Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Soziale Medien als Technologien der Überwachung und Kontrolle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Soziale Medien

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften ((SRS))

Zusammenfassung

Soziale Medien und Überwachung sind untrennbar miteinander verbunden. Da der Begriff der Überwachung eine wechselhafte Geschichte hat, wird anfangs ein Überblick über die unterschiedlichen konzeptuellen und operationalen Bedeutungen des Begriffes gegeben. Daran anschließend wird erläutert, inwiefern das Geschäftsmodell aller großen Plattformen auf der Sammlung von Daten gründet. Zweitens sind Social-Media-Plattformen zunehmend ein Datenschatz für staatliche Akteure wie Polizeien und Geheimdienste. Drittens meint Überwachung und Kontrolle im Kontext sozialer Medien auch die laterale Überwachung der Benutzer untereinander. Im letzten Schritt dieses Beitrags wird die Zunahme der mobilen Nutzung sozialer Medien diskutiert und die sich hierbei addierenden Überwachungsaspekte erklärt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Albrechtslund, Anders. 2008. Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday 13(3). http://www.journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2142/1949. Zugegriffen am 03.03.2014.

  • Andrejevic, Mark. 2004. The work of watching one another: Lateral surveillance, risk, and governance. Surveillance & Society 2(4): 479–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrejevic, Mark. 2007a. iSpy: Surveillance and power in the interactive era. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrejevic, Mark. 2007b. Surveillance in the digital enclosure. The Communication Review 10(4): 295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrejevic, Mark. 2011. Facebook als neue Produktionsweise. In Generation Facebook, Hrsg. Leistert Oliver und Röhle Theo, 31–49. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrejevic, Mark, und Kelly Gates. 2014. Editorial. Big data surveillance. Surveillance & Society 12(2): 185–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, Kirstie, und Laureen Snider, Hrsg. 2013. The surveillance-industrial complex. A political economy of surveillance. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barocas, Solon, Seda Gürses, Arvind Narayanan, und Vincent Toubiana. 2013. Unlikely outcomes? A distributed discussion on the prospects and promise of decentralized personal data architectures. In Unlike Us reader. Socia media monopolies and their alternatives, Hrsg. Geert Lovink und Miriam Rasch, 347–363. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, Didier. 2006. Security, exception, ban and surveillance. In Theorising surveillance. The panopticon and beyond, Hrsg. David Lyon, 46–68. Oregon: Willian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, Lori, und Mariglynn Edlins. 2014. Top 10 U.S. municipal police departments and their social media usage. American Review of Public Administration, September. doi:10.1177/0275074014524478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Ian, und Douwe Korff. 2009. Terrorism and the proportionality of internet surveillance. European Journal of Criminology 6(2): 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Roger. 1988. Information technology and dataveillance. Communications of the ACM 31(5): 498–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Nicole. 2008. The valorization of surveillance: Towards a political economy of Facebook. Democratique Communique 22(1): 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coté, Mark, und Jennifer Pybus. 2011. Social Networks: Erziehung zur immateriellen Arbeit 2.0. In Generation Facebook, Hrsg. Oliver Leistert und Theo Röhle, 51–74. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gille, und Félix Guattari. 1993. Tausend Plateaus. Kapitalismus und Schizophrenie. Berlin: Merve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denef, Sebastian, Petra S. Bayerl, und Nico Kaptein. 2013. Social media and the police – tweeting practices of british police forces during the August 2011 riots. In CHI ’13 proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 3471–3480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmer, Greg. 2003. A diagram of panoptic surveillance. New Media & Society 5(2): 231–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1996. Überwachen und Strafen. Die Geburt des Gefängnisses. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp [1975].

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 2004. Geschichte der Gouvernementalität, Bd. 2, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Christian. 2010. Class and knowledge labour in informational capitalism and on the Internet. The Information Society 26(3): 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Christian. 2011. Foundations of critical media and information studies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Christian. 2012. Political economy and surveillance theory. Critical Sociology 39(5): 671–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Christian, Kees Boersma, Anders Albrechtslund, und Marisol Sandoval. 2012. Introduction. In Internet and survillance. The challenges of Web 2.0 and social media, Hrsg. Christian Fuchs, Kees Boersma, Anders Albrechtslund und Marisol Sandoval, 1–28. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandy, Oscar. 1993. The panoptic sort: A political economy of personal information. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandy, Oscar. 2006. Data mining, surveillance, and the discrimination in the post-9/11 environment. In Surveillance and visibility, Hrsg. Kevin D. Haggerty und Richard V. Ericson, 363–384. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandy, Oscar. 2009. Coming to terms with chance: Engaging rational discrimination and cumulative disadvantages. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliom, John, und Torin Monahan. 2013. SuperVision. An introduction to the surveillance society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Stephen, und Wood David. 2003. Digitizing surveillance: Categories, space, inequality. In The surveillance studies reader, Hrsg. Hier Sean und Greenberg Josh, 218–230. Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, Glenn. 2014. No place to hide. Edward Snowden, the NSA and the surveillance state. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, Kevin. 2006. Tear down the walls: On demolishing the panopticon. In Theorising surveillance. The panopticon and beyond, Hrsg. David Lyon, 23–45. Oregon: Willian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, Kevin, und Richard V. Ericson. 2000. The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology 51(4): 605–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, Susan. 2010. Surveillance or security? The risks posed by new wirtetapping technologies. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Humphreys. 2013. Mobile social media: Future challenges and opportunities. Mobile Media & Communication 1(1): 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leistert, Oliver. 2008. Data retention in the European Union. When a call returns. International Journal of Communication 2. http://www.ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/302. Zugegriffen am 03.03.2014.

  • Leistert, Oliver. 2014. The kids are alright, but what about Facebook? In Medien – Bildung – Dispositive. Beiträge zu einer interdisziplinären Medienbildungsforschung, Hrsg. Othmer Julius und Weich Andreas. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. (im Erscheinen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, Thomas. 2001. The Birth of Bio-Politics: Michel Foucault’s lectures at the College de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society 30(2): 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, Joel, Deborah Koetzle, und Mari Sakiyama. 2013. Police departments’ use of Facebook: Patterns and policy issues. Policy Quarterly 16(4): 438–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, Sonia. 2008. Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media Society 10(3): 393–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, David. 1993. An electronic panopticon? A sociological critique of surveillance theory. Sociological Review 41(4): 653–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, David. 2003a. Surveillance as social sorting: Computer codes and mobile bodies. In Surveillance as social sorting. Privacy, risk and digital discrimination, Hrsg. David Lyon, 13–30. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, David. 2003b. Surveillance after September 11. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, David. 2007. Surveillance studies. An overview. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, David. 2014. Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society 1(1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiesen, Thomas. 1997. The viewer society: Michel Foucault’s ‚Panopticon‘ revisited. Theoretical Criminology 1(2): 215–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McStay, Andrew. 2011. The mood of information: A critique of online behavioural advertising. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Harrow, Robert. 2005. No place to hide. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogura, Toshimura. 2006. Electronic government and surveillance oriented society. In Theorising surveillance. The panopticon and beyond, Hrsg. David Lyon, 270–295. Oregon: Willian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pariser, Eli. 2011. The filter bubble. What the Internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieri, Elisa. 2014. Emergent policing practices: Operation shop a looter and urban space securitisation in the aftermath of the Manchester 2011 riots. Surveillance & Society 12(1): 38–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrems, Max. 2014. Kämpf um Deine Daten. Wien: edition a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semitsu, Junichi. 2011. From Facebook to mug shot: How the dearth of social networking privacy rights revolutionized online government surveillance. Pace Law Review 31(1): 291–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senft, Theresa M. 2008. Camgirls: Celebrity and authenticity in the age of social networks. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solove, Daniel. 2004. The digital person: Technology and privacy in the information age. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, Nigel. 2005. Knowing capitalism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinic, Serra. 2006. (En)visioning the television audience: Revisiting questions of power in an age of interactive television. In The new politics of surveillance and visibility, Hrsg. Kevin Haggerty und Richard Ericson, 279–307. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trottier, Daniel. 2012a. Policing social media. Canadian Review of Sociology 49(4): 411–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trottier, Daniel. 2012b. Social media as surveillance. Rethinking visibility in a converging world. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trottier, Daniel. 2014. Crowdsourcing CCTV surveillance on the Internet. Information, Communication & Society 17(5): 609–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufekci, Zeynep. 2008. Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 28(1): 20–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, Jerry, Larissa Hjorth, und Ilpo Koskinen. 2012. Wising up: Revising mobile media in an age of smartphones. Continuum 26(5): 665–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedemann, Carolin. 2011. Das Assessment-Center der alltäglichen Lebensführung. In Generation Facebook. Über das Leben im Social Net, Hrsg. Leistert Oliver und Röhle Theo, 161–182. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Kultur und Ästhetik Digitaler Medien (ICAM), Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Deutschland

    Oliver Leistert

Authors
  1. Oliver Leistert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Leistert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hans-Bredow-Inst. für Medienforschung Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Jan-Hinrik Schmidt

  2. Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany

    Monika Taddicken

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leistert, O. (2017). Soziale Medien als Technologien der Überwachung und Kontrolle. In: Schmidt, JH., Taddicken, M. (eds) Handbuch Soziale Medien. Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03765-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03765-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-03764-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-03765-9

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation