Advertisement

Ausgewählte Anwendungsfelder

Chapter
  • 19k Downloads

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Abschnitt werden ausgewählte Anwendungen der Ideen der Behavioral Economics vorgestellt. Behavioral Finance, Sozialpolitik und die Idee des liberalen Paternalismus, der versucht, mit den Ideen der Behavioral Economics das Verhalten der Menschen zu beeinflussen.

Literatur

  1. Ariely, Dan; Wertenbroch, Klaus (2002), Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment, Psychological Science, 13(3), pp. 219–224.Google Scholar
  2. Barber, Brad M.; Odean, Terrance (2001), Boys will be boys: gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, February 2001, pp. 261–292.Google Scholar
  3. Barberis, Nicholas; Thaler, Richard (2003), A survey of behavioral finance, in: (Eds) G. Constantinidis; M. Harris; R. Stulz: Handbook of the Economics of Finance, North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaulier, Scott; Caplan, Bryan (2002), Behavioral Economics and Perverse Effects of the Welfare State, George Mason University, Global Prosperity Initiative, Working Paper 2, Fairfax.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, Hanno (2010), Ist paretianischer Liberalismus doch möglich? Verhaltenswissenschaftliche Ökonomik und liberaler Paternalismus, List Forum für Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik, Band 36 (2010), S. 43–58.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, Hanno (2011), Zur Psychologie des Gesundheitswesens: Können die Erkenntnisse der Behavioral Economics die Effizienz des Gesundheitssystems verbessern?, in: Georg Rüter, Patrick Da-Cruz, Philipp Schwegel (Hrsg.): Gesundheitsökonomie und Wirtschaftspolitik. Festschrift zum 70. Geburtstag von Peter Oberender, Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart 2011, S. 277–288.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, Hanno (2012): Geld denkt nicht, Hanser Verlag, München 2012.Google Scholar
  8. Bertrand, Marianne; Mullainathan, Sendhil; Shafir, Elgar (2004), A Behavioral-Economics View of Poverty, American Economic Association, Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 94, No. 2, pp. 419–423.Google Scholar
  9. Camerer, Collin; Issacharoff, Samuel; Loewenstein, George; O’Donoghue, Ted; Rabin, Matthew (2003), Regulation for conservatives: Behavioral economics and the case for “asymmetric paternalism”, University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 151, pp. 101–144.Google Scholar
  10. De Bondt, Werner F. M.; Thaler, Richard (1985), Does the Stock Market Overreact?, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 40, No. 3, Papers and Proceedings of the Forty-Third Annual Meeting American Finance Association, Dallas, Texas, December 28–30, 1984. (Jul., 1985), pp. 793–805.Google Scholar
  11. Fama, Eugene F. (1970), Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work, Journal of Finance, Vol. ; 25, pp. 383–417.Google Scholar
  12. Fama, Eugene F. (1991), Efficient capital markets II, Journal of Finance, Vol. ; 46, pp. 1575–1618.Google Scholar
  13. Fama, Eugene F. (1998), Market effciency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance, Journal of Financial Economics 49 (1998), pp. 283–306.Google Scholar
  14. French, Kenneth; Poterba, James (1991), Investor Diversification and International Equity Markets, American Economic Review, Vol. 8 (2), pp. 222–226.Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, Milton (1953), The Case for Flexible Exchange Rates, Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Froot, Kenneth; Dabora, Emil (1999), How are stock prices affected by the location of trade?, Journal of Financial Economics, 53, pp. 189–216.Google Scholar
  17. Glaeser, Edward L. (2006), Paternalism and Psychology, University of Chicago Law Review Vol. 73, pp. 133–156.Google Scholar
  18. Hau, Harald; Rey, Helene (2008), Home Bias at the Fund Level, NBER Working Paper No. 14172, July 2008.Google Scholar
  19. Hellerstein, Judith K. (1998), The Importance of the Physician in the Generic Versus Trade-Name Prescription Decision, Rand Journal of Economics 29(1), pp. 108–136.Google Scholar
  20. Jarrel, Greg, Peltzman, Sam (1985), The impact of product recalls on the wealth of sellers, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 31 (1985), pp. 521–536.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, Eric J.; Hershey, John; Meszaros; Jacqueline, Kunreuther, Howard (1993), Framing, Probability Distortions, and Insurance Decisions, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 7, pp. 35–51.Google Scholar
  22. Levya, Tamir; Yagil, Joseph (2005), The informational content of article publication: the case of twin stocks, Applied Financial Economics, 2005, 15, pp. 1199–1202.Google Scholar
  23. Loewenstein, George; Haisley, Emily (2007), The Economist as Therapist: Methodological Ramifications of ‚Light‘ Paternalism, mimeo 2007.Google Scholar
  24. Loewenstein, George; O’Donoghue, Ted (2006), We Can Do This the Easy Way or the Hard Way: Negative Emotions, Self-Regulation, and the Law, University of Chicago Law Review, pp. 183–206.Google Scholar
  25. Madrian, Brigitte C.; Shea, Dennis F. (2001), The power of suggestion: inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior, Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(4), pp. 1149–1187.Google Scholar
  26. Marquering, Wessel; Nisser, Johan; Valla, Toni (2006), Disappearing anomalies: a dynamic analysis of the persistence of anomalies, Applied Financial Economics, 2006, Vol. 16, pp. 291–302.Google Scholar
  27. McLean, R. David; Pontiff, Jeffrey (2012), Does Academic Research Destroy Stock Return Predictability?, AFFI/EUROFIDAI, Paris December 2012 Finance Meetings Paper; University of Alberta and MIT Sloan School of Management and Boston College; URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2156623
  28. Meyerowitz, Beth E.; Chaiken, Shelly (1987), The effect on message framing on breast-self-examination attitudes, intentions and behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52, pp. 500–510.Google Scholar
  29. Odean, Terrance (1998), Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?, Journal of Finance, 1998, vol. 53 (5), pp. 1775–1798.Google Scholar
  30. O’Donoghue, Ted; Rabin, Matthew (2000), Choice and procastination, Economics Department, University of California, Berkeley, 2000, Paper E00–281.Google Scholar
  31. O’Donoghue, Ted; Rabin, Matthew (2003), Studying optimal paternalism, illustrated by a modell of sin taxes, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 92 (2), May 2003, pp. 186–191.Google Scholar
  32. Reschke, Carl Henning (2010), Risk-identification and strategic foresight based on history, management and complex systems perspectives – the example of the bio-pharmaceutical industry. Paper presented at the Summer Conference 2010 on „Opening Up Innovation: Strategy, Organization and Technology“ at Imperial College London Business School, June 16–18, 2010.Google Scholar
  33. Santoni, Alessandro; Kelshiker, Arun R. (2010), Behavioral Finance: An Ananlysis of the Performance of Behavioral Finance Funds, Journal of Index Investing, Fall 2010, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 56–72.Google Scholar
  34. Schwartz, Janet, Bertrand, Marianne, Mullainathan, Sendhil, Shafir, Eldar (2006), Boosting program take-up: An experiment with flexible spending accounts. Paper presented at “Behavioral Decision Research in Management Conference”, Santa Monica, June 15–17.Google Scholar
  35. Sercu, Piet; Vanpée, Rosanne (2007), Home bias in international equity portfolios: a review, University Leuven, Department of Accountancy, Finance and Insurance (AFI), Working Paper, 2007.Google Scholar
  36. Shefrin, Hersh, and Statman, Meir (1985), The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long: Theory and Evidence, Journal of Finance. Vol. 40 (3, July). Pp. 777–790.Google Scholar
  37. Shiller, Robert J. (1981), Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends?, American Economic Review, Vol. ; 71, pp. 421–436.Google Scholar
  38. Shiller, Robert J. (1998), Human behavior and the efficiency of the financial system. NBER Working Paper 6375; January 1998.Google Scholar
  39. Shleifer, Andrei (2000), Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to behavioral Finance. Clarendon.Google Scholar
  40. Shleifer, Andrei; Vishny, Robert (1997), The Limits of Arbitrage, Journal of Finance. Vol. 52 (1). Pp. 35–55.Google Scholar
  41. Siegel, Jeremy J.; Thaler, Richard H. (1997), Anomalies: The Equity Premium Puzzle, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 11, No. 1. (Winter, 1997), pp. 191–200.Google Scholar
  42. Spremann, Klaus, Gantenbein, Pascal (2005): Kapitalmärkte, Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  43. Thaler, Richard; Benartzi, Shlomo (2004), Save more tomorrow: Using behavioral Economics to increase employee saving, Journal of political Economy, Vol. 112 (No. 1), pp. 164–187.Google Scholar
  44. Thaler, Richard; Sunstein, Cass R. (2003), Libertarian Paternalism, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings Vol. 92 No. 2 (May 2003), pp. 175–179.Google Scholar
  45. Wansink, Brian; Just, David R.; Payne, Collin R. (2009), Mindless Eating and Healthy Heuristics for the Irrational, American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 2009, 99:2, pp. 165–169.Google Scholar
  46. Whitman, Glen (2006), Against the new Paternalism. Internalities and the Economics of Self-Control, Cato Institute, Policy Analysis No.563 (February 2006).Google Scholar
  47. Wright, Colby; Banerjee, Prithviraj; Boney, Vaneesha R. (2008), Behavioral Finance: Are the Disciples Profiting from the Doctrine?, The Journal of Investing Winter 2008, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 82–90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hochschule PforzheimPforzheimDeutschland

Personalised recommendations