Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Wider die Begrenzung der Enhancement-Debatte auf angewandte Ethik

Zur Dynamik und Komplexität technowissenschaftlicher Entwicklungen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Die Leistungssteigerung des menschlichen Gehirns

  • 3722 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Reflexionen zum Verhältnis von Mensch und Technik durchziehen die Technikphilosophie und angrenzende Bereiche spätestens seit den grundlegenden Überlegungen von Karl Marx (vgl. Quante 2013) und haben vor allem im deutschsprachigen Raum wesentliche Anregungen durch Arnold Gehlen (vgl. Gutmann 2013) und andere Vertreter der Philosophischen Anthropologie erhalten. Visionen einer Technisierung des Menschen, einer „Verwissenschaftlichung“ gesellschaftlicher Beziehungen und eines Verschmelzens von Mensch und Technik – die aktuell insbesondere aufgrund des sog. ‚Transhumanismus‘ und im Diskurs über ‚Cyborgs‘ viel diskutiert werden – gewinnen im Verlauf des 20.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Babcock Q, Byrne T (2000) Student perceptions of methylphenidate abuse at a public liberal arts college. J Am Coll Health 49: 143-145

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechmann G. (1993) Ethische Grenzen der Technik oder technische Grenzen der Ethik? Geschichte und Gegenwart. Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte, Gesellschaftsanalyse und politische Bildung 12: 213-225

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck S (Hg) (2012) Gehört mein Körper noch mir? Strafgesetzgebung zur Verfügungsbefugnis über den eigenen Körper in den Lebenswissenschaften. Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Béland JP, et al. (2011) The Social and Ethical Acceptability of NBICs for Purposes of Human Enhancement: Why Does the Debate Remain Mired in Impasse? NanoEthics 5(3): 295-307

    Google Scholar 

  • Boenink M, Swierstra T, Stemerding D (2010) Anticipating the interaction between technology and morality: a scenario study of experimenting with humans in bionanotechnology. Stud Ethics Law Tech 4(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogle KE, Smith BH (2009) Illicit methylphenidate use: a review of prevalence, availability, pharmacology, and consequences. Curr Drug Abuse Rev May 2(2): 157-176

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogner A (Hg) (2013) Ethisierung der Technik – Technisierung der Ethik. Der Ethik-Boom im Lichte der Wissenschafts- und Technikforschung. Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Brey PAE (2012) Anticipatory Ethics for Emerging Technologies. NanoEthics 6(1): 1-13

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldera EO (2008) Cognitive Enhancement and Theories of Justice: Contemplating the Malleability of Nature and Self. In: The Journal of Evolution and Technology 18 (01), http://jetpress.org/v18/caldera.htm

  • Caldwell J, et al. (2004) The efficacy of modafinil for sustaining alertness and simulator flight performance in F-117 pilots during 37 hours of continuous wakefulness. U. S. Air Force Research Laboratory Technical Report AFRLHE-BR-TR-2004-0003

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee A (2006) The promise and predicament of cosmetic neurology. Journal of Medical Ethics 32: 110-113

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee A (2013) The ethics of neuroenhancement. Handbook of Clinical Neurology 118: 323–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Christmas D, et al. (2014) A randomised trial of the effect of the glycine reuptake inhibitor Org 25935 on cognitive performance in healthy male volunteers. Hum Psychopharmacol Jan 14: https://doi.org/10.1002/hup.2384

  • Clatworthy PL, et al. (2009) Dopamine release in dissociable striatal subregions predicts the different effects of oral methylphenidate on reversal learning and spatial working memory. Journal of Neuroscience 29: 4690-4696

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenen C (2008) Von der Leistungs- zur Leistungssteigerungsgesellschaft? TAB-Brief 33 (Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung, Berlin): 21-27

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenen C (2010) Deliberating Visions: The Case of Human Enhancement in the Discourse on Nanotechnology and Convergence. In: Kaiser M et al. (2009): 73-88

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenen C (2013) Converging technologies. In: Gramelsberger G, Bexte P, Kogge W (2013): 209-230

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenen C, et al. (2009) Human enhancement. Brussels: European Parliament, http://www.itas.fzk.de/deu/lit/2009/coua09a.pdf

  • Coenen C (2013) Nachdarwinsche Visionen einer technischen Transformation der Menschheit. In: Ebert U, Riha O, Zerling L (2013): 9-36

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenen C, Simakova E (2013) STS policy interactions, technology assessment and the governance of technovisionary sciences. In: Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 9(2): 3-20

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingridge D (1980) The social control of technology. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper AC (1999) The slippery slope and technological determinism. Princeton Journal of Bioethics 2(1): 64-76

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jongh R, et al. (2008) Botox for the brain: Enhancement of cognition, mood and pro-social behavior and blunting of unwanted memories. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 32(4): 760-776

    Google Scholar 

  • Decker M, Ladikas M (Hg) (2004) Bridges between Science, Society and Policy. Technology Assessment – Methods and Impacts. Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • DEEPEN (2009) Reconfiguring Responsibility. Deepening Debate on Nanotechnology. www.geography.dur.ac.uk/projects/deepen

  • DGPPN (2009) Stellungnahme der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde (DGPPN) zum Gebrauch von Neuroenhancern, 2009, http://www.dgppn.de/publikationen/stellungnahmen/detailansicht/select/stellungnahmen-2009/article/141/stellungnahm-3.html

  • Dresler M, et al. (2013) Non-pharmacological cognitive enhancement. Neuropharmacology 64: 529-543

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert U, Riha O, Zerling L (Hg) (2013) Der Mensch der Zukunft - Hintergründe, Ziele und Probleme des Human Enhancement (Abhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften; Bd. 82/3). Stuttgart, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott R, et al. (1997) Effects of methylphenidate on spatial working memory and planning in healthy young adults. Psychopharmacology 131: 196-206

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott C (1998) What’s wrong with enhancement technologies? CHIPS Public Lecture, University of Minnesota, February 26, 1998, Center for Bioethics, University of Minnesota, http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucbtdag/bioethics/writings/Elliott.html

  • Emanuel R, et al. (2013) Cognitive enhancement drug use among future physicians: Findings from a multi-institutional census of medical students. Journal of General Internal Medicine 28(8): 1028-1034

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito R, et al. (2013) Acute effects of Modafinil on Brain resting state networks in young healthy subjects. In: PLOS One 8(7): e69224

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah MJ, et al. (2004) Neurocognitive enhancement: What can we do and what should we do? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5(5): 421-425

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah MJ (2011) Overcorrecting the neuroenhancement discussion. Addiction 106(6): 1190, author reply 1190-1191

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari A (2012) Autonomie und Visionen in der Debatte um pharmakologisches Cognitive Enhancement (PCE). In: Beck S (2012): 347-367

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari A, et al. (2012) Visions and ethics in current discourse on human enhancement. NanoEthics 6(3): 215-229

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger G, et al. (2013) Use of methylphenidate among medical students: a systematic review. Rev assoc med bras. 59(3): 285-289

    Google Scholar 

  • Forlini C, Racine E (2009a) Autonomy and coercion in academic “cognitive enhancement” using methylphenidate: perspectives of key stakeholders. Neuroethics 2(3): 163-177

    Google Scholar 

  • Forlini C, Racine E (2009b) Disagreements with implications: Diverging discourses on the ethics of non-medical use of methylphenidate for performance enhancement. BMC Medical Ethics 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Forlini C, Racine E (2010) Response. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7(4): 383-384

    Google Scholar 

  • Forlini C, Racine E (2013) Does the cognitive enhancement debate call for a renewal of the deliberative role of bioethics? In: Hildt E, Franke A (2013): 173-186

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox RC, Swazey JP (2008) Observing Bioethics. Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke A, et al. (2011) Non-medical use of prescription stimulants and illicit use of stimulants for cognitive enhancement in pupils and students in Germany. Pharmacopsychiatry 44: 60-66

    Google Scholar 

  • Galert T, et al. (2009) Das optimierte Gehirn. Gehirn und Geist 11. http://zeus.zeit.de/wissen/2009-10/memorandum-gehirn-geist.pdf

  • Gramelsberger G, Bexte P, Kogge W (Hg) (2013) Synthesis. Zur Konjunktur eines philosophischen Begriffs in Wissenschaft und Technik. Bielefeld

    Google Scholar 

  • Goordjin B (2005) Nanoethics: From Utopian Dreams and Apocalyptic Nightmares Towards a More Balanced View. Science and Engineering Ethics 11(4): 521-533

    Google Scholar 

  • Greely H, et al. (2008) Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy. Nature 456: 702-705

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald A (2010) From Speculative Nanoethics to Explorative Philosophy of Nanotechnology. NanoEthics 4(2): 91-101

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald A (2006) Nanotechnologie als Chiffre der Zukunft. In: Nordmann A, Schummer J, Schwarz A (2006): 49-80

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald A (2007) Converging Technologies: Visions, Increased Contingencies of the Conditio Humana, and Search for Orientation. Futures 39(4): 380-392

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald A (2008) Auf dem Weg in eine nanotechnologische Zukunft. Freiburg/München

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald A (2009) Technology Assessment: Concepts and Methods. In: Meijers A (Hg) Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences. Volume 9. Amsterdam. S 1103-1146

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald A (2011) Energy futures: Diversity and the need for assessment. Futures 43: 820-830

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald A (2012) Technikzukünfte als Medium von Zukunftsdebatten und Technikgestaltung. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald A (2013) Techno-visionary Sciences: Challenges to Policy Advice. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies 9(2): 21-38

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall SS (2003) The quest for a smart pill. Scientific American 289(3): 54-65

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall W, Lucke J (2010) The enhancement use of neuropharmaceuticals: More scepticism and caution needed. Addiction 105(12): 2041-2043

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson SO (2006) Great Uncertainty about small Things. In: Schummer J, Baird D (2006): 315-325

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris J (2010) Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People. Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris J, Chatterjee A (2009) Is it acceptable for people to take methylphenidate to enhance performance? YES and NO. British Medical Journal 338: 1532-1533

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley LR, et al. (1983) The effect of beta adrenergic blocking drugs on speakers’ performance and memory. British Journal of Psychiatry 142: 512-517

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays S, et al. (2011) Public Attitudes Towards Nanotechnology-Enabled Cognitive Enhancement in the United States. In: Hays S, et al. (2011a): 43-65

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays S, et al. (Hg) (2011a) The Yearbook of Nanotechnology: Nanotechnology, the Brain, and the Future, Volume III. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedgecoe A (2010) Bioethics and the reinforcement of socio-technical expectations. Social Studies of Science 40(2): 163-186

    Google Scholar 

  • Heil R, Coenen C (2013) Zukünfte menschlicher Natur: Biovisionäre Diskurse von der Eugenik bis zum Human Enhancement. Technikfolgenabschätzung - Theorie und Praxis 22(1): 23-31

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildt E (2011) Neuroenhancement Bubble? — Neuroenhancement Wave! In: AJOB Neuroscience 2(4): 44-45

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildt E, Franke A (Hg) (2013) Cognitive enhancement: An interdisciplinary perspective. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff S, Kim SH (2009) Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47: 119-146

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser M. et al. (Hg) (2009, 2010) Governing Future Technologies. Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime. Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Karafyllis NC (2009) Facts or Fiction? A Critique on Vision Assessment as a Tool for Technology Assessment. In: Sollie P, Düwell M (2009): 93-117

    Google Scholar 

  • Keiper A (2007) Nanoethics as a Discipline? The New Atlantis. A Journal of Technology & Science 16: 55-67

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettner M (2009) Wunscherfüllende Medizin - Ärztliche Behandlung im Dienst von Selbstverwirklichung und Lebensplanung. Frankfurt/M

    Google Scholar 

  • Khushf G (2005) The Use of Emergent Technologies for Enhancing Human Performance: Are We Prepared to Address the Ethical and Political Issues? Public Policy & Practice 4(2): 1-17

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogge W (2008) Technologie des 21. Jahrhunderts. Perspektiven der Technikphilosophie. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 56(6): 935-956

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer F (2011) Authenticity anyone? The enhancement of emotions via neuropsychopharmacology. Neuroethics 4(1): 51- 64

    Google Scholar 

  • Larriviere D, et al. (2009) Responding to requests from adult patients for neuroenhancements. Guidance of the Ethics, Law and Humanities Committee. Neurology 73: 1406-1412

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieb K (2010) Hirndoping: Warum wir nicht alles schlucken sollten. Mannheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Looby A, Earleywine M (2011) Expectation to receive methylphenidate enhances subjective arousal but not cognitive performance. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 19(6): 433-444

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucivero F, et al. (2011) Assessing Expectations: Towards a Toolbox for an Ethics of Emerging Technologies. NanoEthics 5(2): 129-141

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch G, et al (2011) The likelihood of cognitive enhancement. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 99(2): 116-29

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher B, et al. (2008): Pool results: Look who’s doping. Nature 452(7188): 674-675

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin PA, et al. (2011) Pharmaceutical Cognitive Enhancement: Interrogating the Ethics, Adressing the Issues. In: Segev I, Markram H (2011): 179-192

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta MA, et al. (2000) Methylphenidate enhances working memory by modulating discrete frontal and parietal lobe regions in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience 20(6): RC65

    Google Scholar 

  • Middendorff E, et al. (2012) Formen der Stresskompensation und Leistungssteigerung bei Studierenden. HISBUS-Befragung zur Verbreitung und zu Mustern von Hirndoping und Medikamentenmissbrauch, HIS: Forum Hochschule 01 | 2012, Hannover, http://www.his.de/pdf/pub_fh/fh-201201.pdf

  • Mittelstraß J (1991) Auf dem Wege zu einer Reparaturethik? In: Wils JP, Mieth D (Hg): Ethik ohne Chance? Erkundungen im technologischen Zeitalter. Tübingen, S 89-108

    Google Scholar 

  • Mnyusiwalla A, Daar AS, Singer PA (2003) Mind the Gap. Science and Ethics in Nanotechnology. Nanotechnology 14: R9-R13

    Google Scholar 

  • Moor J, Weckert J (2004) Nanoethics: Assessing the Nanoscale from an Ethical Point of View. In: Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J (Hg) Discovering the Nanoscale. Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller U, et al. (2012) Effects of modafinil on non-verbal cognition, task enjoyment and creative thinking in healthy volunteers. Neuropharmacology 64: 490-495

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler R, Reiner PB (2010) A call for data to inform discussion on cognitive enhancement. BioSocieties 5(4): 481-482

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler R, Reiner PB (2011) Prototypes or Pragmatics? The Open Question of Public Attitudes Toward Enhancement. AJOB Neuroscience 2(2): 49-50

    Google Scholar 

  • NEK‐CNE (National Advisory Commission on Biomedical Ethics) (2011) Human Enhancement by means of pharmacological agents (Opinion No. 18, October 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nida-Rümelin J (Hg) (2005) Angewandte Ethik. Die Bereichsethiken und ihre theoretische Fundierung. Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordmann A (2007) If and Then: A Critique of Speculative Nanoethics. Nano-Ethics 1(1): 31-46

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordmann A (2010) A Forensics Of Wishing: Technology Assessment In The Age Of Technoscience. Poiesis & Praxis. International Journal Of Technology Assessment And Ethics Of Science 7(1-2): 5-15

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordmann A, Rip A (2009) Mind the gap revisited. Nature Nanotechnology 4: 273-274

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordmann A, Schummer J, Schwarz A (Hg) (2006) Nanotechnologien im Kontext. Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Outram SM, Racine E (2011) Developing Public Health Approaches to Cognitive Enhancement: An Analysis of Current Reports. Public Health Ethics 4(1): 93-105

    Google Scholar 

  • Outram SM (2011) Ethical Considerations in the Framing of the Cognitive Enhancement Debate. Neuroethics 5(2): 173-184

    Google Scholar 

  • Outram SM (2010) The use of methylphenidate among students: the future of enhancement? Journal of Medical Ethics 36: 198-202

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm E, Hansson SO (2006) The case for ethical technology assessment (eTA). Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73(5): 543-558

    Google Scholar 

  • Patenaude J, et al. (2011) Moral Arguments in the Debate over Nanotechnologies: Are We Talking Past Each Other? NanoEthics 5(3): 285-293

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira AG, von Schomberg R, Funtowicz S (2007) Foresight Knowledge Assessment. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 4: 65-79

    Google Scholar 

  • Quednow B (2010) Ethics of neuroenhancement: a phantom debate. BioSocieties 5: 153-156

    Google Scholar 

  • Racine E, et al. (2014) The value and the pitfalls of speculation about science and technology in bioethics: the case of cognitive enhancement. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17(3): 325-37

    Google Scholar 

  • Racine E, Forlini C (2010) Cognitive Enhancement, Lifestyle Choice or Misuse of Prescription Drugs? Ethics Blind Spots in Current Debates. Neuroethics 3(1): 1-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragan CI, Bard J, Singh I (2013) What should we do about student use of cognitive enhancers? An analysis of current evidence. Neuropharmacology 64: 588-595

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayne S, Malone L (Hg) (1998) Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol 2 Resources and Technology. Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reches A, et al. (2013) Network dynamics predict improvement in working memory performance following donepezil administration in healthy young adults. Neuroimage Nov 21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.020

  • Rehmann-Sutter C, Leach Scully J (2010) Which Ethics for (of) the Nanotechnologies? In: Kaiser M, et al. (2010): 233-252

    Google Scholar 

  • Repantis D, et al. (2010a) Modafinil and methylphenidate for neuroenhancement in healthy individuals: A systematic review. Pharmacological Research Sep; 62(3): 187-206

    Google Scholar 

  • Repantis D, et al. (2010b) Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for neuroenhancement in healthy individuals: a systematic review. Pharmacological Research 61(6): 473-481

    Google Scholar 

  • Rip A, Kemp R (1998) Technological Change. In: Rayne S, Malone L (1998): 327-399

    Google Scholar 

  • Rip A, te Kulve H (2008) Constructive technology assessment and sociotechnical scenarios. In: Fisher E, Selin C, Wetmore JM (Hg) The yearbook of nanotechnology in society, Volume 1: Presenting futures. Berlin, S 49-70

    Google Scholar 

  • Roache R (2008) Ethics, speculation, and values. NanoEthics 2(3): 317-327

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohbeck J (1993) Technologische Urteilskraft. Zu einer Ethik technischen Handelns. Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose SPR (2002) ‘Smart drugs’: do they work? Are they ethical? Will they be legal? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3: 975-979

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society (2012): Human enhancement and the future of work, The Royal Society, London, http://royalsociety.org/policy/projects/human-enhancement/workshop-report/

  • Sahakian B, Morein-Zhamir S (2007) Professor’s little helper. Nature 450: 1157-1159

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel M (2007) The case against perfection. Ethics in the age of genetic engineering. Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler S, Wiegel C (2013) Test anxiety and cognitive enhancement: the influence of students’ worries on their use of performance-enhancing drugs. Substance Use & Misuse 48: 220–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauter A, Gerlinger K (2012) Der pharmakologisch verbesserte Mensch. Leistungssteigernde Mittel als gesellschaftliche Herausforderung. Studien des Büros für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag, Bd. 34. Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu J, Bostrom N (Hg) (2008) Human Enhancement. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu J, Bostrom N (2008) Human Enhancement Ethics: The State of the Debate. In: Savulescu J. Bostrom N (2008): 1-22

    Google Scholar 

  • Schermer M, et al. (2009) The future of psychopharmacological enhancements: Expectations and policies. Neuroethics 2: 75-87

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleim S (2010) Risiken und Nebenwirkungen der Enhancement-Debatte. Suchtmagazin 2: 49-51

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöne-Seifert B, et al. (2009) Neuro-Enhancement. Ethik vor neuen Herausforderungen. Paderborn

    Google Scholar 

  • Schummer J, Baird D (Hg) (2006) Nanotechnology Challenges – Implications for Philosophy, Ethics and Society. Singapur

    Google Scholar 

  • Segev I, Markram H (Hg) (2011) Augmenting Cognition. Lausanne

    Google Scholar 

  • Selin C (2011) Negotiating Plausibility: Intervening in the Future of Nanotechnology. Science and Engineering Ethics 17(4): 723-737

    Google Scholar 

  • Silber BY, et al. (2006) The acute effects of d-amphetamine and methamphetamine on attention and psychomotor performance. Psychopharmacology 187: 154-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver JA, et al. (2004) Effect of anxiolytics on cognitive flexibility in problem solving. Cognitive Behavioral Neurology 17: 93-97

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh I, Kelleher KJ (2010) Neuroenhancement in Young People: Proposal for Research, Policy, and Clinical Management. AJOB Neuroscience 1(1): 3-16

    Google Scholar 

  • Skorupinski B, Ott K (2000) Technikfolgenabschätzung und Ethik. Eine Verhältnisbestimmung in Theorie und Praxis. Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith ME, Farah M (2011) Are Prescription Stimulants “Smart Pills”? The Epidemiology and Cognitive Neuroscience of Prescription Stimulant Use by Normal Healthy Individuals. Psychological Bulletin 137(5): 717-741

    Google Scholar 

  • Siep L (2006) Die biotechnische Neuerfindung des Menschen. In: Abel G (Hg) Kreativität. Akten des XX. Deutschen Kongresses für Philosophie. Hamburg, S 306-323

    Google Scholar 

  • Siune K, Markus E, Calloni M, Felt U, Gorski A, Grunwald A, Rip A, de Semir V, Wyatt S (2009) Challenging Futures of Science in Society. Report of the MASIS Expert Group. Europäische Kommission; Brüssel

    Google Scholar 

  • Sollie P, Düwell M (Hg) (2009) Evaluating New Technologies, The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology 3. Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl B (2011) IT for a better future: how to integrate ethics, politics and innovation. Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society 9(3): 140-156

    Google Scholar 

  • Synofzik M (2009) Ethically justified, clinically applicable criteria for physician decision-making in psychopharmacological enhancement. Neuroethics 2: 89-102

    Google Scholar 

  • Teter CJ, et al. (2006) Illicit use of specific prescription stimulants among college students: prevalence, motives, and routes of administration. Pharmacotherapy 26(10): 1501-1510

    Google Scholar 

  • Tone A (2005) Listening to the past: History, psychiatry, and anxiety. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 50(7): 373-380

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner DC, et al. (2003) Cognitive enhancing effects of modafinil in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology 165: 260-269

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Plas A, et al. (2010) Beyond speculative robot ethics: a vision assessment study on the future of the robotic caretaker. In: Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 17(6): 299-315

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lente H (1993) Promising Technology. The Dynamics of Expectations in Technological Developments. Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Viehöver W, Wehling P (2011) Entgrenzung der Medizin? Von der Heilkunst zur Verbesserung des Menschen. Bielefeld

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams R (2006) Compressed Foresight and Narrative Bias: Pitfalls in Assessing High Technology Futures. Science as Culture 15(4): 327-348

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolbring G (2008) Why NBIC? Why human performance enhancement? The European Journal of Social Science Research 21: 25-40

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Technikfolgenabschätzung und Systemanalyse (ITAS), KIT, Karlsruhe, Deutschland

    Christopher Coenen, Arianna Ferrari & Armin Grunwald

Authors
  1. Christopher Coenen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arianna Ferrari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Armin Grunwald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Coenen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fachbereich Gesellschaftsw. und Soziale Arbeit, Hochschule Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany

    Nicola Erny

  2. Fachbereich Gesellschaftswissenschaften, Hochschule Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Hessen, Germany

    Matthias Herrgen

  3. Fachbereich Gesellschaftswissenschaften, Hochschule Darmstadt , Darmstadt, Hessen, Germany

    Jan C. Schmidt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Coenen, C., Ferrari, A., Grunwald, A. (2018). Wider die Begrenzung der Enhancement-Debatte auf angewandte Ethik. In: Erny, N., Herrgen, M., Schmidt, J. (eds) Die Leistungssteigerung des menschlichen Gehirns. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03683-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03683-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-03682-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-03683-6

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation