Skip to main content

Terrorismus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Sicherheitsgefahren

Part of the book series: Globale Gesellschaft und internationale Beziehungen ((GGIB))

  • 11k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Zahllose Diskussionen zum Terrorismus beginnen mit der Feststellung, dass sich der Terrorismus einer gemeinhin anerkannten Definition entzieht. Die Beschreibung eines Vorgangs oder Subjekts als terroristisch ist niemals nur deskriptiv, sondern mit einer radikalen Aberkennung der Legitimität des so Bezeichneten verbunden, was wiederum in Zweifel gezogen werden kann. Dies wird durch den bekannten Ausspruch, one man‘s freedom fighter is another man’s terrorist zum Ausdruck gebracht. Eine Diskussion des Terrorismus als solchen kann ebenso problematisch sein, insofern exzessive politische Reaktionen und Bedrohungsgefühle hervorgerufen werden können, wie etwa im sog. War on Terror.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Abrahms, M. (2012). The Political Effectiveness of Terrorism Revisited. Comparative Political Studies 45(3), 366–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acosta, B., & Childs, S. J. (2012). Illuminating the Global Suicide-Attack Network. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 36(1), 49–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altier, M., Horgan, J. & Thoroughgood, C. (2012). In Their Own Words? Methodological Considerations in the Analysis of Terrorist Autobiographies. Journal of Strategic Security 5(4), 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, E. (2012). Forecasting Terrorism: The Need for a More Systematic Approach. Journal of Strategic Security 5(4), 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangert, D. (2011). Rational Choice, Spieltheorie und Terrorismusforschung. In A. Spencer, A. Kocks and K. Harbrich (Hrsg.), Terrorismusforschung in Deutschland (S. 76–98). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, P., Hoffman, B., & Tiedeman K. (2011). Assessing the Jihadist Terrorist Threat to America and American Interests. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 34(2), 65–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottee, S. (2011). Jihadism as a Subcultural Response to Social Strain: Extending Marc Sageman’s “Bunch of Guys” Thesis. Terrorism and Political Violence 23(4), 730–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, M. (2011). Explaining terrorism : causes, processes and consequences. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalgaard-Nielsen, A. (2013). Promoting Exit from Violent Extremism: Themes and Approaches. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 36(2), 99–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. (2011). When Terrorism as Strategy Fails: Dissident Irish Republicans and the Threat to British Security. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 34(4), 318–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enders, W., Sandler, T., & Gaibulloev, K. (2011). Domestic versus transnational terrorism: Data, decomposition, and dynamics. Journal of Peace Research 48(3), 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU (2002). Rahmenbeschluss des Rates vom 13. Juni 2002 zur Terrorismusbekämpfung (2002/475/JI). Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L(164), 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fimreite, A. L., Lango, P., Lægreid, P., & Lise, H. (2013). After Oslo and Utøya: A Shift in the Balance Between Security and Liberty in Norway? Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 36(10), 839–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freytag, A., Krüger, J., Schneider, F., & Meierrieks, D. (2011).The Origins of Terrorism: Cross-Country Estimates of Socio-Economic Determinants of Terrorism. European Journal of Political Economy 27(1), 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, B. H. (2011). Managing Fear: The Politics of Homeland Security. Political Science Quarterly 126(1), 77–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B. (2013). Al Qaeda’s Uncertain Future. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 36(8), 635–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, T. J. (2012). Exploring the Intersections of Technology, Crime, and Terror. Terrorism and Political Violence 24(2), 337–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, J. (2005). The Psychology of Terrorism. London, New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, J. (2009). Walking away from terrorism: accounts of disengagement from radical and extremist movements. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, J. & Boyle, M. J. (2008). A case against ‘Critical Studies Terrorism Studies’. Critical Studies on Terrorism 1 (1), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (2007). The core commitments of critical terrorism studies. European Political Science 6(3), 244–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, L. (2009). The Spaces and Faces of Critical Terrorism Studies. Security Dialogue, 40(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, L., Macdonald, S. & L. Nouri, (2013). The Cyberterrorism Threat: Findings from a Survey of Researchers. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism (online first), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, B. M. (2008). Will terrorists go nuclear? Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. (2001). The United States, International Policing and the War against Anarchist Terrorism, 1900-1914. Terrorism and Political Violence, 13(1), 15–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M., & Taylor, D. M. (2011). The Radicalization of Homegrown Jihadists: A Review ofTheoretical Models and Social Psychological Evidence. Terrorism and Political Violence 23(4), 602–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFree, G. & Freilich, J. (2012). Editor’s Introduction: Quantitative Approaches to the Study of Terrorism. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 28(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, W. (2001). A history of terrorism. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lützinger, S. 2010. Die Sicht der Anderen - Eine qualitative Studie zu Biographien von Extremisten und Terroristen. Köln: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. E., & Stewart, M. G. (2011). Terror, security, and money : balancing the risks, benefits, and costs of homeland security. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, P. R., & Smith, M. L. R. (2007). The strategy of terrorism : how it works, and why it fails. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, J. A. (2009). Is Islamist Terrorism More Dangerous?: An Empirical Study of Group Ideology, Organization, and Goal Structure. Terrorism and Political Violence 21(1), 62–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisoiu, D. (2012). Islamist radicalisation in Europe: an occupational change process. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranstorp, M. (2007). Mapping Terrorism Research: State of the Art, Gaps and Future Direction. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, D. C. (2004). The Four Waves of modern terrorism. In Cronin, A., & Ludes, J. (Hrsg., Attacking Terrorism: Elements of a Grand Strategy (S. 46–73).Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, J. E. (2011). Terrorism, identity, and legitimacy : the four waves theory and political violence. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sageman, M. 2004. Understanding Terror Networks. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, A. P., Jongman, A. J., & Prince, E. (2011). The Routledge handbook of terrorism research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneier, B. (2003). Beyond fear: thinking sensibly about security in an uncertain world. New York: Copernicus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, A. (2011). Sic[k] of the ‘new terrorism’ debate? A response to our critics. Critical Studies on Terrorism 4(3), 459–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kocks, A., Harbrich, K. & Spencer, A. (Hrsg.) (2011). Terrorismusforschung in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stampnitzky, L. (2011). Disciplining an Unruly Field: Terrorism Experts and Theories of Scientific/Intellectual Production. Qualitative Sociology 34(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stohl, M. (2012). Don’t confuse me with the facts: knowledge claims and terrorism. Critical Studies on Terrorism 5(1), 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinnes, J. (2013). The art of searching: how to find terrorism literature in the digital age. Perspectives on Terrorism 7(4), 79–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. K., & Findley, M. G. (2011). Promise and Pitfalls of Terrorism Research. International Studies Review 13(2), 411–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, P. (2011). Terrorism versus democracy: the liberal state response.Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiktorowicz, Q. (2005). Radical Islam Rising. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bossong, R., Pisoiu, D. (2015). Terrorismus. In: Jäger, T. (eds) Handbuch Sicherheitsgefahren. Globale Gesellschaft und internationale Beziehungen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02753-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02753-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02752-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02753-7

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics