Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sozialpolitik zwischen Markt und Staat

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Politik USA

Part of the book series: Springer NachschlageWissen

Zusammenfassung

Der Artikel bietet eine problemorientierte Skizze der Sozialpolitik in den USA. Aus einer vergleichenden Perspektive werden dabei sowohl konzeptionelle als auch empirische Besonderheiten des US-amerikanischen Wohlfahrtsregimes diskutiert. Anhand der Bereiche Alterssicherung, Gesundheit und Sozialhilfe werden die Kernmerkmale von US-Sozialpolitik herausgearbeitet, die sich insbesondere im Bereich der privaten Absicherung und der staatlichen Subventionierung von Sozialpolitik über das Steuersystem zeigen.

Für eine detaillierte Betrachtung der Thematik siehe auch Grell und Lammert 2013

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Albert, Vicky. 2000. Reducing welfare benefits: consequences for adequacy of and eligibility for benefits. Social Work. Journal of the National Association of Social Workers 45(4): 300–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amenta, Edwin. 1998. Bold relief: Institutional politics and the origins of modern social policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béland, Daniel, und Jacob Hacker. 2004. Ideas, private institutions and American welfare state „Exceptionalism“: The case of health and old-age insurance, 1915-1965. In International Journal of Social Welfare 13: 42–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, Rebecca M. 2010. The new American model of work-conditioned public support. In United in diversity? Comparing social models in Europe and in America, Hrsg. Jens Alber und Neil Gilbert, 176–198. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center on Budget und Policy Priorities. 2012. The earned income tax credit. Washington, D.C.: CBPP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Medicare und Medicaid Services. 2010. National health expenditure accounts. http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/NationalHealthAccountsHistorical.html. Zugegriffen am 11.10. 2013.

  • Copeland, Craig. 2010. Employment-based retirement plan participation: Geographic differences and trends, 2009. Employment Benefits Research Institute Issue Brief No. 348. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeNavas, Carmen, Bernadette Proctor, und Cheryl Lee. 2013. Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2012. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Commerce. http://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/p60-245.pdf. Zugegriffen am 11.10. 2013.

  • Eslami, Esa, Kai Filion, und Mark Strayer. 2011. Characteristics of supplemental nutrition assistance program households: Fiscal year 2010. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 2002. Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy, und Linda Gordon. 1997. Abhängigkeit im Sozialstaat. Genealogie eines Schlüsselbegriffs. In Die halbierte Gerechtigkeit, Hrsg. Nancy Fraser, 180–220. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Irwin, Lee Rainwater, und Timothy Smeeding. 2010. Wealth & welfare states. Is America a laggard or leader? Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grell, Britta, und Christian Lammert. 2013. Sozialpolitik in den USA, Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelstein, David et al. 2009. Medical bankruptcy in the United States, 2007: Results of a national study. The American Journal of Medicine 20(10): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holohan, John, und Alison Cook. 2009. Changes in health insurance coverage, 2007–2008: Early impact of the recession. Issue Paper, Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, Washington. D.C.: Kaiser family Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, Christopher. 1997. The hidden welfare state. Tax expenditures and social policy in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaisers Family Foundation. 2011. Employer health benefits. Annual report. Menlo Park. http://ehbs.kff.org/pdf/2011/8225.pdf. Zugegriffen am 11.10. 2013.

  • Kaisers Family Foundation. 2012. Employer health benefits 2012. Annual survey. http://ehbs.kff.org/pdf/2012/8345.pdf. Zugegriffen am 11.10. 2013.

  • Leman, Christopher. 1977. Patterns of policy development: Social security in the United States and Canada. Public Policy 25: 261–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mettler, Suzanne. 2011. The submerged state. How invisible government policies dermine american democracy. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munnell, Alicia, und Laura Quinby. 2009. Pension coverage and retirement security. Chestnut Hill: Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, John. 2011. The nation: Obama’s social security dilemma. NPR News. http://www.npr.org/2011/01/25/133207198/the-nation-obamas-social-security-dilemma. Zugegriffen am 11.10. 2013.

  • OECD. 2010. Employment outlook 2010, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2011. Gross pension replacement rates. In Pensions at a glance 2011: Retirement-income systems in OECD and G20 countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2013. Social expenditure database. http://www.oecd.org/els/social/expenditures. Zugegriffen am 11.10. 2013.

  • Orloff, Ann Shola. 1993. The politics of pensions: A comparative analysis of Britain, Canada, and the United States, 1880-1940. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, Waltraut. 2005. Der amerikanische earned income tax credit als Beispiel einer „make work pay“-Strategie. In I.W-Trends – Vierteljahresschrift zur empirischen Wirtschaftsforschung (http://www.iwkoeln.de/de/studien/iw-trends/beitrag/53895). Zugegriffen am 11.10. 2013.

  • Quadagno, Jill S. 2004. Why the United States has no national health insurance: Stakeholder mobilization against the welfare state, 1945-1996. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour 45: 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Security Administration. 2012. Beneficiary data: Benefits paid by type of beneficiary. Baltimore, M.D.: Social Security Administration (http://www.ssa.gov/oact/progdata/benefits.html). Zugegriffen am 11.10. 2013.

  • Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titmuss, Richard M. 1976. Commitment to welfare. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Labor. 2010. Private pension plan bulletin. Washington, D.C.: Historical Tables and Graphs.

    Google Scholar 

  • US House of Representatives. 2012. 2011 Green book. Chapter TANF. Tables and figures. Washington, D.C.: U.S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, Kent R. 2000. Ending welfare as we know it. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, Margaret, Ann Shola Orloff, und Theda Skocpol. 1988. Understanding american social policy. In The politics of social policy in the United States, Hrsg. Dies, 3–27. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolch, Jennifer. 1990. The shadow state: Government and voluntary sector in transition. New York: The Foundation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, Alan. 1975. The limits of legitimacy: Political contradictions of contemporary capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, Song G. 2010. Consumer-driven health care: What is it, and what does it mean for employees and employers? Washington, D.C.: US Bureau of Labor Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. John F. Kennedy-Institut für Nordamerikastudien, FU Berlin, Lansstraße 7-9, Berlin, 14195, Deutschland

    Christian Lammert

Authors
  1. Christian Lammert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Lammert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Christian Lammert

  2. Gesellschaftswissenschaften, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany

    Markus B. Siewert

  3. JFK Institut für Nordamerikastudien, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Boris Vormann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lammert, C. (2016). Sozialpolitik zwischen Markt und Staat. In: Lammert, C., Siewert, M., Vormann, B. (eds) Handbuch Politik USA. Springer NachschlageWissen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02642-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02642-4_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02641-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02642-4

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation