Skip to main content

How to Improve Supply Chain Performance by Anticipating Human Decision Behavior

  • Chapter
Supply Management Research

Part of the book series: Advanced Studies in Supply Management ((ASSM))

  • 5057 Accesses

Abstract

The main assumption underlying most supply chain models is the assumption of a fully rational expected profit maximizing decision maker. This might be correct assuming computerized decisions. But in reality most decisions are made by human decision makers and humans’ decisions are not always rational. This paper discusses recent behavioral operations literature describing different decision biases observed in laboratory experiments. Then, we analyze how human decision makers behave under three different supply contracts. Based on these observations we show how to take human behavior into account to improve supply chain performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This paper is based on the doctoral thesis published as Becker-Peth (2012).

Bibliography

  • Arrow, K. J., T. Harris. 1951. Optimal Inventory Policy. Econometrica 19(3) 250–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Peth, M. 2012. Behavioral Supply Chain Contracting - Decision Biases in Behavioral Operations Management. Kölner Wissenschaftsverlag, Köln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendoly, E. 2006. Incorporating Behavioral Theory in OM Empirical Models. Journal of Operations Management 24(6) 735–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benzion, U.;Cohen, Y.; Peled, R.; Shavit, T. 2008. Decision-Making and the Newsvendor Problem: An Experimental Study. Journal of the Operational Research Society 59(9) 1281–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, G. E.; Katok, E. 2008. Learning by Doing in the Newsvendor Problem: A Laboratory Investigation of the Role of Experience and Feedback. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 10(3) 519–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, G. E.; Ockenfels, A.; Thonemann, U. W. 2012. Manager and Students as Newsvendors: How Experience Matters. Management Science 58(12) 22252233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachon, G. P. 2003. Supply Chain Coordination with Contracts. S. Graves, T. De Kok, eds., Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 46, chap. 6. Elsevier, North-Holland, 229–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croson, R.;Ren, Y. 2013. Overconfidence in Newsvendor Orders: An Experimental Study. Management Science (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. M. 2009. An Experimental Investigation of Pull Contracts in Supply Chains. Johnson school research paper series no. 34-2011, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Destatis. 2012. Kennzahlen der Unternehmen des Verarbeitenden Gewerbes 2009, https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/Wirtschaftsbereiche/ IndustrieVerarbeitendesGewerbe/Tabellen/KennzahlenVerarbeitendesGewerbe.html. Last access 27.04.2012.

  • Eeckhoudt, L.; Gollier, C.; Schlesinger, H. 1995. The Risk-Averse (and Prudent) Newsboy. Management Science 41(5) 786–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D.; Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica 47(2) 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katok, E.; Wu, D. Y. 2009. Contracting in Supply Chains: A Laboratory Investigation. Management Science 55(12) 1953–1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, M.; Minner, S.; Van Wassenhove, L. N. 2010. Do Random Errors Explain Newsvendor Behavior? Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 12(4) 673-681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, M.; Moritz, B.; Siemsen, E. 2011. Demand Forecasting Behavior: System Neglect and Change Detection. Management Science 57(10) 1827–1843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loch, C. H.; Wu, Y. 2007. Behavioral Operations Management. October, Now Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahmias, S. 1993. Production and Operations Analysis. 2nd ed. Irwin, Homewood, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, M. E.; Cachon, G. P. 2000. Decision Bias in the Newsvendor Problem with a Known Demand Distribution: Experimental Evidence. Management Science 46(3) 404–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, X. 2008. Bounded Rationality in Newsvendor Models. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 10(4) 566–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H. 1985. Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science 4(3) 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thonemann, U. W.; Brown, A. O.; Hausman, W. H. 2002. Easy Quantification of Improved Parts Spare Inventory Policies. Management Science 48(9) 1213–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A.; Kahneman, D. 1974. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science 185(4157) 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C.; Webster, S. 2009. The Loss-Averse Newsvendor Problem. Omega 37(1) 93105.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Becker-Peth, M. (2013). How to Improve Supply Chain Performance by Anticipating Human Decision Behavior. In: Bogaschewsky, R., Eßig, M., Lasch, R., Stölzle, W. (eds) Supply Management Research. Advanced Studies in Supply Management. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03061-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03061-2_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-03060-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-03061-2

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics