The Negative C. V.



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Belair, R., E. C. Johnson, and P. L. Woodard. 2001. Use and Management of Criminal History Record Information: A Comprehensive Report, 2001 Update. Pub. No. NCJ 187670.
  2. Cole, S. A. 2001. Suspect Identities: A history of Fingerprinting and Criminal Identification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Conley, A., A. Datta, H. Nissenbaum, and D. Sharma. 2012. Sustaining Privacy and Open Justice in the Transition to Online Court Records: A Multidisciplinary Inquiry. Maryland Law Review 71: 772–847.Google Scholar
  4. Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center. 2010. Employer Surveys Regarding Employment of People with Criminal Histories.
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 2012. Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment Decisions Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  6. Harris, P. M., and K.S. Keller. 2005. Ex-Offenders Need Not Apply: The Criminal Background Check in Hiring Decisions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 21 (1): 6–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jacobs, J. B. 2005. Mass Incarceration and the Proliferation of Criminal Records. University of St. Thomas Law Journal 3 (3): 387–420.Google Scholar
  8. Jacobs, J. B. Forthcoming. 2014. Juvenile Criminal Record Confidentiality, eds. D. Tanenhaus, and F. Zimring. Choosing the Future of Criminal Justice. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  9. Jacobs, J. B., and D. Blitsa. 2008. Major “Minor” Progress Under the Third Pillar: EU Institution Building in the Sharing of Criminal Record Information. Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law 8: 111–65.Google Scholar
  10. Jacobs, J. B. and D. Blitsa. 2008. Sharing Criminal Records: The United States, the European Union and Interpol Compared. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 30: 125–210.Google Scholar
  11. Jacobs, J. B., and D. Blitsa. 2012. US, EU & UK Employment Vetting as Strategy for Preventing Convicted Sex Offenders from Gaining Access to Children. European Journal on Crime, Criminal Law & Criminal Justice 20 (3): 265–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacobs, J. B., and T. Crepet. 2007. The Expanding Scope, Use and Availability of Criminal Records. NYU Journal of Legislation and Public Policy 11: 177–213.Google Scholar
  13. Jacobs, J. B., and E. Larrauri. 2012. Are Criminal Convictions a Public Matter? The USA and Spain. Punishment and Society 14: 3–28.Google Scholar
  14. Knouse, S. B. 1994. Impressions of the Resume: The Effects of Applicant Education, Experience, and Impression Management. Journal of Business and Psychology 9 (1): 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larrauri, E., and J. B. Jacobs. 2013. A Spanish Window on European Law and Policy on Employment Discrimination Based on Criminal Record. Essays on European Penology, eds. T. Deams, D. van ZylSmit et al. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Legal Action Center. 2002. How to Get and Clean Up Your California Rap Sheet.
  17. Love, M. C., J. Roberts, and C. Klingele. 2013. Collateral Consequences of Criminal Convictions: Law, Policy and Practice. Minnesota: Thomson West.Google Scholar
  18. Martin, P. W. 2008. Online Access to Court Records— Documents to Data, Particulars to Patterns. Villanova Law Review 53, 855–88.Google Scholar
  19. Saxonhouse, E. 2004. Unequal Protection: Comparing Former Felons’ Challenges to Disenfranchisement and Employment Discrimination. Stanford Law Review 56 (6), 1597–1639.Google Scholar
  20. SEARCH. 2005. Report of the National Task Force on the Commercial Sale of Criminal Justice Record Information.
  21. SEARCH. 2005. Report of the National Task Force on the Criminal Backgrounding of America.
  22. U.S. Department of Justice. 2006. Attorney General’s Report on Criminal History Background Checks.
  23. U.S. General Accounting Office. 1984. Observations on the FBI’s Interstate Identification Index.
  24. United States Interagency Council on Homelessness. 2013. Federal Efforts to Improve Reentry: Federal Interagency Council on Reentry.
  25. Whitman, J. Q. 2004. The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity Versus Liberty. Yale Law Journal 113: 1151–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Research in CrimeJustice an der New York University School of LawNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations