Advertisement

Work Motivation and Job Satisfaction as Antecedents of Research Performance: Investigation of Different Mediation Models

  • Stefanie Ringelhan
  • Jutta Wollersheim
  • Isabell M. Welpe
  • Marina Fiedler
  • Matthias Spörrle
Part of the ZfB-Special Issues book series (ZFB, volume 3/2013)

Abstract

Knowledge of the factors that influence the quality and quantity of research productivity is vital for governments, universities, departments, and research groups. Using a data set of 995 young scholars in academia from the fields of business and economics, we investigate the influence of job satisfaction, two different types of work motivation, and their interrelations on research performance. Our cross-sectional data reveal that intrinsic work motivation, extrinsic work motivation and job satisfaction have a direct influence on research performance without control variables in the model. Our data support models that suggest job satisfaction as a mediator of the relationship between intrinsic work motivation and research performance. The findings also support models that demonstrate that intrinsic work motivation mediates the relationship between job satisfaction and research performance. Our findings empirically support conceptual arguments on the crucial role of intrinsic and extrinsic work motivation and job satis faction in an academic context and thus should be considered for the tailoring of appropriate incentive systems at universities. The paper provides a discussion of these findings.

Keywords

Research performance intrinsic motivation extrinsic motivation job satisfaction performance management mediation models 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abe le A E, Hagmaier T (2011) Berufliche Laufbahnentwicklung von Akademikerinnen und Akademikern der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (BELA-E). ProjektberichtGoogle Scholar
  2. Abele A E, Spurk D (2009) How do objective and subjective career success interrelate over time? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 82:803–824Google Scholar
  3. Aguin is H, Suárez-González I, Lannelongue G et al (2012) Scholarly impact revisited. Academy of Management Perspectives 26:105–132Google Scholar
  4. Amabile T M (1997) Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review 40:39–58Google Scholar
  5. Amabile T M (1998) How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review 76:76–87Google Scholar
  6. Amabile T M, Hil K G, Hennessey B A et al (1995) ‚The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations‘: Correction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68:580–580Google Scholar
  7. Amabile T M, Hill K G, Hennessey B A et al (1994) The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66:950–967Google Scholar
  8. Amabile T M, Kramer S J (2011) The power of small wins. Harvard Business Review 89:70-80Google Scholar
  9. Arvey R D, Dewhirst H D, Boling J C (1976) Relationships between goal clarity, participation in goal setting, and personality characteristics on job satisfaction in a scientific organization. Journal of Applied Psychology 61:103–105Google Scholar
  10. Atkinso n J W (1957) Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review 64:359–372Google Scholar
  11. Aydin O T (2012) The impact of motivation and hygiene factors on research performance: An empirical study from a Turkish university. International Review of Management and Marketing 2:106–111Google Scholar
  12. Backes-G ellner U, Sadowski D (1990) Organizational implementation of bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics 19:385–395Google Scholar
  13. Baum J A C (2011) Free-riding on power laws: Questioning the validity of the Impact Factor as a measure of research quality in organization studies. Organization 18:449–466Google Scholar
  14. Bentea C -C, Anghelache V (2012) Teachers‘ motivation and satisfaction for professional activity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 22:563–567Google Scholar
  15. Berning E, Falk S (2006) Promovieren an den Universitäten in Bayern. Praxis–Modelle–Perspektiven. Bayerisches Staatsinstitut für Hochschulforschung und Hochschulplanung, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  16. Bland C J, Center B A, Finstad D A et al (2005) A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Academic Medicine 80:225–237Google Scholar
  17. Bortz J (20 05) Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer, Heidelberg Bowling N A (2007) Is the job satisfaction–job performance relationship spurious? A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Vocational Behavior 71:167–185Google Scholar
  18. Brewer G A, Douglas J W, Facer R L et al (1999) Determinants of graduate research productivity in doctoral programs of public administration. Public Administration Review 59:373–382Google Scholar
  19. Card D, Mas A, Moretti E et al (2010) Inequality at work: The effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. National Bureau of Economic Research. Chalofsky N, Krishna V (2009) Meaningfulness, commitment, and engagement: The intersection of a deeper level of intrinsic motivation. Advances in Developing Human Resources 11:189–203Google Scholar
  20. Chlosta K, P ull K, Fiedler M et al (2010) Should I stay or should I go? Warum Nachwuchswissenschaftler in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre das Universitätssystem verlassen. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 80:1207–1229Google Scholar
  21. Clark A, Oswal d A, Warr P (1996) Is job satisfaction U-shaped in age? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 69:57–81Google Scholar
  22. Cohen J, Cohen P, West S G et al (2003) Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  23. Cole J R, Zuck erman H (1991) Marriage, motherhood, and research performance in science. In: Zuckerman H, Cole J R & Bruer J T (ed) The outer circle: Women in the scientific community. W. W. Norton and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Crane D (1965) Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of productivity and recognition. American Sociological Review 30:699–714Google Scholar
  25. Csikszentmihal yi M, Csikszentmihalyi I (1991) Die außergewöhnliche Erfahrung im Alltag: Die Psychologie des flow-Erlebenisses. Klett-Cotta, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  26. Deci E L (1971) Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 18:105–115Google Scholar
  27. Deci E L (1972) Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 22:113–120Google Scholar
  28. Deci E L, Koestn er R, Ryan R M (1999) A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin 125:627–668Google Scholar
  29. Deemer E D, Maho ney K T, Ball J H (2012) Research motives of faculty in academic STEM: Measurement invariance of the Research Motivation Scale. Journal of Career Assessment 20:182–195Google Scholar
  30. Dilger A (2001) Was lehrt die Prinzipal-Agenten-Theorie für die Anreizgestaltung in Hochschulen? Zeitschrift für Personalforschung 2:132–148Google Scholar
  31. Dilger A (2010) Ra nkings von Zeitschriften und Personen in der BWL. Zeitschrift für Management 5:91–102Google Scholar
  32. DiTomaso N, Post C, Smith D R et al (2007) Effects of structural position on allocation and evaluation decisions for scientists and engineers in industrial R&D. Administrative Science Quarterly 52:175–207Google Scholar
  33. Dooley L M, Lindner J R (2003) The handling of nonresponse error. Human Resource Development Quarterly 14:99–110Google Scholar
  34. Dundar H, Lewis D R (1998) Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education 39:607–631Google Scholar
  35. Eisend M (2011) Is VHB-JOURQUAL2 a good measure of scientific quality? Assessing the validity of the major business journal ranking in German-speaking countries. Business Research 4:241–274Google Scholar
  36. Fabel O, Hein M, Ho fmeister R (2008) Research productivity in business economics: An investigation of Austrian, German and Swiss universities. German Economic Review 9:506–531Google Scholar
  37. Fiedler M, Welpe I M, Lindlbauer K et al (2008) Denn wer da hat, dem wird gegeben: Publikationsproduktivität des BWL-Hochschullehrernachwuchses und deren wissenschaftlicher Betreuer. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 78:477–508Google Scholar
  38. Fiedler M, Welpe I M, Picot A O (2006) Terra Incognita. Forschungsleistungen und Qualifizierungswege des deutschsprachigen Hochschullehrernachwuchses für Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Die Betriebswirtschaft 66:464–486Google Scholar
  39. Franck E, Opitz C (200 0) Selektion und Veredelung von Humankapital: Implikationen für eine leistungsorientierte Vergütung von Hochschullehrern. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung 3:270–290Google Scholar
  40. Franck E, Schönfelder B ( 2000) On the role of competition in higher education: Uses and abuses of the economic metaphor. Schmalenbach Business Review 52:214–237Google Scholar
  41. Frank R H, Gilovich T, Reg an D T (1993) Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 7:159–171Google Scholar
  42. Frey B S (1994) How intrin sic motivation is crowded out and in. Rationality and Society 6:334–352Google Scholar
  43. Frey B S, Jegen R (2001) M otivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys 15:589–611Google Scholar
  44. Gardner D G, Van Dyne L, P ierce J L (2004) The effects of pay level on organization-based selfesteem and performance: A field study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 77:307–322Google Scholar
  45. Gendron Y (2008) Constitut ing the academic performer: The spectre of superficiality and stagnation in academia. European Accounting Review 17:97–127Google Scholar
  46. Glenn N D, Taylor P A, Wea ver C N (1977) Age and job satisfaction among males and females: A multivariate, multisurvey study. Journal of Applied Psychology 62:189Google Scholar
  47. Gneezy U, Rustichini A (20 00) Pay enough or don‘t pay at all. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115:791–810Google Scholar
  48. Goodall A H (2009) Highly cited leaders and the performance of research universities. Research Policy 38:1079–1092Google Scholar
  49. Gu J, Lin Y, Vogel D et al (2011) What are the major impact factors on research performance of young doctorate holders in science in China: a USTC survey. Higher Education 62:483–502Google Scholar
  50. Hackman J R, Oldham G R (1 975) Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology 60:159–170Google Scholar
  51. Hackman J R, Oldham G R (1 980) Work redesign. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  52. Harley S, Muller-Camen M, Collin A (2004) From academic communities to managed organizations: The implications for academic careers in UK and German universities. Journal of Vocational Behavior 64:329–345Google Scholar
  53. Harris G, Kaine G (1994) The determinants of research performance: A study of Australian university economists. Higher Education 27:191–201Google Scholar
  54. Hedjazi Y, Behravan J (201 1) Study of factors influencing research productivity of agriculture faculty members in Iran. Higher Education 62:635–647Google Scholar
  55. Herzberg F, Mausner B, Sny derman B (1967) The motivation to work. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Huang T P (2011) Comparing motivating work characteristics, job satisfaction, and turnover intention of knowledge workers and blue-collar workers, and testing a structural model of the variables‘ relationships in China and Japan. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 22:924–944Google Scholar
  57. Hyland M E (1988) Motivati onal control theory: An integrative framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55:642–651Google Scholar
  58. Ivancevich J M (1976) Effe cts of goal-setting on performance and job-satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology 61:605–612Google Scholar
  59. Jansen D, Wald A, Franke K et al (2007) Drittmittel als Performanzindikator der wissenschaftlichen Forschung: Zum Einfluss von Rahmenbedingungen auf Forschungsleistungen. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 59:125–149Google Scholar
  60. Jöstl G, Bergsmann E, Lüften egger M et al (2012) When will they blow my cover? Zeitschrift für Psychologie 220:109–120Google Scholar
  61. Judge T A, Thoresen C J, Bono J E et al (2001) The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin 127:376–407Google Scholar
  62. Keller R T (2012) Predicting th e performance and innovativeness of scientists and engineers. Journal of Applied Psychology 97:225–233Google Scholar
  63. Keller R T, Julian S D, Kedia B L (1996) A multinational study of work climate, job satisfaction, and the productivity of R&D teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 43:48–55Google Scholar
  64. Kieser A (2010) Unternehmen Wis senschaft? Leviathan 38:347–367Google Scholar
  65. Kieser A (2012) JOURQUAL - der Gebrauch, nicht der Missbrauch, ist das Problem. Die Betriebswirtschaft 1:93–110Google Scholar
  66. Kim B, Oh H (2002) Economic com pensation compositions preferred by R&D personnel of different R&D types and intrinsic values. R&D Management 32:47–59Google Scholar
  67. Kleinbeck U (1996) Arbeitsmotiv ation: Entstehung, Wirkung und Förderung. Juventa, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  68. Lam A (2011) What motivates acad emic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘Gold’, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? Research Policy 40:1354–1368Google Scholar
  69. Lange S (2008) New Public Manage ment und die Governance der Universitäten. Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management 1:235–248Google Scholar
  70. Latham G P, Ernst C T (2006) Keys to motivating tomorrow’s workforce. Human Resource Management Review 16:181–198Google Scholar
  71. Lawler E E, Hall D T (1970) Relati onship of job characteristics to job involvement, satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology 54:305–312Google Scholar
  72. Leahey E (2007) Not by productivit y alone: How visibility and specialization contribute to academic earnings. American Sociological Review 72:533–561Google Scholar
  73. Leifer R, O‘Connor G C, Rice M (20 01) Implementing radical innovation in mature firms: The role of hubs. Academy of Management Executive 15:102–113Google Scholar
  74. Lepper M R, Greene D, Nisbett R E (1973) Undermining children‘s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the „overjustification“ hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28:129–137Google Scholar
  75. Levin S, Stephan P E (1998) Gender differences in the rewards to publishing in academe: Science in the 70’s. Sex Roles 38:1049–1064Google Scholar
  76. Lindner J R, Murphy T H, Briers G E (2001) Handling nonresponse in social science research. Journal of Agricultural Education 42:43–53Google Scholar
  77. Locke E A (1965) The relationship of task success to task liking and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology 49:379–385Google Scholar
  78. Locke E A (1976) The nature and ca uses of job satisfaction. In: Dunnette M (ed) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Rand McNally, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  79. Locke E A, Latham G P (1990) Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological Science 1:240–246Google Scholar
  80. Luna-Arocas R, Tang T L P (2004) The love of money, satisfaction, and the protestant work ethic: Money profiles among univesity professors in the USA and Spain. Journal of Business Ethics 50:329-354Google Scholar
  81. Macdonald S, Kam J (2007) Ring a r ing o’ roses: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies. Journal of Management Studies 44:640–655Google Scholar
  82. MacKinnon D, Coxe S, Baraldi A (20 12) Guidelines for the investigation of mediating variables in business research. Journal of Business and Psychology 27:1–14Google Scholar
  83. Manning L M, Barrette J (2005) Res earch performance management in academe. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 22:273–287Google Scholar
  84. Melo A I, Sarrico C S, Radnor Z (2 010) The influence of performance management systems on key actors in universities. Public Management Review 12:233–254Google Scholar
  85. Merton R K (1968) The Matthew Effe ct in science. Science 159:56-63Google Scholar
  86. Miller L E, Smith K L (1983) Handl ing nonresponse issues. Journal of Extension 21:45–50Google Scholar
  87. Miner J B (2003) The rated importa nce, scientific validity, and practical usefulness of organizational behavior theories: A quantitative review. Academy of Management Learning and Education 2:250–268Google Scholar
  88. Minssen H, Wilkesmann U (2003) Las sen Hochschulen sich steuern? Soziale Welt 54:123–144Google Scholar
  89. Muller-Camen M, Salzgeber S (2005) Changes in academic work and the chair regime: The case of German business administration academics. Organization Studies 26:271–290Google Scholar
  90. Murayama K, Matsumoto M, Izuma K e t al (2010) Neural basis of the undermining effect of monetary reward on intrinsic motivation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:20911–20916Google Scholar
  91. Nerkar A A, McGrath R G, MacMillan I C (1996) Three facets of satisfaction and their influence on the performance of innovation teams. Journal of Business Venturing 11:167–188Google Scholar
  92. Osel J. (2012, 06.02.2012). Leistu ngslohn für Professoren: Das 50.000-Euro-Prekariat klagt an, Spiegel Online. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/unispiegel/jobundberuf/0,1518,812521,00.html
  93. Osterloh M (2010) Governance by num bers. Does it really work in research? Analyse & Kritik 2:267–283Google Scholar
  94. Osterloh M (2012) ‘New Public Manag ement’ versus ‘Gelehrtenrepublik’. Rankings als Instrument der Qualitätsbeurteilung in der Wissenschaft? In: Wilkesmann U & Schmid C J (ed) Hochschule als Organisation. VS – Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, MünsterGoogle Scholar
  95. Osterloh M, Frost J, Frey B S (2002) The dynamics of motivation in new organizational forms. International Journal of the Economics of Business 9:61–77Google Scholar
  96. Petty M M, McGee G W, Cavender J W (19 84) A meta-analysis of the relationships between individual job satisfaction and individual performance. Academy of Management Review 9:712–721Google Scholar
  97. Preacher K J, Hayes A F (2008) Asympto tic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40:879–891Google Scholar
  98. Röbken H (2011) Forschungsproduktivitä t von Wissenschaftlern und Wissenschaftlerinnen – Eine empirische Analyse von Publikationsaktivitäten vor und nach der Berufung. In: Hartwig L (ed) Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung 3/2011. Bayerisches Staatsinstitut für Hochschulforschung und Hochschulplanung, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  99. Schleicher D J, Watt J D, Greguras G J (2004 ) Reexamining the job satisfaction-performance relationship: The complexity of attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology 89:165–177Google Scholar
  100. Schmoch U, Schubert T, Jansen D et al (2010) How to use indicators to measure scientific performance: A balanced approach. Research Evaluation 19:2–18Google Scholar
  101. Seashore Louis K, Holdsworth J M, Anderson M S et al (2007) Becoming a scientist: The effects of work-group size and organizational climate. The Journal of Higher Education 78:311–336Google Scholar
  102. Sheikh K, Mattingly S (1981) Investigating n on-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 35:293–296Google Scholar
  103. Sheridan J E, Slocum Jr J W (1975) The direc tion of the causal relationship between job satisfaction and work performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 14:159–172Google Scholar
  104. Spencer S J, Zanna M P, Fong G T (2005) Esta blishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89:845–851Google Scholar
  105. Teodorescu D (2000) Correlates of faculty pu blication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education 39:201–222Google Scholar
  106. Tien F F, Blackburn R T (1996) Faculty rank system, research motivation, and faculty research productivity: Measure refinement and theory testing. The Journal of Higher Education 67:2–22Google Scholar
  107. Van Knippenberg D (2000) Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology 49:357–371Google Scholar
  108. Wiersma U J (1992) The effects of extrinsic rewards in intrinsic motivation: A meta–analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 65:101–114Google Scholar
  109. Wilkesmann U, Schmid C J (2010) Wirksamer Anr eiz? Einfluss von Leistungszulagen und Zielvereinbarungen auf die Lehre. Forschung & Lehre 17:504–507Google Scholar
  110. Williamson I O, Cable D M (2003) Predicting e arly career research productivity. The case of management faculty. Journal of Organizational Behavior 24:25–44Google Scholar
  111. Wu A D, Zumbo B D (2008) Understanding and us ing mediators and moderators. Social Indicators Research 87:367–392Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Gabler | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefanie Ringelhan
    • 1
  • Jutta Wollersheim
    • 1
  • Isabell M. Welpe
    • 1
  • Marina Fiedler
    • 2
  • Matthias Spörrle
    • 3
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Strategie und OrganisationTechnische Universität MünchenMünchenGermany
  2. 2.Lehrstuhl für Management, Personal und InformationUniversität PassauPassauGermany
  3. 3.Fachhochschule für angewandtes ManagementErdingGermany

Personalised recommendations