kollektive Buddenbrooks-Effekt. Leviathan 36 (4): 501–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dixon, A. D. 2008. The Rise of Pension Fund Capitalism in Europe. An Unseen Revolution? New Political Economy 13 (3): 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dixon, A. D., und A. H. B. Monk. 2009. The Power of Finance. Accounting Harmonization‘s Effect on Pension Provision. Journal of Economic Geography 9 (5): 619–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Drucker, P. F. 1976/1996. The Pension Fund Revolution. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Ebbinghaus, B., und M. Gronwald. 2011. The Changing Public-Private Pension Mix in Europe. From Path Dependence to Path Departure. In The Varieties of Pension Governance. Pension Privatization in Europe, hrsg. B. Ebbinghaus, 23–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. EZB. 2011. Recent Developments in Securitisation. February 2011. Frankfurt: Europäische Zentralbank.Google Scholar
  20. Epstein, G. A. (hrsg.). 2005. Financialization and the World Economy. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  21. Erturk, I., J. Froud, S. Johal, A. Leaver, und K. Williams. 2007. The Democratization of Finance? Promises, Outcomes and Conditions. Review of International Political Economy 14 (4): 553–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. European Credit Research Institute. 2011. Lending to Households in Europe (1995–2010). Brussels: ECRI.Google Scholar
  23. Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. 2011. The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report. Final Report of the National Commission on the Causes of the Financial and Economic Crisis in the United States. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  24. Hacker, J. S. 2008. The Great Risk Shift. The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hay, C. 2011. Pathology Without Crisis? The Strange Demise of the Anglo-Liberal Growth Model. Government and Opposition 46 (1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krippner, G. R. 2011. Capitalizing on Crisis. The Political Origins of the Rise of Finance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Langley, P. 2008. The Everyday Life of Global Finance. Saving and Borrowing in Anglo-America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Langley, P., und A. Leaver. 2012. Remaking Retirement Investors. Behavioural Economics and Defined-Contribution Occupational Pensions. Journal of Cultural Economy 5 (4): 473–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lapavitsas, C. 2009. Financialised Capitalism. Crisis and Financial Expropriation. Historical Materialism 17 (2): 114–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martin, R. 2002. Financialization of Daily Life. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Montgomerie, J. 2006a. Giving Credit where it’s Due. Public Policy and Household Debt in the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada. Policy and Society 25 (3): 109–141.Google Scholar
  32. Montgomerie, J. 2006b. The Financialization of the American Credit Card Industry. Competition and Change 10 (3): 301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Montgomerie, J. 2007. The Logic of Neo-Liberalism and the Political Economy of Consumer Debt Led- Growth. In Neo-Liberalism, State Power and Global Governance, hrsg. S. Lee, und S. McBride, 157- 172. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Neuhaus, S. 2009. Auslagerung betrieblicher Pensionszusagen. Eine ökonomische Analyse der Motive und Durchführungsformen. Bochum: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  35. OECD. 2008. Growing Unequal? Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries. Paris.Google Scholar
  36. OECD. 2009. Pensions at a Glance. Retirement Income Systems in OECD Countries. Paris.Google Scholar
  37. Prasad, M. 2012. The Land of Too Much. A Demand-Side Theory of Comparative Political Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rajan, R. G. 2010. Fault Lines. How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Ricken, S. 2008. Verbriefung von Krediten und Forderungen in Deutschland. Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung.Google Scholar
  40. Ring, P. J. 2010. Governance and Governmentality. A Discussion in the Context of UK Private Pension Provision. Economy and Society 39 (4): 534–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roxburgh, C., S. Lund, und J. Piotrowski. 2011. Mapping Global Capital Markets 2011. McKinsey Global Institute.Google Scholar
  42. Schwartz, H. M. 2009. Subprime Nation. American Power, Global Capital, and the Housing Bubble. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Schwartz, H. 2012. Housing, the Welfare State, and the Global Financial Crisis. What is the Connection? Politics & Society 40 (1): 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schwartz, H., und L. Seabrooke. 2008. Varieties of Residential Capitalism in the International Political Economy. Old Welfare States and the New Politics of Housing. Comparative European Politics 6 (3): 237–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shapiro, M., und E. N. Wolff (hrsg.). 2001. Assets for the Poor. The Benefits of Spreading Asset Ownership. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  46. SIFMA. 2012. Structured Finance Database. New York: Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.Google Scholar
  47. Soederberg, S. 2010. Corporate Power and Ownership in Contemporary Capitalism. The Politics of Resistance and Domination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Stockhammer, E. 2007. Charakteristika eines finanz-dominierten Akkumulationsregimes in Europa. WSI Mitteilungen 60 (12): 643–649.Google Scholar
  49. Strauss, K. 2009. Gender, Risk, and Occupational Pensions, In Managing Financial Risks. From Global to Local. hrsg. G. L. Clark, 258–279. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Streeck, W. 2011. The Crises of Democratic Capitalism. New Left Review 71: 5–29.Google Scholar
  51. Sullivan, T. A., E. Warren, und J. Lawrence Westbrook. 2001. The Fragile Middle Class. Americans in Debt. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Towers Watson. 2012. Global Pension Assets Study 2012.Google Scholar
  53. Waine, B. 2006. Ownership and Security. Individualised Pensions and Pension Policy in the United Kingdom and the United States. Competition & Change 10 (3): 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Waine, B. 2008. Rules for the Rich? Contemporary Trends in Executive Pensions. Competition & Change 12 (3): 281–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weller, C. 2007. Need or Want. What Explains the Run-up in Consumer Debt? Journal of Economic Issues XLI (2): 583–591.Google Scholar
  56. Young, B. 2009. Vom staatlichen zum privatisierten Keynesianismus. Der globale makroökonomische Kontext der Finanzkrise und der Privatverschuldung. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 16 (1): 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Young, B. 2011. Der privatisierte Keynesianismus, die Finanzialisierung des ‚alltäglichen Lebens‘ und die Schuldenfalle. In Die Internationale Politische Ökonomie der Weltfinanzkrise, hrsg. O. Kessler, 15–36. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zelinsky, E. A. 2008. The Origins of the Ownership Society. How the Defined Contribution Paradigm Changed America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für GesellschaftsforschungKölnDeutschland
  2. 2.Universität zu KölnKölnDeutschland

Personalised recommendations