Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Zur gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung von Unternehmen aus mikroökonomischer Perspektive

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Unternehmen im öffentlichen Raum

  • 2915 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der Begriff der gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung von Unternehmen (Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR) hat sich mittlerweile fest etabliert, sowohl in der unternehmerischen Wirklichkeit (vgl. z. B. die Initiative CSR Germany, die gemeinsam von vier Spitzenverbänden der deutschen Wirtschaft getragen wird) als auch in der wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fachliteratur. Dabei ist die Bestimmung dieses Begriffs weder einfach noch einheitlich.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Aguinis, H., Glavas, A. 2012. What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management 38 (4): S. 932–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. 1989. Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence. Journal of Political Economy 97 (6): S. 1447–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. 1990. Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving? Economic Journal 100 (401): S. 464–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K., Debreu, G. 1954. Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 22 (3): S. 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagnoli, M., Watts, S.G. 2003. Selling to Socially Responsible Consumers: Competition and the Private Provision of Public Goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 12 (3): S. 419–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D.P. 2001. Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 10 (1): S. 7–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D.P. 2007. Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Entrepreneurship. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 16 (3): S. 683–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D.P. 2009. A Positive Theory of Moral Management, Social Pressure, and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 18 (1): S. 7–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D.P., Diermeier, D. 2007. Strategic Activism and Nonmarket Strategy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 16 (3): S. 599–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Olsen, K.L., Cudmore, B.A., Hill, R.P. 2006. The Impact of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior. Journal of Business Research 59 (1): S. 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T., Blume, L., Varian, H. 1986. On the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics 29 (1): S. 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., Ghatak, M. 2007. Retailing Public Goods: The Economics of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Public Economics 91 (9): S. 1645–1663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettzüge, M.O., van Bracht, G., Heider, M., Schmidt, C.M., Paqué, K.-H. 2013. Sondervotum. In Schlussbericht der Enquête-Kommission „Wachstum, Wohlstand, Lebensqualität“, Drucksache 17/13300 des Deutschen Bundestags: S. 519–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beurden, P. van, Gössling, T. 2008. The Worth of Values – A Literature Review on the Relation Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 82: S. 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brekke, K.A., Nyborg, K. 2004. Moral Hazard and Moral Motivation: Corporate Social Responsibility as Labor Market Screening. University of Oslo Department of Economics Memorandum 25/2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T.J., Dacin. P.A. 1997. The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses. Journal of Marketing 61 (1): S. 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A.B. 1979. A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review 4 (4): S. 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cespa, G., Cestone, G. 2007. Corporate Social Responsibility and Managerial Entrenchment. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 16 (3): S. 741–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, W.N., Worrell, D.L., El-Jelly, A. 1995. Influencing Managers to Change Unpopular Corporate Behavior through Boycotts and Divestitures: A Stock Market Test. Business and Society 34 (2): S. 171–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. 1959. Theory of Value. An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMarzo, P.M. 1993. Majority Voting and Corporate Control: The Role of the Dominant Shareholder. Review of Economic Studies 60 (3): S. 713–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., Preston, L.E. 1995. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. The Academy of Management Review 20 (1): S. 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eesley, C., Lenox, M.J. 2006. Firm Responses to Secondary Stakeholder Action. Strategic Management Journal 27 (8): S. 765–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, P.S., Mohr, L.A., Webb, D.J. 2000. Charitable programs and the retailer: do they mix? Journal of Retailing 76 (3): S. 393–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission. 2001. Grünbuch – Europäische Rahmenbedingungen für die soziale Verantwortung der Unternehmen. KOM/2001/0366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pittman-Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1970. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13. September 1970: S. 122–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P.C. 2005. The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy And Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective. The Academy of Management Review 30 (4): S. 777–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P.C., Merrill, C.B., Hansen, J.M. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30: S. 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graff Zivin, J., Small, A. 2005. A Modigliani– Miller Theory of Altruistic Corporate Social Responsibility. B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy: Topics in Economic Analysis and Policy 5 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, S.B., Waddock, S.A. 1994. Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance. The Academy of Management Journal 37 (4): S. 1034–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greening, D.W., Turban, D.B. 2000. Corporate Social Performance as a Competitive Advantage in Attracting a Quality Workforce. Business and Society 39 (3): S. 254–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günther, E. 2012. CSR und Rechnungslegung. In Corporate Social Responsibility, hrsg. A. Schneider, R. Schmidpeter, S. 357–370. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Habisch, A., Schwarz, C. 2012. CSR als Investition in Human- und Sozialkapital. In Corporate Social Responsibility, hrsg. A. Schneider, R. Schmidpeter, 98–117. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques, I., Sadorsky, P. 1996. The Determinants of an Environmentally Responsive Firm: An Empirical Approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30 (3): S. 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, R., Sam, A.G. 2008. Voluntary Pollution Reductions and the Enforcement of Environmental Law: An Empirical Study of the 33/50 Program. Journal of Law and Economics 51 (2): S. 271–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H. 1979. Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T.M., Wicks, A.C. 1999. Convergent Stakeholder Theory. The Academy of Management Review 24 (2): S. 206–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, R.A., Gunningham, N., Thornton, D. 2003. Explaining Corporate Environmental Performance: How Does Regulation Matter? Law and Society Review 37 (1): S. 51–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzmueller, M., Shimshack, J. 2012. Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature 50 (1): S. 51–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotchen, M.J. 2006. Green Markets and Private Provision of Public Goods. Journal of Political Economy 114 (4): S. 816–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.S. 2001. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review 26 (1): S. 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., Wood, D.J. 1997. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review 22 (4): S. 853–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, P. 1988. Why Do Corporations Give to Charity? Journal of Business 61 (1): S. 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaeva, R., Bicho, M. 2011. The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 29 (1): S. 136–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. 2006. Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review 12/2006: S. 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. 2011. Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review 1/2011: S. 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E., van der Linde, C. 1995. Toward a New Conception of the Environment– Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (4): S. 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, A.E. 1989. The Nonprofit Worker in a For-Profit World. Journal of Labor Economics 7 (4): S. 438–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A. 2012. Reifegradmodell CSR – eine Begriffsklärung und -abgrenzung. In Corporate Social Responsibility, hrsg. A. Schneider, R. Schmidpeter, S. 17–38. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreck, P. 2012. Der Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility. In Corporate Social Responsibility, hrsg. A. Schneider, R. Schmidpeter, 67–86. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbach, J., Klink, D. 2012. Der Ehrbare Kaufmann als individuelle Verantwortungskategorie der CSR-Forschung. In Corporate Social Responsibility, hrsg. A. Schneider, R. Schmidpeter, S. 219–240. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sedmak, C. 2012. CSR – eine humanistische Sichtweise. In Corporate Social Responsibility, hrsg. A. Schneider, R. Schmidpeter, S. 191–202. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. 2001. Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research 38 (2): S. 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchanek, A. 2012. Vertrauen als Grundlage nachhaltiger unternehmerischer Wertschöpfung.In Corporate Social Responsibility, hrsg. A. Schneider, R. Schmidpeter, 55–66. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr, P. 1983. The Private Provision of a Public Good is Independent of the Distribution of Income. Economics Letters 13: S. 207–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Direktor, Staatswissenschaftliches Seminar der Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Marc Oliver Bettzüge

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Marc Oliver Bettzüge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Oliver Bettzüge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft, Köln, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

    Michael Hüther

  2. Leiter Kommunikation und Hauptstadtbüro, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft, Köln, Germany

    Knut Bergmann

  3. Kompetenzfeld Institutionenökonomik, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft, Köln, Germany

    Dominik H. Enste

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bettzüge, M. (2015). Zur gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung von Unternehmen aus mikroökonomischer Perspektive. In: Hüther, M., Bergmann, K., Enste, D. (eds) Unternehmen im öffentlichen Raum. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02646-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02646-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02645-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02646-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation