Advertisement

„The new enclosures“.

Zur Finanzialisierung von Land und Agrarwirtschaft
  • Stefan OumaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Globale Politische Ökonomie book series (GPÖ)

Zusammenfassu

Die „Agrarfrage“, also die Frage, in welcher Beziehung die innere Struktur der Landwirtschaft zu (globalen) kapitalistischen Transformationsprozessen steht, ist beinahe so alt wie Debatten über „den Kapitalismus“ selbst. Während sich diesbezüglich in der vielfach dynamisierten Landwirtschaft des 21. Jahrhunderts zahlreiche Anknüpfungspunkte finden ließen, muss diese im Hinblick auf gegenwärtige globale Einhegungen („enclosures“) neu gestellt werden (White et al. 2012).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Anseeuw, W., L. A. Wily, L. Cotula, und M. Taylor. 2012. Land Rights and the Rush for Land: Findings of the Global Commercial Pressures on Land. Rome: ILC.Google Scholar
  2. Baxter, J. 2010. Wie Gold, nur besser: Fette Dividenden aus Afrikas Böden. Le Monde Diplomatique 2010 (9089): 9–10.Google Scholar
  3. Black Earth Agriculture. 2012. About Black Earth Agriculture. http://blackearthfarming.com/. Zugegriffen: 14.Dezember 2012.Google Scholar
  4. Black Sea Farming. 2012. An Investor‘s Guide to Agricultural Opportunities in Today’s Challenging Economic Climate. New York.Google Scholar
  5. BlackRock. 2009. BlackRock Agriculture Fund. http://www.blackrockinternational.com/content/groups/uksite/documents/literature/1111092430.pdf. Zugegriffen: 14.Dezember 2012.
  6. Çalışkan, K. und M. Callon 2010. Economization, Part 2: A Research Programme for the Study of Markets. Economy and Society 39 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar
  7. Castree, N. 2008. Neoliberalising Nature: Processes, Effects and Evaluations. Environment and Planning A 40 (1): 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christophers, B. 2011. Follow the Thing: Money. Environment and Planning D 29 (6): 1068–1084. Clapp, J. 2011. Food. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cotula, L., S. Vermeulen, R. Leonard, und J. Keeley. 2009. Land Grab or Development Opportunity? London/ Rome: IIED/FAO/IFAD.Google Scholar
  10. Daniel, S. 2012. Situating Private Equity Capital in the Land Grab Debate. Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (3–4): 703–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, G. 2011. Farmland as an Asset Class: The Focus of Private Equity Firms in Africa. Paper presented at the International Conference on Global Land Grabbing. Brighton, UK, 11. Juli 2011.Google Scholar
  12. Deininger, K. 2011. Challenges posed by the New Wave of Farmland Investment. Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (2): 217–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deininger, K., D. Byerlee, J. Lindsay, A. Norton, H. Selod, und M. Stickler. 2011. Rising Global Interest in Farmland: Can It Yield Sustainable and Equitable Benefits? Washington: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DWS. 2010. DWS Global Agribusiness Fund – Investing in a Global Megatrend: The Business of Feeding the World. Frankfurt: Investments Deutsche Bank Group.Google Scholar
  15. DWS. 2011. DWS Invest Global Agrobusiness. Fondsreporting. Frankfurt: Investments Deutsche Bank Group.Google Scholar
  16. Epstein, G. A. 2005. Introduction: The Financialization of the World Economy. In Financialization and the World Economy, hrsg. G. A. Epstein, 1–16. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  17. French, S., A. Leyshon, und T. Wainwright. 2011. Financializing Space, spacing Financialization. Progress in Human Geography 35 (6): 798–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Funk, M. 2010. Meet the New Capitalists of Chaos. Rolling Stone 2010 (Mai): 58–65.Google Scholar
  19. Garner, D., und W. Brittain. 2012. Farmland as an Alternative Investment Asset Class. Fundamentals – Characteristics – Performance – Opportunities – Risks. DGC Asset Management. Northampton.Google Scholar
  20. Grain. 2008. SEIZED! The 2008 Land Grab for Food and Financial Security. GRAIN Briefing, October 2008. http://www.grain.org/article/entries/93-seized-the –2008-landgrab-for-food-and-financial-security. Zugegriffen: 14. Dezember 2012.
  21. Grain. 2011. Pension Funds. Key Players in the Global Farmland Grab FARMLAND GRAB. http://www.grain.org/articles/. Zugegriffen: 14. Dezember 2012.
  22. Hall, S. 2012. Geographies of Money and Finance III: Financial Circuits and the ‚Real Economy‘. Progress in Human Geography 37 (2): 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harvey, D. 2011. Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography: Crises, Geographic Disruptions and the Uneven Development of Political Responses. Economic Geography 87 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heires, M., und A. Nölke (2013; im Erscheinen): Finanzialisierung. In Theorien der Internationalen Politischen Ökonomie, hrsg. J. Wullweber, M. Behrens und A. Graf. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  25. Herre, R. 2010. German Investment Funds Involved in Land Grabbing. Köln: FIAN Deutschland. http://www.fian-deutschland.de/online/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=160 &func=fileinfo &id=406. Zugegriffen: 12. August 2013.
  26. HighQuest Partners. 2011. Farmland Institutional Investment May Rise $4B-$5B/Year. http://www.highquestpartners.com/news_story.php?id=128. Zugegriffen: 14. Dezember 2012.
  27. Kaplan, H. M. 1985. Farmland as a Portfolio Investment. In Journal of Portfolio Management 11 (2): 73–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krippner, G. R. 2005. The Financialization of the American Economy. Socio-Economic Review 3 (2): 173–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Land Matrix 2013. Agricultural Drivers. Zugegriffen: 12. August 2013.Google Scholar
  30. Leyshon, A., und N. Thrift. 2007. The Capitalization of Almost Everything: The Future of Finance and Capitalism. Theory, Culture & Society 24 (7–8): 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li, T. M. 2011. Centering Labor in the Land Grab Debate. Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (2): 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marx, K. 2008/1867. Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. 34. Aufl., unveränd. Nachdr. d. 11. Aufl., 1962. Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar
  33. McMichael, P. 2012. The Land Grab and Corporate Food Regime Restructuring. Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (3–4): 681–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ouma, S. 2014. Assembling Export Markets. The Making and Unmaking of Global Market Connections in West Africa. Chicester: Wiley (in Bearbeitung).Google Scholar
  35. Ouma, S. 2012. Land Grabbing. In Ortsregister. Raumbegriffe der Gegenwart, hrsg. N. Marquart, und V. Schreiber. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  36. Ouma, S., M. Boeckler, und P. Lindner. 2013. Extending the Margins of Marketization: Frontier Regions and the Making of Agro-export Markets in Northern Ghana. Geoforum 40: 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pike, A., und J. Pollard. 2010. Economic Geographies of Financialization. Economic Geography 86 (1): 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pryke, M. 2012. Joining the Dots. Cultural Anthropology May 17. 2012. http://www.culanth.org/?q=node/578.
  39. Smith, N. 2007. Nature as Accumulation Strategy. In Socialist Register 2007: Coming to Terms with Natur, hrsg. L. Panitch, und C. Leys, 19–41. London: Monthlys Review Press.Google Scholar
  40. The Economist. 2009. Green Shoots. The Economist 19. März 2009. http://www.economist.com/node/13331189. Zugegriffen: 14. Dezember 2012.
  41. White, Ben, S. M. Borras Jr., R. Hall, I. Scoones, und W. Wolford. 2012. The New Enclosures: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Land Deals. Journal of Peasant Studies 39 (3–4): 619–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zeller, C. 2010. Die Natur als Anlagefeld des konzentrierten Finanzkapitals. In Die Krise der Nachhaltigkeit. Zur Kritik der politischen Ökologie, hrsg. F. Schmieder, 103–136. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für HumangeographieJohann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität FrankfurtFrankfurt am MainDeutschland

Personalised recommendations