Abstract
Knowledge of the factors that influence the quality and quantity of research productivity is vital for governments, universities, departments, and research groups. Using a data set of 995 young scholars in academia from the fields of business and economics, we investigate the influence of job satisfaction, two different types of work motivation, and their interrelations on research performance. Our cross-sectional data reveal that intrinsic work motivation, extrinsic work motivation and job satisfaction have a direct influence on research performance without control variables in the model. Our data support models that suggest job satisfaction as a mediator of the relationship between intrinsic work motivation and research performance. The findings also support models that demonstrate that intrinsic work motivation mediates the relationship between job satisfaction and research performance. Our findings empirically support conceptual arguments on the crucial role of intrinsic and extrinsic work motivation and job satis faction in an academic context and thus should be considered for the tailoring of appropriate incentive systems at universities. The paper provides a discussion of these findings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abe le A E, Hagmaier T (2011) Berufliche Laufbahnentwicklung von Akademikerinnen und Akademikern der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (BELA-E). Projektbericht
Abele A E, Spurk D (2009) How do objective and subjective career success interrelate over time? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 82:803–824
Aguin is H, Suárez-González I, Lannelongue G et al (2012) Scholarly impact revisited. Academy of Management Perspectives 26:105–132
Amabile T M (1997) Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review 40:39–58
Amabile T M (1998) How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review 76:76–87
Amabile T M, Hil K G, Hennessey B A et al (1995) ‚The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations‘: Correction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68:580–580
Amabile T M, Hill K G, Hennessey B A et al (1994) The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66:950–967
Amabile T M, Kramer S J (2011) The power of small wins. Harvard Business Review 89:70-80
Arvey R D, Dewhirst H D, Boling J C (1976) Relationships between goal clarity, participation in goal setting, and personality characteristics on job satisfaction in a scientific organization. Journal of Applied Psychology 61:103–105
Atkinso n J W (1957) Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review 64:359–372
Aydin O T (2012) The impact of motivation and hygiene factors on research performance: An empirical study from a Turkish university. International Review of Management and Marketing 2:106–111
Backes-G ellner U, Sadowski D (1990) Organizational implementation of bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics 19:385–395
Baum J A C (2011) Free-riding on power laws: Questioning the validity of the Impact Factor as a measure of research quality in organization studies. Organization 18:449–466
Bentea C -C, Anghelache V (2012) Teachers‘ motivation and satisfaction for professional activity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 22:563–567
Berning E, Falk S (2006) Promovieren an den Universitäten in Bayern. Praxis–Modelle–Perspektiven. Bayerisches Staatsinstitut für Hochschulforschung und Hochschulplanung, München
Bland C J, Center B A, Finstad D A et al (2005) A theoretical, practical, predictive model of faculty and department research productivity. Academic Medicine 80:225–237
Bortz J (20 05) Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer, Heidelberg Bowling N A (2007) Is the job satisfaction–job performance relationship spurious? A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Vocational Behavior 71:167–185
Brewer G A, Douglas J W, Facer R L et al (1999) Determinants of graduate research productivity in doctoral programs of public administration. Public Administration Review 59:373–382
Card D, Mas A, Moretti E et al (2010) Inequality at work: The effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. National Bureau of Economic Research. Chalofsky N, Krishna V (2009) Meaningfulness, commitment, and engagement: The intersection of a deeper level of intrinsic motivation. Advances in Developing Human Resources 11:189–203
Chlosta K, P ull K, Fiedler M et al (2010) Should I stay or should I go? Warum Nachwuchswissenschaftler in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre das Universitätssystem verlassen. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 80:1207–1229
Clark A, Oswal d A, Warr P (1996) Is job satisfaction U-shaped in age? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 69:57–81
Cohen J, Cohen P, West S G et al (2003) Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Cole J R, Zuck erman H (1991) Marriage, motherhood, and research performance in science. In: Zuckerman H, Cole J R & Bruer J T (ed) The outer circle: Women in the scientific community. W. W. Norton and Company, New York
Crane D (1965) Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of productivity and recognition. American Sociological Review 30:699–714
Csikszentmihal yi M, Csikszentmihalyi I (1991) Die außergewöhnliche Erfahrung im Alltag: Die Psychologie des flow-Erlebenisses. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart
Deci E L (1971) Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 18:105–115
Deci E L (1972) Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 22:113–120
Deci E L, Koestn er R, Ryan R M (1999) A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin 125:627–668
Deemer E D, Maho ney K T, Ball J H (2012) Research motives of faculty in academic STEM: Measurement invariance of the Research Motivation Scale. Journal of Career Assessment 20:182–195
Dilger A (2001) Was lehrt die Prinzipal-Agenten-Theorie für die Anreizgestaltung in Hochschulen? Zeitschrift für Personalforschung 2:132–148
Dilger A (2010) Ra nkings von Zeitschriften und Personen in der BWL. Zeitschrift für Management 5:91–102
DiTomaso N, Post C, Smith D R et al (2007) Effects of structural position on allocation and evaluation decisions for scientists and engineers in industrial R&D. Administrative Science Quarterly 52:175–207
Dooley L M, Lindner J R (2003) The handling of nonresponse error. Human Resource Development Quarterly 14:99–110
Dundar H, Lewis D R (1998) Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education 39:607–631
Eisend M (2011) Is VHB-JOURQUAL2 a good measure of scientific quality? Assessing the validity of the major business journal ranking in German-speaking countries. Business Research 4:241–274
Fabel O, Hein M, Ho fmeister R (2008) Research productivity in business economics: An investigation of Austrian, German and Swiss universities. German Economic Review 9:506–531
Fiedler M, Welpe I M, Lindlbauer K et al (2008) Denn wer da hat, dem wird gegeben: Publikationsproduktivität des BWL-Hochschullehrernachwuchses und deren wissenschaftlicher Betreuer. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 78:477–508
Fiedler M, Welpe I M, Picot A O (2006) Terra Incognita. Forschungsleistungen und Qualifizierungswege des deutschsprachigen Hochschullehrernachwuchses für Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Die Betriebswirtschaft 66:464–486
Franck E, Opitz C (200 0) Selektion und Veredelung von Humankapital: Implikationen für eine leistungsorientierte Vergütung von Hochschullehrern. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung 3:270–290
Franck E, Schönfelder B ( 2000) On the role of competition in higher education: Uses and abuses of the economic metaphor. Schmalenbach Business Review 52:214–237
Frank R H, Gilovich T, Reg an D T (1993) Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 7:159–171
Frey B S (1994) How intrin sic motivation is crowded out and in. Rationality and Society 6:334–352
Frey B S, Jegen R (2001) M otivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys 15:589–611
Gardner D G, Van Dyne L, P ierce J L (2004) The effects of pay level on organization-based selfesteem and performance: A field study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 77:307–322
Gendron Y (2008) Constitut ing the academic performer: The spectre of superficiality and stagnation in academia. European Accounting Review 17:97–127
Glenn N D, Taylor P A, Wea ver C N (1977) Age and job satisfaction among males and females: A multivariate, multisurvey study. Journal of Applied Psychology 62:189
Gneezy U, Rustichini A (20 00) Pay enough or don‘t pay at all. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115:791–810
Goodall A H (2009) Highly cited leaders and the performance of research universities. Research Policy 38:1079–1092
Gu J, Lin Y, Vogel D et al (2011) What are the major impact factors on research performance of young doctorate holders in science in China: a USTC survey. Higher Education 62:483–502
Hackman J R, Oldham G R (1 975) Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology 60:159–170
Hackman J R, Oldham G R (1 980) Work redesign. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
Harley S, Muller-Camen M, Collin A (2004) From academic communities to managed organizations: The implications for academic careers in UK and German universities. Journal of Vocational Behavior 64:329–345
Harris G, Kaine G (1994) The determinants of research performance: A study of Australian university economists. Higher Education 27:191–201
Hedjazi Y, Behravan J (201 1) Study of factors influencing research productivity of agriculture faculty members in Iran. Higher Education 62:635–647
Herzberg F, Mausner B, Sny derman B (1967) The motivation to work. Wiley, New York
Huang T P (2011) Comparing motivating work characteristics, job satisfaction, and turnover intention of knowledge workers and blue-collar workers, and testing a structural model of the variables‘ relationships in China and Japan. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 22:924–944
Hyland M E (1988) Motivati onal control theory: An integrative framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55:642–651
Ivancevich J M (1976) Effe cts of goal-setting on performance and job-satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology 61:605–612
Jansen D, Wald A, Franke K et al (2007) Drittmittel als Performanzindikator der wissenschaftlichen Forschung: Zum Einfluss von Rahmenbedingungen auf Forschungsleistungen. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 59:125–149
Jöstl G, Bergsmann E, Lüften egger M et al (2012) When will they blow my cover? Zeitschrift für Psychologie 220:109–120
Judge T A, Thoresen C J, Bono J E et al (2001) The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin 127:376–407
Keller R T (2012) Predicting th e performance and innovativeness of scientists and engineers. Journal of Applied Psychology 97:225–233
Keller R T, Julian S D, Kedia B L (1996) A multinational study of work climate, job satisfaction, and the productivity of R&D teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 43:48–55
Kieser A (2010) Unternehmen Wis senschaft? Leviathan 38:347–367
Kieser A (2012) JOURQUAL - der Gebrauch, nicht der Missbrauch, ist das Problem. Die Betriebswirtschaft 1:93–110
Kim B, Oh H (2002) Economic com pensation compositions preferred by R&D personnel of different R&D types and intrinsic values. R&D Management 32:47–59
Kleinbeck U (1996) Arbeitsmotiv ation: Entstehung, Wirkung und Förderung. Juventa, Weinheim
Lam A (2011) What motivates acad emic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘Gold’, ‘ribbon’ or ‘puzzle’? Research Policy 40:1354–1368
Lange S (2008) New Public Manage ment und die Governance der Universitäten. Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management 1:235–248
Latham G P, Ernst C T (2006) Keys to motivating tomorrow’s workforce. Human Resource Management Review 16:181–198
Lawler E E, Hall D T (1970) Relati onship of job characteristics to job involvement, satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology 54:305–312
Leahey E (2007) Not by productivit y alone: How visibility and specialization contribute to academic earnings. American Sociological Review 72:533–561
Leifer R, O‘Connor G C, Rice M (20 01) Implementing radical innovation in mature firms: The role of hubs. Academy of Management Executive 15:102–113
Lepper M R, Greene D, Nisbett R E (1973) Undermining children‘s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the „overjustification“ hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28:129–137
Levin S, Stephan P E (1998) Gender differences in the rewards to publishing in academe: Science in the 70’s. Sex Roles 38:1049–1064
Lindner J R, Murphy T H, Briers G E (2001) Handling nonresponse in social science research. Journal of Agricultural Education 42:43–53
Locke E A (1965) The relationship of task success to task liking and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology 49:379–385
Locke E A (1976) The nature and ca uses of job satisfaction. In: Dunnette M (ed) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Rand McNally, Chicago
Locke E A, Latham G P (1990) Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological Science 1:240–246
Luna-Arocas R, Tang T L P (2004) The love of money, satisfaction, and the protestant work ethic: Money profiles among univesity professors in the USA and Spain. Journal of Business Ethics 50:329-354
Macdonald S, Kam J (2007) Ring a r ing o’ roses: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies. Journal of Management Studies 44:640–655
MacKinnon D, Coxe S, Baraldi A (20 12) Guidelines for the investigation of mediating variables in business research. Journal of Business and Psychology 27:1–14
Manning L M, Barrette J (2005) Res earch performance management in academe. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 22:273–287
Melo A I, Sarrico C S, Radnor Z (2 010) The influence of performance management systems on key actors in universities. Public Management Review 12:233–254
Merton R K (1968) The Matthew Effe ct in science. Science 159:56-63
Miller L E, Smith K L (1983) Handl ing nonresponse issues. Journal of Extension 21:45–50
Miner J B (2003) The rated importa nce, scientific validity, and practical usefulness of organizational behavior theories: A quantitative review. Academy of Management Learning and Education 2:250–268
Minssen H, Wilkesmann U (2003) Las sen Hochschulen sich steuern? Soziale Welt 54:123–144
Muller-Camen M, Salzgeber S (2005) Changes in academic work and the chair regime: The case of German business administration academics. Organization Studies 26:271–290
Murayama K, Matsumoto M, Izuma K e t al (2010) Neural basis of the undermining effect of monetary reward on intrinsic motivation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:20911–20916
Nerkar A A, McGrath R G, MacMillan I C (1996) Three facets of satisfaction and their influence on the performance of innovation teams. Journal of Business Venturing 11:167–188
Osel J. (2012, 06.02.2012). Leistu ngslohn für Professoren: Das 50.000-Euro-Prekariat klagt an, Spiegel Online. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/unispiegel/jobundberuf/0,1518,812521,00.html
Osterloh M (2010) Governance by num bers. Does it really work in research? Analyse & Kritik 2:267–283
Osterloh M (2012) ‘New Public Manag ement’ versus ‘Gelehrtenrepublik’. Rankings als Instrument der Qualitätsbeurteilung in der Wissenschaft? In: Wilkesmann U & Schmid C J (ed) Hochschule als Organisation. VS – Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Münster
Osterloh M, Frost J, Frey B S (2002) The dynamics of motivation in new organizational forms. International Journal of the Economics of Business 9:61–77
Petty M M, McGee G W, Cavender J W (19 84) A meta-analysis of the relationships between individual job satisfaction and individual performance. Academy of Management Review 9:712–721
Preacher K J, Hayes A F (2008) Asympto tic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40:879–891
Röbken H (2011) Forschungsproduktivitä t von Wissenschaftlern und Wissenschaftlerinnen – Eine empirische Analyse von Publikationsaktivitäten vor und nach der Berufung. In: Hartwig L (ed) Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung 3/2011. Bayerisches Staatsinstitut für Hochschulforschung und Hochschulplanung, München
Schleicher D J, Watt J D, Greguras G J (2004 ) Reexamining the job satisfaction-performance relationship: The complexity of attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology 89:165–177
Schmoch U, Schubert T, Jansen D et al (2010) How to use indicators to measure scientific performance: A balanced approach. Research Evaluation 19:2–18
Seashore Louis K, Holdsworth J M, Anderson M S et al (2007) Becoming a scientist: The effects of work-group size and organizational climate. The Journal of Higher Education 78:311–336
Sheikh K, Mattingly S (1981) Investigating n on-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 35:293–296
Sheridan J E, Slocum Jr J W (1975) The direc tion of the causal relationship between job satisfaction and work performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 14:159–172
Spencer S J, Zanna M P, Fong G T (2005) Esta blishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89:845–851
Teodorescu D (2000) Correlates of faculty pu blication productivity: A cross-national analysis. Higher Education 39:201–222
Tien F F, Blackburn R T (1996) Faculty rank system, research motivation, and faculty research productivity: Measure refinement and theory testing. The Journal of Higher Education 67:2–22
Van Knippenberg D (2000) Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology 49:357–371
Wiersma U J (1992) The effects of extrinsic rewards in intrinsic motivation: A meta–analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 65:101–114
Wilkesmann U, Schmid C J (2010) Wirksamer Anr eiz? Einfluss von Leistungszulagen und Zielvereinbarungen auf die Lehre. Forschung & Lehre 17:504–507
Williamson I O, Cable D M (2003) Predicting e arly career research productivity. The case of management faculty. Journal of Organizational Behavior 24:25–44
Wu A D, Zumbo B D (2008) Understanding and us ing mediators and moderators. Social Indicators Research 87:367–392
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Gabler | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ringelhan, S., Wollersheim, J., Welpe, I., Fiedler, M., Spörrle, M. (2013). Work Motivation and Job Satisfaction as Antecedents of Research Performance: Investigation of Different Mediation Models. In: Dilger, A., Dyckhoff, H., Fandel, G. (eds) Performance Management im Hochschulbereich. ZfB-Special Issues, vol 3/2013. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03348-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03348-4_2
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-03347-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-03348-4
eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)