Zusammenfassung
Zahllose Diskussionen zum Terrorismus beginnen mit der Feststellung, dass sich der Terrorismus einer gemeinhin anerkannten Definition entzieht. Die Beschreibung eines Vorgangs oder Subjekts als terroristisch ist niemals nur deskriptiv, sondern mit einer radikalen Aberkennung der Legitimität des so Bezeichneten verbunden, was wiederum in Zweifel gezogen werden kann. Dies wird durch den bekannten Ausspruch, one man‘s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist zum Ausdruck gebracht. Eine Diskussion des Terrorismus als solchen kann ebenso problematisch sein, insofern exzessive politische Reaktionen und Bedrohungsgefühle hervorgerufen werden können, wie etwa im sog. War on Terror.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Abrahms, M. (2012). The Political Effectiveness of Terrorism Revisited. Comparative Political Studies 45(3), 366–393.
Acosta, B., & Childs, S. J. (2012). Illuminating the Global Suicide-Attack Network. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 36(1), 49–76.
Altier, M., Horgan, J. & Thoroughgood, C. (2012). In Their Own Words? Methodological Considerations in the Analysis of Terrorist Autobiographies. Journal of Strategic Security 5(4), 85–98.
Bakker, E. (2012). Forecasting Terrorism: The Need for a More Systematic Approach. Journal of Strategic Security 5(4), 69–84.
Bangert, D. (2011). Rational Choice, Spieltheorie und Terrorismusforschung. In A. Spencer, A. Kocks and K. Harbrich (Hrsg.), Terrorismusforschung in Deutschland (S. 76–98). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Bergen, P., Hoffman, B., & Tiedeman K. (2011). Assessing the Jihadist Terrorist Threat to America and American Interests. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 34(2), 65–101.
Cottee, S. (2011). Jihadism as a Subcultural Response to Social Strain: Extending Marc Sageman’s “Bunch of Guys” Thesis. Terrorism and Political Violence 23(4), 730–751.
Crenshaw, M. (2011). Explaining terrorism : causes, processes and consequences. New York: Routledge.
Dalgaard-Nielsen, A. (2013). Promoting Exit from Violent Extremism: Themes and Approaches. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 36(2), 99–11
Edwards, A. (2011). When Terrorism as Strategy Fails: Dissident Irish Republicans and the Threat to British Security. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 34(4), 318–336.
Enders, W., Sandler, T., & Gaibulloev, K. (2011). Domestic versus transnational terrorism: Data, decomposition, and dynamics. Journal of Peace Research 48(3), 319–337.
EU (2002). Rahmenbeschluss des Rates vom 13. Juni 2002 zur Terrorismusbekämpfung (2002/475/JI). Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L(164), 3–7.
Fimreite, A. L., Lango, P., Lægreid, P., & Lise, H. (2013). After Oslo and Utøya: A Shift in the Balance Between Security and Liberty in Norway? Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 36(10), 839–856.
Freytag, A., Krüger, J., Schneider, F., & Meierrieks, D. (2011).The Origins of Terrorism: Cross-Country Estimates of Socio-Economic Determinants of Terrorism. European Journal of Political Economy 27(1), 5–16.
Friedman, B. H. (2011). Managing Fear: The Politics of Homeland Security. Political Science Quarterly 126(1), 77–106.
Hoffman, B. (2013). Al Qaeda’s Uncertain Future. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 36(8), 635–653.
Holt, T. J. (2012). Exploring the Intersections of Technology, Crime, and Terror. Terrorism and Political Violence 24(2), 337–354.
Horgan, J. (2005). The Psychology of Terrorism. London, New York: Routledge.
Horgan, J. (2009). Walking away from terrorism: accounts of disengagement from radical and extremist movements. London: Routledge.
Horgan, J. & Boyle, M. J. (2008). A case against ‘Critical Studies Terrorism Studies’. Critical Studies on Terrorism 1 (1), 51–64.
Jackson, R. (2007). The core commitments of critical terrorism studies. European Political Science 6(3), 244–251.
Jarvis, L. (2009). The Spaces and Faces of Critical Terrorism Studies. Security Dialogue, 40(1), 5–27.
Jarvis, L., Macdonald, S. & L. Nouri, (2013). The Cyberterrorism Threat: Findings from a Survey of Researchers. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism (online first), 1–40.
Jenkins, B. M. (2008). Will terrorists go nuclear? Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.
Jensen, R. (2001). The United States, International Policing and the War against Anarchist Terrorism, 1900-1914. Terrorism and Political Violence, 13(1), 15–46.
King, M., & Taylor, D. M. (2011). The Radicalization of Homegrown Jihadists: A Review ofTheoretical Models and Social Psychological Evidence. Terrorism and Political Violence 23(4), 602–622.
LaFree, G. & Freilich, J. (2012). Editor’s Introduction: Quantitative Approaches to the Study of Terrorism. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 28(1), 1–5.
Laqueur, W. (2001). A history of terrorism. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction.
Lützinger, S. 2010. Die Sicht der Anderen - Eine qualitative Studie zu Biographien von Extremisten und Terroristen. Köln: Luchterhand.
Mueller, J. E., & Stewart, M. G. (2011). Terror, security, and money : balancing the risks, benefits, and costs of homeland security. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Neumann, P. R., & Smith, M. L. R. (2007). The strategy of terrorism : how it works, and why it fails. Abingdon: Routledge.
Piazza, J. A. (2009). Is Islamist Terrorism More Dangerous?: An Empirical Study of Group Ideology, Organization, and Goal Structure. Terrorism and Political Violence 21(1), 62–88.
Pisoiu, D. (2012). Islamist radicalisation in Europe: an occupational change process. Abingdon: Routledge.
Ranstorp, M. (2007). Mapping Terrorism Research: State of the Art, Gaps and Future Direction. Abingdon: Routledge.
Rapoport, D. C. (2004). The Four Waves of modern terrorism. In Cronin, A., & Ludes, J. (Hrsg., Attacking Terrorism: Elements of a Grand Strategy (S. 46–73).Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Rosenfeld, J. E. (2011). Terrorism, identity, and legitimacy : the four waves theory and political violence. New York: Routledge.
Sageman, M. 2004. Understanding Terror Networks. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Schmid, A. P., Jongman, A. J., & Prince, E. (2011). The Routledge handbook of terrorism research. New York: Routledge.
Schneier, B. (2003). Beyond fear: thinking sensibly about security in an uncertain world. New York: Copernicus Books.
Spencer, A. (2011). Sic[k] of the ‘new terrorism’ debate? A response to our critics. Critical Studies on Terrorism 4(3), 459–467.
Kocks, A., Harbrich, K. & Spencer, A. (Hrsg.) (2011). Terrorismusforschung in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Stampnitzky, L. (2011). Disciplining an Unruly Field: Terrorism Experts and Theories of Scientific/Intellectual Production. Qualitative Sociology 34(1), 1–19.
Stohl, M. (2012). Don’t confuse me with the facts: knowledge claims and terrorism. Critical Studies on Terrorism 5(1), 31–49.
Tinnes, J. (2013). The art of searching: how to find terrorism literature in the digital age. Perspectives on Terrorism 7(4), 79–111.
Young, J. K., & Findley, M. G. (2011). Promise and Pitfalls of Terrorism Research. International Studies Review 13(2), 411–431.
Wilkinson, P. (2011). Terrorism versus democracy: the liberal state response.Abingdon: Routledge.
Wiktorowicz, Q. (2005). Radical Islam Rising. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bossong, R., Pisoiu, D. (2015). Terrorismus. In: Jäger, T. (eds) Handbuch Sicherheitsgefahren. Globale Gesellschaft und internationale Beziehungen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02753-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02753-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02752-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02753-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)