Skip to main content

Global and EU-Level Corporate Social Responsibility: Dynamism, Growth, and Conflict

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Unternehmen in Deutschland

Zusammenfassung

During recent decades, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has grown at an explosive rate, and global CSR frameworks have proliferated. This chapter provides an overview of these initiatives which include the United Nations Global Compact, the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, and the Global Reporting Initiative for non-financial reporting. It then focuses on EU-level CSR. Two lessons emerge from this analysis. First, CSR is dynamic and constantly evolving. Second, CSR is contested and conflictual. Stakeholders disagree over whether CSR is by definition voluntary or involves some degree of regulation by public authorities. One example of this is the change in the European Commission’s definition of CSR between 2001 and 2011. Civil society groups were unhappy with the EU’s first definition, and business organizations are unhappy with the second one. There is much at stake in these conflicts: as a result of business and German government resistance, the scope of the EU Directive 2014/95/EU which mandates non-financial reporting for large companies has been significantly reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Recommended literature

  • Kinderman D (2013) Corporate Social Responsibility in the EU, 1993–2013: Institutional Ambiguity, Economic Crises, Business Legitimacy and Bureaucratic Politics, Journal of Common Market Studies 51: 701–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinderman D (2017) Why Do Governments Support or Oppose More Stringent Transnational Regulation? Lessons from the Struggles over the Sustainability Reporting Directive 2014/95/EU Regulation & Governance, forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie J (2013) Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights. W. W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

Recommended internet sources

References

  • European Commission (2011) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a Renewed EU Strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility’. COM(2011) 681 final. Brussels, 25 October

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001) Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. COM(2001) 366 final. Brussels 18 July

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2014). Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson D, Nelson J (2013) Corporate Responsibility Coalitions: The Past, Present, and Future of Alliances for Sustainable Capitalism. Stanford Business Books, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaidonis MA, Stoianoff NP, Andrew JL (2010) The Shifting Meaning of Sustainability. In: Aras G, Crowther D (Eds) A Handbook of Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility Farnham. Gower, Farnham, 83-90

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinderman D (2017) Why Do Governments Support or Oppose More Stringent Transnational Regulation? Lessons from the Struggles over the Sustainability Reporting Directive 2014/95/EU Regulation & Governance, forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinderman D (2016) Time for a reality check: Is business willing to support a smart mixof complementary regulation in private governance? Policy and Society 35: 29-42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinderman D (2013) Corporate Social Responsibility in the EU, 1993–2013: Institutional Ambiguity, Economic Crises, Business Legitimacy and Bureaucratic Politics JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 51: 701-720

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JW, Pope S, Isaacson A (2015) Legitimating the Transnational Corporation in a Stateless World Society. In: Tsustui K, Lym A (Eds) Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World. Cambridge University Press, New York, 27-72

    Google Scholar 

  • Monciardini D (2016) The ‘Coalition of the Unlikely’ Driving the EU Regulatory Process of Non-Financial Reporting Social and Environmental Accountability Journal 36: 76-89

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasche A, Kell G (2010) The United Nations Global Compact: Achievements, Trends and Challenges. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie J (2013) Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights. W. W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie J (2008) Protect, Respect and Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights. United Nations Human Rights Council, New York. www.refworld.org/docid/484d2d5f2.html. Zugegriffen: 14.03.2017

  • Sagafi-nejad T, Dunning JH (2008) The UN and Transnational Corporations From Code of Conduct to Global Compact. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutter O d (2008) Corporate Social Responsibility European Style. European Law Journal 14(2):203-236Simmons BA, Dobbin F, Garrett G (2008) The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungericht B, Hirt C (2010) CSR as a Political Arena: The Struggle for a European Framework. Business and Politics 12: 1-22

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel D (2005) The Market For Virtue. Brookings Institution Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward H (2011) Mapping the Hard Law/Soft Law Terrain: Labor Rights and Environmental Protection: The ISO 26 000 Global Guidance Standardon Social Responsibility: Implications for Public Policy and Transnational Democracy. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 12: 665-718

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Kinderman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kinderman, D. (2018). Global and EU-Level Corporate Social Responsibility: Dynamism, Growth, and Conflict. In: Backhaus-Maul, H., Kunze, M., Nährlich, S. (eds) Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Unternehmen in Deutschland. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02585-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02585-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02584-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02585-4

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics