Skip to main content

Die Rolle der USA in internationalen Organisationen: Primus inter pares?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Politik USA

Part of the book series: Springer NachschlageWissen

Zusammenfassung

Zwischen 1944 und 1951 schufen die Vereinigten Staaten gemeinsam mit anderen fortgeschrittenen industriellen Demokratien eine Nachkriegsordnung mit umfangreichen neuen Sicherheits- und Wirtschaftsinstitutionen, in denen die USA eine führende Rolle spielten. Die zentrale Rolle der USA in dieser institutionellen Ordnung ist nicht nur ein Ausdruck, sondern auch eine Quelle für ihre Vormachtstellung. In diesem Kapitel soll diese Beziehung reflektiert werden. Im Besonderen wird ein genauer Blick auf die Rolle der USA innerhalb der UN, NATO, IWF und WTO vorgenommen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rede von 10.6.2011. http://www.defense.gov/speeches/speech.aspx?speechid=1581 (4.4.2014).

  2. 2.

    http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_by_country_e.htm. Zugegriffen am 13.02.2014.

  3. 3.

    http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/dev3_e.htm. Zugegriffen am 13.02.2014.

  4. 4.

    http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/secre_e/budget_e.htm. Zugegriffen am 13.02.2014.

  5. 5.

    https://www.imf.org/external/about/staff.htm. Zugegriffen am 13.02.2014.

Literatur

  • Barnett, Michael, und Raymond Duvall. 2005. Power in international politics. International organization 59(1): 39–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael, und Martha Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, Robert, und Jong-Wha Lee. 2005. IMF programs: Who is chosen and what are the effects? Journal of Monetary Economics 52: 1245–1269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, Alison. 2003. U.S. funding of the United Nations: Arrears payment as an indicator of multilateralism. Berkeley Journal of International Law 21(3): 703–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Stephen und William Wohlforth. 2009. Reshaping the world order: How Washington should reform international institutions Foreign Affairs 88:2 (Mar/Apr): 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chwieroth, Jeffrey. 2009. Capital Ideas: The IMF and the rise of financial liberalization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Robert, und Harald Jacobson. 1973. The anatomy of influence: Decision making in international organization. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert. 1957. The concept of power. Behavioral Science 2(3): 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foot, Rosemary, S. Neil MacFarlane, und Michael Mastanduno. 2003. US hegemony and international organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, Ian. 2008. After anarchy: Legitimacy and power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After victory: Institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Seth. 2007. The rise of European security cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Lawrence. 2004. NATO divided, the evolution of an alliance. Praeger: NATO United.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert. 1998. International institutions: Can interdependence work? Foreign Policy 110: 82–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, David. 2003. US-UN relations in the UN Security Council in the Post-Cold War Era. In US hegemony and international organizations, Hrsg. Rosemary Foot, S. Neil MacFarlane, und Michael Mastanduno, 73–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, Jessica. 1997. Power shift. Foreign Affairs. 76:1 (Jan/Feb):50–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, Joseph. 2005. Globalization’s democratic deficit: How to make international institutions more accountable. Foreign Affairs 80(4): 2–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oatley, Thomas, und Jason Yackee. 2004. American interests and IMF lending. International Politics 41: 415–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pape, Robert. 2009. First draft of history: Empire falls, The National Interest January/February 2009: 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Guatam. 2003. The United States and the GATT/WTO system. In US Hegemony and international organizations, Hrsg. Rosemary Foot, S Neil MacFarlane und Michael Mastanduno, 115–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. 1998. States and markets, 2. Aufl. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, Jonas, Thomas Sommerer, Theresa Squatrito, und Christer Jönsson. 2013. The opening up of international organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thacker, Strom. 1999. The high politics of IMF lending. World Politics 52(1): 38–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viola, Lora Anne, Duncan Snidal, und Michael Zürn. 2014. Sovereign (In)equality in the evolution of the international system. In The Oxford handbook of transformations of the state, Hrsg. Leibfried, Stephan et al. Oxford. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • VN-Charta. 1945. Kap. 1, Art. 1:3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Bruce. 2007. Compliance by WTO members with adverse WTO dispute settlement Rulings: The record to date. Journal of international economic law 10(2): 397–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, Ngaire. 2003. The United States and the international financial institutions: Power and influence within the World Bank and IMF. In US hegemony and international organizations, Hrsg. Rosemary Foot, S. Neil MacFarlane und Michael Mastanduno, 92–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, Michael. 1998. Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaats Globalisierung und Denationalisierung als Chance. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, Michael, Martin Binder, und Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt. 2012. International authority and its politicization. International Theory 4(1): 69–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, Michael. 2013. Politisierung als Konzept der internationalen Beziehungen. In Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik, Hrsg. Michael Zürn und Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt, 7–35. Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lora Anne Viola .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Viola, L.A. (2016). Die Rolle der USA in internationalen Organisationen: Primus inter pares?. In: Lammert, C., Siewert, M., Vormann, B. (eds) Handbuch Politik USA. Springer NachschlageWissen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02642-4_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02642-4_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02641-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02642-4

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics